OVERALL

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

ALTERNATIVES

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price: ~£250
VRAM: 8 GB
Memory bus width: 2048 bit
Thermal Design Power (TDP): 210 W

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 review. Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among graphics cards and if it is worth buying.

5.7

Good

5.3

Good

8.7

Excellent

4.2
Gaming
Score components:
45.0%
2.4
Floating-point performance
25.0%
2.8
VRAM
20.0%
?
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4.9
Video editing
Score components:
35.0%
7.0
AV1 encode
30.0%
2.8
VRAM
20.0%
2.4
Floating-point performance
15.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3.6
1080p
Score components:
55.0%
2.4
Floating-point performance
25.0%
2.8
VRAM
10.0%
?
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3.6
1440p
Score components:
50.0%
2.4
Floating-point performance
30.0%
2.8
VRAM
15.0%
?
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3.9
4K
Score components:
40.0%
2.4
Floating-point performance
35.0%
2.8
VRAM
20.0%
?
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version

Best prices in UK

Best rankings

#12 in Best AMD Graphic Cards
#108 in Best Budget Graphic Cards
#229 in Best 8 GB Graphic Cards
#230 in Best AMD Radeon Graphic Cards
#772 in Best Graphic Cards For Video Editing
#785 in Best Graphic Cards For Gaming
#789 in Best Graphic Cards For 1440p Gaming
#900 in Best Graphic Cards

Verdict

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is a high-end graphics card built on the 14nm Vega 10 architecture, featuring 3584 shading units, 56 compute units, and a boost clock speed of 1471 MHz. A standout characteristic is its 8GB of HBM2 memory on a massive 2048-bit bus, providing 410 GB/s of bandwidth. Its main pros include strong 1080p and 1440p gaming performance that often outperforms the GTX 1070, excellent compute capabilities for tasks like rendering, and features like FreeSync and Dual BIOS support. However, it is held back by high power consumption (210W TDP), significant heat generation, and loud operation, especially in reference blower-style models.

Technical Specifications of AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

Overall score

5.7

Show more

Hide

Popularity

What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.

When it matters: When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.

Performance

4.5

Show more

Hide

3DMark Time Spy benchmark score

What it is: Benchmark result from 3DMark Time Spy, a synthetic DirectX 12 test often used as a quick gaming-performance reference.

When it matters: When you need a fast rough performance sort before digging into game-specific reviews and frame-rate data.

Importance: LOW

?

3DMark Port Royal score

What it is: Benchmark result from 3DMark Port Royal, a synthetic test focused on ray tracing performance.

When it matters: When ray tracing matters in the games you actually play and you want one quick way to separate stronger and weaker RT cards.

Importance: LOW

N/A

PassMark (G3D) result

What it is: Overall GPU performance score in PassMark G3D benchmark

When it matters: When you need one broad score to sort cards into rough performance tiers.

Importance: LOW

?

PassMark (DirectCompute) result

What it is: PassMark score for DirectCompute performance tests

When it matters: When compute workloads matter alongside gaming performance.

Importance: LOW

?

Floating-point performance

What it is: Theoretical floating-point compute performance of the GPU.

When it matters: When rendering, AI, or heavy compute work needs strong single-precision throughput.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Memory

4.3

Show more

Hide

VRAM

What it is: Total video memory available on the graphics card

When it matters: When you play at high settings, use texture mods, or work with large creative projects.

Importance: HIGH

Memory type

What it is: Type of graphics memory used (GDDR6, HBM2e, etc.)

When it matters: When memory technology is part of the buying decision because it affects bandwidth class, power use, and product positioning.

Importance: LOW

HBM2

GDDR version

What it is: Generation of GDDR memory used by the graphics card.

When it matters: When you want to separate older memory generations from newer ones before comparing bandwidth, power behavior, and market tier.

Importance: LOW

N/A

Memory bus width

What it is: Width of the memory interface bus in bits

When it matters: When you care about steadier performance at higher resolutions, heavier texture settings, or ray-traced workloads that stress memory traffic.

Importance: HIGH

Maximum memory bandwidth

What it is: Maximum data transfer rate between GPU and its memory

When it matters: When 4K gaming, ray tracing, or creator work can choke a slower memory subsystem.

