Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7900 GRE Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£560VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):268 W

Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7900 GRE Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7900 GRE
8.5/10

Overall score

Score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

8.4

Technical score

10%

8.6

User score

â–²Better than 73% of graphics cards
8.2

Value for money

Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.5

Overall score

30%

7.6

Price

★Better than 96%
8.4

Technical score

Technical score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

8.6

Performance

24%

8.2

Memory

12%

8.2

Power & Cooling

11%

9.3

Platform & Features

5%

6.6

Design

4%

9.0

Connectivity & Media

â–²Better than 73%
8.6

User score

User score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.1

User ratings

30%

7.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 74%
  • sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-7900-gre
  • sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-7900-gre
  • sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-7900-gre
  • sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-7900-gre
  • sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-7900-gre
  • sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-7900-gre
  • sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-7900-gre
sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-7900-gre
sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-7900-gre
sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-7900-gre
sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-7900-gre
sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-7900-gre
sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-7900-gre
sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-7900-gre
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Graphics cards model ranking

Ranked #279 of 2,195 models in Graphics cards (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of graphics card Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7900 GRE

Technical score
Technical score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

8.6

Performance

24%

8.2

Memory

12%

8.2

Power & Cooling

11%

9.3

Platform & Features

5%

6.6

Design

4%

9.0

Connectivity & Media

8.4
User score
User score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.1

User ratings

30%

7.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.6
Popularity
Popularity
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7900 GRE has a popularity score of 7.4 points, which is higher than that of 69% of products in this category.
7.4
Value for money
Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

8.5

Overall score

30%

7.6

Price

8.2
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
19,558 points
This graphics card scores 19,558 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 63.5% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
12,250 points
This graphics card scores 12,250 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 61.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
27,198 points
This graphics card scores 27,198 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 64.2% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
23,000 points
This graphics card scores 23,000 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 85.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
46.96 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 46.96 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 79.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
16 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 61.5% of graphics cards and equal to 28.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
576 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 576 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 62.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.8% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.3
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.3, which is older than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 15.7% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
2
This graphics card offers 2 DisplayPort outputs, which is fewer than 79.1% of graphics cards and equal to 9.5% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1, which is more advanced than on 67.5% of graphics cards and equal to 8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
54 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 54 Gbps, which is faster than on 80.4% of graphics cards and equal to 4.6% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
268 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 268 W, which is higher than that of 66.3% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
268 W
This graphics card draws 268 W under peak load, which is higher than 63.4% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
700 W
This graphics card recommends a 700 W PSU, which is higher than that of 59.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.7% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
260 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 260 W, which is higher than that of 59.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.8% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
268 W
Show more
Size
320x 128.75x 52.57 mm
This graphics card measures 320x128.75x 52.57 mm, which is larger than 57.8% of graphics cards and equal in size to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Length
320 mm
This graphics card is 320 mm long, which is longer than 73.4% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.4% of graphics cards.
Height
128.8 mm
This graphics card is 128.8 mm tall, which is taller than 57.3% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.5 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s, which is slimmer than 36.3% of graphics cards and equal in width to 14.7% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,100 g
This graphics card weighs 1,100 g, which is heavier than 54.2% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 1.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7900 GRE vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 40 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (80 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    80 vs 40
  • 40 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (80 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    80 vs 40
  • 96 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (160 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    160 vs 64
  • 136 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (320 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    320 vs 184
  • 2.25x higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (366.9 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    366.9 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 92.5% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (733.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    733.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 2.08x higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (47 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    46.96 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 13.9% better value for money
    Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7900 GRE has better value for money than the average graphics card (8.19 vs 7.2).
    8.19 vs 7.2
  • 7.5% higher user score
    User score
    8.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7900 GRE
    the average graphics card
    Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7900 GRE has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.60 vs 8.000).
    8.6 vs 8
  • 40 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (80 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    80 vs 40
  • 40 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (80 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    80 vs 40
  • 96 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (160 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    160 vs 64
  • 2.25x higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (366.9 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    366.9 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 136 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (320 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    320 vs 184
  • 92.5% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (733.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    733.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 2.08x higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (47 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    46.96 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 3.06x higher FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP64 performance than the average graphics card (1.5 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    1.47 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 3.16x higher FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP16 performance than the average graphics card (93.9 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    93.92 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 90.5% higher compute score
    This graphics card has a higher compute score than the average graphics card (23000 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    23,000 points vs 12,074 points
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 28.6% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2250 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 28.6% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (576 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    576 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 16x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (64 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    64 MB vs 4 MB
  • 2x larger L1 cache
    This graphics card has more L1 cache than the average graphics card (256 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    256 vs 128
  • 2.52x more transistors
    This graphics card has more transistors than the average graphics card (57700 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    57,700 million vs 22,900 million
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 1.4a).
    2.1 vs 1.4a
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 2.1).
    2.1a vs 2.1
  • 2.7x higher DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (54 Gbps vs 20 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 20 Gbps.
    54 Gbps vs 20 Gbps
  • 9.3 dB quieter under load
    This graphics card has a lower load noise level than the average graphics card (26.1 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    26.1 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 29.3% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1358 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,358 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 8.5% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2293 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,293 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • No AI upscalers
    This graphics card does not support AI upscalers, the average graphics card does.
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 1 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    2 vs 3
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 29.3% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1358 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,358 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 8.5% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2293 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,293 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 75% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (6 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    6 MB vs 24 MB
  • 5.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (18000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    18,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No AI upscalers
    This graphics card does not support AI upscalers, the average graphics card does.
  • Older Vulkan version
    This graphics card supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.3 vs 1.4).
    1.3 vs 1.4
  • Older OpenCL version
    This graphics card supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 3).
    2.2 vs 3.0
  • 79.3% larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (529 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    529 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • 1 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    2 vs 3
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 24.7% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (268 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    268 W vs 215 W
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 7.7% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (700 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    700 W vs 650 W
  • 15.6% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (260 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    260 W vs 225 W
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 35 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (320 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    320 mm vs 285 mm
  • 3.8 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (128.8 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    128.8 mm vs 125 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

