OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6800 XT Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£640VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):300 W

GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6800 XT Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6800 XT
8.1/10

Overall score

Score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 69% of models
Score components

90%

8.1

Technical score

10%

8.1

User score

▲Better than 69% of graphics cards
7.8

Value for money

Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 80% of models
Score components

70%

8.1

Overall score

30%

7.1

Price

▲Better than 80%
8.1

Technical score

Technical score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 69% of models
Score components

44%

7.9

Performance

24%

7.9

Memory

12%

8.1

Power & Cooling

11%

9.1

Platform & Features

5%

7.3

Design

4%

8.4

Connectivity & Media

▲Better than 69%
8.1

User score

User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 61% of models
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

7.9

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▲Better than 61%
  • gigabyte-radeon-rx-6800-xt
gigabyte-radeon-rx-6800-xt
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6800 XT

Technical score
Technical score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 69% of models
Score components:

44%

7.9

Performance

24%

7.9

Memory

12%

8.1

Power & Cooling

11%

9.1

Platform & Features

5%

7.3

Design

4%

8.4

Connectivity & Media

8.1
User score
User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 61% of models
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

7.9

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.1
Popularity
Popularity
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 74% of models
Popularity:
GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6800 XT has a popularity score of 7.9 points, which is higher than that of 74% of products in this category.
7.9
Value for money
Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 80% of models
Score components:

70%

8.1

Overall score

30%

7.1

Price

7.8
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
19,577 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 19,577 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 63.7% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
10,490 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 10,490 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 56.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
24,194 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 24,194 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 55.2% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
13,165 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 13,165 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 52.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
21.06 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 21.06 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 56.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
16 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 61.5% of graphics cards and equal to 28.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
512 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 512 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 60.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.8% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
2
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 2 DisplayPort outputs, which is fewer than 79.1% of graphics cards and equal to 9.5% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
25.92 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 25.92 Gbps, which is faster than on 52.7% of graphics cards and equal to 4.4% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
300 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 300 W, which is higher than that of 71.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 6.4% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
325 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 325 W under peak load, which is higher than 81.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 750 W PSU, which is higher than that of 64.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 17.1% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
330 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 330 W, which is higher than that of 79% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
300 W
Show more
Size
286x 118x 58 mm
Length
286 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 286 mm long, which is longer than 50.3% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Height
118 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 118 mm tall, which is shorter than 66% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.7% of graphics cards.
Slot width
3 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 3 slot/s, which is wider than 69.8% of graphics cards and equal in width to 17.3% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,500 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 1,500 g, which is heavier than 73% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 1.3% of graphics cards.
Show more

GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6800 XT vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 64 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (128 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    128 vs 64
  • 32 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (72 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    72 vs 40
  • 32 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (72 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    72 vs 40
  • 76.5% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (288 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    288 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 104 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (288 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    288 vs 184
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 70% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (648 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    648 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 32x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (128 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    128 MB vs 4 MB
  • 8.1% better value for money
    GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6800 XT has better value for money than the average graphics card (7.78 vs 7.2).
    7.78 vs 7.2
  • 64 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (128 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    128 vs 64
  • 32 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (72 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    72 vs 40
  • 32 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (72 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    72 vs 40
  • 76.5% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (288 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    288 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 104 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (288 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    288 vs 184
  • 70% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (648 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    648 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • 2.71x higher FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP64 performance than the average graphics card (1.3 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    1.3 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 32x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (128 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    128 MB vs 4 MB
  • 14.3% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (512 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    512 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 14.3% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2000 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,000 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 7 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (118 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    118 mm vs 125 mm
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 8.8% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2285 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,285 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 40% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (7 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    7 nm vs 5 nm
  • 39.5% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (300 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    300 W vs 215 W
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 1 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    2 vs 3
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 8.8% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2285 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,285 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 8.1% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (20.7 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    20.74 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 15.8% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (16000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    16,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 83.3% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (4 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    4 MB vs 24 MB
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 40% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (7 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    7 nm vs 5 nm
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (3 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    3.0 vs 8
  • 3 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2020 vs 2023).
    November 2020
    2,020 vs 2,023
  • 76.3% larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (520 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    520 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 1 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    2 vs 3
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • 39.5% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (300 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    300 W vs 215 W
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 46.7% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (330 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    330 W vs 225 W
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 8 °C higher load temperature
    This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (75 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    75 °C vs 67 °C
  • 47.7% higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (325 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    325 W vs 220 W
  • 0.5 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 46.9% heavier card weight
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (1500 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    1,500 g vs 1,021 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

E
eteknix.com
27/01/2021
Summary of the review
Gigabyte RX 6800 XT Gaming OC 16G Review - eTeknix
P
pcgamer.com
08/01/2021
Summary of the review
Gigabyte Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming OC Review - PC Gamer
E
eteknix.com
27/01/2021
Summary of the review
Gigabyte RX 6800 XT Gaming OC 16G Review - Page 20 (Verdict) - eTeknix
E
eteknix.com
27/01/2021
Summary of the review
Gigabyte RX 6800 XT Gaming OC 16GGo to product viewer dialogue for this item. Review - Page 4 (Benchmarks) - eTeknix
H
hardwareluxx.de
20/12/2020
Summary of the review
Gut, aber nicht überragend: Gigabyte Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming OC im Test
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6800 XT

  • Excellent raw rasterization performance, capable of high frame rates at 1440p and competitive with the RTX 3080 in non-raytracing workloads.
  • Efficient WINDFORCE 3X cooling system that keeps temperatures stable, with many users reporting peak temperatures staying around or below 70-76°C.
  • Silent operation during low-load tasks thanks to semi-passive 3D Active Fans that stop spinning when the GPU is idle.
  • Dual BIOS feature provides a 'Silent' mode for quieter acoustics and extra safety when experimenting with overclocking.
  • Generous 16GB of VRAM helps prevent performance bottlenecks and visual artifacts at higher resolutions compared to cards with less memory.
  • Sturdy build quality featuring a protective metal backplate and RGB Fusion 2.0 for customizable lighting synchronization.

What we don't like about GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6800 XT

  • Significant performance drop in raytracing compared to equivalent NVIDIA GeForce RTX cards.
  • Lack of a mature DLSS alternative (at launch) can limit high-resolution gaming performance in demanding titles with raytracing enabled.
  • Notable coil whine reported by some users when the card is pushed to high utilization levels in demanding games.
  • Large physical dimensions (2.9-slot thickness) may cause clearance issues in smaller cases or interfere with motherboard components like PCH fans.
  • Historical driver stability issues, such as aggressive downclocking in lighter titles causing occasional stuttering, which may require manual tuning.
  • Gigabyte's RMA and customer support systems have been described by some users as difficult to navigate or unresponsive.

Verdict

The Gigabyte Radeon RX 6800 XT is a high-performance graphics card built on the RDNA 2 architecture with 4608 stream processors, 72 ray accelerators, and a substantial 16GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus. It features a boost clock of up to 2285 MHz on Gaming OC models and utilizes a 128MB AMD Infinity Cache to significantly enhance memory bandwidth for 4K gaming. Key strengths include its excellent 1440p and 4K rasterization performance that rivals high-end competitors, the efficient Windforce 3X cooling system with alternate spinning fans, and a solid build quality featuring a protective metal backplate and dual BIOS. However, it lacks the superior ray tracing and AI-upscaling performance (DLSS) found in rival NVIDIA cards, can be physically large at 2.5 to 2.9 slots thick, and may exhibit audible fan noise or coil whine under heavy load.

Compare GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6800 XT with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6800 XT and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found