Importance: HIGH

Show more

Platform & Features

6.7

Show more

Hide

PCI Express (PCIe) version

What it is: Version of PCI Express interface supported

When it matters: When you are pairing the card with an older motherboard and want to avoid leaving bandwidth or future compatibility on the table.

Importance: LOW

PCIe lanes

What it is: Number of PCI Express lanes used for communication

When it matters: When limited lane width could bottleneck the card in some systems.

Importance: LOW

DirectX version

What it is: Highest supported DirectX API version

When it matters: When you play newer Windows games that depend on the latest graphics features.

Importance: LOW

?

Vulkan version

What it is: Highest supported Vulkan API version

When it matters: When modern games, emulators, or creative apps lean on Vulkan support.

Importance: LOW

OpenGL version

What it is: Highest supported OpenGL API version

When it matters: When older games or pro apps still depend on OpenGL compatibility.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Connectivity & Media

7.7

Show more

Hide

Max displays supported

What it is: Total number of external displays supported simultaneously

When it matters: When you run a multi-monitor desk for sim racing, trading, or editing.

Importance: LOW

Max digital resolution

What it is: Maximum supported digital display resolution

When it matters: When you plan to drive 4K or 8K panels at their native resolution.

Importance: LOW

DisplayPort outputs

What it is: Number of DisplayPort video outputs

When it matters: When your setup needs several high-refresh monitors without adapters.

Importance: LOW

DisplayPort version

What it is: Version of DisplayPort standard supported

When it matters: When your monitor setup depends on newer DisplayPort features for higher refresh rates, higher resolution, or better cable flexibility.

Importance: LOW

DisplayPort link rates

What it is: Supported data link rates for DisplayPort connections

When it matters: When you are pushing high resolution and refresh rate over DisplayPort.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Power & Cooling

7.0

Show more

Hide

Thermal Design Power (TDP)

What it is: Typical power consumption under full load (TDP)

When it matters: When you need a realistic idea of power draw before choosing a PSU or case.

Importance: MEDIUM

Power consumption while under peak load

What it is: Peak power draw of the graphics card under maximum load.

When it matters: When transient-heavy gaming loads could stress your power supply.

Importance: LOW

Recommended PSU wattage

What it is: Recommended wattage of the system power supply

When it matters: When you are checking whether your current power supply is enough.

Importance: LOW

Board power limit

What it is: Maximum configurable power limit for the GPU board

When it matters: When you care about how far the card can be pushed through tuning or factory power settings.

Importance: LOW

PCIe power spec

What it is: PCIe power delivery specification followed

When it matters: When you are checking whether the slot and external cables match the card's intended power-delivery standard.

Importance: LOW

210 W

Show more

Design

8.6

Show more

Hide

Size

What it is: Physical size of the GPU card

When it matters: When you need the card to fit a compact case without blocking nearby hardware.

Importance: LOW

?

Length

What it is: Physical length of the GPU card

When it matters: When front radiators or drive cages leave only limited GPU clearance.

Importance: LOW

Height

What it is: Physical height of the GPU card

When it matters: When side panels, brackets, or tight case layouts reduce vertical clearance.

Importance: LOW

Slot width

What it is: Number of PCIe slots occupied by the card

When it matters: When you need room for another PCIe card or better airflow under the GPU.

Importance: LOW

Weight

What it is: Total weight of the graphics card

When it matters: When sag, bracket support, or shipping stress matters in your build.

Importance: LOW

?

