OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Evo Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£560VRAM:12 GBMemory bus width:192 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):200 W

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Evo Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Evo
7.5/10

Overall score

Score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 58% of models
Score components

90%

7.4

Technical score

10%

8.1

User score

▲Better than 58% of graphics cards
7.5

Value for money

Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 64% of models
Score components

70%

7.5

Overall score

30%

7.6

Price

▲Better than 64%
7.4

Technical score

Technical score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 58% of models
Score components

44%

6.9

Performance

24%

6.5

Memory

12%

8.2

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

8.4

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

▲Better than 58%
8.1

User score

User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 61% of models
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

5.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▲Better than 61%
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-4070-evo
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-4070-evo
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Evo

Technical score
Technical score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 58% of models
Score components:

44%

6.9

Performance

24%

6.5

Memory

12%

8.2

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

8.4

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

7.4
User score
User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 61% of models
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

5.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.1
Popularity
Popularity
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 55% of models
Popularity:
ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Evo has a popularity score of 5.4 points, which is higher than that of 55.4% of products in this category.
5.4
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 64% of models
Score components:

70%

7.5

Overall score

30%

7.6

Price

7.5
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
17,000 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 17,000 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 54.9% of graphics cards and equal to 1.8% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
20,100 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 20,100 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 87.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.4% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
30,163 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 30,163 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 71.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
14,665 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 14,665 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 58.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
29.15 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 29.15 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 56.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
12 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 12 GB of VRAM, which is more than 45.5% of graphics cards and equal to 16% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6X
GDDR version
GDDR6X
This graphics card uses GDDR6X memory, which is newer than on 56.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
192 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 192 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 50.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 18.8% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
504 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 504 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 53.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
32.4 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 32.4 Gbps, which is faster than on 57.6% of graphics cards and equal to 21.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
200 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 200 W, which is lower than that of 51.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.9% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
200 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 200 W under peak load, which is lower than 54% of graphics cards and equal to 3.6% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
650 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 650 W PSU, which is lower than that of 40.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 13.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
216 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 216 W, which is lower than that of 53.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.2% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
200 W
Show more
Size
227.2x 123.24x 49.6 mm
This graphics card measures 227.2x123.24x 49.6 mm, which is more compact than 72.9% of graphics cards and equal in size to 1.3% of graphics cards.
Length
227.2 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 227.2 mm long, which is shorter than 82.9% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.6% of graphics cards.
Height
123.24 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 123.24 mm tall, which is shorter than 54.2% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.5% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.5 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s, which is slimmer than 36.3% of graphics cards and equal in width to 14.7% of graphics cards.
Weight
684 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 684 g, which is lighter than 80.3% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Evo vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 57.8 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (227.2 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    227.2 mm vs 285 mm
  • 2.19x higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (20100 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    20,100 points vs 9,166 points
  • 1.8% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2550 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,550 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 12x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    48 MB vs 4 MB
  • 10.5% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (21000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    21,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 12.5% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (504 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    504 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (227.2x123.24 x 49.6 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    227.2x123.24 x 49.6 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • 2.19x higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (20100 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    20,100 points vs 9,166 points
  • 1.8% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2550 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,550 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 33.2% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (30163 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    30,163 points vs 22,653 points
  • 40 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (184 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    184 vs 144
  • 29.2% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (29.2 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    29.15 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 6 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (46 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    46 vs 40
  • 19.5% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (455.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    455.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 12x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    48 MB vs 4 MB
  • 10.5% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (21000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    21,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 12.5% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (504 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    504 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 50% larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (36 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    36 MB vs 24 MB
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 2.1).
    2.1a vs 2.1
  • 57.8 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (227.2 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    227.2 mm vs 285 mm
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (227.2x123.24 x 49.6 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    227.2x123.24 x 49.6 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1313 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (3 vs 3.1).
    3.0 vs 3.1
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1313 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (3 vs 3.1).
    3.0 vs 3.1
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
profesionalreview.com
12/04/2023
Summary of the review
Asus Dual RTX 4070 12G Review en Español (Análisis completo)
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Evo

  • Excellent power efficiency, delivering RTX 3080-level performance with significantly lower power draw
  • Compact 2.5-slot design makes it ideal for small form factor (SFF) builds
  • Quiet operation under light to moderate loads thanks to 0dB technology and dual Axial-tech fans
  • Native 8-pin PCIe power connector avoids the need for 12VHPWR adapters used in other 40-series cards
  • Solid build quality featuring an aluminum backplate and stainless steel bracket
  • Strong performance in 1440p gaming and AI-driven tasks like DLSS 3 frame generation

What we don't like about ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Evo

  • Can become noticeably loud and run hotter (up to 80°C+) in compact cases or during 100% GPU usage
  • Price-to-performance ratio is seen by some as a poor value compared to older or competing AMD cards
  • Limited to 12GB VRAM, which may be a bottleneck for future 4K gaming or memory-intensive titles
  • The 192-bit memory bus is narrower than previous generation cards in this tier
  • A few users reported an aggressive initial fan ramp-up before settling into a quieter profile

Verdict

The ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 EVO is a compact, SFF-ready graphics card featuring 12GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit interface and 5,888 CUDA cores, all powered by the efficient NVIDIA Ada Lovelace architecture. It delivers a boost clock of 2520 MHz (2550 MHz in OC mode) and utilizes a 2.5-slot design with two Axial-tech fans and dual ball bearings for enhanced thermal reliability and broad case compatibility. Main pros include its exceptional power efficiency—performing similarly to an RTX 3080 while using roughly 40% less power—and support for advanced AI features like DLSS 3 Frame Generation for smooth 1440p gaming. However, some users have noted that the card can become audible or run warmer under sustained 100% load in cases with restricted airflow, and its 12GB VRAM may face limitations in future ultra-demanding 4K titles.

Compare ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Evo with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Evo and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found