Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v3.0

ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 6700 XT Gaming OC review: 117 specs compared

Avg. price:~£590VRAM:12 GBMemory bus width:192 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):230 W

ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 6700 XT Gaming OC Review: Compare 117 technical specifications and 13 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 6700 XT Gaming OC
7.6/10

Overall score

Score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 25%, List score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

40%

6.9

Technical score

25%

8.1

Reviews score

25%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

10

Sentiment score

â–²Better than 58% of graphics cards
7.6

Value for money

Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.6

Overall score

30%

7.4

Price

â–²Better than 62%
6.9

Technical score

Technical score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

6.1

Performance

24%

6.0

Memory

12%

8.8

Power

11%

9.2

Features

5%

5.9

Design

4%

9.2

Connectivity

â–¼Worse than 51%
8.1

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

80%

7.9

Average grade

20%

8.7

Popularity

Grades by review (13)
9 reviews: 5 with a printed score, 4 estimated from the review. 4 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 60%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-6700-xt-gaming-oc
  • asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-6700-xt-gaming-oc
  • asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-6700-xt-gaming-oc
  • asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-6700-xt-gaming-oc
  • asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-6700-xt-gaming-oc
  • asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-6700-xt-gaming-oc
  • asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-6700-xt-gaming-oc
  • asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-6700-xt-gaming-oc
  • asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-6700-xt-gaming-oc
  • asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-6700-xt-gaming-oc
  • asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-6700-xt-gaming-oc
  • asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-6700-xt-gaming-oc
  • asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-6700-xt-gaming-oc
  • asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-6700-xt-gaming-oc
  • asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-6700-xt-gaming-oc
asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-6700-xt-gaming-oc
asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-6700-xt-gaming-oc
asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-6700-xt-gaming-oc
asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-6700-xt-gaming-oc
asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-6700-xt-gaming-oc
asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-6700-xt-gaming-oc
asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-6700-xt-gaming-oc
asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-6700-xt-gaming-oc
asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-6700-xt-gaming-oc
asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-6700-xt-gaming-oc
asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-6700-xt-gaming-oc
asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-6700-xt-gaming-oc
asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-6700-xt-gaming-oc
asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-6700-xt-gaming-oc
asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-6700-xt-gaming-oc
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

What reviewers say about the ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 6700 XT Gaming OC

Based on 9 · 4

Reviewers praise the cooling and build, but criticise weak ray tracing, the bulky size and lacking upscaling; performance divides opinion.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 6700 XT Gaming OC

Based on 223 owners sharing their experience in online comments

83%positive9%mixed8%negative

Owners praise its strong gaming speed and ample VRAM, while driver issues, heat, and weak ray tracing bother some.

What owners dislike

  • Stuttering and unstable frame rates in games10
  • Owners report driver problems such as random black screens, driver timeouts, and system reboots, especially with automatic Adrenalin driver updates or when Smart Access Memory is enabled.10
  • High hotspot and memory temperatures8
  • Owners say ray tracing performance is weak, with frame rates falling sharply when it is turned on, so many prefer to keep it off.5
  • Some owners say the card falls behind the RTX 3070 and 3060 Ti in some titles, such as Far Cry 6, and the 6800 is clearly faster.4
  • Owners on 4K displays say native 4K gaming can drop to 30 to 40 fps in newer titles, so they rely on FSR upscaling to get playable frame rates.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 6700 XT Gaming OC

Technical score
Technical score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

