OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v3.0

GALAX GeForce RTX 4070 Super EX Gamer 1-Click OC review: 117 specs compared

Avg. price:~£560VRAM:12 GBMemory bus width:192 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):220 W

GALAX GeForce RTX 4070 Super EX Gamer 1-Click OC Review: Compare 117 technical specifications and 7 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

GALAX GeForce RTX 4070 Super EX Gamer 1-Click OC
8.0/10

Overall score

Score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 25%, List score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 72% of models
Score components

40%

7.8

Technical score

25%

8.5

Reviews score

25%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

9.0

Sentiment score

▲Better than 72% of graphics cards
7.9

Value for money

Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 94% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

Overall score

30%

7.6

Price

★Better than 94%
7.8

Technical score

Technical score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 63% of models
Score components

44%

7.8

Performance

24%

6.4

Memory

12%

8.8

Power

11%

9.7

Features

5%

6.6

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity

▲Better than 63%
8.5

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models

80%

8.6

Average grade

20%

8.3

Popularity

Grades by review (7)
6 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 4 estimated from the review. 1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
★Better than 92%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • galax-geforce-rtx-4070-super-ex-gamer-1-click-oc
  • galax-geforce-rtx-4070-super-ex-gamer-1-click-oc
  • galax-geforce-rtx-4070-super-ex-gamer-1-click-oc
  • galax-geforce-rtx-4070-super-ex-gamer-1-click-oc
  • galax-geforce-rtx-4070-super-ex-gamer-1-click-oc
  • galax-geforce-rtx-4070-super-ex-gamer-1-click-oc
  • galax-geforce-rtx-4070-super-ex-gamer-1-click-oc
  • galax-geforce-rtx-4070-super-ex-gamer-1-click-oc
  • galax-geforce-rtx-4070-super-ex-gamer-1-click-oc
galax-geforce-rtx-4070-super-ex-gamer-1-click-oc
galax-geforce-rtx-4070-super-ex-gamer-1-click-oc
galax-geforce-rtx-4070-super-ex-gamer-1-click-oc
galax-geforce-rtx-4070-super-ex-gamer-1-click-oc
galax-geforce-rtx-4070-super-ex-gamer-1-click-oc
galax-geforce-rtx-4070-super-ex-gamer-1-click-oc
galax-geforce-rtx-4070-super-ex-gamer-1-click-oc
galax-geforce-rtx-4070-super-ex-gamer-1-click-oc
galax-geforce-rtx-4070-super-ex-gamer-1-click-oc
Where to buy
    N/A~ £560
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the GALAX GeForce RTX 4070 Super EX Gamer 1-Click OC

Based on 6 · 1

Reviewers praise the cool, quiet running and overclocking headroom, but are split on the power connector and dislike the memory.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card GALAX GeForce RTX 4070 Super EX Gamer 1-Click OC

Technical score
Technical score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 63% of models
Score components:

