OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Evo OC Edition 16GB Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£540VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:128 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):165 W

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Evo OC Edition 16GB Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Evo OC Edition 16GB
7.2/10

Overall score

Score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 51% of models
Score components

90%

7.0

Technical score

10%

8.7

User score

▲Better than 51% of graphics cards
7.3

Value for money

Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 53% of models
Score components

70%

7.2

Overall score

30%

7.7

Price

▲Better than 53%
7.0

Technical score

Technical score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 51% of models
Score components

44%

6.1

Performance

24%

6.1

Memory

12%

8.5

Power & Cooling

11%

9.7

Platform & Features

5%

8.4

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

▲Better than 51%
8.7

User score

User score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 75% of models
Score components

70%

9.4

User ratings

30%

7.0

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▲Better than 75%
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-evo-oc-edition-16gb
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-evo-oc-edition-16gb
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-evo-oc-edition-16gb
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-evo-oc-edition-16gb
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-evo-oc-edition-16gb
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-evo-oc-edition-16gb
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-evo-oc-edition-16gb
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-evo-oc-edition-16gb
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-evo-oc-edition-16gb
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-evo-oc-edition-16gb
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-evo-oc-edition-16gb
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-evo-oc-edition-16gb
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-evo-oc-edition-16gb
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-evo-oc-edition-16gb
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Evo OC Edition 16GB

Technical score
Technical score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 51% of models
Score components:

44%

6.1

Performance

24%

6.1

Memory

12%

8.5

Power & Cooling

11%

9.7

Platform & Features

5%

8.4

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

7.0
User score
User score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 75% of models
Score components

70%

9.4

User ratings

30%

7.0

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.7
Popularity
Popularity
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 66% of models
Popularity:
ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Evo OC Edition 16GB has a popularity score of 7 points, which is higher than that of 65.6% of products in this category.
7.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 53% of models
Score components:

70%

7.2

Overall score

30%

7.7

Price

7.3
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
12,000 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 12,000 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 61.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.5% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
8,726 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 8,726 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 52.2% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
22,710 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 22,710 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 52.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
12,063 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 12,063 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 50.8% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
22.84 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 22.84 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 50.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
16 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 61.5% of graphics cards and equal to 28.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
128 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 128 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 69.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 26% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
288 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 288 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 69.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 6.8% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x8
This graphics card uses x8 PCIe lanes, which is fewer than 76.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.2% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
32.4 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 32.4 Gbps, which is faster than on 57.6% of graphics cards and equal to 21.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
165 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 165 W, which is lower than that of 65.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.6% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
160 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 160 W under peak load, which is lower than 71.2% of graphics cards and equal to 3.8% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
650 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 650 W PSU, which is lower than that of 40.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 13.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
165 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 165 W, which is lower than that of 68.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
160 W
Show more
Size
227.2x 123.2x 49.6 mm
Length
227.2 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 227.2 mm long, which is shorter than 82.9% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.6% of graphics cards.
Height
123.24 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 123.24 mm tall, which is shorter than 54.2% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.5% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.5 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s, which is slimmer than 36.3% of graphics cards and equal in width to 14.7% of graphics cards.
Weight
680 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 680 g, which is lighter than 80.5% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.6% of graphics cards.
Show more

