OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Super Evo Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£620VRAM:12 GBMemory bus width:192 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):220 W

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Super Evo Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Super Evo
7.9/10

Overall score

Score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 65% of models
Score components

90%

7.7

Technical score

10%

9.3

User score

â–²Better than 65% of graphics cards
7.7

Value for money

Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 75% of models
Score components

70%

7.9

Overall score

30%

7.2

Price

â–²Better than 75%
7.7

Technical score

Technical score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 61% of models
Score components

44%

7.7

Performance

24%

6.4

Memory

12%

7.8

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

8.4

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

â–²Better than 61%
9.3

User score

User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Score components

70%

9.1

User ratings

30%

9.9

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
★Better than 92%
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-4070-super-evo
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-4070-super-evo
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-4070-super-evo
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-4070-super-evo
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-4070-super-evo
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-4070-super-evo
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-4070-super-evo
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-4070-super-evo
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-4070-super-evo
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-4070-super-evo
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Super Evo

Technical score
Technical score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 61% of models
Score components:

44%

7.7

Performance

24%

6.4

Memory

12%

7.8

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

8.4

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

7.7
User score
User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Score components

70%

9.1

User ratings

30%

9.9

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
9.3
Popularity
Popularity
9.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 91% of models
Popularity:
ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Super Evo has a popularity score of 9.9 points, which is higher than that of 91.2% of products in this category.
9.9
Value for money
Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 75% of models
Score components:

70%

7.9

Overall score

30%

7.2

Price

7.7
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
19,568 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 19,568 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 63.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
20,100 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 20,100 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 87.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.4% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
30,564 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 30,564 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 72% of graphics cards and equal to 0.8% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
29,956 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 29,956 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 95.5% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
35.48 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 35.48 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 64.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
12 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 12 GB of VRAM, which is more than 45.5% of graphics cards and equal to 16% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6X
GDDR version
GDDR6X
This graphics card uses GDDR6X memory, which is newer than on 56.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
192 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 192 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 50.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 18.8% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
504.2 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 504.2 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 55.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
21.6 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 21.6 Gbps, which is faster than on 50.5% of graphics cards and equal to 2% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
220 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 220 W, which is higher than that of 50.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.2% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
220 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 220 W under peak load, which is lower than 48.5% of graphics cards and equal to 3.4% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 750 W PSU, which is higher than that of 64.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 17.1% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
250 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 250 W, which is higher than that of 55.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.4% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
220 W
Show more
Size
227.2x 123.2x 49.6 mm
Length
227.2 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 227.2 mm long, which is shorter than 82.9% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.6% of graphics cards.
Height
123.2 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 123.2 mm tall, which is shorter than 54.8% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.5% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.5 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s, which is slimmer than 36.3% of graphics cards and equal in width to 14.7% of graphics cards.
Weight
684 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 684 g, which is lighter than 80.3% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Super Evo vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 16 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (56 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    56 vs 40
  • 16 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (56 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    56 vs 40
  • 57.8 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (227.2 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    227.2 mm vs 285 mm
  • 45.4% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (554.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    554.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 2.19x higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (20100 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    20,100 points vs 9,166 points
  • 60.1% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (36.1 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    36.13 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 80 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (224 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    224 vs 144
  • 12x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    48 MB vs 4 MB
  • 16.5% higher user score
    User score
    9.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Super Evo
    the average graphics card
    ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Super Evo has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.32 vs 8.000).
    9.32 vs 8
  • 2.34x more popular
    ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Super Evo is more popular than the average graphics card (9.88 vs 4.2).
    9.88 vs 4.22
  • 16 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (56 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    56 vs 40
  • 16 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (56 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    56 vs 40
  • 45.4% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (554.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    554.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 2.19x higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (20100 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    20,100 points vs 9,166 points
  • 80 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (224 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    224 vs 144
  • 60.1% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (36.1 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    36.13 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 16 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (80 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    80 vs 64
  • 40 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (224 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    224 vs 184
  • 34.9% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (30564 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    30,564 points vs 22,653 points
  • 21.3% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (198 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    198 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 2.48x higher compute score
    This graphics card has a higher compute score than the average graphics card (29956 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    29,956 points vs 12,074 points
  • 2x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    48 MB vs 24 MB
  • 12x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    48 MB vs 4 MB
  • 10.5% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (21000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    21,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 12.5% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (504.2 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    504.2 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 2.1).
    2.1a vs 2.1
  • 4x higher HDMI bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher HDMI bandwidth than the average graphics card (48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps). The average graphics card has HDMI bandwidth of 12 Gbps.
    48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps
  • More NVENC sessions
    This graphics card has more concurrent NVENC sessions than the average graphics card (12 vs 8). The average graphics card has 8 concurrent NVENC sessions.
    12 vs 8
  • 57.8 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (227.2 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    227.2 mm vs 285 mm
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1313 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 1.2% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2475 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,475 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • 5 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (100 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    100 °C vs 95 °C
  • 1.2% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2475 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,475 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1313 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (3 vs 3.1).
    3.0 vs 3.1
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 5 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (100 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    100 °C vs 95 °C
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

O
overclocking.com
19/02/2024
Summary of the review
Test : ASUS Dual RTX 4070 SUPER
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Super Evo

  • Strong 1440p gaming performance, outperforming the previous generation RTX 3080 in many scenarios
  • Extremely quiet operation and effective cooling even under heavy load
  • Highly power efficient with low energy consumption for its performance tier
  • Features a physical Dual BIOS switch for choosing between performance and quiet modes
  • Compact dual-slot/dual-fan design fits easily into smaller PC cases

What we don't like about ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Super Evo

  • The 'Evo' version uses a slightly smaller radiator and fewer heat pipes than the original non-Evo Dual model
  • 12GB of VRAM may be a limiting factor for some future 4K gaming or heavy productivity tasks
  • High price point for a mid-to-high-range card compared to historical MSRPs
  • The 16-pin power connector (12VHPWR) can be cumbersome for users with older power supplies

Verdict

The ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Super Evo is a compact, SFF-ready graphics card based on the NVIDIA Ada Lovelace architecture, featuring 7,168 CUDA cores, 12GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, and a boost clock of up to 2,505 MHz (or 2,550 MHz in OC mode). Its primary characteristics include a 2.5-slot design measuring just 227.2 mm in length, dual Axial-tech fans with 0dB technology for silent low-load operation, and a 16-pin power connector requiring a recommended 750W PSU. Main pros include exceptional 1440p gaming performance, high power efficiency, and broad case compatibility due to its small footprint. However, notable cons include its 12GB VRAM buffer which may limit future-proofing in high-resolution titles and reports of high fan noise and temperatures when pushed to full 100% utilization in demanding games.

Compare ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Super Evo with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Super Evo and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found