OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

Sapphire Radeon RX 7900 XTX Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£840VRAM:24 GBMemory bus width:384 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):420 W

Sapphire Radeon RX 7900 XTX Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

Sapphire Radeon RX 7900 XTX
8.5/10

Overall score

Score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 74% of models
Score components

90%

8.8

Technical score

10%

6.2

User score

▲Better than 74% of graphics cards
7.8

Value for money

Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 80% of models
Score components

70%

8.5

Overall score

30%

6.1

Price

▲Better than 80%
8.8

Technical score

Technical score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 78% of models
Score components

44%

9.3

Performance

24%

9.2

Memory

12%

7.3

Power & Cooling

11%

9.3

Platform & Features

5%

5.4

Design

4%

9.0

Connectivity & Media

▲Better than 78%
6.2

User score

User score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

70%

7.6

User ratings

30%

2.8

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▼Worse than 99%
  • sapphire-radeon-rx-7900-xtx
  • sapphire-radeon-rx-7900-xtx
  • sapphire-radeon-rx-7900-xtx
sapphire-radeon-rx-7900-xtx
sapphire-radeon-rx-7900-xtx
sapphire-radeon-rx-7900-xtx
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card Sapphire Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Technical score
Technical score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 78% of models
Score components:

44%

9.3

Performance

24%

9.2

Memory

12%

7.3

Power & Cooling

11%

9.3

Platform & Features

5%

5.4

Design

4%

9.0

Connectivity & Media

8.8
User score
User score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

70%

7.6

User ratings

30%

2.8

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
6.2
Popularity
Popularity
2.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 55% of models
Popularity:
Sapphire Radeon RX 7900 XTX has a popularity score of 2.8 points, which is lower than that of 53.8% of products in this category.
2.8
Value for money
Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 80% of models
Score components:

70%

8.5

Overall score

30%

6.1

Price

7.8
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
30,139 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 30,139 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 90% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
16,517 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 16,517 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 76.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
31,291 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 31,291 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 73.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.4% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
17,771 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 17,771 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 68.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
61.4 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 61.4 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 92.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
24 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 24 GB of VRAM, which is more than 91.1% of graphics cards and equal to 5.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
384 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 384 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 89.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 7.3% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
960 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 960 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 88% of graphics cards and equal to that of 5.8% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.3
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.3, which is older than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 15.7% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
2
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 2 DisplayPort outputs, which is fewer than 79.1% of graphics cards and equal to 9.5% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1, which is more advanced than on 67.5% of graphics cards and equal to 8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
54 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 54 Gbps, which is faster than on 80.4% of graphics cards and equal to 4.6% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
420 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 420 W, which is higher than that of 93.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
370 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 370 W under peak load, which is higher than 90.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.4% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
800 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 800 W PSU, which is higher than that of 81.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.4% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
420 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 420 W, which is higher than that of 91.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
355 W
Show more
Size
320x 135.75x 71.6 mm
Length
313 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 313 mm long, which is longer than 69% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Height
135.8 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 135.8 mm tall, which is taller than 71.5% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
3.5 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 3.5 slot/s, which is wider than 90.1% of graphics cards and equal in width to 5.7% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,840 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 1,840 g, which is heavier than 84.9% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

Sapphire Radeon RX 7900 XTX vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 56 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (96 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    96 vs 40
  • 56 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (96 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    96 vs 40
  • 12 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (24 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    24 GB vs 12 GB
  • 128 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (192 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    192 vs 64
  • 2.14x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (960 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    960 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 2.52x higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (960 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    960 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 200 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (384 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    384 vs 184
  • 2.94x higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (479.8 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    479.8 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 8.5% better value for money
    Sapphire Radeon RX 7900 XTX has better value for money than the average graphics card (7.81 vs 7.2).
    7.81 vs 7.2
  • 56 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (96 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    96 vs 40
  • 56 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (96 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    96 vs 40
  • 128 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (192 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    192 vs 64
  • 2.52x higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (960 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    960 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 200 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (384 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    384 vs 184
  • 2.94x higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (479.8 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    479.8 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 2.72x higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (61.4 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    61.4 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 2.05x higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (30139 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    30,139 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 80.2% higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (16517 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    16,517 points vs 9,166 points
  • 38.1% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (31291 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    31,291 points vs 22,653 points
  • 48 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (192 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    192 vs 144
  • 7.92x higher FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP64 performance than the average graphics card (3.8 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    3.8 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 4.14x higher FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP16 performance than the average graphics card (123 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    123 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • 2.67x higher compute throughput
    This graphics card has a higher compute throughput than the average graphics card (61.4 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    61.4 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 0.8% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2525 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,525 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 3.46x higher BF16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (123 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.5 TFLOPS.
    123 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS
  • 12 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (24 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    24 GB vs 12 GB
  • 2.14x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (960 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    960 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 128 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (384 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    384 bit vs 256 bit
  • 42.9% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2500 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,500 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 24x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (96 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    96 MB vs 4 MB
  • 2x larger L1 cache
    This graphics card has more L1 cache than the average graphics card (256 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    256 vs 128
  • 2.53x more transistors
    This graphics card has more transistors than the average graphics card (58000 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    58,000 million vs 22,900 million
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 1.4a).
    2.1 vs 1.4a
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 2.1).
    2.1a vs 2.1
  • 2.7x higher DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (54 Gbps vs 20 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 20 Gbps.
    54 Gbps vs 20 Gbps
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 95.3% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (420 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    420 W vs 215 W
  • 1 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3.5 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3.5 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 1 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    2 vs 3
  • 23.1% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (800 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    800 W vs 650 W
  • No XeSS support
    This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 86.7% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (420 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    420 W vs 225 W
  • 29.9% lower user score
    User score
    6.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Sapphire Radeon RX 7900 XTX
    the average graphics card
    Sapphire Radeon RX 7900 XTX has a lower user score than the average graphics card (6.16 vs 8.000).
    6.16 vs 8
  • 58.5% more expensive
    Sapphire Radeon RX 7900 XTX is more expensive than the average graphics card (£840 vs £530).
    £840 vs £530
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 75% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (6 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    6 MB vs 24 MB
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No XeSS support
    This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (4 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    4.0 vs 8
  • Older Vulkan version
    This graphics card supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.3 vs 1.4).
    1.3 vs 1.4
  • 79.3% larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (529 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    529 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • 1 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2022 vs 2023).
    December 2022
    2,022 vs 2,023
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.7 vs 6.8).
    6.7 vs 6.8
  • 1 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    2 vs 3
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 95.3% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (420 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    420 W vs 215 W
  • 23.1% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (800 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    800 W vs 650 W
  • 86.7% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (420 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    420 W vs 225 W
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 68.2% higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (370 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    370 W vs 220 W
  • 1 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3.5 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3.5 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 10.8 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (135.8 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    135.8 mm vs 125 mm
  • 28 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (313 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    313 mm vs 285 mm
  • 80.2% heavier card weight
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (1840 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    1,840 g vs 1,021 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