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Evo OC Edition 16GB vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 4.8% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2625 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,625 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 20.3% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2310 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,310 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 28.6% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2250 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 57.8 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (227.2 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    227.2 mm vs 285 mm
  • 23.3% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (165 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    165 W vs 215 W
  • 4x higher HDMI bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher HDMI bandwidth than the average graphics card (48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps). The average graphics card has HDMI bandwidth of 12 Gbps.
    48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps
  • 8.4% higher user score
    User score
    8.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Evo OC Edition 16GB
    the average graphics card
    ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Evo OC Edition 16GB has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.67 vs 8.000).
    8.67 vs 8
  • 4.8% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2625 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,625 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 20.3% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2310 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,310 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 28.6% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2250 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 8x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (32 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    32 MB vs 4 MB
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 2.1).
    2.1a vs 2.1
  • 4x higher HDMI bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher HDMI bandwidth than the average graphics card (48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps). The average graphics card has HDMI bandwidth of 12 Gbps.
    48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps
  • 23.3% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (165 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    165 W vs 215 W
  • 26.7% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (165 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    165 W vs 225 W
  • 57.8 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (227.2 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    227.2 mm vs 285 mm
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    128 bit vs 256 bit
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • 35.7% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (288 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    288 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 48 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (136 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    136 vs 184
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 16 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (48 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    48 vs 64
  • 6 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (34 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    34 vs 40
  • 48 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (136 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    136 vs 184
  • 16 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (48 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    48 vs 64
  • 6 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (34 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    34 vs 40
  • 6 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (34 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    34 vs 40
  • 22.8% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (126 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    126 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 6.3% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (357 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    357 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 18.2% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (12000 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    12,000 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    128 bit vs 256 bit
  • 35.7% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (288 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    288 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 5.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (18000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    18,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

V
vividrepairs.co.uk
25/11/2025
Summary of the review
ASUS RTX 4060 TI DUAL EVO Gaming Graphics Card Review 2026
G
geekom.it
30/12/2025
Summary of the review
RTX 4060 in 2026: Ne Vale la Pena?
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Evo OC Edition 16GB

  • Generous 16GB VRAM offers superior longevity and better performance in VRAM-heavy productivity tasks like 4K video editing and AI workloads.
  • Excellent thermal performance with the [Dual EVO cooler](https://www.vividrepairs.co.uk/asus-rtx-4060-ti-dual-evo-gaming-graphics-card-review) maintaining gaming temperatures typically under 70°C.
  • Extremely quiet operation, supported by '0dB Technology' that halts fans during light loads for silent use.
  • High power efficiency with low energy consumption, requiring only a simple single 8-pin power connector.
  • Compact 2.5-slot design and a length of approximately 227mm make it highly compatible with small form factor (SFF) cases.
  • Strong build quality featuring a [protective metal backplate](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9KJCcudTpc) rather than plastic alternatives.
  • Full support for modern features like DLSS 3 Frame Generation and AV1 encoding for high-quality streaming.

What we don't like about ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Evo OC Edition 16GB

  • Questionable value for gamers, as the high price premium over the 8GB model doesn't translate to significantly higher frame rates in most current titles.
  • Limited 128-bit memory bus bandwidth can bottleneck performance at resolutions higher than 1080p.
  • Rasterization performance is frequently outperformed by similarly priced or cheaper competitors like the [AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT](https://www.reddit.com/r/buildapc/comments/1h9z5r0/is_the_asus_dual_rtx4060_ti_evo_oc_edition_16gb/).
  • The 2.5-slot thickness may still be too bulky for some ultra-compact ITX builds.
  • Lack of RGB lighting may be seen as a downside for users wanting a flashier aesthetic for their build.
  • Minimal performance gains over the previous generation's RTX 3060 Ti in standard rasterized gaming.

Verdict

The Asus Dual GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Evo OC Edition 16GB is a compact, 2.5-slot graphics card built on the NVIDIA Ada Lovelace architecture, featuring 4,352 CUDA cores and a boosted OC clock speed of 2,595 MHz. Its standout characteristic is the 16GB of GDDR6 memory, which provides a significant VRAM buffer for texture-heavy 1080p and 1440p gaming, supported by two efficient Axial-tech fans with dual ball bearings and 0dB technology for silent operation under light loads. Main pros include its exceptional power efficiency at 160W, support for DLSS 3 Frame Generation for massive AI-driven performance boosts, and a durable aluminum backplate that ensures structural rigidity in smaller chassis. However, its performance is often limited by a narrow 128-bit memory bus, and it offers diminishing returns for pure gamers compared to the 8GB version or more powerful 1440p alternatives like the RTX 4070.

Compare ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Evo OC Edition 16GB with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Evo OC Edition 16GB and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found