OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v3.0

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB review: 117 specs compared

Avg. price:~£390VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:128 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):160 W

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB Review: Compare 117 technical specifications and 33 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB
7.0/10

Overall score

Score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 25%, List score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Score components

40%

6.6

Technical score

25%

6.6

Reviews score

25%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

8.8

Sentiment score

â–¼Worse than 65% of graphics cards
7.4

Value for money

Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Score components

70%

7.0

Overall score

30%

8.5

Price

â–¼Worse than 54%
6.6

Technical score

Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Score components

44%

6.0

Performance

24%

4.2

Memory

12%

8.5

Power

11%

9.5

Features

5%

9.3

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity

â–¼Worse than 60%
6.6

Reviews score

Reviews score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models

6.6

Mark 7.2 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

6.7

Average grade

20%

9.3

Popularity

Grades by review (33)
14 reviews: 8 with a printed score, 6 estimated from the review. 19 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 76%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-8gb
nvidia-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-8gb
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB

Based on 13 · 21

Reviewers praise its efficiency, frame generation and quiet cooling, but slam the limited video memory, weak value and small generational leap.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB

Based on 151 owners sharing their experience in online comments

77%positive13%mixed10%negative

Owners praise its efficient gaming and AI performance, while price and limited memory cause the most frustration.

What owners dislike

  • Many owners feel the price is high for the performance, especially at launch, and say it was better value when it dropped to around 400 to 450 dollars or euros.14
  • Games that use more than 8GB of VRAM stutter, freeze, or run out of memory at higher settings, so owners of the 8GB version report problems in newer titles.7
  • Owners report games crashing or freezing when VRAM fills up, for example in Resident Evil 4 and Spider-Man Remastered, and some report crashes with ray tracing enabled.3
  • Owners say it is a 1080p card rather than a 1440p card, and say 1440p or 4K performance drops below expectations in demanding games.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB

Technical score
Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Score components:

44%

6.0

Performance

24%

4.2

Memory

12%

8.5

Power

11%

9.5

Features

5%

9.3

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity

6.6
Reviews score
6.6
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Score components:

70%

7.0

Overall score

30%

8.5

Price

7.4
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
13,400 points
Market range: <4.1k points – >30.1k points
This graphics card scores 13,400 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 56.7% of graphics cards and equal to 0.6% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
10,500 points
Market range: <0 points – >22.4k points
This graphics card scores 10,500 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 57.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
22,638 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 22,638 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 48.9% of graphics cards and equal to 1.3% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
12,074 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 12,074 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 50.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.7% of graphics cards.
FP32 performance
22.06 TFLOPS
Market range: <3.94 TFLOPS – >56.3 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 22.06 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is lower than that of 52.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say
VRAM
8 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This graphics card has 8 GB of VRAM, which is less than 56.8% of graphics cards and equal to 25.7% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 16.4% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
128 bit
Market range: <128 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 128 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 68.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 26.7% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
288 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 288 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 69.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 6.5% of graphics cards.
Effective memory speed
18,000 MHz
Market range: <7k MHz – >28k MHz
This graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 18,000 MHz, which is slower than that of 51.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 8.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.5% of graphics cards and equal to 50.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x8
This graphics card uses x8 PCIe lanes, which is fewer than 75.9% of graphics cards and equal to 22.9% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.8% of graphics cards and equal to 77.2% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.8% of graphics cards and equal to 79.2% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 2% of graphics cards and equal to 98% of graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 9% of graphics cards and equal to 88.2% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 90.9% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21.7% of graphics cards and equal to 76% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.3% of graphics cards and equal to 46.3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
32.4 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 32.4 Gbps, which is faster than on 56.6% of graphics cards and equal to 20.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
160 W
Market range: <86 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 160 W, which is lower than that of 67.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.8% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
160 W
Market range: <106 W – >365 W
This graphics card draws 160 W under peak load, which is lower than 71.4% of graphics cards and equal to 3.8% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
550 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 550 W PSU, which is lower than that of 61.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 13.3% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
160 W
Market range: <107 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 160 W, which is lower than that of 71.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.7% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
160 W
Show more
What reviewers say
Size
244x 112x 40 mm
Length
244 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >337 mm
This graphics card is 244 mm long, which is shorter than 72.1% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Height
111 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 111 mm tall, which is shorter than 83.6% of graphics cards and equal in height to 5.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 52.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 43.4% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,021 g
Market range: <541 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 1,021 g, which is heavier than 50.6% of Graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of Graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryFeaturesConnectivityPowerDesign
  • 20.3% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,310 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,310 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 28.6% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
    2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 14 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (111 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    111 mm vs 125 mm
  • 25.6% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (160 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    160 W vs 215 W
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 38.2 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (244 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
    244 mm vs 282.2 mm
  • 15.4% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (550 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    550 W vs 650 W
  • 1.2% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,535 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    2,535 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 12.8% higher sentiment score
    8.8 vs 7.8
  • 20.3% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,310 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,310 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 1.2% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,535 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    2,535 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 28.6% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
    2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 8x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (32 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    32 MB vs 4 MB
  • 25.6% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (160 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    160 W vs 215 W
  • 15.4% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (550 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    550 W vs 650 W
  • 27.3% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (160 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
    160 W vs 220 W
  • 14 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (111 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    111 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 38.2 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (244 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
    244 mm vs 282.2 mm
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
    128 bit vs 192 bit
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (frame generation vs multi frame generation).
    frame generation vs multi frame generation
  • 35.7% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (288 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    288 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 48 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (136 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    136 vs 184
  • 8.3% lower review score
    Reviews score
    6.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models

