Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Vanguard Soc Launch Edition Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£3,690VRAM:32 GBMemory bus width:512 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):575 W

MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Vanguard Soc Launch Edition Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Vanguard Soc Launch Edition
9.0/10

Overall score

Score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

9.2

Technical score

10%

7.5

User score

▲Better than 86% of graphics cards
6.6

Value for money

Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

Overall score

30%

1.0

Price

▼Worse than 78%
9.2

Technical score

Technical score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

9.7

Performance

24%

9.8

Memory

12%

7.1

Power & Cooling

11%

9.9

Platform & Features

5%

4.2

Design

4%

10

Connectivity & Media

★Better than 93%
7.5

User score

User score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

3.8

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▼Worse than 93%
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Vanguard Soc Launch Edition

Technical score
Technical score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

9.7

Performance

24%

9.8

Memory

12%

7.1

Power & Cooling

11%

9.9

Platform & Features

5%

4.2

Design

4%

10

Connectivity & Media

9.2
User score
User score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

3.8

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.5
Popularity
Popularity
3.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Vanguard Soc Launch Edition has a popularity score of 3.8 points, which is lower than that of 51% of products in this category.
3.8
Value for money
Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

9.0

Overall score

30%

1.0

Price

6.6
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
50,574 points
This graphics card scores 50,574 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 99.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
39,112 points
This graphics card scores 39,112 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 99.7% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
38,407 points
This graphics card scores 38,407 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 94.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
24,582 points
This graphics card scores 24,582 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 86.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
109.3 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 109.3 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 98.4% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
32 GB
This graphics card has 32 GB of VRAM, which is more than 96.8% of graphics cards and equal to 3% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR7
GDDR version
GDDR7
This graphics card uses GDDR7 memory, which is newer than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 20.6% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
512 bit
This graphics card uses a 512 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 96.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.8% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
1,790 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 1,790 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 97.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5
This graphics card supports PCIe 5, which is newer than on 74.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1b
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1b, which is more advanced than on 78.6% of graphics cards and equal to 21.4% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
1.62 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 1.62 Gbps, which is slower than on 95.3% of graphics cards and equal to 1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
575 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 575 W, which is higher than that of 97.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.5% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
575 W
This graphics card draws 575 W under peak load, which is higher than 96.9% of graphics cards and equal to 1.7% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
1,000 W
This graphics card recommends a 1,000 W PSU, which is higher than that of 95.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
575 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 575 W, which is higher than that of 96.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.4% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
575 W
Show more
Size
357x 151x 76 mm
Length
357 mm
This graphics card is 357 mm long, which is longer than 96.8% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.6% of graphics cards.
Height
151 mm
This graphics card is 151 mm tall, which is taller than 96.6% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.5% of graphics cards.
Slot width
3.7 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 3.7 slot/s, which is wider than 96.6% of graphics cards and equal in width to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Weight
2,407 g
This graphics card weighs 2,407 g, which is heavier than 96.4% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Vanguard Soc Launch Edition vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 130 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (170 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    170 vs 40
  • 130 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (170 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    170 vs 40
  • 20 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (32 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    32 GB vs 12 GB
  • 4x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (1790 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    1,790 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 4.48x higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (1708 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    1,708 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 496 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (680 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    680 vs 184
  • 112 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (176 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    176 vs 64
  • 536 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (680 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    680 vs 144
  • 130 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (170 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    170 vs 40
  • 130 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (170 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    170 vs 40
  • 4.48x higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (1708 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    1,708 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 496 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (680 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    680 vs 184
  • 112 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (176 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    176 vs 64
  • 536 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (680 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    680 vs 144
  • 2.71x higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (442.1 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    442.1 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 4.84x higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (109.3 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    109.3 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 3.45x higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (50574 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    50,574 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 4.27x higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (39112 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    39,112 points vs 9,166 points
  • 69.5% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (38407 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    38,407 points vs 22,653 points
  • 6.16x higher BF16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (218.6 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.5 TFLOPS.
    218.6 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS
  • 17,408 more FP32 units
    This graphics card has more FP32 units than the average graphics card (21,760 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    21,760 vs 4,352
  • 3.42x higher FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP64 performance than the average graphics card (1.6 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    1.64 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 6.93x higher INT8 performance
    This graphics card has a higher INT8 performance than the average graphics card (1677 TOPS vs 242 TOPS). The average graphics card has INT8 performance of 242 TOPS.
    1,677 TOPS vs 242 TOPS
  • 4.76x higher compute throughput
    This graphics card has a higher compute throughput than the average graphics card (109.3 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    109.3 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 5.1% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2017 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,017 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 3.68x higher FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP16 performance than the average graphics card (109.3 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    109.3 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 2.04x higher compute score
    This graphics card has a higher compute score than the average graphics card (24582 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    24,582 points vs 12,074 points
  • 20 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (32 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    32 GB vs 12 GB
  • 4x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (1790 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    1,790 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 47.4% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (28000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    28,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 256 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (512 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    512 bit vs 256 bit
  • 4x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (96 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    96 MB vs 24 MB
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 24x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (96 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    96 MB vs 4 MB
  • Newer GDDR version
    This graphics card uses a newer GDDR version than the average graphics card (GDDR7 vs GDDR6).
    GDDR7 vs GDDR6
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • 2 newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    January 2025
    2,025 vs 2,023
  • 4.03x more transistors
    This graphics card has more transistors than the average graphics card (92200 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    92,200 million vs 22,900 million
  • Newer encoder generation
    This graphics card uses a newer encoder generation than the average graphics card (9 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    9 vs 8
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 1.4a).
    2.1b vs 1.4a
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 2.1).
    2.1b vs 2.1
  • 2.67x higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (575 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    575 W vs 215 W
  • 53.8% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (1000 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    1,000 W vs 650 W
  • 72 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (357 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    357 mm vs 285 mm
  • 26 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (151 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    151 mm vs 125 mm
  • 1.2 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3.7 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3.7 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 2.56x higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (575 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    575 W vs 225 W
  • No XeSS support
    This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 6.96x more expensive
    MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Vanguard Soc Launch Edition is more expensive than the average graphics card (£3,690 vs £530).
    £3,690 vs £530
  • 6.96x more expensive
    MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Vanguard Soc Launch Edition is more expensive than the average graphics card (£3,690 vs £530).
    £3,690 vs £530
  • 8.8% worse value for money
    MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Vanguard Soc Launch Edition has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.61 vs 7.2).
    6.61 vs 7.2
  • 7.3% lower user score
    User score
    7.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Vanguard Soc Launch Edition
    the average graphics card
    MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Vanguard Soc Launch Edition has a lower user score than the average graphics card (7.45 vs 8.000).
    7.45 vs 8
  • No XeSS support
    This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 2.52x larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (744 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    744 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • 91.9% lower DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (1.6 Gbps vs 20 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 20 Gbps.
    1.62 Gbps vs 20 Gbps
  • 2.67x higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (575 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    575 W vs 215 W
  • 53.8% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (1000 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    1,000 W vs 650 W
  • 2.56x higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (575 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    575 W vs 225 W
  • 2.61x higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (575 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    575 W vs 220 W
  • 33.3% higher idle power draw
    This graphics card has a higher idle power draw than the average graphics card (16 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    16 W vs 12 W
  • 72 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (357 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    357 mm vs 285 mm
  • 26 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (151 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    151 mm vs 125 mm
  • 1.2 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3.7 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3.7 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 2.36x heavier card weight
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (2407 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    2,407 g vs 1,021 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

