Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

GIGABYTE Radeon RX 5700 XT Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£430VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):225 W

GIGABYTE Radeon RX 5700 XT Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

GIGABYTE Radeon RX 5700 XT
6.2/10

Overall score

Score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.9

Technical score

10%

8.9

User score

â–¼Worse than 72% of graphics cards
6.8

Value for money

Value for money
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.2

Overall score

30%

8.3

Price

â–¼Worse than 68%
5.9

Technical score

Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

4.2

Performance

24%

5.6

Memory

12%

8.6

Power & Cooling

11%

8.2

Platform & Features

5%

8.2

Design

4%

8.7

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 75%
8.9

User score

User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

9.8

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 83%
  • gigabyte-radeon-rx-5700-xt
  • gigabyte-radeon-rx-5700-xt
gigabyte-radeon-rx-5700-xt
gigabyte-radeon-rx-5700-xt
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card GIGABYTE Radeon RX 5700 XT

Technical score
Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

4.2

Performance

24%

5.6

Memory

12%

8.6

Power & Cooling

11%

8.2

Platform & Features

5%

8.2

Design

4%

8.7

Connectivity & Media

5.9
User score
User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

9.8

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.9
Popularity
Popularity
9.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
GIGABYTE Radeon RX 5700 XT has a popularity score of 9.8 points, which is higher than that of 90.4% of products in this category.
9.8
Value for money
Value for money
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.2

Overall score

30%

8.3

Price

6.8
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
9,611 points
This graphics card scores 9,611 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 72.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
0 points
This graphics card scores 0 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 83.2% of graphics cards and equal to 16.8% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
16,167 points
This graphics card scores 16,167 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 73% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
7,592 points
This graphics card scores 7,592 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 73% of graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
9.75 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 9.75 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 75.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.4% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
8 GB
This graphics card has 8 GB of VRAM, which is less than 57.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
448 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 448 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 41.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 11% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12
This graphics card supports DirectX 12, which is older than on 81.8% of graphics cards and equal to 16.9% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
21.6 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 21.6 Gbps, which is faster than on 50.5% of graphics cards and equal to 2% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
225 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 225 W, which is higher than that of 54.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.1% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
192 W
This graphics card draws 192 W under peak load, which is lower than 58.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
600 W
This graphics card recommends a 600 W PSU, which is lower than that of 54.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 7.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
225 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W, which is lower than that of 49.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
225 W
Show more
Size
280x 114x 50 mm
Length
279.85 mm
This graphics card is 279.85 mm long, which is shorter than 54.1% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Height
114.35 mm
This graphics card is 114.35 mm tall, which is shorter than 74.3% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.5 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s, which is slimmer than 36.3% of graphics cards and equal in width to 14.7% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,500 g
This graphics card weighs 1,500 g, which is heavier than 73% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 1.3% of graphics cards.
Show more