    6.6

    Mark 7.2 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    6.7

    Average grade

    20%

    9.3

    Popularity

    Grades by review (33)
    14 reviews: 8 with a printed score, 6 estimated from the review. 19 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    6.6 vs 7.2
  • 48 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (136 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    136 vs 184
  • 16 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (48 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    48 vs 64
  • 6 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (34 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    34 vs 40
  • 24.6% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (121.7 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 161.3 GPixel/s.
    121.7 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s
  • 6 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (34 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    34 vs 40
  • 8.8% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (344.8 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
    344.8 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
    128 bit vs 192 bit
  • 35.7% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (288 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    288 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 5.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (18,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
    18,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (frame generation vs multi frame generation).
    frame generation vs multi frame generation
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.7 vs 6.8).
    6.7 vs 6.8
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
The Tech Quest
≈ estimated
13/09/2026
Hands-on review · 1080p gaming benchmarks and ray tracing
Verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB is easy to recommend for 1080p gaming, but its current used price is poor.
4.0
Hardware Unboxed
≈ estimated
20/07/2024
Video review · 8GB VRAM and PCIe bandwidth tests
Verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB is overpriced and held back by its 8GB of VRAM, so it is not recommended.
8.0
RandomGaminginHD
≈ estimated
29/05/2023
Benchmark test · 40 games at 1080p with frame generation
Verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB delivers solid 1080p performance across 40 games, and frame generation smooths out CPU-limited titles.
4.0
Digital Foundry
≈ estimated
28/05/2023
Hands-on review · performance, VRAM and DLSS 3 tests
Verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB is efficient and useful with DLSS 3, but its small performance gain and price make it a disappointment.
3.0
Hardware Unboxed
≈ estimated
23/05/2023
Hands-on review · VRAM limits and game benchmarks
Verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB is not recommended at its price, as 8GB of VRAM holds back playability in many games.
4.0
zWORMz Gaming
≈ estimated
23/05/2023
Hands-on review · 18 game benchmarks and VRAM checks
Verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB is not recommended with 8 GB of memory in 2023, though it may be worth a look if the price drops.
4.0
Gamers Nexus
≈ estimated
23/05/2023
Full review · benchmarks, power and thermal testing
Verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB is not recommended, as it barely improves on the previous generation at the same price.
6.0
Linus Tech Tips
≈ estimated
23/05/2023
Full review · benchmarks, thermals and pricing analysis
Verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB offers good performance and efficiency, but its 8GB of memory and pricing make it hard to recommend.
4.0
KitGuruTech
≈ estimated
23/05/2023
Full review · benchmarks, efficiency, VRAM and ray tracing tests
Verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB is efficient but a weak generational upgrade with 8GB of VRAM, so it is not recommended at this price.
6.0
CrazyTechLab
≈ estimated
23/05/2023
Hands-on review · benchmarks, power draw and DLSS tests
Verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB is efficient and decent, but not a great upgrade, so it is worth waiting before buying at launch.
6.0
RandomGaminginHD
≈ estimated
01/11/2024
Comparison · 1080p game benchmarks against the RTX 4060
Verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB offers decent 1080p performance, but its price premium over the RTX 4060 is hard to justify.
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

