OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v3.0

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 review: 117 specs compared

Avg. price:~£380VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:128 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):115 W

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 Review: Compare 117 technical specifications and 13 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060
7.3/10

Overall score

Score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 25%, List score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 51% of models
Score components

40%

6.1

Technical score

25%

8.4

Reviews score

25%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

9.3

Sentiment score

▼Worse than 51% of graphics cards
7.7

Value for money

Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 75% of models
Score components

70%

7.3

Overall score

30%

8.5

Price

▲Better than 75%
6.1

Technical score

Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

44%

5.0

Performance

24%

4.0

Memory

12%

8.9

Power

11%

9.5

Features

5%

8.4

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity

▼Worse than 70%
8.4

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 85% of models

80%

8.3

Average grade

20%

8.7

Popularity

Grades by review (13)
12 reviews: 6 with a printed score, 6 estimated from the review. 1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▲Better than 85%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-4060
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-4060
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060

Based on 12 · 2

Reviewers praise its quiet, cool and efficient running, but limited video memory holds it back at higher resolutions.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060

Based on 197 owners sharing their experience in online comments

78%positive15%mixed7%negative

Owners praise its strong gaming performance and efficiency, while limited video memory and softer upscaling remain the main frustrations.

What owners dislike

  • Owners say 8GB of video memory forces them to lower texture settings in some demanding games, and they expect it to limit performance in future titles.7
  • Owners say DLSS at 1080p looks softer and blurrier than native resolution, and frame generation can cause shimmering or flickering textures.3
  • Owners report stutter and frame drops below 60 fps in some demanding games, and some laptop versions dip further under load.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060

Technical score
Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components:

44%

5.0

Performance

24%

4.0

Memory

12%

8.9

Power

11%

9.5

Features

5%

8.4

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity

6.1
Reviews score
8.4
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 75% of models
Score components:

70%

7.3

Overall score

30%

8.5

Price

7.7
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
11,061 points
Market range: <4.1k points – >30.1k points
This graphics card scores 11,061 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 66% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
6,054 points
Market range: <0 points – >22.4k points
This graphics card scores 6,054 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 66.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.7% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
19,578 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 19,578 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 61.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
7,606 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 7,606 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 72.8% of graphics cards.
FP32 performance
15.11 TFLOPS
Market range: <3.94 TFLOPS – >56.3 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is lower than that of 63.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say
VRAM
8 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This graphics card has 8 GB of VRAM, which is less than 56.8% of graphics cards and equal to 25.7% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 16.4% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
128 bit
Market range: <128 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 128 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 68.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 26.7% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
272 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 272 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 76.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.2% of graphics cards.
Effective memory speed
17,000 MHz
Market range: <7k MHz – >28k MHz
This graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 17,000 MHz, which is slower than that of 61% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.5% of graphics cards and equal to 50.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x8
This graphics card uses x8 PCIe lanes, which is fewer than 75.9% of graphics cards and equal to 22.9% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.8% of graphics cards and equal to 77.2% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.8% of graphics cards and equal to 79.2% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 2% of graphics cards and equal to 98% of graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 9% of graphics cards and equal to 88.2% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 90.9% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21.7% of graphics cards and equal to 76% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.3% of graphics cards and equal to 46.3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 65.3% of graphics cards and equal to 22.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
115 W
Market range: <86 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 115 W, which is lower than that of 85.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.7% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
116 W
Market range: <106 W – >365 W
This graphics card draws 116 W under peak load, which is lower than 87.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
550 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 550 W PSU, which is lower than that of 61.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 13.3% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
138 W
Market range: <107 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 138 W, which is lower than that of 81.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
115 W
Show more
What reviewers say
Size
227.2x 123.2x 49.6 mm
Length
227.2 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >337 mm
This graphics card is 227.2 mm long, which is shorter than 82.2% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.6% of graphics cards.
Height
123.24 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 123.24 mm tall, which is shorter than 53.8% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.5% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.5 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s, which is slimmer than 35.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 14.7% of graphics cards.
Weight
616 g
Market range: <541 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 616 g, which is lighter than 85.8% of Graphics cards.
Show more

