OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 5700 XT Gaming OC Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£430VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):225 W

ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 5700 XT Gaming OC Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 5700 XT Gaming OC
6.3/10

Overall score

Score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

90%

6.0

Technical score

10%

8.9

User score

â–¼Worse than 70% of graphics cards
6.9

Value for money

Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Score components

70%

6.3

Overall score

30%

8.3

Price

â–¼Worse than 65%
6.0

Technical score

Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Score components

44%

4.4

Performance

24%

5.6

Memory

12%

8.8

Power & Cooling

11%

8.4

Platform & Features

5%

6.9

Design

4%

8.7

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 74%
8.9

User score

User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 82% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 82%
  • asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-5700-xt-gaming-oc
  • asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-5700-xt-gaming-oc
  • asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-5700-xt-gaming-oc
  • asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-5700-xt-gaming-oc
  • asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-5700-xt-gaming-oc
  • asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-5700-xt-gaming-oc
  • asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-5700-xt-gaming-oc
asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-5700-xt-gaming-oc
asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-5700-xt-gaming-oc
asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-5700-xt-gaming-oc
asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-5700-xt-gaming-oc
asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-5700-xt-gaming-oc
asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-5700-xt-gaming-oc
asus-rog-strix-radeon-rx-5700-xt-gaming-oc
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 5700 XT Gaming OC

Technical score
Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Score components:

44%

4.4

Performance

24%

5.6

Memory

12%

8.8

Power & Cooling

11%

8.4

Platform & Features

5%

6.9

Design

4%

8.7

Connectivity & Media

6.0
User score
User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 82% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.9
Popularity
Popularity
10/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Popularity:
ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 5700 XT Gaming OC has a popularity score of 10 points, which is higher than that of 91.9% of products in this category.
10
Value for money
Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Score components:

70%

6.3

Overall score

30%

8.3

Price

6.9
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
9,650 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 9,650 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 72.5% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
7,600 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 7,600 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 60.2% of graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
16,900 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 16,900 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 70.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
16,892 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 16,892 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 65% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
10.29 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 10.29 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 74.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
8 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 8 GB of VRAM, which is less than 57.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
448 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 448 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 41.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 11% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12
This graphics card supports DirectX 12, which is older than on 81.8% of graphics cards and equal to 16.9% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
6
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 6 displays, which is more than 98.7% of graphics cards and equal to 1.3% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
16.2 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 16.2 Gbps, which is slower than on 58.4% of graphics cards and equal to 2% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
225 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 225 W, which is higher than that of 54.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.1% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
225 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 225 W under peak load, which is higher than 51.7% of graphics cards and equal to 1.2% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
600 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 600 W PSU, which is lower than that of 54.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 7.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
337 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 337 W, which is higher than that of 80.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.2% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
225 W
Show more
Size
30.5x 13x 5.4 mm
Length
305 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 305 mm long, which is longer than 64.5% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.1% of graphics cards.
Height
130 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 130 mm tall, which is taller than 58.6% of graphics cards and equal in height to 2.9% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.7 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.7 slot/s, which is wider than 65% of graphics cards and equal in width to 2.3% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,453 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 1,453 g, which is heavier than 71.9% of graphics cards.
Show more

ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 5700 XT Gaming OC vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 2 more displays supported
    This graphics card supports more displays than the average graphics card (6 vs 4). The average graphics card supports 4 displays.
    6 vs 4
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • 11.4% higher user score
    User score
    8.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 5700 XT Gaming OC
    the average graphics card
    ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 5700 XT Gaming OC has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.91 vs 8.000).
    8.91 vs 8
  • 2.37x more popular
    ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 5700 XT Gaming OC is more popular than the average graphics card (9.98 vs 4.2).
    9.98 vs 4.22
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • 4x larger L1 cache
    This graphics card has more L1 cache than the average graphics card (512 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    512 vs 128
  • 7.7% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (600 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    600 W vs 650 W
  • 11.4% higher user score
    User score
    8.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 5700 XT Gaming OC
    the average graphics card
    ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 5700 XT Gaming OC has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.91 vs 8.000).
    8.91 vs 8
  • 2.37x more popular
    ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 5700 XT Gaming OC is more popular than the average graphics card (9.98 vs 4.2).
    9.98 vs 4.22
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • 4x larger L1 cache
    This graphics card has more L1 cache than the average graphics card (512 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    512 vs 128
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • 2 more displays supported
    This graphics card supports more displays than the average graphics card (6 vs 4). The average graphics card supports 4 displays.
    6 vs 4
  • 7.7% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (600 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    600 W vs 650 W
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 19.8% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2010 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,010 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 40% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (7 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    7 nm vs 5 nm
  • 5% worse value for money
    ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 5700 XT Gaming OC has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.85 vs 7.2).
    6.85 vs 7.2
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 19.8% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2010 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,010 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 56.8% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (9.8 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    9.75 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 20% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (304.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    304.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 13% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1670 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,670 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 21.2% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (128.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    128.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 25.4% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (16900 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    16,900 points vs 22,653 points
  • 34.3% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (9650 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    9,650 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 24 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (160 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    160 vs 184
  • 17.1% lower ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (7600 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    7,600 points vs 9,166 points
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 26.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (14000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 83.3% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (4 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    4 MB vs 24 MB
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • 40% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (7 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    7 nm vs 5 nm
  • No mesh shaders
    This graphics card does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No XeSS support
    This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 4 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2019 vs 2023).
    August 2019
    2,019 vs 2,023
  • Lower VRS tier
    This graphics card supports a lower VRS tier than the average graphics card (Tier 1 vs Tier 2).
    Tier 1 vs Tier 2
  • Older DirectX version
    This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12 vs 12 Ultimate).
    12 vs 12 Ultimate
  • Older OpenCL version
    This graphics card supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 3).
    2.1 vs 3.0
  • No sampler feedback
    This graphics card does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (7 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    7 vs 8
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (1 vs 3.1).
    1.0 vs 3.1
  • 55% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (10300 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    10,300 million vs 22,900 million
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.0b vs 2.1).
    2.0b vs 2.1
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 49.8% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (337 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    337 W vs 225 W
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 11 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (48 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    48 °C vs 37 °C
  • 4.7% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (225 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    225 W vs 215 W
  • 20 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (305 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    305 mm vs 285 mm
  • 5 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (130 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    130 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.2 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (2.7 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2.7 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 42.3% heavier card weight
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (1453 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    1,453 g vs 1,021 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

O
overclock3d.net
12/08/2019
Summary of the review
ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 5700 XT Review - OC3D
G
guru3d.com
12/08/2019
Summary of the review
ASUS Radeon RX 5700 XT ROG STRIX review
T
techpowerup.com
12/08/2019
Summary of the review
ASUS Radeon RX 5700 XT STRIX OC Review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 5700 XT Gaming OC

  • High-end 1440p gaming performance with stable frame rates above 60fps in modern titles.
  • Quiet operation thanks to triple Axial-tech fans and a massive 2.7-slot heatsink.
  • Premium build quality with a reinforced frame, solid backplate, and 14-phase VRM.
  • Dual BIOS allows users to switch between Performance and Quiet modes to suit their needs.
  • Aesthetic appeal with customizable Aura Sync RGB lighting on the shroud and backplate.

What we don't like about ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 5700 XT Gaming OC

  • Initial manufacturing defect involving loose/long screws that led to poor mounting pressure and overheating.
  • Premium price point that often significantly exceeds the base MSRP for RX 5700 XT cards.
  • Massive physical size (305mm length) makes it incompatible with many compact PC cases.
  • High power consumption compared to competitors, requiring a minimum 600W PSU and dual 8-pin connectors.
  • Limited overclocking headroom due to aggressive factory settings already pushing the card's limits.

Verdict

The ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 5700 XT Gaming OC is a high-end graphics card built on AMD’s 7nm RDNA architecture, featuring 2,560 stream processors and 8GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus. Designed for 1440p dominance, this model boasts a substantial factory overclock with a boost clock of up to 2,035 MHz and a 2.7-slot cooling system equipped with triple Axial-tech fans and MaxContact technology for superior thermal transfer. Key pros include exceptional cooling performance compared to reference models, a dual BIOS for performance or quiet operation, and premium build quality with a reinforced frame and Aura Sync RGB lighting. However, common cons include its massive footprint that may cause sag, a significantly higher price tag than other 5700 XT variants, and increased power requirements needing dual 8-pin connectors and a 600W power supply.

Compare ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 5700 XT Gaming OC with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 5700 XT Gaming OC and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found