Show more

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs the average graphics card

Why is AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 better than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

1,792 bit wider memory bus
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (2,048 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
What it is: Width of the memory interface bus in bits
When it matters: When you care about steadier performance at higher resolutions, heavier texture settings, or ray-traced workloads that stress memory traffic.
Importance: HIGH
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (2,048 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.2048 bit vs 256 bit
16 more compute units
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has more compute units than the average graphics card (56 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
What it is: Total number of shader multiprocessors or compute units
When it matters: When you want a better sense of the GPU's overall parallel hardware resources before relying on game benchmarks alone.
Importance: HIGH
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has more compute units than the average graphics card (56 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.56 vs 40
Includes dual BIOS
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 includes dual BIOS, the average graphics card does not.
What it is: Includes dual BIOS for redundancy or overclocking profiles
When it matters: When you want a safer recovery path after tweaking fan curves or overclock settings, or you need separate quiet and performance profiles.
Importance: LOW
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 includes dual BIOS, the average graphics card does not.
16 mm lower card height
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is shorter than the average graphics card (111 mm vs 127 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 127 mm.
What it is: Physical height of the GPU card
When it matters: When side panels, brackets, or tight case layouts reduce vertical clearance.
Importance: LOW
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is shorter than the average graphics card (111 mm vs 127 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 127 mm.111 mm vs 127 mm
40 more TMUs
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has more TMUs than the average graphics card (224 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
What it is: Total count of texture mapping units on the GPU
When it matters: When texture-heavy gaming performance matters and you want extra hardware context behind texture-rate claims.
Importance: HIGH
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has more TMUs than the average graphics card (224 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.224 vs 184
Better FP64 ratio
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
What it is: Ratio of double-precision (FP64) to single-precision (FP32) performance
When it matters: When you need to know whether FP64 is merely present or genuinely useful.
Importance: LOW
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).1:16 vs 1:64
Supports multi-GPU linking
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
What it is: Supports NVIDIA SLI or AMD CrossFire multi-GPU setup
When it matters: When you still run legacy multi-GPU gaming or rendering workflows.
Importance: LOW
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
2.12x cheaper
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is cheaper than the average graphics card (£250 vs £530).
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is cheaper than the average graphics card (£250 vs £530).£250 vs £530
16 more compute units
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has more compute units than the average graphics card (56 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
40 more TMUs
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has more TMUs than the average graphics card (224 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
Better FP64 ratio
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
1,792 bit wider memory bus
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (2,048 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
Supports multi-GPU linking
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
Includes dual BIOS
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 includes dual BIOS, the average graphics card does not.
16 mm lower card height
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is shorter than the average graphics card (111 mm vs 127 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 127 mm.

Platform & Features

Power & Cooling

Why is AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 worse than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

