Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Suprim Soc Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£3,100VRAM:32 GBMemory bus width:512 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):600 W

MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Suprim Soc Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

9.1/10

Overall score

Score
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

9.2

Technical score

10%

8.0

User score

▲Better than 88% of graphics cards
6.6

Value for money

Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.1

Overall score

30%

1.0

Price

▼Worse than 78%
9.2

Technical score

Technical score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

9.8

Performance

24%

9.7

Memory

12%

7.1

Power & Cooling

11%

10

Platform & Features

5%

4.2

Design

4%

10

Connectivity & Media

★Better than 92%
8.0

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

6.5

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▼Worse than 83%
  • No image
No image
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Suprim Soc

Technical score
Technical score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

9.8

Performance

24%

9.7

Memory

12%

7.1

Power & Cooling

11%

10

Platform & Features

5%

4.2

Design

4%

10

Connectivity & Media

9.2
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

6.5

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.0
Popularity
Popularity
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Suprim Soc has a popularity score of 6.5 points, which is higher than that of 61.9% of products in this category.
6.5
Value for money
Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

9.1

Overall score

30%

1.0

Price

6.6
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
41,120 points
This graphics card scores 41,120 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 98.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
38,424 points
This graphics card scores 38,424 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 99.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
38,842 points
This graphics card scores 38,842 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 95.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.4% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
30,178 points
This graphics card scores 30,178 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 95.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
111.6 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 111.6 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 98.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
32 GB
This graphics card has 32 GB of VRAM, which is more than 96.8% of graphics cards and equal to 3% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR7
GDDR version
GDDR7
This graphics card uses GDDR7 memory, which is newer than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 20.6% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
512 bit
This graphics card uses a 512 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 96.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.8% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
1,792 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 1,792 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 97.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5
This graphics card supports PCIe 5, which is newer than on 74.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1b
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1b, which is more advanced than on 78.6% of graphics cards and equal to 21.4% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 80 Gbps, which is faster than on 86.3% of graphics cards and equal to 13.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
600 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 600 W, which is higher than that of 99.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
600 W
This graphics card draws 600 W under peak load, which is higher than 98.7% of graphics cards and equal to 1.1% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
1,000 W
This graphics card recommends a 1,000 W PSU, which is higher than that of 95.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
600 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 600 W, which is higher than that of 98% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.8% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
575 W
Show more
Size
359x 150x 76 mm
This graphics card measures 359x150x 76 mm, which is larger than 99.2% of graphics cards and equal in size to 0.4% of graphics cards.
Length
359 mm
This graphics card is 359 mm long, which is longer than 98.6% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.4% of graphics cards.
Height
150 mm
This graphics card is 150 mm tall, which is taller than 93.8% of graphics cards and equal in height to 2.2% of graphics cards.
Slot width
3.8 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 3.8 slot/s, which is wider than 97% of graphics cards and equal in width to 0.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
2,840 g
This graphics card weighs 2,840 g, which is heavier than 98.2% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Suprim Soc vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 130 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (170 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    170 vs 40
  • 130 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (170 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    170 vs 40
  • 4x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (1792 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    1,792 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 20 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (32 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    32 GB vs 12 GB
  • 4.29x higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (1637 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    1,637 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 496 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (680 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    680 vs 184
  • 112 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (176 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    176 vs 64
  • 2.77x higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (451.4 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    451.4 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 130 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (170 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    170 vs 40
  • 130 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (170 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    170 vs 40
  • 4.29x higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (1637 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    1,637 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 496 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (680 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    680 vs 184
  • 112 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (176 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    176 vs 64
  • 2.77x higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (451.4 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    451.4 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 536 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (680 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    680 vs 144
  • 4.64x higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (104.8 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    104.8 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 2.8x higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (41120 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    41,120 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 4.19x higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (38424 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    38,424 points vs 9,166 points
  • 2.4% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2565 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,565 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 71.5% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (38842 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    38,842 points vs 22,653 points
  • 3.65x higher FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP64 performance than the average graphics card (1.8 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    1.75 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 17,408 more FP32 units
    This graphics card has more FP32 units than the average graphics card (21,760 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    21,760 vs 4,352
  • 5.9x higher BF16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (209.5 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.5 TFLOPS.
    209.5 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS
  • 4.86x higher compute throughput
    This graphics card has a higher compute throughput than the average graphics card (111.6 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    111.6 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 2.5x higher compute score
    This graphics card has a higher compute score than the average graphics card (30178 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    30,178 points vs 12,074 points
  • 3.75x higher FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP16 performance than the average graphics card (111.6 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    111.6 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 3.46x higher INT8 performance
    This graphics card has a higher INT8 performance than the average graphics card (838 TOPS vs 242 TOPS). The average graphics card has INT8 performance of 242 TOPS.
    838 TOPS vs 242 TOPS
  • 4.7% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2010 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,010 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 4x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (1792 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    1,792 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 20 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (32 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    32 GB vs 12 GB
  • 47.4% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (28000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    28,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 256 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (512 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    512 bit vs 256 bit
  • 4x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (96 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    96 MB vs 24 MB
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • Newer GDDR version
    This graphics card uses a newer GDDR version than the average graphics card (GDDR7 vs GDDR6).
    GDDR7 vs GDDR6
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • 2 newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    January 2025
    2,025 vs 2,023
  • 4.03x more transistors
    This graphics card has more transistors than the average graphics card (92200 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    92,200 million vs 22,900 million
  • Newer encoder generation
    This graphics card uses a newer encoder generation than the average graphics card (9 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    9 vs 8
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 1.4a).
    2.1b vs 1.4a
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 2.1).
    2.1b vs 2.1
  • 4x higher HDMI bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher HDMI bandwidth than the average graphics card (48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps). The average graphics card has HDMI bandwidth of 12 Gbps.
    48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps
  • 4x higher DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (80 Gbps vs 20 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 20 Gbps.
    80 Gbps vs 20 Gbps
  • 7.4 dB quieter under load
    This graphics card has a lower load noise level than the average graphics card (28 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    28 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • 2.79x higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (600 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    600 W vs 215 W
  • 53.8% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (1000 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    1,000 W vs 650 W
  • 74 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (359 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    359 mm vs 285 mm
  • 25 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (150 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    150 mm vs 125 mm
  • 1.3 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3.8 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3.8 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 2.67x higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (600 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    600 W vs 225 W
  • 5.85x more expensive
    MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Suprim Soc is more expensive than the average graphics card (£3,100 vs £530).
    £3,100 vs £530
  • 2.78x heavier card weight
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (2840 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    2,840 g vs 1,021 g
  • 5.85x more expensive
    MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Suprim Soc is more expensive than the average graphics card (£3,100 vs £530).
    £3,100 vs £530
  • 8.3% worse value for money
    MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Suprim Soc has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.64 vs 7.2).
    6.64 vs 7.2
  • 0.5% lower user score
    User score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Suprim Soc
    the average graphics card
    MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Suprim Soc has a lower user score than the average graphics card (7.96 vs 8.000).
    7.96 vs 8
  • 2.54x larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (750 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    750 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 2.79x higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (600 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    600 W vs 215 W
  • 53.8% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (1000 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    1,000 W vs 650 W
  • 2.67x higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (600 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    600 W vs 225 W
  • 2.73x higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (600 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    600 W vs 220 W
  • 2.08x higher idle power draw
    This graphics card has a higher idle power draw than the average graphics card (25 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    25 W vs 12 W
  • 74 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (359 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    359 mm vs 285 mm
  • 25 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (150 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    150 mm vs 125 mm
  • 1.3 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3.8 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3.8 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 2.78x heavier card weight
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (2840 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    2,840 g vs 1,021 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
tweaktown.com
03/02/2025
Summary of the review
A
alktech.co
05/02/2025
Summary of the review
H
hothardware.com
24/01/2025
Summary of the review
P
pcguide.com
25/07/2025
Summary of the review
T
thefpsreview.com
20/08/2025
Summary of the review
H
hwcooling.net
02/04/2025
Summary of the review
I
igorslab.de
24/01/2025
Summary of the review
O
overclock3d.net
24/01/2025
Summary of the review
K
kitguru.net
04/02/2025
Summary of the review
T
tweaktown.com
24/01/2025
Summary of the review
K
kitguru.net
04/02/2025
Summary of the review
I
igorslab.de
11/08/2025
Summary of the review
C
clubic.com
01/02/2025
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Suprim Soc

