Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v3.0

ASUS ProArt GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB review: 117 specs compared

Avg. price:~£430VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:128 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):165 W

ASUS ProArt GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB Review: Compare 117 technical specifications and 4 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

ASUS ProArt GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
7.6/10

Overall score

Score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 25%, List score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

40%

7.0

Technical score

25%

8.0

Reviews score

25%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

8.8

Sentiment score

â–²Better than 55% of graphics cards
7.8

Value for money

Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.6

Overall score

30%

8.3

Price

â–²Better than 86%
7.0

Technical score

Technical score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

6.1

Performance

24%

5.9

Memory

12%

9.3

Power

11%

9.5

Features

5%

7.3

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity

â–²Better than 52%
8.0

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

80%

8.1

Average grade

20%

8.0

Popularity

Grades by review (4)
3 reviews: 1 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 51%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • asus-proart-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-16gb
  • asus-proart-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-16gb
  • asus-proart-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-16gb
  • asus-proart-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-16gb
  • asus-proart-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-16gb
  • asus-proart-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-16gb
  • asus-proart-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-16gb
  • asus-proart-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-16gb
  • asus-proart-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-16gb
  • asus-proart-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-16gb
  • asus-proart-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-16gb
  • asus-proart-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-16gb
  • asus-proart-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-16gb
  • asus-proart-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-16gb
  • asus-proart-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-16gb
asus-proart-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-16gb
asus-proart-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-16gb
asus-proart-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-16gb
asus-proart-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-16gb
asus-proart-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-16gb
asus-proart-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-16gb
asus-proart-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-16gb
asus-proart-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-16gb
asus-proart-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-16gb
asus-proart-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-16gb
asus-proart-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-16gb
asus-proart-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-16gb
asus-proart-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-16gb
asus-proart-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-16gb
asus-proart-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-16gb
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

What reviewers say about the ASUS ProArt GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

Based on 3 · 1

Reviewers love how quiet it runs, but most complain about its demanding power requirements.
Praised
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the ASUS ProArt GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

Based on 151 owners sharing their experience in online comments

77%positive13%mixed10%negative

Owners praise its efficient gaming and AI performance, while price and limited memory cause the most frustration.

What owners dislike

  • Many owners feel the price is high for the performance, especially at launch, and say it was better value when it dropped to around 400 to 450 dollars or euros.14
  • Games that use more than 8GB of VRAM stutter, freeze, or run out of memory at higher settings, so owners of the 8GB version report problems in newer titles.7
  • Owners report games crashing or freezing when VRAM fills up, for example in Resident Evil 4 and Spider-Man Remastered, and some report crashes with ray tracing enabled.3
  • Owners say it is a 1080p card rather than a 1440p card, and say 1440p or 4K performance drops below expectations in demanding games.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card ASUS ProArt GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

Technical score
Technical score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

6.1

Performance

24%

5.9

Memory

12%

9.3

Power

11%

9.5

Features

5%

7.3

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity

7.0
Reviews score
8.0
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

7.6

Overall score

30%

8.3

Price

7.8
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
13,432 points
This graphics card scores 13,432 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 55.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
8,000 points
This graphics card scores 8,000 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 58.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.9% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
22,710 points
This graphics card scores 22,710 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 52.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
12,063 points
This graphics card scores 12,063 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 50.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
FP32 performance
22.06 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 22.06 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is lower than that of 52.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
16 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 62% of graphics cards and equal to 28.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 16.4% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
128 bit
This graphics card uses a 128 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 68.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 26.7% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
288 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 288 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 69.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 6.5% of graphics cards.
Effective memory speed
18,000 MHz
This graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 18,000 MHz, which is slower than that of 51.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 8.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.5% of graphics cards and equal to 50.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x8
This graphics card uses x8 PCIe lanes, which is fewer than 75.9% of graphics cards and equal to 22.9% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.8% of graphics cards and equal to 77.2% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.8% of graphics cards and equal to 79.2% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 2% of graphics cards and equal to 98% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 9% of graphics cards and equal to 88.2% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 90.9% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21.7% of graphics cards and equal to 76% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.3% of graphics cards and equal to 46.3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
16.2 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 16.2 Gbps, which is slower than on 59% of graphics cards and equal to 2% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
165 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 165 W, which is lower than that of 65.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.5% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
165 W
This graphics card draws 165 W under peak load, which is lower than 68.7% of graphics cards and equal to 2.1% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
650 W
This graphics card recommends a 650 W PSU, which is lower than that of 39.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 13.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
165 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 165 W, which is lower than that of 69.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.2% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
165 W
Show more
What reviewers say
Size
300x 120x 50 mm
Length
300 mm
This graphics card is 300 mm long, which is longer than 57.3% of graphics cards and equal in length to 2.9% of graphics cards.
Height
120 mm
This graphics card is 120 mm tall, which is shorter than 59.3% of graphics cards and equal in height to 5.3% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.5 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s, which is slimmer than 35.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 14.7% of graphics cards.
Weight
960 g
This graphics card weighs 960 g, which is lighter than 58.1% of Graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of Graphics cards.
Show more

ASUS ProArt GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryFeaturesConnectivityPowerDesign
  • 7.2% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,685 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    2,685 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 20.3% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,310 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,310 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 28.6% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
    2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 23.3% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (165 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    165 W vs 215 W
  • 11.1% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    80%