41.2% lower boost clock speed
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,471 MHz vs 2,500 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,500 MHz.
39.8% lower base clock speed
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,156 MHz vs 1,920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1,920 MHz.
No CUDA support
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
43% lower pixel rate
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (94.1 GPixel/s vs 165.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 165.2 GPixel/s.
54.1% lower FP32 performance
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (10.5 TFLOPS vs 22.86 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.86 TFLOPS.
12.6% lower texture rate
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (329.5 GTexel/s vs 376.8 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 376.8 GTexel/s.
54.4% lower compute throughput
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (10.5 TFLOPS vs 23.105 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 23.105 TFLOPS.
91.6% slower memory speed
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (1,600 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
4 GB less VRAM
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
54.3% slower VRAM clock
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (800 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
87.5% smaller L2 cache
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (4 MB vs 32 MB). The average graphics card has 32 MB L2 cache.
87.5% smaller L1 cache
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (16 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
8.5% lower memory bandwidth
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (410 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
2.8x larger process node
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has a higher process node than the average graphics card (14 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
No DLSS support
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
Older PCIe version
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4.0).
6 older
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 was released earlier than the average graphics card (2,017 vs 2,023).
No AI upscalers
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 does not support AI upscalers, the average graphics card does.
No XeSS support
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
No mesh shaders
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
No DirectStorage support
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 does not support DirectStorage, the average graphics card does.
Older Vulkan version
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.3 vs 1.4).
Older OpenCL version
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 3.0).
No sampler feedback
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
62.7% larger GPU die
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (495 mm² vs 304.25 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 304.25 mm².
Older shader model
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.7 vs 6.8).
No AV1 encoding
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
No AV1 decoding
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
No DSC support
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 does not support DSC, the average graphics card does.
Older DisplayPort version
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.4 vs 1.4a).
Older HDCP version
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
2 fewer fans
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
No fan stop
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
12 °C lower thermal ceiling
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (105 °C vs 93 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 93 °C.
7 dB noisier under load
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (42 dB vs 35 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35 dB.
45.5% higher idle power draw
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has a higher idle power draw than the average graphics card (16 W vs 11 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 11 W.
8 °C higher load temperature
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (75 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
No RGB lighting
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
41.2% lower boost clock speed
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,471 MHz vs 2,500 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,500 MHz.
What it is: Maximum boost frequency the GPU can reach under load
When it matters: When you want a rough idea of peak advertised frequency, while knowing real sustained clocks still depend on cooling and power limits.
Importance: HIGH
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,471 MHz vs 2,500 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,500 MHz.1471 MHz vs 2500 MHz
2 fewer fans
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
What it is: Total number of cooling fans
When it matters: When you compare cooler designs and want one more clue about thermal potential.
Importance: MEDIUM
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).1 vs 3
2.8x larger process node
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has a higher process node than the average graphics card (14 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
What it is: Size of the manufacturing process in nanometers
When it matters: When process node differences may affect power, heat, and overall efficiency.
Importance: MEDIUM
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has a higher process node than the average graphics card (14 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.14 nm vs 5 nm
39.8% lower base clock speed
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,156 MHz vs 1,920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1,920 MHz.
What it is: Base operating frequency of the GPU core under standard conditions
When it matters: When you want to understand the card's guaranteed starting frequency instead of looking only at optimistic boost figures.
Importance: HIGH
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,156 MHz vs 1,920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1,920 MHz.1156 MHz vs 1920 MHz
91.6% slower memory speed
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (1,600 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
What it is: Effective memory data rate combining clock and bus width
When it matters: When you compare how quickly each card can push data through its memory subsystem.
Importance: MEDIUM
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (1,600 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.1600 MHz vs 19000 MHz
No CUDA support
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
What it is: Supports CUDA parallel computing platform
When it matters: When your apps or AI tools specifically depend on the CUDA software stack.
Importance: MEDIUM
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
No DLSS support
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
What it is: Supports NVIDIA DLSS upscaling technology
When it matters: When you play NVIDIA-supported games and want better frame rates at higher settings.
Importance: LOW
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
4 GB less VRAM
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
What it is: Total video memory available on the graphics card
When it matters: When you play at high settings, use texture mods, or work with large creative projects.
Importance: HIGH
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.8 GB vs 12 GB

Platform & Features

Connectivity & Media

Power & Cooling

Graphic comparison of AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 and

Attribute category

Attribute

No results found

Third-party reviews

United Kingdom

United States

(Reviews last updated: June 2026)

What customers like about AMD Radeon RX Vega 56?

Strong 1440p and 1080p high-refresh gaming performance, often matching or beating the NVIDIA GTX 1070
Excellent compute performance, making it suitable for tasks like AI acceleration, mining, and rendering
Highly tweakable, with significant gains possible through undervolting and flashing the Vega 64 BIOS
Support for AMD FreeSync, providing a smooth gaming experience without the price premium of G-Sync monitors
Equipped with 8GB of HBM2 memory, offering high bandwidth that benefits higher resolutions like 1440p ultrawide
Good long-term value on the used market, often found at budget-friendly prices years after launch

What customers dislike about AMD Radeon RX Vega 56?

High power consumption compared to NVIDIA's Pascal and newer RDNA architectures
Reference models with blower-style coolers tend to be very loud and run hot
Struggles at 4K resolution without significant lowering of in-game detail settings
Poor out-of-the-box consistency; often requires manual tuning (undervolting) for optimal thermal and noise performance
Reported instability and driver-related issues like black or blue screens in some user configurations
Inconsistent support for older technologies like Crossfire in modern gaming titles

Expert reviews

rockpapershotgun.com

09/03/2018

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 review | Rock Paper Shotgun

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Review Summary The Asus Radeon RX Vega 56 ROG Strix OC Gaming graphics card delivers impressive performance for 1440p gaming and acts as a competent entry-level 4K option. In real-world benchmarks, the card excels in titles like Hitman, Doom, and Wolfenstein II, pushing steady 60fps frame rates on high or ultra settings even at 4K resolutions. Its hardware...Read more

techadvisor.com

23/11/2017

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Review: Alternative to a GTX 1070

