OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

ASRock ARC A770 Phantom Gaming OC Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£330VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):225 W

ASRock ARC A770 Phantom Gaming OC Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

ASRock ARC A770 Phantom Gaming OC
7.9/10

Overall score

Score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 64% of models
Score components

90%

7.8

Technical score

10%

8.1

User score

▲Better than 64% of graphics cards
8.1

Value for money

Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Score components

70%

7.9

Overall score

30%

8.8

Price

★Better than 92%
7.8

Technical score

Technical score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 64% of models
Score components

44%

7.1

Performance

24%

8.1

Memory

12%

8.5

Power & Cooling

11%

9.3

Platform & Features

5%

6.7

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

▲Better than 64%
8.1

User score

User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 62% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

7.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▲Better than 62%
  • asrock-arc-a770-phantom-gaming-oc
  • asrock-arc-a770-phantom-gaming-oc
  • asrock-arc-a770-phantom-gaming-oc
asrock-arc-a770-phantom-gaming-oc
asrock-arc-a770-phantom-gaming-oc
asrock-arc-a770-phantom-gaming-oc
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card ASRock ARC A770 Phantom Gaming OC

Technical score
Technical score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 64% of models
Score components:

44%

7.1

Performance

24%

8.1

Memory

12%

8.5

Power & Cooling

11%

9.3

Platform & Features

5%

6.7

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

7.8
User score
User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 62% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

7.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.1
Popularity
Popularity
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 69% of models
Popularity:
ASRock ARC A770 Phantom Gaming OC has a popularity score of 7.4 points, which is higher than that of 69% of products in this category.
7.4
Value for money
Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Score components:

70%

7.9

Overall score

30%

8.8

Price

8.1
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
13,888 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 13,888 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 52.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
7,500 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 7,500 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 60.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.4% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
14,000 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 14,000 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 76.6% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
6,851 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 6,851 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 75.5% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
19.66 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 19.66 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 58.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
16 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 61.5% of graphics cards and equal to 28.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
560 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 560 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 62.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2, which is more advanced than on 66.7% of graphics cards and equal to 0.7% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 65% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
225 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 225 W, which is higher than that of 54.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.1% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
225 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 225 W under peak load, which is higher than 51.7% of graphics cards and equal to 1.2% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
700 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 700 W PSU, which is higher than that of 59.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.7% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
225 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W, which is lower than that of 49.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
225 W
Show more
Size
305x 131x 56 mm
Length
305 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 305 mm long, which is longer than 64.5% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.1% of graphics cards.
Height
131 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 131 mm tall, which is taller than 61.8% of graphics cards and equal in height to 2% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.8 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.8 slot/s, which is wider than 68.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,146 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 1,146 g, which is heavier than 56.9% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