  • Exceptional thermal performance with many users reporting temperatures staying under 50°C during heavy use
  • Significant performance lead over previous generation, easily handling 4K gaming and professional rendering
  • Robust and premium build quality featuring high-end materials and a sturdy 3D backplate
  • Operates very quietly even under load, often outperforming the Founders Edition in noise levels
  • Includes a substantial 32GB GDDR7 frame buffer for future-proofed gaming and AI workloads
  • Dual BIOS support allows users to easily switch between 'Gaming' and 'Silent' profiles

What we don't like about MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Suprim Soc

  • Extremely high price point, often sold at a significant premium over the baseline MSRP
  • Massive physical dimensions (quad-slot design, ~36cm length) that may not fit in standard ATX cases
  • Very high power consumption, with gaming modes frequently exceeding 600W
  • Substantial weight (nearly 3kg) which puts significant stress on the PCIe slot, necessitating the included support stand
  • Surface materials tend to easily trap oils from fingerprints, making the card difficult to keep clean

Verdict

The MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Suprim SOC is a flagship graphics card featuring the NVIDIA Blackwell architecture with 21,760 CUDA cores and 32GB of high-speed GDDR7 memory on a massive 512-bit bus. It arrives with a significant factory overclock reaching a boost frequency of 2565 MHz in Gaming Mode, supported by a 600W TGP and a robust Hyper Frozr thermal design utilizing three StormForce fans and a vapor chamber. Main pros include its unmatched 4K/8K gaming performance, superior cooling efficiency that maintains lower VRAM temperatures than the Founders Edition, and dual BIOS flexibility for silent or performance-focused operation. Major cons include its massive quad-slot physical footprint at 359mm in length, extreme power requirements necessitating a high-wattage ATX 3.1 PSU, and a substantial price premium over the base MSRP.

Compare MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Suprim Soc with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Suprim Soc and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found