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is a 14nm "Vega 10" architecture graphics card designed to compete directly with Nvidia’s GTX 1070 and GTX 1070 Ti, offering 56 compute units, 3,584 stream processors, and a boost clock speed up to 1,471 MHz. Equipped with 8GB of HBM2 high-bandwidth memory delivering 410 GB/s of bandwidth, it easily handles smooth virtual reality gameplay and stable 60 fps...Read more

hardwarecanucks.com

28/09/2017

AMD RX Vega 64 & Vega 56 Performance Review

AMD RX Vega 64 & 56 Performance Review Summary The AMD RX Vega 64 and Vega 56 graphics cards launch represents a highly anticipated yet controversial entry aimed at competing with NVIDIA’s high-end graphics stack, arriving over a year after initial teases. The flagship Vega 64 offers competitive performance in a bubble, trading blows evenly with the NVIDIA GTX 1080 and achieving its...Read more

pcmag.com

30/08/2017

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Review

The PCMag review positions the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 as a highly competitive, better-value alternative to the Vega 64, optimized for 1440p gaming and holding its own against the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070. It offers roughly 87% of the stream processors of the Vega 64 with significantly lower power consumption, making it a compelling option for high-refresh-rate 1080p experiences....Read more

m.hexus.net

14/08/2017

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 and Radeon RX Vega 56

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 and Vega 56, released in August 2017, represent the high-end of AMD's Vega 10 architecture aimed at reclaiming competitiveness in the enthusiast graphics market. Based on a 14nm FinFET LPP process, these cards feature significant upgrades over the older Fury series, including 8GB of HBM2 memory and a nearly 50% increase in peak GPU clock speeds, which...Read more

semiaccurate.com

14/08/2017

AMD’s Radeon RX Vega 56: A Review(bit-tech.net) | 14 August 2017 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 and RX Vega 56 Review

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Review Summary The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is the entry-level $400 graphics card in the Vega 10 lineup, utilizing a slightly cut-down core with 8 compute units disabled, a 1471 MHz boost clock, and HBM2 memory clocked at 400 MHz. In terms of raw performance, it is highly efficient compared to older architectures, trading blows with the premium RX Vega 64 by...Read more

ign.com

14/08/2017

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 & 56 Review

AMD Radeon RX Vega Review Summary The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 and Vega 56 mark AMD's return to the high-end gaming GPU market, targeting Nvidia's GTX 1080 and 1070 respectively. Built on a large 14nm architecture, these flagship cards introduce cutting-edge High Bandwidth Memory (HBM2) on a massive 2048-bit wide path to rival Nvidia's performance. While the Vega 64 struggles to...Read more

techspot.com

14/08/2017

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Review | TechSpot

The TechSpot review of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 presents it as a highly competitive $399, upper-midrange card that frequently edges out the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 by 2.5% overall. It excels at 1440p gaming and offers strong performance in modern titles using DX12 or Vulkan. Conversely, key drawbacks include high power consumption compared to Nvidia rivals and a loud, hot reference...Read more

techpowerup.com

14/08/2017

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8 GB Review | TechPowerUp

The TechPowerUp review identifies the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 as a compelling $399 high-end card that outperforms the GTX 1070 by 6% while offering better power efficiency and lower noise than the Vega 64. It features 8 GB of HBM2 memory, a premium backplate, and delivers excellent 1440p gaming performance, with added value from features like dual BIOS and the High Bandwidth Cache...Read more

digitalfoundry.net

07/07/2018

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 review | Digital Foundry

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is a highly competitive, high-end graphics card designed to challenge Nvidia's GTX 1070, offering a superb value proposition for 1440p and 4K gaming. Built on a large 486mm² silicon area with 12.5 billion transistors, it features a cut-down configuration of 56 compute units, 3,584 stream processors, and 8GB of cutting-edge HBM2 memory delivering 410GB/s of...Read more

eurogamer.net

06/06/2019

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 benchmarks: the better first-gen Vega GPU Do you need technical specifications or benchmarks for a specific modern game to see h...