    8.1

    Average grade

    20%

    8.0

    Popularity

    Grades by review (4)
    3 reviews: 1 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.0 vs 7.2
  • 9.95x higher BF16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (353 TFLOPS vs 35.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.48 TFLOPS.
    353 TFLOPS vs 35.48 TFLOPS
  • 5.98x higher FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP16 performance than the average graphics card (176.4 TFLOPS vs 29.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.5 TFLOPS.
    176.4 TFLOPS vs 29.5 TFLOPS
  • 11.1% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    80%

    8.1

    Average grade

    20%

    8.0

    Popularity

    Grades by review (4)
    3 reviews: 1 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.0 vs 7.2
  • 4.8% better value for money
    ASUS ProArt GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has better value for money than the average graphics card (7.77 vs 7.4).
    7.77 vs 7.41
  • 12.8% higher sentiment score
    8.8 vs 7.8
  • 7.2% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,685 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    2,685 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 20.3% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,310 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,310 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 9.95x higher BF16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (353 TFLOPS vs 35.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.48 TFLOPS.
    353 TFLOPS vs 35.48 TFLOPS
  • 5.98x higher FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP16 performance than the average graphics card (176.4 TFLOPS vs 29.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.5 TFLOPS.
    176.4 TFLOPS vs 29.5 TFLOPS
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 28.6% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
    2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 4x higher HDMI bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher HDMI bandwidth than the average graphics card (48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps). The average graphics card has HDMI bandwidth of 12 Gbps.
    48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps
  • 23.3% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (165 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    165 W vs 215 W
  • 12 °C lower load temperature
    This graphics card has a lower load temperature than the average graphics card (55 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    55 °C vs 67 °C
  • 25% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (165 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
    165 W vs 220 W
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
    128 bit vs 192 bit
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (frame generation vs multi frame generation).
    frame generation vs multi frame generation
  • 35.7% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (288 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    288 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 48 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (136 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    136 vs 184
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 16 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (48 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    48 vs 64
  • 6 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (34 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    34 vs 40
  • 48 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (136 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    136 vs 184
  • 16 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (48 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    48 vs 64
  • 6 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (34 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    34 vs 40
  • 24.6% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (121.7 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 161.3 GPixel/s.
    121.7 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s
  • 6 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (34 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    34 vs 40
  • 8.7% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (345 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
    345 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
    128 bit vs 192 bit
  • 35.7% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (288 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    288 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 5.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (18,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
    18,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (frame generation vs multi frame generation).
    frame generation vs multi frame generation
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 17.8 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (300 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
    300 mm vs 282.2 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Northern Viking Everyday
≈ estimated
11/03/2025
Unboxing · Heaven benchmark in a self-built PC
Verdict
ASUS ProArt GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB posts strong benchmark results and should suit both work and play.
Shop video
Not graded
Overview video
Overview video

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
xda-developers.com
✓ explicit
21/12/2023
Full review · Cooling and gaming
Verdict
The ASUS ProArt GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a cool, quiet creator card that handles 1440p well, but its speed matches other RTX 4060 Ti cards.
6.0
elchapuzasinformatico.com
≈ estimated
29 de noviembre de 2023
Full review · Creative graphics card
Verdict
The ASUS ProArt GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is a cool, quiet card for creative professionals who want extra memory, though its 300mm length suits roomy cases.
9.0
masgamers.com
≈ estimated
07/05/2024
Review · Quiet design for creators
Verdict
The ASUS ProArt GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB runs quiet and cool with a black-and-gold design, suiting creators who prefer clean looks over RGB lighting.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about ASUS ProArt GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

  • Generous 16GB VRAM is excellent for creative apps like video editing, VFX, and AI modeling (LLMs/Stable Diffusion).
  • Exceptional thermal performance with triple axial-tech fans that stay cool and quiet under load.
  • Aesthetic, understated 'ProArt' design with no RGB, ideal for professional workstations.
  • Highly power-efficient architecture that requires only a single 8-pin power connector.
  • Support for NVIDIA features like DLSS 3 Frame Generation and AV1 encoding for high-quality streaming.

What customers don't like about ASUS ProArt GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

  • Limited 128-bit memory bus can bottle-neck performance at higher resolutions (4K) despite the large VRAM.
  • Significantly higher price point compared to the 8GB version with minimal gaming performance gains in many titles.
  • Large physical footprint (triple-fan design) may be difficult to fit in smaller or compact cases.
  • Lacks support for DisplayPort 2.0, which is found on competing cards from other brands.

Verdict

The ASUS ProArt GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is a creator-focused graphics card built on the NVIDIA Ada Lovelace architecture, featuring 4,352 CUDA cores and a significant 16GB of GDDR6 VRAM. It operates with a boost clock of up to 2685 MHz in OC mode and 2655 MHz in default mode, paired with an 18 Gbps memory speed across a 128-bit interface. Its main characteristics include a minimalist black and rose gold design, a 2.5-slot cooling system with three Axial-tech fans, and a single 8-pin power connector requirement. Key pros include its ample VRAM for memory-intensive creative workloads (like 3D rendering and video editing), highly efficient and quiet cooling, and a compact 300mm length that fits easily into diverse PC cases. However, main cons include a narrow 128-bit memory bus that can bottleneck performance at higher resolutions and a higher price point compared to the 8GB model without offering proportional gains in most standard gaming scenarios.

Compare ASUS ProArt GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of ASUS ProArt GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found