Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

Acer Predator Bifrost ARC A770 OC Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£340VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):225 W

Acer Predator Bifrost ARC A770 OC Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

Acer Predator Bifrost ARC A770 OC
7.9/10

Overall score

Score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

7.9

Technical score

10%

7.4

User score

â–²Better than 64% of graphics cards
8.1

Value for money

Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.9

Overall score

30%

8.7

Price

★Better than 92%
7.9

Technical score

Technical score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

7.2

Performance

24%

8.4

Memory

12%

7.4

Power & Cooling

11%

9.2

Platform & Features

5%

9.0

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

â–²Better than 67%
7.4

User score

User score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.5

User ratings

30%

5.0

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 93%
  • acer-predator-bifrost-arc-a770-oc
  • acer-predator-bifrost-arc-a770-oc
  • acer-predator-bifrost-arc-a770-oc
  • acer-predator-bifrost-arc-a770-oc
  • acer-predator-bifrost-arc-a770-oc
  • acer-predator-bifrost-arc-a770-oc
  • acer-predator-bifrost-arc-a770-oc
  • acer-predator-bifrost-arc-a770-oc
  • acer-predator-bifrost-arc-a770-oc
  • acer-predator-bifrost-arc-a770-oc
acer-predator-bifrost-arc-a770-oc
acer-predator-bifrost-arc-a770-oc
acer-predator-bifrost-arc-a770-oc
acer-predator-bifrost-arc-a770-oc
acer-predator-bifrost-arc-a770-oc
acer-predator-bifrost-arc-a770-oc
acer-predator-bifrost-arc-a770-oc
acer-predator-bifrost-arc-a770-oc
acer-predator-bifrost-arc-a770-oc
acer-predator-bifrost-arc-a770-oc
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card Acer Predator Bifrost ARC A770 OC

Technical score
Technical score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

7.2

Performance

24%

8.4

Memory

12%

7.4

Power & Cooling

11%

9.2

Platform & Features

5%

9.0

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

7.9
User score
User score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.5

User ratings

30%

5.0

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.4
Popularity
Popularity
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Acer Predator Bifrost ARC A770 OC has a popularity score of 5 points, which is higher than that of 53.5% of products in this category.
5.0
Value for money
Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

7.9

Overall score

30%

8.7

Price

8.1
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
13,953 points
This graphics card scores 13,953 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 52% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
10,107 points
This graphics card scores 10,107 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 54.3% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
16,600 points
This graphics card scores 16,600 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 71.5% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
5,838 points
This graphics card scores 5,838 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 79.5% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
19.66 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 19.66 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 58.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
16 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 61.5% of graphics cards and equal to 28.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
559.9 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 559.9 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 62.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2, which is more advanced than on 66.7% of graphics cards and equal to 0.7% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
20 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 20 Gbps, which is faster than on 42.9% of graphics cards and equal to 7.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
225 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 225 W, which is higher than that of 54.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.1% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
252 W
This graphics card draws 252 W under peak load, which is higher than 61.7% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
650 W
This graphics card recommends a 650 W PSU, which is lower than that of 40.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 13.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
225 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W, which is lower than that of 49.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
250 W
Show more
Size
267x 117.8x 40.81 mm
Length
267 mm
This graphics card is 267 mm long, which is shorter than 59.7% of graphics cards and equal in length to 3.5% of graphics cards.
Height
117 mm
This graphics card is 117 mm tall, which is shorter than 67.9% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
800 g
This graphics card weighs 800 g, which is lighter than 70.8% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 1.2% of graphics cards.
Show more

