OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5050 Gaming OC Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£260VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:128 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):130 W

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5050 Gaming OC Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5050 Gaming OC
6.4/10

Overall score

Score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 67% of models
Score components

90%

6.2

Technical score

10%

8.1

User score

▼Worse than 67% of graphics cards
7.2

Value for money

Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 52% of models
Score components

70%

6.4

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

▼Worse than 52%
6.2

Technical score

Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 67% of models
Score components

44%

5.0

Performance

24%

4.2

Memory

12%

9.5

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

8.8

Design

4%

9.2

Connectivity & Media

▼Worse than 67%
8.1

User score

User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 61% of models
Score components

70%

8.9

User ratings

30%

6.2

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▲Better than 61%
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5050-gaming-oc
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5050-gaming-oc
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5050-gaming-oc
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5050-gaming-oc
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5050-gaming-oc
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5050-gaming-oc
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5050-gaming-oc
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5050-gaming-oc
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5050-gaming-oc
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5050-gaming-oc
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5050-gaming-oc
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5050-gaming-oc
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5050-gaming-oc
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5050-gaming-oc
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5050 Gaming OC

Technical score
Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 67% of models
Score components:

44%

5.0

Performance

24%

4.2

Memory

12%

9.5

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

8.8

Design

4%

9.2

Connectivity & Media

6.2
User score
User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 61% of models
Score components

70%

8.9

User ratings

30%

6.2

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.1
Popularity
Popularity
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 60% of models
Popularity:
GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5050 Gaming OC has a popularity score of 6.2 points, which is higher than that of 60% of products in this category.
6.2
Value for money
Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 52% of models
Score components:

70%

6.4

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

7.2
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
11,375 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 11,375 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 64% of graphics cards and equal to 0.5% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
6,131 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 6,131 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 65.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
17,303 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 17,303 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 67.2% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
8,547 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 8,547 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 67.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.9% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
13.48 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 13.48 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 66.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
8 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 8 GB of VRAM, which is less than 57.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
128 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 128 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 69.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 26% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
320 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 320 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 66.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5
This graphics card supports PCIe 5, which is newer than on 74.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x8
This graphics card uses x8 PCIe lanes, which is fewer than 76.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.2% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
2
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 2 DisplayPort outputs, which is fewer than 79.1% of graphics cards and equal to 9.5% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1b
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1b, which is more advanced than on 78.6% of graphics cards and equal to 21.4% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
20 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 20 Gbps, which is faster than on 42.9% of graphics cards and equal to 7.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
130 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 130 W, which is lower than that of 79.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.2% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
150 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 150 W under peak load, which is lower than 75.7% of graphics cards and equal to 1.3% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
550 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 550 W PSU, which is lower than that of 62.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 13.3% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
150 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 150 W, which is lower than that of 75.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.8% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
130 W
Show more
Size
280x 117x 40 mm
Length
280 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 280 mm long, which is shorter than 52.5% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.3% of graphics cards.
Height
117 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 117 mm tall, which is shorter than 67.9% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
710 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 710 g, which is lighter than 77.9% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.5% of graphics cards.
Show more