6.1

Performance

24%

6.0

Memory

12%

8.8

Power

11%

9.2

Features

5%

5.9

Design

4%

9.2

Connectivity

6.9
Reviews score
8.1
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

7.6

Overall score

30%

7.4

Price

7.6
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
12,500 points
This graphics card scores 12,500 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 59.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.4% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
6,412 points
This graphics card scores 6,412 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 63.2% of graphics cards and equal to 0.4% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
20,427 points
This graphics card scores 20,427 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 59.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
7,614 points
This graphics card scores 7,614 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 72.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of graphics cards.
FP32 performance
13.46 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 13.46 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is lower than that of 65.4% of graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say
VRAM
12 GB
This graphics card has 12 GB of VRAM, which is more than 46% of graphics cards and equal to 16% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 16.4% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
192 bit
This graphics card uses a 192 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 31.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 18.7% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
384 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 384 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 60.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.1% of graphics cards.
Effective memory speed
16,000 MHz
This graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 16,000 MHz, which is slower than that of 63.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.5% of graphics cards and equal to 50.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 24.1% of graphics cards and equal to 75.9% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.8% of graphics cards and equal to 77.2% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.8% of graphics cards and equal to 79.2% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 2% of graphics cards and equal to 98% of graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 9% of graphics cards and equal to 88.2% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 90.9% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21.7% of graphics cards and equal to 76% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.3% of graphics cards and equal to 46.3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
16.2 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 16.2 Gbps, which is slower than on 59% of graphics cards and equal to 2% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
230 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 230 W, which is higher than that of 56.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
238 W
This graphics card draws 238 W under peak load, which is higher than 55.1% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
650 W
This graphics card recommends a 650 W PSU, which is lower than that of 39.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 13.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
203 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 203 W, which is lower than that of 54.9% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
230 W
Show more
What reviewers say
Size
322x 141x 56.5 mm
Length
322 mm
This graphics card is 322 mm long, which is longer than 75.3% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.1% of graphics cards.
Height
141 mm
This graphics card is 141 mm tall, which is taller than 85.8% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.9% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.9 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.9 slot/s, which is wider than 69.6% of graphics cards and equal in width to 0.8% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,664 g
This graphics card weighs 1,664 g, which is heavier than 81.2% of Graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say

ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 6700 XT Gaming OC vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryFeaturesConnectivityPowerDesign
  • 4.7% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,622 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    2,622 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 20.9% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,321 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,321 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 24x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (96 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    96 MB vs 4 MB
  • 12.5% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    80%

    7.9

    Average grade

    20%

    8.7

    Popularity

    Grades by review (13)
    9 reviews: 5 with a printed score, 4 estimated from the review. 4 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.1 vs 7.2
  • 14.3% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2000 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
    2,000 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 28.2% higher sentiment score
    10.0 vs 7.8
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    This graphics card supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • 12.5% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    80%

    7.9

    Average grade

    20%

    8.7

    Popularity

    Grades by review (13)
    9 reviews: 5 with a printed score, 4 estimated from the review. 4 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.1 vs 7.2
  • 28.2% higher sentiment score
    10.0 vs 7.8
  • 4.7% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,622 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    2,622 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 20.9% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,321 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,321 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • More FP64 throughput
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 24x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (96 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    96 MB vs 4 MB
  • 14.3% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2000 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
    2,000 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    This graphics card supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • 13 °C lower load temperature
    This graphics card has a lower load temperature than the average graphics card (54 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    54 °C vs 67 °C
  • 58.3% lower idle power draw
    This graphics card has a lower idle power draw than the average graphics card (5 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    5 W vs 12 W
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (frame generation vs multi frame generation).
    frame generation vs multi frame generation
  • 40% larger process node
    This graphics card uses a larger manufacturing process than the average graphics card (7 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a manufacturing process of 5 nm.
    7 nm vs 5 nm
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • 16 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (141 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    141 mm vs 125 mm
  • 15.8% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (16,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
    16,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 40.4% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (13.5 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.6 TFLOPS.
    13.46 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS
  • 2 years older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2021 vs 2023).
    March 2021
    2021 vs 2023
  • 24 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (160 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    160 vs 184
  • 29.9% lower ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (6,412 points vs 9,148 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9,148 points.
    6,412 points vs 9,148 points
  • 9.8% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (20,427 points vs 22,638 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22,638 points.
    20,427 points vs 22,638 points
  • 15.4% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (12,500 points vs 14,779 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14,779 points.
    12,500 points vs 14,779 points
  • 15.8% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (16,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
    16,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 87.5% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (3 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    3 MB vs 24 MB
  • 14.3% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (384 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    384 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (frame generation vs multi frame generation).
    frame generation vs multi frame generation
  • 40% larger process node
    This graphics card uses a larger manufacturing process than the average graphics card (7 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a manufacturing process of 5 nm.
    7 nm vs 5 nm
  • Older OpenCL version
    This graphics card supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 3).
    2.1 vs 3
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 2.1a).
    2.1 vs 2.1a
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • More basic codec support
    This graphics card encodes more basic formats than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 7% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (230 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    230 W vs 215 W
  • 6 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (43 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    43 °C vs 37 °C
  • 16 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (141 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    141 mm vs 125 mm
  • 39.8 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (322 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
    322 mm vs 282.2 mm
  • 0.4 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (2.9 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2.9 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 64.1% heavier
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (1,664 g vs 1,014 g). The average graphics card weighs 1,014 g.
    1,664 g vs 1,014 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Top3Entertainment
≈ estimated
15/10/2021
Open-box review · benchmarks and temperature tests
Verdict
ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 6700 XT Gaming OC has great looks, strong performance and good temperatures, and it is recommended despite being one of the pricier cards.
4.0
Hardware Unboxed
≈ estimated
24/04/2021
Hands-on review · teardown, temperatures and pricing
Verdict
ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 6700 XT Gaming OC has strong cooling and build quality, but its price premium makes it hard to recommend.
Hands-on video, no verdict
Overview video
Overview video