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryFeaturesConnectivityPowerDesign
  • 46.5% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (115 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    115 W vs 215 W
  • 21.4% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2,125 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
    2,125 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 55 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (227.2 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
    227.2 mm vs 282.2 mm
  • 16.7% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 85% of models

    80%

    8.3

    Average grade

    20%

    8.7

    Popularity

    Grades by review (13)
    12 reviews: 6 with a printed score, 6 estimated from the review. 1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.4 vs 7.2
  • 15.4% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (550 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    550 W vs 650 W
  • 37.3% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (138 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
    138 W vs 220 W
  • 19.2% higher sentiment score
    9.3 vs 7.8
  • 4x higher HDMI bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher HDMI bandwidth than the average graphics card (48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps). The average graphics card has HDMI bandwidth of 12 Gbps.
    48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps
  • 16.7% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 85% of models

    80%

    8.3

    Average grade

    20%

    8.7

    Popularity

    Grades by review (13)
    12 reviews: 6 with a printed score, 6 estimated from the review. 1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.4 vs 7.2
  • 19.2% higher sentiment score
    9.3 vs 7.8
  • 21.4% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2,125 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
    2,125 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 4x higher HDMI bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher HDMI bandwidth than the average graphics card (48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps). The average graphics card has HDMI bandwidth of 12 Gbps.
    48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps
  • 46.5% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (115 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    115 W vs 215 W
  • 15.4% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (550 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    550 W vs 650 W
  • 37.3% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (138 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
    138 W vs 220 W
  • 7 °C lower load temperature
    This graphics card has a lower load temperature than the average graphics card (60 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    60 °C vs 67 °C
  • 55 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (227.2 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
    227.2 mm vs 282.2 mm
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 16 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (24 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    24 vs 40
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 88 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (96 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    96 vs 184
  • 16 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (24 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    24 vs 40
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
    128 bit vs 192 bit
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (frame generation vs multi frame generation).
    frame generation vs multi frame generation
  • 16 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (24 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    24 vs 40
  • 88 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (96 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    96 vs 184
  • 16 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (24 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    24 vs 40
  • 37.5% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (236.2 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
    236.2 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
  • 26.8% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (118.1 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 161.3 GPixel/s.
    118.1 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s
  • 16 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (48 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    48 vs 64
  • 48 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (96 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    96 vs 144
  • 33.1% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (15.1 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.6 TFLOPS.
    15.11 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS
  • 25.2% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (11,061 points vs 14,779 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14,779 points.
    11,061 points vs 14,779 points
  • 4.7% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,830 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,830 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 33.8% lower ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (6,054 points vs 9,148 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9,148 points.
    6,054 points vs 9,148 points
  • 13.5% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (19,578 points vs 22,638 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22,638 points.
    19,578 points vs 22,638 points
  • 50% lower FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0.2 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    0.24 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
    128 bit vs 192 bit
  • 39.3% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (272 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    272 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 10.5% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (17,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
    17,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (frame generation vs multi frame generation).
    frame generation vs multi frame generation
  • More basic codec support
    This graphics card encodes more basic formats than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 62.5% lower DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (8.1 Gbps vs 21.6 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 21.6 Gbps.
    8.1 Gbps vs 21.6 Gbps
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

