Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£1,760VRAM:12 GBMemory bus width:192 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):115 W

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

7.4/10

Overall score

Score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

7.4

Technical score

10%

?

User score

▲Better than 55% of graphics cards
5.5

Value for money

Value for money
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.4

Overall score

30%

1.2

Price

▼Worse than 97%
7.4

Technical score

Technical score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

5.7

Performance

24%

7.6

Memory

12%

9.4

Power & Cooling

11%

10

Platform & Features

5%

8.4

Design

4%

9.3

Connectivity & Media

▲Better than 56%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop

Technical score
Technical score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

5.7

Performance

24%

7.6

Memory

12%

9.4

Power & Cooling

11%

10

Platform & Features

5%

8.4

Design

4%

9.3

Connectivity & Media

7.4
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than that of 57.7% of products in this category.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

7.4

Overall score

30%

1.2

Price

5.5
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
17,112 points
This graphics card scores 17,112 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 57.2% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
11,263 points
This graphics card scores 11,263 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 58.8% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
23,000 points
This graphics card scores 23,000 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 53.8% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
8,818 points
This graphics card scores 8,818 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 65.8% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
17.04 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 17.04 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 61.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
12 GB
This graphics card has 12 GB of VRAM, which is more than 45.5% of graphics cards and equal to 16% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR7
GDDR version
GDDR7
This graphics card uses GDDR7 memory, which is newer than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 20.6% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
192 bit
This graphics card uses a 192 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 50.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 18.8% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
677 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 677 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 74.6% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5
This graphics card supports PCIe 5, which is newer than on 74.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
?
DisplayPort version
2.1
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1, which is more advanced than on 67.5% of graphics cards and equal to 8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
20 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 20 Gbps, which is faster than on 42.9% of graphics cards and equal to 7.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
115 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 115 W, which is lower than that of 85.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.8% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
140 W
This graphics card draws 140 W under peak load, which is lower than 79.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.6% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
?
Board power limit
140 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 140 W, which is lower than that of 79.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.9% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
140 W
Show more
Size
?
Length
?
Height
?
Slot width
?
Weight
?
Show more

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 68.4% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (32,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
    32,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 51.1% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (677 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    677 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 46.5% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (115 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    115 W vs 215 W
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 20% smaller process node
    This graphics card has a lower process node than the average graphics card (4 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    4 nm vs 5 nm
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • 16x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (64 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    64 MB vs 4 MB
  • 14.3% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2000 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
    2,000 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 16 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (80 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    80 vs 64
  • 40 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (184 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    184 vs 144
  • 6 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (46 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    46 vs 40
  • 68.4% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (32,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
    32,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 51.1% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (677 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    677 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 16x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (64 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    64 MB vs 4 MB
  • 14.3% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2000 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
    2,000 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 2x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    48 MB vs 24 MB
  • Newer GDDR version
    This graphics card uses a newer GDDR version than the average graphics card (GDDR7 vs GDDR6).
    GDDR7 vs GDDR6
  • 20% smaller process node
    This graphics card has a lower process node than the average graphics card (4 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    4 nm vs 5 nm
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • 2 newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    March 2025
    2,025 vs 2,023
  • Newer encoder generation
    This graphics card uses a newer encoder generation than the average graphics card (9 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    9 vs 8
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 1.4a).
    2.1 vs 1.4a
  • 46.5% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (115 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    115 W vs 215 W
  • 37.8% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (140 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    140 W vs 225 W
  • 7 °C higher thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a higher thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (88 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    88 °C vs 95 °C
  • 55.9% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (847 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    847 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 11.4% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,220 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    2,220 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 30.2% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (266.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    266.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 29% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (115.8 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    115.8 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 3.32x more expensive
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop is more expensive than the average graphics card (£1,760 vs £530).
    £1,760 vs £530
  • 30.3% worse value for money
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop has worse value for money than the average graphics card (5.52 vs 7.2).
    5.52 vs 7.2
  • 3.32x more expensive
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop is more expensive than the average graphics card (£1,760 vs £530).
    £1,760 vs £530
  • 30.3% worse value for money
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop has worse value for money than the average graphics card (5.52 vs 7.2).
    5.52 vs 7.2
  • 4.22x less popular
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop is less popular than the average graphics card (1 vs 4.2).
    1 vs 4.22
  • 55.9% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (847 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    847 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 11.4% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,220 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    2,220 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 29% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (115.8 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    115.8 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 30.2% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (266.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    266.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 24.7% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (17 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    17 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (1 vs 3.1).
    1.0 vs 3.1
  • 13 °C higher load temperature
    This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (80 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    80 °C vs 67 °C
  • 5 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (42 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    42 °C vs 37 °C
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Toasty Bros
≈ estimated
09/12/2025
Hands-on review · benchmarks and teardown
Verdict
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop is excellent for gaming and workstation work, but the 18-inch size and high price are drawbacks.
9.0
zWORMz Gaming
≈ estimated
29/06/2025
Gameplay review · 22 games tested on a laptop
Verdict
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop delivers strong performance for the money, though ray tracing and frame generation need compromises.
7.0
Jarrod'sTech
≈ estimated
29/08/2025
Comparison test · laptop vs desktop, 25 games
Verdict
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop is fine for high-settings gaming on the go, but 4K value is poor, so portability is the deciding factor.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

gamestar.de
24/12/2025
Benchmark test · Gaming laptop
Verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop beats the RTX 4080 laptop at 1440p on a 140W power budget, but the RTX 5080 laptop is clearly faster.
C
cowcotland.com
13/10/2025
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What customers like about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop

  • Excellent 1440p gaming performance, often exceeding 60 FPS in demanding titles at high settings.
  • Equipped with 12GB of GDDR7 VRAM, providing better longevity for high-resolution gaming and content creation compared to base 8GB models.
  • Support for DLSS 4 and Multi-Frame Generation (MFG) significantly boosts frame rates in supported games.
  • Strong power efficiency, delivering performance comparable to previous-gen high-end cards like the RTX 4080 but with better energy use.
  • Significant performance leap for users upgrading from older hardware, such as the RTX 3070 Ti or 20-series cards.

What customers don't like about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop

  • Performance is artificially capped by a 140W wattage limit in many laptop designs, preventing the chip from reaching its full potential.
  • Limited generational improvement over the previous year's top-tier cards, leading some to view it as a rebrand of existing performance levels.
  • High retail prices for some premium laptop models can erode the 'value' proposition, making it a tougher sell against discounted last-gen alternatives.
  • Thermal throttling can occur in ultra-slim laptop chassis, potentially leading to inconsistent performance during extended gaming sessions.
  • Noticeable fan noise in high-performance modes required to hit peak frame rates.

Verdict

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop GPU is a high-end mobile graphics card based on the Blackwell architecture (GB205 chip), featuring 5,888 CUDA cores and 12 GB of GDDR7 VRAM on a 192-bit memory bus. Operating with a TGP ranging from 60W to 140W, it introduces advanced features like DLSS 4 with Multi-Frame Generation and 5th-gen Tensor cores for superior AI and ray tracing performance at 1440p. Its main pros include a significant 23-33% performance lead over the standard RTX 5070, better future-proofing due to its increased memory capacity compared to 8GB models, and excellent energy efficiency in frames per watt. However, its primary cons are the strict 140W power cap that prevents it from reaching its full hardware potential and a less favorable price-to-performance ratio compared to the cheaper base RTX 5070.

Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found