E
en.gamegpu.com
22/03/2023
Summary of the review
Sapphire graphics card review and benchmarks Radeon RX 7900 XTX Pulse If you need help comparing the performance metrics (such as FPS, temperatures, o...
O
overclock3d.net
15/01/2023
Summary of the review
Sapphire RX 7900 XTX Nitro+ Review
K
kitguru.net
26/12/2022
Summary of the review
Sapphire RX 7900 XTX Nitro+ Review
T
tweaktown.com
20/12/2022
Summary of the review
SAPPHIRE NITRO+ Radeon RX 7900 XTX OC Vapor-X Review
V
vicbstard.medium.com
26/02/2023
Summary of the review
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX review | Vic B’Stard’s State of Play TechPowerUp
T
tomshardware.com
12/12/2022
Summary of the review
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX and XT Review
K
kitguru.net
12/12/2022
Summary of the review
AMD RX 7900 XTXGo to product viewer dialogue for this item. Review
T
tomshardware.com
13/01/2023
Summary of the review
Sapphire RX 7900 XTX Nitro+ Vapor-X Review: More Is More
T
techpowerup.com
15/12/2022
Summary of the review
Sapphire Radeon RX 7900 XTX NitroGo to product viewer dialogue for this item.+ Review
C
computerbase.de
22/12/2022
Summary of the review
Vier AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX Custom-Designs im Test ComputerBase
(Translated)Show original
P
profesionalreview.com
19/01/2023
Summary of the review
AMD RX 7900 XTX de Sapphire alcanza los 3.5 GHz, pero no en juegos
(Translated)Show original
T
tweakers.net
17/01/2025
Summary of the review
Sapphire Pulse AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX Review - Tweakers
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Sapphire Radeon RX 7900 XTX

  • Phenomenal rasterization performance, often outperforming the RTX 4080 in non-ray-tracing titles.
  • Excellent cooling solutions (especially on Nitro+ and Pulse models) that maintain low temperatures and run very quietly.
  • Generous 24GB of VRAM provides significant future-proofing for high-resolution 4K gaming.
  • High build quality with premium materials, including rigid metal frames and customizable RGB lighting on certain models.
  • Competitive value for a high-end card compared to its direct NVIDIA counterparts.
  • Generally smaller physical footprint than high-end RTX 40-series cards, fitting into more mid-sized cases.
  • Stable performance on Linux due to less resource-intensive drivers compared to NVIDIA.

What we don't like about Sapphire Radeon RX 7900 XTX

  • Significantly weaker ray-tracing performance compared to similarly priced NVIDIA RTX 40-series cards.
  • High power consumption, often requiring at least an 850W PSU and three 8-pin PCIe power connectors.
  • Reports of noticeable coil whine under heavy loads or high frame rates on some units.
  • Early driver stability issues led to occasional timeouts or flickering, though many users report these are now largely resolved.
  • Aggressive out-of-the-box fan curves on some models may require manual adjustment for optimal noise levels.
  • Lacks support for proprietary NVIDIA features like DLSS 3 Frame Generation, relying instead on AMD's FSR.

Verdict

The Sapphire Radeon RX 7900 XTX is an enthusiast-grade graphics card built on the RDNA 3 chiplet architecture, featuring 6,144 stream processors, 96 ray accelerators, and a massive 24GB of GDDR6 memory on a 384-bit bus. Key characteristics of Sapphire's custom models include the Tri-X cooling system with angular velocity fan blades and a robust digital power design that supports boost clocks up to 2,680 MHz on the Nitro+ variant. Main pros include exceptional 4K gaming performance that often rivals the RTX 4080, a generous VRAM buffer ideal for high-resolution textures, and a high-quality cooling solution that remains relatively quiet under load. However, notable cons include high power consumption reaching up to 420W, ray tracing performance that lags behind competitors, and the significant physical size which may require a large chassis and a minimum 800W power supply.

Compare Sapphire Radeon RX 7900 XTX with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Sapphire Radeon RX 7900 XTX and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found