GIGABYTE Radeon RX 5700 XT vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • 10.65 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (114.4 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    114.35 mm vs 125 mm
  • 11.9% higher user score
    User score
    8.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    GIGABYTE Radeon RX 5700 XT
    the average graphics card
    GIGABYTE Radeon RX 5700 XT has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.95 vs 8.000).
    8.95 vs 8
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • 2.33x more popular
    GIGABYTE Radeon RX 5700 XT is more popular than the average graphics card (9.82 vs 4.2).
    9.82 vs 4.22
  • 4x larger L1 cache
    This graphics card has more L1 cache than the average graphics card (512 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    512 vs 128
  • 7.7% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (600 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    600 W vs 650 W
  • 11.9% higher user score
    User score
    8.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    GIGABYTE Radeon RX 5700 XT
    the average graphics card
    GIGABYTE Radeon RX 5700 XT has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.95 vs 8.000).
    8.95 vs 8
  • 2.33x more popular
    GIGABYTE Radeon RX 5700 XT is more popular than the average graphics card (9.82 vs 4.2).
    9.82 vs 4.22
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • 4x larger L1 cache
    This graphics card has more L1 cache than the average graphics card (512 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    512 vs 128
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • 7.7% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (600 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    600 W vs 650 W
  • 10.65 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (114.4 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    114.35 mm vs 125 mm
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 24% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1905 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,905 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 5.5% worse value for money
    GIGABYTE Radeon RX 5700 XT has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.82 vs 7.2).
    6.82 vs 7.2
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 24% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1905 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,905 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 56.8% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (9.8 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    9.75 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 25.3% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (121.9 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    121.9 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 20% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (304.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    304.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 14.1% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1650 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,650 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 28.6% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (16167 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    16,167 points vs 22,653 points
  • 34.5% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (9611 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    9,611 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 24 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (160 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    160 vs 184
  • 37.1% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (7592 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    7,592 points vs 12,074 points
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 26.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (14000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 83.3% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (4 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    4 MB vs 24 MB
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • 40% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (7 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    7 nm vs 5 nm
  • No AI upscalers
    This graphics card does not support AI upscalers, the average graphics card does.
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (2 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    2.0 vs 8
  • No mesh shaders
    This graphics card does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 4 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2019 vs 2023).
    August 2019
    2,019 vs 2,023
  • Worse SAM support
    This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
  • Older DirectX version
    This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12 vs 12 Ultimate).
    12 vs 12 Ultimate
  • Older OpenCL version
    This graphics card supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2.0 vs 3.0
  • 55% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (10300 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    10,300 million vs 22,900 million
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.0b vs 2.1).
    2.0b vs 2.1
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
    2.2 vs 2.3
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 13 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (50 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    50 °C vs 37 °C
  • 4.7% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (225 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    225 W vs 215 W
  • 46.9% heavier card weight
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (1500 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    1,500 g vs 1,021 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

H
hothardware.com
13/09/2019
Summary of the review
T
tweaktown.com
31/08/2020
Summary of the review
G
guru3d.com
03/01/2020
Summary of the review
G
gamersnexus.net
06/09/2019
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
28/01/2020
Summary of the review
T
tech-critter.com
07/01/2020
Summary of the review
T
tech-critter.com
18/10/2019
Summary of the review
L
lanoc.org
06/11/2019
Summary of the review
T
tektick.com
26/12/2019
Summary of the review
E
einfoldtech.com
13/07/2020
Summary of the review
O
overclock3d.net
18/10/2019
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about GIGABYTE Radeon RX 5700 XT

  • Excellent cooling performance, often cited as one of the coolest-running 5700 XT models
  • Strong value proposition, offering competitive 1440p gaming performance for its price point
  • Quiet operation under typical gaming loads compared to reference blower designs
  • Solid build quality featuring a triple-fan Windforce 3X cooling system
  • Multiple display outputs (some models like Aorus offer up to 6 ports)

What we don't like about GIGABYTE Radeon RX 5700 XT

  • History of driver instability, including black screens and crashes, particularly near launch
  • Memory temperatures (GDDR6) can run high, even when the GPU core remains cool
  • High power consumption compared to modern alternatives, often requiring undervolting for efficiency
  • Lack of hardware-based ray tracing support
  • Large physical footprint (triple-slot or long design) may not fit in smaller cases

Verdict

The Gigabyte Radeon RX 5700 XT is a high-performance graphics card built on AMD's 7nm RDNA architecture, specifically designed for smooth 1440p gaming. It features 2,560 stream processors, a base clock of 1650MHz, and a boost clock of 1905MHz, supported by 8GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 448 GB/s bandwidth. Main characteristics include PCIe 4.0 support for doubled bandwidth and Gigabyte's Windforce 3X cooling system, which utilizes three 80mm alternate-spinning fans and direct-touch copper heat pipes to maintain thermal efficiency. Its primary pros are its strong value proposition for 1440p performance and effective, quiet cooling on 'Gaming OC' and 'AORUS' models. However, notable cons include a lack of hardware-accelerated ray tracing, relatively high power consumption (225W TDP), and junction temperatures that can reach up to 110°C under heavy loads.

Compare GIGABYTE Radeon RX 5700 XT with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of GIGABYTE Radeon RX 5700 XT and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found