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is an upper mid-range graphics card designed to compete directly with Nvidia's GTX 1070, providing a value-focused alternative to the faster but more power-hungry Vega 64. Built with 3,584 GPU cores, a 1471MHz boost clock, and 8GB of HBM2 memory, it delivers excellent performance at 1080p and 1440p resolutions across demanding titles. The card notably...Read more

uk.pcmag.com

30/08/2017

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Review | PCMag UK

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is an excellent $399 enthusiast-grade graphics card designed to deliver uncompromising performance for 1440p gaming or high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming. Powered by the "Vega 10" chip with 56 compute units and 8GB of high-bandwidth HBM2 memory, it stands as a highly competitive and lower-priced alternative to Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 1070. In benchmark testing,...Read more

tomshardware.com

09/01/2018

Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 56 Gaming OC 8G | Tom's Hardware

The Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 56 Gaming OC 8G delivers strong performance but suffers from high power draw and thermal limitations when pushed to its limits. On the positive side, the graphics card features an exceptionally well-implemented power balancing architecture that keeps the motherboard's PCIe slot safe from heavy electrical loads, drawing a maximum of only 2.1A during...Read more

cgmagonline.com

18/12/2017

AMD Radeon Vega 56 GPU Review | Comics Gaming Magazine

The AMD Radeon Vega 56 delivers exceptional raw performance, capable of reaching Nvidia GTX 1080 levels, and features advanced, efficient HBM2 memory technology. However, intense demand from cryptocurrency miners, coupled with high manufacturing costs, led to severely inflated retail pricing well above the intended $500 CAD MSRP. Comics Gaming Magazine These market-driven factors...Read more

techspot.com

02/03/2020

One Power Hungry GPU: AMD Radeon Vega 56 Revisited

The TechSpot review revisits the 2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56, utilizing a 32-game benchmark suite to evaluate its performance against modern alternatives like the Radeon RX 5600 XT. While the card's aging architecture remains competitive in specific titles owing to its HBM2 memory, it is heavily criticized for its poor power efficiency, consuming nearly 40% more system power than...Read more

enostech.com

28/11/2017

Gigabyte RX Vega 56 8G GVRXVEGA56-8GD-B Review

The Gigabyte RX Vega 56 8G (GVRXVEGA56-8GD-B) is a reference-design graphics card featuring AMD's Vega 10 architecture built on a 14nm FinFET process. It is equipped with 3,584 stream processors, a 2048-bit memory bus interface, and 8GB of second-generation High-Bandwidth Memory (HBM2). Built with a premium, fully enclosed aluminium housing shroud, the card includes distinct...Read more

babeltechreviews.com

12/09/2017

RX Vega 56 vs. GTX 1070 FE – 28 Game Showdown

This review evaluates the stock performance of the reference AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 against the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition, both priced at a $399 MSRP, using a suite of 28 modern PC games and 4 synthetic benchmarks across multiple resolutions (1080p to 4K). Testing on an Intel Core i7-6700K system reveals that when the RX Vega 56 is configured to maximum power limits...Read more

au.pcmag.com

30/08/2017

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Review

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is a highly competitive, enthusiast-grade graphics card launched at a $399 MSRP to target Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 1070 for 1440p gaming and high-refresh-rate 1080p experiences. Built on the "Vega 10" architecture with 56 compute units and 8GB of high-bandwidth HBM2 memory, it matches its pricier sibling, the Vega 64, in both physical card length (10.5 inches)...Read more

computerbase.de

13/09/2017

Radeon RX Vega 64/56: 6 BIOS-Power-Modi und Undervolting im Test

The Radeon RX Vega 64 and Vega 56 reference graphics cards feature a highly flexible but complex power system consisting of two hardware BIOS switches and three driver profiles (Balanced, Turbo, and Power Save), resulting in six distinct power and performance configurations. In terms of pros, this design grants users immense customisation freedom, allowing the Vega 64's GPU power...Read more