O
overclock.net
28/02/2025
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Vanguard Soc Launch Edition

  • Exceptional 4K and 8K gaming performance, often exceeding previous-gen flagships by over 30%
  • Superior cooling efficiency with load temperatures typically staying in the 50°C-60°C range
  • Surprisingly quiet fan operation, even under heavy stress, with a dedicated silent BIOS mode
  • High build quality featuring a lighter design that reduces strain on PCIe slots compared to the Suprim series
  • Effective undervolting capabilities that significantly lower power draw while maintaining stable performance
  • Includes exclusive collectibles like the 'Lucky Around The World' series figure in the Launch Edition bundle

What we don't like about MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Vanguard Soc Launch Edition

  • Extremely high MSRP and frequent retail markups making it one of the most expensive GPUs on the market
  • Significant physical footprint (massive quad-slot design) that may not fit in many standard PC cases
  • Occasional reports of noticeable coil whine, particularly when running high frame rates in specific games
  • High power consumption, often requiring a modern ATX 3.1 PSU or a complex 4-cable adapter setup
  • Included GPU support stand is described by some users as flimsy or difficult to position in compact cases
  • Initial driver instability reported by some early adopters, requiring manual VBIOS updates

Verdict

The MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Vanguard SOC Launch Edition is a flagship graphics card powered by the NVIDIA Blackwell architecture, featuring 21,760 CUDA cores and 32GB of ultra-fast GDDR7 memory on a wide 512-bit bus. It boasts a factory-overclocked boost speed of up to 2,527 MHz in Extreme Performance mode and utilises a Hyper Frozr thermal design with Stormforce fans and an advanced vapor chamber for elite cooling. Main pros include its unmatched 8K gaming performance, support for DLSS 4.0, and a dual BIOS that allows users to prioritise silent operation or maximum power. However, significant cons include its massive four-slot physical footprint, a high power draw of 575W requiring at least a 1,000W PSU, and potential for coil whine under heavy load.

Compare MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Vanguard Soc Launch Edition with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Vanguard Soc Launch Edition and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found