H
hardwarezone.com.sg
24/06/2024
Summary of the review
H
hwbusters.com
04/03/2024
Summary of the review
T
tech-critter.com
26/02/2024
Summary of the review
O
overclock3d.net
26/02/2024
Summary of the review
K
kitguru.net
26/02/2024
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
26/02/2024
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
26/02/2024
Summary of the review
C
computerbase.de
26/02/2024
Summary of the review
G
geeknetic.es
26/02/2024
Summary of the review
H
hwupgrade.it
26/02/2024
Summary of the review
H
hwlegend.tech
28/03/2024
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
13/06/2024
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7900 GRE

  • Excellent rasterization performance, often outperforming the RTX 4070 in non-ray-traced games.
  • Competitive pricing, typically offering better performance-per-dollar than its immediate NVIDIA rivals.
  • Equipped with 16GB of VRAM, providing better longevity for high-resolution gaming compared to 12GB alternatives.
  • Compact and understated design that fits easily into most cases and clean, non-RGB builds.
  • Runs quietly and maintains cool operating temperatures thanks to Sapphire's effective dual-fan cooling system.
  • Solid overclocking potential, with some users reporting significant performance gains after manual tuning.

What we don't like about Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7900 GRE

  • Lags behind NVIDIA competitors in ray tracing performance and lacks access to DLSS features.
  • Higher power consumption compared to similarly performing NVIDIA cards like the RTX 4070 Super.
  • The baseline 'Pulse' model lacks premium features like RGB lighting or a dual-BIOS switch found on higher-tier models.
  • Occasional reports of driver stability issues or crashes, though many users find it perfectly stable.
  • Does not include high-end extras like the light bars or beefier coolers found on the Nitro+ series.

Verdict

The Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7900 GRE is a high-performance RDNA 3 graphics card featuring 5,120 stream processors, 80 Ray Accelerators, and 16GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with an 18Gbps effective speed. It offers a boost clock of up to 2293 MHz and a game clock of 1927 MHz, utilizing a 2.5-slot Tri-X cooling system with three dual-ball bearing fans for quiet operation. Main pros include excellent 1440p and entry-level 4K rasterization performance that often outperforms the RTX 4070 Super, a generous 16GB VRAM buffer for longevity, and a whisper-quiet thermal design with idle-fan-stop technology. However, it suffers from mediocre ray tracing performance compared to NVIDIA rivals, lacks support for DLSS, and has higher power consumption than its immediate competition.

Compare Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7900 GRE with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7900 GRE and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found