44%

7.8

Performance

24%

6.4

Memory

12%

8.8

Power

11%

9.7

Features

5%

6.6

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity

7.8
Reviews score
8.5
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 94% of models
Score components:

70%

8.0

Overall score

30%

7.6

Price

7.9
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
20,000 points
Market range: <4.1k points – >30.1k points
This graphics card scores 20,000 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 64.9% of graphics cards and equal to 1.5% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
14,300 points
Market range: <0 points – >22.4k points
This graphics card scores 14,300 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 68.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.4% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
29,958 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 29,958 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 70.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
20,563 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 20,563 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 84% of graphics cards.
FP32 performance
36 TFLOPS
Market range: <3.94 TFLOPS – >56.3 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 36 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is higher than that of 68.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
12 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This graphics card has 12 GB of VRAM, which is more than 46% of graphics cards and equal to 16% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6X
This graphics card uses GDDR6X memory, which is newer than on 57.1% of graphics cards and equal to 22.4% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
192 bit
Market range: <128 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 192 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 31.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 18.7% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
504 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 504 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 54.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2% of graphics cards.
Effective memory speed
21,000 MHz
Market range: <7k MHz – >28k MHz
This graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 21,000 MHz, which is faster than that of 61.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 12.4% of graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.5% of graphics cards and equal to 50.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 24.1% of graphics cards and equal to 75.9% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.8% of graphics cards and equal to 77.2% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.8% of graphics cards and equal to 79.2% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 2% of graphics cards and equal to 98% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 9% of graphics cards and equal to 88.2% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 90.9% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21.7% of graphics cards and equal to 76% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.3% of graphics cards and equal to 46.3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
32.4 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 32.4 Gbps, which is faster than on 56.6% of graphics cards and equal to 20.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
220 W
Market range: <86 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 220 W, which is higher than that of 50.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.2% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
272 W
Market range: <106 W – >365 W
This graphics card draws 272 W under peak load, which is higher than 64.5% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
650 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 650 W PSU, which is lower than that of 39.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 13.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
300 W
Market range: <107 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 300 W, which is higher than that of 68.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 5.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
220 W
Show more
What reviewers say
Size
336x 146x 48 mm
Length
336 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >337 mm
This graphics card is 336 mm long, which is longer than 88.1% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.9% of graphics cards.
Height
131 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 131 mm tall, which is taller than 62.4% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.9% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.5 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s, which is slimmer than 35.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 14.7% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,160 g
Market range: <541 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 1,160 g, which is heavier than 58.3% of Graphics cards and equal to 0.4% of Graphics cards.
Show more

GALAX GeForce RTX 4070 Super EX Gamer 1-Click OC vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryFeaturesConnectivityPowerDesign
  • 3% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,580 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    2,580 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 16 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (56 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    56 vs 40
  • 52% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (574.6 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
    574.6 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
  • 16 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (56 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    56 vs 40
  • 18.1% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ★ Better than 92% of models

    80%

    8.6

    Average grade

    20%

    8.3

    Popularity

    Grades by review (7)
    6 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 4 estimated from the review. 1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.5 vs 7.2
  • 80 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (224 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    224 vs 144
  • 59.3% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (36 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.6 TFLOPS.
    36 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS
  • 27.2% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (205.2 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 161.3 GPixel/s.
    205.2 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s
  • 18.1% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ★ Better than 92% of models

    80%

    8.6

    Average grade

    20%

    8.3

    Popularity

    Grades by review (7)
    6 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 4 estimated from the review. 1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.5 vs 7.2
  • 6.3% better value for money
    GALAX GeForce RTX 4070 Super EX Gamer 1-Click OC has better value for money than the average graphics card (7.88 vs 7.4).
    7.88 vs 7.41
  • 15.4% higher sentiment score
    9.0 vs 7.8
  • 3% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,580 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    2,580 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 16 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (56 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    56 vs 40
  • 52% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (574.6 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
    574.6 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
  • 16 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (56 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    56 vs 40
  • 80 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (224 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    224 vs 144
  • 59.3% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (36 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.6 TFLOPS.
    36 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS
  • 27.2% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (205.2 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 161.3 GPixel/s.
    205.2 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s
  • 16 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (80 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    80 vs 64
  • 40 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (224 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    224 vs 184
  • 32.3% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (29,958 points vs 22,638 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22,638 points.
    29,958 points vs 22,638 points
  • 56.3% higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (14,300 points vs 9,148 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9,148 points.
    14,300 points vs 9,148 points
  • 35.3% higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (20,000 points vs 14,779 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14,779 points.
    20,000 points vs 14,779 points
  • 2x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    48 MB vs 24 MB
  • 12x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    48 MB vs 4 MB
  • 10.5% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (21,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
    21,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 12.5% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (504 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    504 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (frame generation vs multi frame generation).
    frame generation vs multi frame generation
  • 53.8 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (336 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
    336 mm vs 282.2 mm
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 36.4% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (300 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
    300 W vs 220 W
  • 6 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (131 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    131 mm vs 125 mm
  • 5 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (100 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    100 °C vs 95 °C
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (frame generation vs multi frame generation).
    frame generation vs multi frame generation
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 36.4% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (300 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
    300 W vs 220 W
  • 5 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (100 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    100 °C vs 95 °C
  • 53.8 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (336 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
    336 mm vs 282.2 mm
  • 6 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (131 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    131 mm vs 125 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Hardware Busters
≈ estimated
18/03/2024
Performance review · temperatures, power and noise tests
Verdict
GALAX GeForce RTX 4070 Super EX Gamer 1-Click OC is a good-value pick for a powerful gaming PC, with low noise and efficient power use.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
guru3d.com
≈ estimated
22/03/2024
Benchmark review · Semi-passive cooling
Verdict
The Galax GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER EX Gamer is a quiet triple-fan card, only 4–5% faster than the Founder's Edition, and suits buyers who want a calm, good-looking build.
10
techpowerup.com
✓ explicit
19/03/2024
Product overview · Triple-fan design
Verdict
The Galax GeForce RTX 4070 Super EX is a triple-fan, RGB-lit card with a small factory overclock, best suited to buyers who want solid cooling and a good-looking build.
9.0
hwbusters.com
≈ estimated
16/03/2024
Benchmark review · QHD gaming
Verdict
The Galax GeForce RTX 4070 Super EX Gamer is a quiet, efficient card that suits QHD gaming well, though its 12 GB of memory can hold back some titles.
9.0
wccftech.com
≈ estimated
17/03/2024
Hardware review · Overclocking test
Verdict
The Galax GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER EX Gamer is a strong, efficient card whose user-set overclock can match the RTX 4070 Ti, though the gain is modest.
8.0
elchapuzasinformatico.com
≈ estimated
16/08/2024
Hands-on test · Triple-fan cooling
Verdict
The KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER EX Gamer is a near-silent triple-fan card suited to QHD gaming at 144 Hz, but its fixed 220 W power limit caps overclocking.
10
techpowerup.com
✓ explicit
19/03/2024
Product overview · Triple-fan design
Verdict
The Galax GeForce RTX 4070 Super EX is a triple-fan, RGB-lit card with a small factory overclock, best suited to buyers who want solid cooling and a good-looking build.
10
techpowerup.com
✓ explicit
19/03/2024
Product overview · Triple-fan design
Verdict
The Galax GeForce RTX 4070 Super EX is a triple-fan, RGB-lit card with a small factory overclock, best suited to buyers who want solid cooling and a good-looking build.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about GALAX GeForce RTX 4070 Super EX Gamer 1-Click OC

