Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£180VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):235 W

GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 Super
6.7/10

Overall score

Score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

6.5

Technical score

10%

8.5

User score

▼Worse than 61% of graphics cards
7.5

Value for money

Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

9.6

Price

▲Better than 64%
6.5

Technical score

Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

5.4

Performance

24%

5.6

Memory

12%

8.8

Power & Cooling

11%

8.9

Platform & Features

5%

6.5

Design

4%

8.7

Connectivity & Media

▼Worse than 63%
8.5

User score

User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

7.2

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▲Better than 70%
  • gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-2070-super
  • gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-2070-super
  • gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-2070-super
  • gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-2070-super
  • gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-2070-super
gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-2070-super
gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-2070-super
gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-2070-super
gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-2070-super
gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-2070-super
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Technical score
Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

5.4

Performance

24%

5.6

Memory

12%

8.8

Power & Cooling

11%

8.9

Platform & Features

5%

6.5

Design

4%

8.7

Connectivity & Media

6.5
User score
User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

7.2

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.5
Popularity
Popularity
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 Super has a popularity score of 7.2 points, which is higher than that of 67.1% of products in this category.
7.2
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

9.6

Price

7.5
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
10,000 points
This graphics card scores 10,000 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 70.7% of graphics cards and equal to 0.9% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
9,000 points
This graphics card scores 9,000 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 50.7% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
18,155 points
This graphics card scores 18,155 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 66.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
10,046 points
This graphics card scores 10,046 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 60.5% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
9.75 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 9.75 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 75.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.4% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
8 GB
This graphics card has 8 GB of VRAM, which is less than 57.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
448 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 448 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 41.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 11% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3
This graphics card supports PCIe 3, which is older than on 77.7% of graphics cards and equal to 20.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
vendor-name or prompt-tail contamination removed; Vulkan version unresolved.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4, which is older than on 80.6% of graphics cards and equal to 13.3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 65% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
235 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 235 W, which is higher than that of 56.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
215 W
This graphics card draws 215 W under peak load, which is lower than 52.3% of graphics cards and equal to 1.2% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
650 W
This graphics card recommends a 650 W PSU, which is lower than that of 40.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 13.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
255 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 255 W, which is higher than that of 59.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
215 W
Show more
Size
290x 134.31x 59.9 mm
Length
290 mm
This graphics card is 290 mm long, which is longer than 51.8% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.7% of graphics cards.
Height
134.31 mm
This graphics card is 134.31 mm tall, which is taller than 69.6% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
3 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 3 slot/s, which is wider than 69.8% of graphics cards and equal in width to 17.3% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,265 g
This graphics card weighs 1,265 g, which is heavier than 63.6% of graphics cards.
Show more

GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 176 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (320 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    320 vs 144
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • Supports NVLink
    This graphics card supports NVLink, the average graphics card does not.
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    This graphics card supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • 2.94x cheaper
    GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 Super is cheaper than the average graphics card (£180 vs £530).
    £180 vs £530
  • 6 °C higher thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a higher thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (89 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    89 °C vs 95 °C
  • 5.9% higher user score
    User score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 Super
    the average graphics card
    GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 Super has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.47 vs 8.000).
    8.47 vs 8
  • 7 °C lower idle temperature
    This graphics card has a lower idle temperature than the average graphics card (30 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    30 °C vs 37 °C
  • 2.94x cheaper
    GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 Super is cheaper than the average graphics card (£180 vs £530).
    £180 vs £530
  • 5.9% higher user score
    User score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 Super
    the average graphics card
    GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 Super has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.47 vs 8.000).
    8.47 vs 8
  • 176 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (320 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    320 vs 144
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    This graphics card supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • Supports NVLink
    This graphics card supports NVLink, the average graphics card does not.
  • 6 °C higher thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a higher thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (89 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    89 °C vs 95 °C
  • 7 °C lower idle temperature
    This graphics card has a lower idle temperature than the average graphics card (30 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    30 °C vs 37 °C
  • 24% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1905 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,905 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 2.4x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (12 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    12 nm vs 5 nm
  • 26.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (14000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 59.7% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (9.1 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    9.1 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • Older PCIe version
    This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4).
    3.0 vs 4.0
  • 25.7% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (283.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    283.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 24% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1905 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,905 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 59.7% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (9.1 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    9.1 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 25.7% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (283.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    283.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 16.4% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1605 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,605 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 25.3% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (121.9 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    121.9 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 19.9% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (18155 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    18,155 points vs 22,653 points
  • 31.9% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (10000 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    10,000 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 24 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (160 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    160 vs 184
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 26.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (14000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 83.3% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (4 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    4 MB vs 24 MB
  • 50% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (64 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    64 vs 128
  • 2.4x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (12 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    12 nm vs 5 nm
  • Older PCIe version
    This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4).
    3.0 vs 4.0
  • 4 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2019 vs 2023).
    July 2019
    2,019 vs 2,023
  • Worse SAM support
    This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (6 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    6 vs 8
  • 84.7% larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (545 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    545 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • Older DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.4 vs 1.4a).
    1.4 vs 1.4a
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.0b vs 2.1).
    2.0b vs 2.1
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
    2.2 vs 2.3
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 9.3% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (235 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    235 W vs 215 W
  • 66.7% higher idle power draw
    This graphics card has a higher idle power draw than the average graphics card (20 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    20 W vs 12 W
  • 7 °C higher load temperature
    This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (74 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    74 °C vs 67 °C
  • 0.5 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 9.31 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (134.3 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    134.31 mm vs 125 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

N
nikktech.com
07/01/2020
Summary of the review
G
gamezoom.net
01/11/2026
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 Super

  • Premium 'built like a tank' construction with a heavy, durable metal backplate
  • Excellent thermal management, with temperatures often staying below 65°C under load
  • Advanced RGB lighting effects, including 'halo' fans that are highly visually appealing for vertical mounts
  • Operation is nearly silent, even when fans are running at high speeds
  • Features a total of 7 display outputs (3x HDMI, 3x DP, 1x USB-C), offering more flexibility than reference designs
  • Strong factory overclock and high potential for further manual overclocking

What we don't like about GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 Super

  • Large 3-slot physical footprint that may not fit in smaller or compact PC cases
  • Premium pricing that often exceeds the base MSRP of other RTX 2070 Super variants
  • RGB Fusion 2.0 software is frequently reported as buggy, primitive, and difficult to use
  • Instances of audible coil whine reported by some users, particularly under high frame rate loads
  • The 8GB VRAM capacity is increasingly seen as a potential bottleneck for high-resolution textures in modern AAA titles

Verdict

The Gigabyte Aorus GeForce RTX 2070 Super 8G is a premium high-end graphics card built on the NVIDIA Turing architecture, featuring 2,560 CUDA cores, 8GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit interface, and a significant factory overclock with a boost clock of 1905 MHz. Its standout physical feature is the Windforce Stack 3X cooling system, which utilizes three 100mm overlapping fans and advanced RGB 'Halo' lighting for superior thermal management and aesthetics. Main advantages include its exceptional 1440p gaming performance, an industry-leading 7-video output configuration (3x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB-C), and a robust 12+2 power phase design for stable extreme overclocking. However, notable drawbacks include its massive triple-slot footprint which may restrict case compatibility, and frequently reported issues with audible coil whine under heavy load.

Compare GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 Super with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 Super and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found