7.0
Overclocking_com
≈ estimated
05/07/2023
Hands-on review · performance, overclocking, power and temperatures
Verdict
ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 is efficient and well suited to most 1080p gamers, but it hits its limits quickly at 1440p.
9.0
Overclocking_com
≈ estimated
28/06/2023
First look · unboxing, design and internal build review
Verdict
ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 is an excellent mid-range card: well built and affordable, with performance tests still to come.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
techpowerup.com
✓ explicit
28/06/2023
Review · Factory overclock
Verdict
The ASUS GeForce RTX 4060 Dual OC is a factory-overclocked RTX 4060 with extras usually found on pricier cards, though its 8GB on a 128-bit bus holds it back.
9.0
uk.pcmag.com
✓ explicit
28/06/2023
Lab test · Ray tracing and DLSS
Verdict
The ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 OC is a strong pick for ray-traced 1080p gaming and runs cool, but its 8GB and narrow bus limit it at higher resolutions.
9.0
thefpsreview.com
✓ explicit
28/06/2023
Hands-on review · 1080p gaming
Verdict
The ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 OC is a 1080p card that runs cool and efficient, with DLSS 3 making ray-traced games playable, though 8GB limits it.
9.0
pcmag.com
✓ explicit
28/06/2023
Lab test · Ray tracing and DLSS
Verdict
The ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 OC suits ray-traced 1080p gaming and stays cool, but its 8GB and narrow bus hold it back at higher resolutions.
9.0
en.gamegpu.com
≈ estimated
29/06/2023
Test review · Temperatures and power
Verdict
The ASUS GeForce RTX 4060 DUAL OC is a cool, efficient card at 1080p, but it trails the RTX 3060 Ti and 4060 Ti and has only 8GB.
7.0
guru3d.com
≈ estimated
28/06/2023
In-depth review · Cooling and noise
Verdict
The ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 OC performs roughly like an RTX 3060 Ti, with DLSS 3 frame generation as a bonus, but its 8GB of memory is a concern.
9.0
thefpsreview.com
✓ explicit
28/06/2023
Review · 1080p gaming and DLSS
Verdict
The ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 OC is an efficient, cool 1080p card that keeps ray-traced games playable with DLSS 3, though its 8GB is tight.
8.0
latestintech.com
≈ estimated
01/11/2023
Hands-on test · 1440p performance
Verdict
The ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 OC is a quiet, compact card that runs 1080p and 1440p well and handles ray tracing, but frame generation eats into its 8GB of memory.
9.0
charlestech.fr
✓ explicit
01/08/2024
Hands-on test · DLSS 3 gaming
Verdict
The ASUS GeForce RTX 4060 Dual OC is a simple, well-finished card that handles Full HD and 4K decently with DLSS 3, but its speed is close to last generation's.
8.0
los40.com.mx
≈ estimated
03/04/2026
Hands-on test · DLSS gaming
Verdict
The ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 OC Edition is built for 1080p gaming, where DLSS keeps demanding games smooth, but 1440p and 4K require lowering many settings.
8.0
xanxogaming.com
≈ estimated
28/06/2023
Lab test · Low-power GPU
Verdict
The ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 OC Edition is a small step up from the RTX 3060 12GB, but its 115W power draw keeps it efficient.
9.0
masgamers.com
≈ estimated
28/09/2023
Hands-on review · Cooling and noise
Verdict
The ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 OC is a cool, quiet card with DLSS 3, but it has less memory than the RTX 3060.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060

  • Excellent 1080p gaming performance with high refresh rates in most modern titles.
  • Remarkably cool and quiet operation, often peaking around 59°C–64°C under load.
  • Outstanding power efficiency with a low TGP (approx. 115W), allowing it to run on older 550W PSUs.
  • DLSS 3 with Frame Generation significantly boosts frame rates in supported games.
  • Compact dual-fan design fits easily into small-form-factor (ITX) cases.
  • Reliable single 8-pin power connector avoids the need for complex 12VHPWR adapters.
  • Strong build quality featuring a sturdy metal backplate for protection and heat dissipation.

What customers don't like about ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060

  • 8GB of VRAM is seen as a limiting factor for future-proofing and high-resolution textures.
  • Performance noticeably drops at 1440p and 4K due to the narrow 128-bit memory bus.
  • Modest generational performance uplift over the previous RTX 3060 in pure rasterization.
  • 8-lane PCIe 4.0 interface may cause bottlenecks on older PCIe 3.0 systems.
  • Lack of RGB lighting might be a downside for users wanting a more flashier aesthetic.

Verdict

The Asus Dual GeForce RTX 4060 is a compact, high-efficiency graphics card built on the NVIDIA Ada Lovelace architecture with 3,072 CUDA cores and 8GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit interface. It features a factory boost clock of up to 2,535 MHz in OC mode, a low 115W TDP requiring a single 8-pin power connector, and dual Axial-tech fans within a 2.5-slot design for improved thermal compatibility. Main pros include its exceptional power efficiency, support for DLSS 3 Frame Generation, and a dual BIOS switch that allows for near-silent operation; however, its primary cons are the limited 8GB VRAM and narrow 128-bit memory bus, which can cause performance bottlenecks and stuttering in demanding AAA titles or when gaming at resolutions higher than 1080p.

Compare ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found