  • High efficiency with a strong performance-to-wattage ratio
  • Effective triple-fan cooling system that maintains low temperatures (approx. 65-70°C under load)
  • Silent operation with a 'fan stop' feature for zero noise at low loads
  • Factory overclocked out of the box with additional manual overclocking headroom
  • Aesthetically pleasing design featuring unique ARGB fans and a metallic backplate
  • Includes helpful accessories like a 12+4 pin power adapter and a magnetic anti-sag support bracket
  • Uses the updated 12V-2x6 power header for improved safety over original 12VHPWR connectors

What customers don't like about GALAX GeForce RTX 4070 Super EX Gamer 1-Click OC

  • VRAM capacity (12GB) and 192-bit bus can be a limiting factor for high-end 4K gaming in demanding titles
  • The Xtreme Tuner software for RGB and fan control is often described as clunky or visually outdated
  • The card's shroud is mostly plastic, which some users feel feels slightly cheap compared to premium metal designs
  • Large physical dimensions (triple-slot design) may not fit in smaller or compact cases
  • Absence of an adjustable power limiter on this specific model compared to some competitors

Verdict

The Galax GeForce RTX 4070 Super EX Gamer 1-Click OC is a high-performance graphics card built on the NVIDIA Ada Lovelace architecture, featuring 7,168 CUDA cores and 12GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus. It offers a significant factory overclock with a boost clock of 2,565 MHz, which can be further pushed via the Xtreme Tuner Plus software's 1-Click OC feature to 2,580 MHz. Key characteristics include a substantial triple-fan 'Extreme Gamer' cooling system with ARGB-lit fans (one 102mm and two 92mm), a metallic backplate, and support for DLSS 3.5 frame generation and ray tracing. Main pros include its excellent power efficiency, silent operation under load, and a safer 12V-2x6 power header, providing a notable performance leap over the non-Super 4070. On the downside, it is quite large at 336mm in length, occupying three PCIe slots, and some enthusiasts find the 12GB VRAM capacity somewhat restrictive for heavy 4K gaming in the long term.

Compare GALAX GeForce RTX 4070 Super EX Gamer 1-Click OC with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of GALAX GeForce RTX 4070 Super EX Gamer 1-Click OC and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found