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
techpowerup.com
✓ explicit
17/03/2021
Launch review · Custom card
Verdict
The ASUS ROG Strix RX 6700 XT O12G suits 1440p gaming with 12GB of memory and a silent BIOS, but its narrower memory bus holds it back.
8.0
guru3d.com
≈ estimated
17/03/2021
Lab test · Quiet operation
Verdict
The ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 6700 XT OC is a quiet triple-fan card with a factory overclock, but its narrower 192-bit memory bus limits bandwidth.
7.0
ign.com
✓ explicit
16/07/2021
Benchmark review · Midrange GPU
Verdict
The ASUS ROG Strix RX 6700 XT OC is quiet and cool, but it runs only about 2% faster than the reference card, so most buyers should skip it.
7.5
cgmagonline.com
✓ explicit
15/07/2022
Hands-on test · Triple-fan GPU
Verdict
The ASUS ROG Strix RX 6700 XT OC is a quiet, well-cooled card that handles 1080p and 1440p well, but it lacks DLSS upscaling.
7.0
guru3d.com
≈ estimated
17/03/2021
Lab test · Cooling and noise
Verdict
The ASUS ROG Strix RX 6700 XT OC is near-silent and runs cool, but a 3 to 4% gain over reference is hard to justify.
9.0
hardwareinside.de
≈ estimated
05/07/2021
Hands-on test · Upper midrange card
Verdict
The ASUS ROG Strix RX 6700 XT is a well-built upper midrange card with 12GB of memory that stays cool and quiet, but its cooler is very bulky.
7.4
computerbild.de
✓ explicit
17/09/2021
Lab test · Upper midrange card
Verdict
The ASUS ROG Strix RX 6700 XT is fast at Full HD and WQHD, quiet day to day, but loud under full load and weak at 4K ray tracing.
8.4
ginjfo.com
✓ explicit
17/03/2021
Hands-on test · Cooler design
Verdict
The ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 6700 XT OC has three fans and a quiet mode, but at 322mm long it is very large.
8.0
masgamers.com
≈ estimated
15/11/2021
Hands-on review · 1440p gaming
Verdict
The ASUS ROG Strix RX 6700 XT OC is a sturdy 1440p card with a strong triple-fan cooler, but it has only three DisplayPorts and one HDMI.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 6700 XT Gaming OC

  • Exceptional thermal performance, often running significantly cooler than reference models
  • Excellent build quality with a sturdy metal backplate and 'built like a tank' feel
  • Highly effective triple-fan cooling system that remains very quiet, especially in 'Silent' BIOS mode
  • Strong 1440p gaming performance and high frame rates in e-sports titles
  • Premium aesthetic with customizable RGB lighting that integrates well with other ROG components
  • Dual BIOS feature allowing users to choose between maximum cooling or lower noise levels
  • High VRAM capacity (12GB) providing better future-proofing for modern texture-heavy games compared to 8GB rivals

What customers don't like about ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 6700 XT Gaming OC

  • Significantly higher price tag compared to other RX 6700 XT models, often cited as a 'ROG tax'
  • Large physical footprint (nearly 13 inches long and 2.9-slot width) may not fit in smaller cases
  • Ray tracing performance lags noticeably behind competing NVIDIA cards
  • Lack of a native DLSS alternative (though FSR is available) can affect performance in heavy titles
  • Marginal performance gains (approx. 2-3%) over the base reference card despite the premium cost
  • Possible coil whine reported by some users under high load

Verdict

The ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 6700 XT Gaming OC is a high-performance graphics card built on the AMD RDNA 2 architecture, featuring 2560 stream processors and 12GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit interface. It offers substantial factory overclocks with a boost clock of up to 2622 MHz and is engineered with a massive 2.9-slot heatsink and three Axial-tech fans for superior thermal management. Main characteristics include a premium reinforced frame, addressable RGB lighting compatible with Aura Sync, and a dual BIOS switch for performance or quiet modes. Pros include exceptional 1440p gaming performance, ultra-quiet operation under load, and one of the most robust cooling solutions in its class. However, its large physical footprint requires significant case space, and it carries a higher price premium compared to other RX 6700 XT models.

Compare ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 6700 XT Gaming OC with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 6700 XT Gaming OC and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found