Acer Predator Bifrost ARC A770 OC vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 64 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (128 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    128 vs 64
  • 368 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (512 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    512 vs 144
  • 88.2% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (307.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    307.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 61.2% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (614.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    614.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 72 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (256 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    256 vs 184
  • 25% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2187 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,187 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 13% better value for money
    Acer Predator Bifrost ARC A770 OC has better value for money than the average graphics card (8.13 vs 7.2).
    8.13 vs 7.2
  • 64 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (128 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    128 vs 64
  • 368 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (512 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    512 vs 144
  • 88.2% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (307.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    307.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 61.2% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (614.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    614.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 72 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (256 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    256 vs 184
  • 14.6% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2200 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,200 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:8 vs 1:64).
    1:8 vs 1:64
  • 5.13x higher FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP64 performance than the average graphics card (2.5 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    2.46 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 3.89x higher BF16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (138 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.5 TFLOPS.
    138 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 25% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2187 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,187 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 25% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (559.9 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    559.9 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2 vs 1.4a).
    2.0 vs 1.4a
  • 7 °C lower idle temperature
    This graphics card has a lower idle temperature than the average graphics card (30 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    30 °C vs 37 °C
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 8 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (117 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    117 mm vs 125 mm
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • No fan stop
    This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
  • 8 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (32 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    32 vs 40
  • 4.2% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2400 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,400 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 8 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (32 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    32 vs 40
  • 7.6% lower user score
    User score
    7.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Acer Predator Bifrost ARC A770 OC
    the average graphics card
    Acer Predator Bifrost ARC A770 OC has a lower user score than the average graphics card (7.43 vs 8.000).
    7.43 vs 8
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 8 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (32 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    32 vs 40
  • 4.2% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2400 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,400 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 8 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (32 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    32 vs 40
  • 26.7% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (16600 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    16,600 points vs 22,653 points
  • 12.9% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (19.7 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    19.66 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 51.6% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (5838 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    5,838 points vs 12,074 points
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 20% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (6 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    6 nm vs 5 nm
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (1 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    1.0 vs 8
  • 1 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2022 vs 2023).
    October 2022
    2,022 vs 2,023
  • 37.6% larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (406 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    406 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.7 vs 6.8).
    6.7 vs 6.8
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • Not VR ready
    This graphics card is not VR ready, while the average graphics card is.
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • No fan stop
    This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
  • 17 °C higher load temperature
    This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (84 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    84 °C vs 67 °C
  • 31 dB noisier at idle
    This graphics card has a higher idle noise level than the average graphics card (31 dB vs 0 dB). The average graphics card has an idle noise level of 0 dB.
    31 dB vs 0 dB
  • 2.75x higher idle power draw
    This graphics card has a higher idle power draw than the average graphics card (33 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    33 W vs 12 W
  • 4.7% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (225 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    225 W vs 215 W
  • 5 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (100 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    100 °C vs 95 °C

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

M
me.pcmag.com
02/09/2023
Summary of the review
A
au.pcmag.com
02/09/2023
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
01/09/2023
Summary of the review
T
totalgamingaddicts.com
24/04/2023
Summary of the review
E
en.overclocking.com
05/03/2023
Summary of the review
P
pcunboxing.com
10/06/2024
Summary of the review
W
wepc.com
15/03/2024
Summary of the review
E
en.overclocking.com
05/03/2023
Summary of the review
G
gamesradar.com
07/08/2023
Summary of the review
H
hothardware.com
02/11/2023
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
01/09/2023
Summary of the review
H
hardwareluxx.de
20/01/2023
Summary of the review
C
cowcotland.com
27/02/2023
Summary of the review
P
pausehardware.com
17/03/2024
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.nl
28/10/2023
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Acer Predator Bifrost ARC A770 OC

  • Generous 16GB VRAM provides high bandwidth and longevity for modern textures.
  • Premium build quality featuring a unique metal shroud and hybrid cooling design.
  • Strong value for 1440p gaming compared to similarly priced NVIDIA or AMD alternatives.
  • Excellent AV1 encoding performance, making it a compelling choice for content creators.
  • Competent ray-tracing and XeSS AI upscaling capabilities in supported titles.
  • Regular driver updates from Intel consistently improve performance and stability over time.

What we don't like about Acer Predator Bifrost ARC A770 OC

  • Inconsistent performance with older games using DirectX 9 or 10 APIs.
  • High power consumption, especially at idle, compared to current-gen competitors.
  • Requires Resizable BAR (Re-BAR) support for optimal performance; unusable on older systems.
  • Occasional software and driver stability issues leading to crashes or glitches in specific apps.
  • Cooling fans can become noticeably loud under heavy loads when pushed to max power.
  • Some users report instances of audible coil whine during intensive gaming sessions.

Verdict

The Acer Predator BiFrost Intel Arc A770 OC is a high-performance graphics card featuring a factory-overclocked base clock of 2200 MHz (boostable to 2400 MHz) and a substantial 16GB of GDDR6 VRAM on a 256-bit interface, delivering 560 GB/s of bandwidth. Its standout characteristics include a hybrid cooling system utilizing a 70mm AeroBlade 3D blower fan and a 90mm Axial FrostBlade 2.0 fan paired with a vapor chamber, alongside support for AV1 encoding and AI-enhanced XeSS upscaling. Main pros consist of its generous VRAM capacity for its price bracket, excellent creative application performance, and unique bionic-inspired thermal design. However, notable cons include occasional driver-related instability in newer games, high power consumption with a 250W TBP, and fans that can be audible even at idle.

Compare Acer Predator Bifrost ARC A770 OC with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Acer Predator Bifrost ARC A770 OC and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found