igorslab.de

02/07/2018

Sapphire RX Vega 56 Pulse im Test – heißer Kampfzwerg mit dickem Kühlpanzer

The Sapphire RX Vega 56 Pulse is highlighted as a smartly engineered, compact graphics card built on an ultra-short PCB paired with a full-length cooler. Weighing only 938 grams, it is significantly lighter and more compact than its monstrous sibling, the Nitro series. Despite lacking a traditional vapor chamber, the cooling performance remains effective thanks to dual 9.5 cm fans,...Read more

hardwareluxx.de

14/08/2017

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 und RX Vega 56 im Test

This hardware review evaluates the launch of AMD’s high-end graphics cards, the Radeon RX Vega 64 (available in liquid-cooled and air-cooled models) and the smaller Radeon RX Vega 56. Built on the 14nm Vega 10 architecture, these GPUs pack a massive 12.5 billion transistors onto a 484 mm² die size—making the silicon physically comparable to NVIDIA's enthusiast GP102 chip, yet...Read more

lesnumeriques.com

14/08/2017

Test AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 : le modèle phare de la série

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is a high-end graphics card built on the Vega 10 architecture, featuring 56 active NCU blocks, 3,584 computing units, and 8 GB of HBM2 memory with a high bandwidth of 410 Go/s. In terms of performance, the card successfully targets the GeForce GTX 1070, offering a 6% advantage in 4K/UHD and matching its rival in 1080p, making it highly capable for seamless...Read more

tomshardware.fr

16/07/2018

Test : Sapphire RX Vega 56 Pulse, le bon compromis

The Sapphire RX Vega 56 Pulse is a highly compact, dual-slot graphics card that balances impressive thermal performance with a significantly shortened PCB design. Featuring a moderate 9% to 11% factory overclock compared to AMD's reference specifications, the card delivers a 5% to 7% increase in gaming framerates at a cost of just 10 additional watts. It is built for QHD (1440p)...Read more

comptoir-hardware.com

23/10/2017

Test • RADEON RX Vega 56 - Le comptoir du hardware

The Le Comptoir du Hardware review provides a detailed evaluation of AMD’s reference Radeon RX Vega 56, a graphics card based on the Vega 10 architecture positioned as a more affordable, 100 € cheaper alternative to its larger sibling, the Vega 64. Evaluated using an updated 20-game testing suite across multiple 3D engines, the review explores whether the card serves as a highly...Read more

lesnumeriques.com

19/01/2018

Test Asus Radeon RX Vega 56 Strix OC - Les Numériques

The Asus Radeon RX Vega 56 Strix OC graphics card succeeds in addressing the loud acoustic flaws of AMD’s reference design, offering a premium and significantly quieter user experience. Built on a completely redesigned custom PCB with an enhanced 11-phase power delivery system, it features a heavy 2.5-slot cooler adapted from the GTX 1080 Ti Strix. Key strengths include heavily...Read more

geeknetic.es

19/09/2017

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 [Análisis Completo en Español]

The Geeknetic review highlights the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 as an impressive mid-range graphics card that outperforms its primary price competitor, the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070, particularly when running modern APIs like DX12 and Vulkan. Built on a 14nm FinFET architecture, the card features 56 compute units and 3584 shaders operating alongside 8GB of cutting-edge HBM2 memory, which...Read more

muycomputer.com

14/08/2017

Análisis de rendimiento de las Radeon RX Vega en juegos y computación

The Radeon RX Vega 56 stands out as the superior choice from a price-performance perspective, delivering general performance slightly above NVIDIA's GTX 1070 and occasionally matching or beating the GTX 1080 in specific games like The Division, Battlefield 1, and DiRT 4. Its primary pros include competitive gaming performance, promising architectural advancements for future driver...Read more

Video reviews

Best alternatives

ASRock ARC B580 Challenger OC

Graphics cards

XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition

Graphics cards

Graphics cards

PowerColor Hellhound Radeon RX 7600

Graphics cards

Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7600

Graphics cards

Acer Nitro ARC B580 OC

Graphics cards

SPARKLE ARC B580 Titan OC

Graphics cards

ASUS Prime GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition

Graphics cards

MSI GTX 1080 Ti Duke

Graphics cards

ASUS ROG Strix GTX 1080 Ti Gaming

Graphics cards

GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

Graphics cards

MSI GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio

Graphics cards

Compare AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 with

Compare