ASRock ARC A770 Phantom Gaming OC vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 64 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (128 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    128 vs 64
  • 368 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (512 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    512 vs 144
  • 88.2% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (307.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    307.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 58.7% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (604.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    604.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 72 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (256 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    256 vs 184
  • 25% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2187 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,187 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 25% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (560 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    560 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 13.1% better value for money
    ASRock ARC A770 Phantom Gaming OC has better value for money than the average graphics card (8.14 vs 7.2).
    8.14 vs 7.2
  • 64 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (128 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    128 vs 64
  • 368 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (512 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    512 vs 144
  • 88.2% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (307.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    307.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 58.7% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (604.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    604.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 72 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (256 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    256 vs 184
  • 14.6% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2200 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,200 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:8 vs 1:64).
    1:8 vs 1:64
  • 5.13x higher FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP64 performance than the average graphics card (2.5 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    2.46 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 3.89x higher BF16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (138 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.5 TFLOPS.
    138 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 25% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2187 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,187 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 25% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (560 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    560 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2 vs 1.4a).
    2.0 vs 1.4a
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 8 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (32 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    32 vs 40
  • 4.2% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2400 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,400 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 8 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (32 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    32 vs 40
  • 20% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (6 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    6 nm vs 5 nm
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (1 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    1.0 vs 8
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 8 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (32 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    32 vs 40
  • 4.2% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2400 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,400 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 8 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (32 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    32 vs 40
  • 38.2% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (14000 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    14,000 points vs 22,653 points
  • 12.9% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (19.7 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    19.66 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 43.3% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (6851 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    6,851 points vs 12,074 points
  • 18.2% lower ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (7500 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    7,500 points vs 9,166 points
  • 7.9% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (17500 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    17,500 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 20% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (6 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    6 nm vs 5 nm
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (1 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    1.0 vs 8
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.6 vs 6.8).
    6.6 vs 6.8
  • 37.6% larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (406 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    406 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • Not VR ready
    This graphics card is not VR ready, while the average graphics card is.
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • No 3D output
    This graphics card does not support 3D output, the average graphics card does.
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 2.42x higher idle power draw
    This graphics card has a higher idle power draw than the average graphics card (29 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    29 W vs 12 W
  • 11 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (48 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    48 °C vs 37 °C
  • 7.7% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (700 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    700 W vs 650 W
  • 4.7% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (225 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    225 W vs 215 W
  • 5 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (100 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    100 °C vs 95 °C
  • 20 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (305 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    305 mm vs 285 mm
  • 6 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (131 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    131 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.3 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (2.8 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2.8 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

N
noticias3d.com
24/10/2022
Summary of the review
Review: Intel Arc A770 - Noticias3D.com
(Translated)Show original
P
profesionalreview.com
28/10/2022
Summary of the review
Intel Arc A770 Review en Español (Análisis completo)
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about ASRock ARC A770 Phantom Gaming OC

  • Generous 16GB VRAM pool on the OC model provides significant overhead for modern gaming and creative tasks like AI and video editing.
  • Excellent thermal performance with the Phantom Gaming 3X cooling system, maintaining temperatures well under load (often below 72°C).
  • Competitive performance-to-price ratio, often outperforming rivals at 1440p resolution and rivaling cards like the RTX 4060.
  • Strong modern feature set including hardware-accelerated AV1 encoding and robust ray tracing support.
  • Aesthetic design with a premium metal backplate and integrated ARGB lighting compatible with Polychrome SYNC.
  • Significant long-term improvements to performance and stability due to consistent driver updates from Intel.

What we don't like about ASRock ARC A770 Phantom Gaming OC

  • High power consumption, particularly at idle, leading to lower overall energy efficiency compared to NVIDIA or AMD counterparts.
  • Requires Resizable BAR (Re-Size BAR) to be enabled for functional performance; the card is essentially unusable without it.
  • Inconsistent performance in older titles using DirectX 9 or 11 APIs, though this has improved with recent drivers.
  • Enormous physical footprint due to the oversized triple-fan cooler, which may not fit in smaller PC cases.
  • Intel XeSS upscaling, while potent, still lacks the widespread game adoption and polish of NVIDIA's DLSS.

Verdict

The ASRock Intel Arc A770 Phantom Gaming 16GB OC is a high-performance graphics card featuring the Intel Xe HPG microarchitecture with 32 Xe-cores, a factory-overclocked engine clock of 2200 MHz, and 16GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus providing 17.5 Gbps speeds. Its main characteristics include the Phantom Gaming 3X cooling system with striped axial fans and 0dB silent cooling, alongside support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, XeSS upscaling, and hardware-accelerated AV1 encoding. Key pros include exceptional 1440p gaming and content creation performance for its price point, robust thermal management via its copper base and metal backplate, and customizable Polychrome SYNC ARGB lighting. However, notable cons include high idle power consumption in certain multi-monitor or high-refresh setups and occasional software inconsistencies compared to more established competitors.

Compare ASRock ARC A770 Phantom Gaming OC with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of ASRock ARC A770 Phantom Gaming OC and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found