OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 Ti OC Edition Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£660VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):290 W

ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 Ti OC Edition Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 Ti OC Edition
7.2/10

Overall score

Score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 50% of models
Score components

90%

6.9

Technical score

10%

9.5

User score

▲Better than 50% of graphics cards
7.1

Value for money

Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components

70%

7.2

Overall score

30%

7.0

Price

▼Worse than 58%
6.9

Technical score

Technical score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 52% of models
Score components

44%

6.0

Performance

24%

6.2

Memory

12%

8.3

Power & Cooling

11%

9.5

Platform & Features

5%

7.1

Design

4%

9.2

Connectivity & Media

▼Worse than 52%
9.5

User score

User score
9.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 96% of models
Score components

70%

9.4

User ratings

30%

9.6

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
★Better than 96%
  • asus-tuf-gaming-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-oc-edition
  • asus-tuf-gaming-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-oc-edition
  • asus-tuf-gaming-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-oc-edition
  • asus-tuf-gaming-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-oc-edition
  • asus-tuf-gaming-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-oc-edition
  • asus-tuf-gaming-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-oc-edition
asus-tuf-gaming-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-oc-edition
asus-tuf-gaming-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-oc-edition
asus-tuf-gaming-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-oc-edition
asus-tuf-gaming-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-oc-edition
asus-tuf-gaming-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-oc-edition
asus-tuf-gaming-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-oc-edition
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 Ti OC Edition

Technical score
Technical score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 52% of models
Score components:

44%

6.0

Performance

24%

6.2

Memory

12%

8.3

Power & Cooling

11%

9.5

Platform & Features

5%

7.1

Design

4%

9.2

Connectivity & Media

6.9
User score
User score
9.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 96% of models
Score components

70%

9.4

User ratings

30%

9.6

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
9.5
Popularity
Popularity
9.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 89% of models
Popularity:
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 Ti OC Edition has a popularity score of 9.6 points, which is higher than that of 88.8% of products in this category.
9.6
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components:

70%

7.2

Overall score

30%

7.0

Price

7.1
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
15,277 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 15,277 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 51.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
8,800 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 8,800 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 51.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
23,295 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 23,295 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 53.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
23,727 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 23,727 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 86.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
22.3 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 22.3 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 52.8% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
8 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 8 GB of VRAM, which is less than 57.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6X
GDDR version
GDDR6X
This graphics card uses GDDR6X memory, which is newer than on 56.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
608.3 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 608.3 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 63.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 65% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
290 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 290 W, which is higher than that of 70.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.6% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
290 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 290 W under peak load, which is higher than 68.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.5% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 750 W PSU, which is higher than that of 64.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 17.1% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
290 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 290 W, which is higher than that of 66.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.2% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
290 W
Show more
Size
299.9x 126.9x 51.7 mm
Length
299.9 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 299.9 mm long, which is longer than 56.4% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Height
126.9 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 126.9 mm tall, which is taller than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.7 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.7 slot/s, which is wider than 65% of graphics cards and equal in width to 2.3% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,400 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 1,400 g, which is heavier than 69.4% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.6% of graphics cards.
Show more

ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 Ti OC Edition vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 35.8% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (608.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    608.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 8 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (48 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    48 vs 40
  • 18.2% higher user score
    User score
    9.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 Ti OC Edition
    the average graphics card
    ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 Ti OC Edition has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.46 vs 8.000).
    9.46 vs 8
  • 8 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (48 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    48 vs 40
  • 48 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (192 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    192 vs 144
  • Includes LHR limiter
    This graphics card includes an LHR limiter, the average graphics card does not.
  • 18.2% higher user score
    User score
    9.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 Ti OC Edition
    the average graphics card
    ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 Ti OC Edition has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.46 vs 8.000).
    9.46 vs 8
  • 2.29x more popular
    ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 Ti OC Edition is more popular than the average graphics card (9.64 vs 4.2).
    9.64 vs 4.22
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • 8 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (48 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    48 vs 40
  • 8 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (48 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    48 vs 40
  • 48 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (192 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    192 vs 144
  • 96.5% higher compute score
    This graphics card has a higher compute score than the average graphics card (23727 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    23,727 points vs 12,074 points
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 35.8% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (608.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    608.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • Includes LHR limiter
    This graphics card includes an LHR limiter, the average graphics card does not.
  • 27.5% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1815 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,815 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 18% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1575 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,575 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 34.9% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (290 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    290 W vs 215 W
  • 32.1% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1188 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,188 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 27.5% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1815 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,815 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 18% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1575 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,575 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 8.6% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (348.5 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    348.5 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 32.1% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1188 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,188 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 83.3% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (4 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    4 MB vs 24 MB
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • 2 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2021 vs 2023).
    June 2021
    2,021 vs 2,023
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (7 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    7 vs 8
  • 32.9% larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (392 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    392 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 34.9% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (290 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    290 W vs 215 W
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 28.9% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (290 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    290 W vs 225 W
  • 0.2 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (2.7 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2.7 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 14.9 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (299.9 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    299.9 mm vs 285 mm
  • 37.1% heavier card weight
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (1400 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    1,400 g vs 1,021 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

W
windowscentral.com
15/07/2021
Summary of the review
ASUS TUF Gaming RTX 3070 Ti review
H
hi-tech.ua
22/10/2021
Summary of the review
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 Ti video card test — How much better than the regular RTX 3070?
C
comptoir-hardware.com
10/06/2021
Summary of the review
Test • GIGABYTE RTX 3070 Ti Gaming OC (Inclus le duel et comparatif dédié de l'Asus TUF Gaming RTX 3070 Ti OC)
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 Ti OC Edition

  • Excellent cooling performance with triple Axial-tech fans that keep temperatures under 65°C during stress tests
  • Highly effective 1440p gaming performance, consistently reaching 100+ FPS in modern titles
  • Robust industrial build quality featuring an all-aluminum shroud and reinforced backplate
  • Impressively quiet operation even under heavy load, with a '0dB' stop mode for light tasks
  • Includes helpful hardware features like a Dual BIOS switch (Quiet/Performance) and power LED indicators
  • Faster rendering speeds for professional 3D work (e.g., Blender) thanks to GDDR6X memory

What we don't like about ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 Ti OC Edition

  • Poor value proposition compared to the base RTX 3070, offering only minor performance gains (~5-10%) for a higher price
  • Noticeable coil whine (buzzing noise) reported by multiple users when the card is under full load
  • High power draw and reduced efficiency compared to the standard 3070
  • The 8GB VRAM is seen as a potential bottleneck for future-proofing or demanding 4K textures
  • Significant physical size (2.7-slot design) may lead to card sag or compatibility issues in smaller cases

Verdict

The Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 Ti OC Edition is a high-performance graphics card built on the NVIDIA Ampere architecture, featuring 6144 CUDA cores and 8GB of ultra-fast GDDR6X VRAM on a 256-bit interface. This factory-overclocked model reaches a boost clock of 1815 MHz in OC mode and 1785 MHz in Gaming mode, delivering 608.3 GB/s of memory bandwidth for smooth 1440p gaming. Its robust triple-fan Axial-tech cooling system utilizes dual ball bearings and a reversed central fan to minimize turbulence, housed within a durable all-metal shroud with military-grade capacitors. Main pros include exceptional thermal management, a sturdy build that resists sagging, and quiet operation under load. However, notable cons include its high 290W power draw requiring at least a 750W PSU, potential coil whine during intense tasks, and a relatively high price point compared to the standard RTX 3070 for modest performance gains.

Compare ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 Ti OC Edition with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 Ti OC Edition and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found