7.0
trustedreviews.com
✓ explicit
14/06/2023
Benchmark review · Quad HD gaming
Verdict
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti suits Quad HD gamers who use ray tracing and DLSS 3, but RTX 3060 Ti owners will gain little.
8.0
techpowerup.com
✓ explicit
24/05/2023
Lab review · Full HD gaming
Verdict
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a 1080p card whose Frame Generation can double frame rates in supported games, though its 8GB of memory is the main concern.
6.0
gamestar.de
≈ estimated
23/05/2023
Benchmark test · Frame Generation
Verdict
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a quiet, efficient card for high frame rates at 1080p, but its 8GB of memory will feel tight in future games.
5.0
pcwelt.de
✓ explicit
23/05/2023
Lab test · Full HD gaming
Verdict
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti suits Full HD gamers with its strong ray tracing and quiet cooling, but 8GB of memory holds it back at higher resolutions.
8.0
lesnumeriques.com
✓ explicit
24/05/2023
Lab test · Full HD gaming
Verdict
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti reaches over 150fps in many Full HD games, with Frame Generation adding more, but its generational gain is small.
9.0
frandroid.com
✓ explicit
23/05/2023
Lab test · Full HD gaming
Verdict
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB is a well-built Founders Edition that runs Cyberpunk 2077 at 118fps in Full HD with DLSS 3, but its 8GB looks small.
8.6
vandal.elespanol.com
✓ explicit
23/05/2023
Hands-on test · Esports and 1080p
Verdict
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a compact, cool card for 1080p esports at over 200fps, but 1440p will need medium settings within a few years.
9.0
hobbyconsolas.com
≈ estimated
23/05/2023
Lab test · Power and size
Verdict
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a compact card that averages 140W in games and fits mid-size towers, but it drops RGB lighting.
8.9
hardzone.es
✓ explicit
23/05/2023
Hands-on review · 1080p gaming
Verdict
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a 1080p card with high frame rates and lower power use, though its slower GDDR6 memory is a weak point.
8.0
hwupgrade.it
≈ estimated
23/05/2023
Founders Edition review · 1080p gaming
Verdict
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a 1080p card that DLSS 3 pushes to high frame rates, though its 8GB memory and narrow bus are the weak points.
8.5
multiplayer.it
✓ explicit
23/05/2023
Founders Edition review · Full HD gaming
Verdict
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a 1080p card whose DLSS 3 Frame Generation brings big gains, though its raw speed gain over the RTX 3060 Ti is small.
8.0
tomshw.it
≈ estimated
23/05/2023
Benchmark review · 1080p gaming
Verdict
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a compact card whose DLSS 3 Frame Generation and low power use suit 1080p gamers, but 8GB of memory holds it back at 1440p.
9.0
techprincess.it
≈ estimated
23/05/2023
Lab test · Full HD gaming
Verdict
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a Full HD card that runs cool and suits high frame rate gaming, though it lacks a USB-C port.
5.0
tweakers.net
≈ estimated
23/05/2023
Lab test · Mainstream card
Verdict
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is almost as fast as the RTX 3070 and draws less power, but its 8GB of memory and weaker value hold it back.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB

  • Extremely power efficient with significantly lower power draw than previous generations
  • Excellent DLSS 3 and Frame Generation support for boosted performance in compatible titles
  • Compact design makes it ideal for small form factor (ITX) builds
  • Great performance for 1080p gaming, often hitting 60+ FPS at maximum settings
  • Quiet operation and effective cooling across most manufacturer models
  • Includes AV1 encoding support, which is beneficial for high-quality streaming
  • Substantial upgrade for users coming from older GTX 10-series or RTX 20-series cards

What customers don't like about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB

  • 8GB of VRAM is considered insufficient and potentially obsolete for future AAA titles
  • Disappointing generational performance uplift over the RTX 3060 Ti in raw rasterization
  • Narrow 128-bit memory bus severely limits performance at 1440p and 4K resolutions
  • Perceived as poor value due to its $399 launch price compared to competitors and previous gen
  • Hardware specifications (CUDA core count, bus width) were regressed or stagnant from predecessor
  • Loses to the older RTX 3070 in many 1440p gaming benchmarks
  • PCIe 4.0 x8 interface can cause performance bottlenecks on older PCIe 3.0 systems

Verdict

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB is a mid-range graphics card based on the ultra-efficient Ada Lovelace architecture, featuring 4,352 CUDA cores, 136 Fourth-Gen Tensor cores, and 34 Third-Gen Ray Tracing cores. It operates with a base clock of 2.31 GHz, a boost clock of 2.54 GHz, and 8GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit interface, providing a memory bandwidth of 288 GB/s. Main pros include exceptional 1080p gaming performance, industry-leading power efficiency with a 160W TDP, and support for advanced features like DLSS 3 Frame Generation and AV1 encoding for streaming. However, its primary cons are the limited 8GB VRAM and narrow 128-bit memory bus, which can cause significant performance bottlenecks at 1440p or 4K resolutions and in memory-intensive modern titles.

Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found