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5050 Gaming OC vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 5.1% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2632 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,632 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 20.7% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2317 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,317 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • 39.5% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (130 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    130 W vs 215 W
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 1.4a).
    2.1b vs 1.4a
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 2.1).
    2.1b vs 2.1
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 2 newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    July 2025
    2,025 vs 2,023
  • 2.04x cheaper
    GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5050 Gaming OC is cheaper than the average graphics card (£260 vs £530).
    £260 vs £530
  • 5.1% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2632 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,632 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 20.7% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2317 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,317 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 8x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (32 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    32 MB vs 4 MB
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • 2 newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    July 2025
    2,025 vs 2,023
  • Newer encoder generation
    This graphics card uses a newer encoder generation than the average graphics card (9 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    9 vs 8
  • 49.5% smaller GPU die
    This graphics card has a lower GPU die size than the average graphics card (149 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    149 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 1.4a).
    2.1b vs 1.4a
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 2.1).
    2.1b vs 2.1
  • 39.5% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (130 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    130 W vs 215 W
  • 15.4% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (550 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    550 W vs 650 W
  • 8 °C higher thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a higher thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (87 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    87 °C vs 95 °C
  • 33.3% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (150 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    150 W vs 225 W
  • 10.4 dB quieter under load
    This graphics card has a lower load noise level than the average graphics card (25 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    25 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • 50% lower idle power draw
    This graphics card has a lower idle power draw than the average graphics card (6 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    6 W vs 12 W
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 8 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (117 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    117 mm vs 125 mm
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    128 bit vs 256 bit
  • 20 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (20 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    20 vs 40
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 104 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (80 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    80 vs 184
  • 20 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (20 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    20 vs 40
  • 32 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (32 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    32 vs 64
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • 20 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (20 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    20 vs 40
  • 104 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (80 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    80 vs 184
  • 20 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (20 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    20 vs 40
  • 32 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (32 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    32 vs 64
  • 48.4% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (84.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    84.22 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 44.8% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (210.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    210.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 64 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (80 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    80 vs 144
  • 41.6% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (13.2 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    13.17 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 23.6% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (17303 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    17,303 points vs 22,653 points
  • 33.1% lower ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (6131 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    6,131 points vs 9,166 points
  • 22.5% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (11375 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    11,375 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 56.3% lower FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0.2 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    0.21 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    128 bit vs 256 bit
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 28.6% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (320 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    320 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • 1 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    2 vs 3
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techpowerup.com
04/07/2025
Summary of the review
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 8 GB Review | TechPowerUp
H
hwcooling.net
11/07/2025
Summary of the review
Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5050 Gaming OCGo to product viewer dialog for this item. Review: Budget Tier
W
winfuture.de
16/07/2025
Summary of the review
Die neue Nvidia RTX 5050 im Test mit vier beliebten Gaming-CPUs
(Translated)Show original
O
overclocking.com
11/08/2025
Summary of the review
Que vaut la Gigabyte RTX 5050 OC Low Profile 8G
(Translated)Show original
H
hardwareand.co
18/08/2025
Summary of the review
Test de la GeForce RTX 5050 : que vaut l'entrée de gamme des verts ?
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5050 Gaming OC

  • Efficient Windforce triple-fan cooling keeps the card cool (approx. 59°C) and quiet under load
  • Support for DLSS 4 with Multi Frame Generation significantly boosts frame rates in demanding AAA titles
  • Low power consumption (130W TGP) makes it suitable for budget builds with standard 550W power supplies
  • Includes modern hardware standards like PCIe 5.0 and DisplayPort 2.1b
  • Solid 1080p performance in esports titles, often exceeding 144fps

What we don't like about GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5050 Gaming OC

  • 8GB of GDDR6 VRAM is considered a potential bottleneck for future-proofing and high-texture 1440p gaming
  • Lower value proposition compared to the RTX 5060, which offers significantly more cores and bandwidth for a modest price increase
  • Lacks premium aesthetics such as RGB lighting, featuring a predominantly plastic shroud
  • DLSS 4 frame generation can introduce noticeable input latency in fast-paced competitive games
  • Performance is roughly on par with or slightly slower than the previous-gen RTX 4060 in some benchmarks

Verdict

The Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5050 Gaming OC is an entry-level graphics card based on the NVIDIA Blackwell architecture, featuring 2,560 CUDA cores and 8GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus. This factory-overclocked model operates at a boost clock of 2,632 MHz and is equipped with a triple-fan WINDFORCE cooling system, including alternate spinning fans and composite copper heat pipes, all powered by a single 8-pin PCIe connector with a 130W TGP. Main pros include support for the latest DLSS 4 technologies for AI-enhanced performance, quiet and cool operation under load, and a robust physical build with a reinforced structure and graphene nano lubricant for extended fan life. However, notable cons include its limitation to 8GB of VRAM which may impact future-proofing at resolutions above 1080p, and a lack of built-in RGB lighting for users seeking customizable aesthetics.

Compare GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5050 Gaming OC with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5050 Gaming OC and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found