Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Xiaomi Smart Band 9 Active Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Battery life:18 daysScreen size:1.47 inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:50 m

Xiaomi Smart Band 9 Active Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

8.3

Overall score

Score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

8.3

Technical score

20%

8.4

User score

★Better than 90% of fitness-trackers
8.3

Technical score

Technical score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

7.9

Sports & Navigation

20%

8.5

Battery

18%

9.2

Health

18%

7.1

Display

8%

9.1

Smart Features

8%

8.8

App & Wellness

4%

8.4

Connectivity

4%

8.2

Design & Durability

★Better than 90% of fitness-trackers
8.4

User score

User score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.7

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 15,485 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–²Better than 75% of fitness-trackers
  • xiaomi-smart-band-9-active
xiaomi-smart-band-9-active

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Xiaomi Smart Band 9 Active

Technical score
Technical score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

7.9

Sports & Navigation

20%

8.5

Battery

18%

9.2

Health

18%

7.1

Display

8%

9.1

Smart Features

8%

8.8

App & Wellness

4%

8.4

Connectivity

4%

8.2

Design & Durability

8.3
User score
User score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.7

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 15,485 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.4
Popularity
Popularity
10.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Xiaomi Smart Band 9 Active has a popularity score of 10 points, which is higher than 91.6% of fitness trackers.
10
Value for money
Value for money
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

8.3

Overall score

40%

10

Price

8.8
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 40.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
yes
Resting heart rate
yes
This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate. 52.6% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
yes
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts. 65.8% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
High and low resting heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
yes
Blood oxygen sensor
yes
This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor. 75.1% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
no satellite positioning support.
GNSS bands supported
no
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.9% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.5% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 16.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
yes
Call control
yes
This fitness tracker supports call controls. 58.7% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Reject/mute only.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
yes
Calendar sync
yes
This fitness tracker supports calendar sync. 80.2% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
via Mi Fit app
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
yes
Achievements
yes
This fitness tracker supports achievements. 24.3% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
yes
Inactivity alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 23.5% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
no
Coaching
no
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 34% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
5.3
Bluetooth version
5.3
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 5.3 which is newer than in 96.5% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 2% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
?
NFC
no
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 1.8% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi connectivity.
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
18 days
Battery life
18 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 18 days which is longer than that of 76.7% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 1% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life in power-saving mode
18 h
Battery life in power-saving mode
18 h
This fitness tracker offers a power-saving battery life of 18 h which is shorter than that of 88.9% of fitness trackers.
Battery capacity
300 mAh
Battery capacity
300 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 300 mAh which is higher than that of 98.7% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
yes
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
1.47 inch
Screen size
1.47 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.47 inch which is larger than that of 75.5% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 9.1% of fitness trackers.
Display type
TFT LCD
Display type
TFT LCD
This fitness tracker uses TFT LCD display technology which is less advanced than that of 62.1% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 5.6% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
172x 320
Screen resolution
172x 320
This fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 172x320 which is higher than that of 83% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 1.1% of fitness trackers.
Pixel density
247 ppi
Pixel density
247 ppi
This fitness tracker has a pixel density of 247 ppi which is higher than that of 50.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 1.9% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
Replaceable watch band
yes
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 25.6% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
20 mm
Show more

Xiaomi Smart Band 9 Active vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • 8 days longer battery life
    Battery life
    18 days
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (18 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    18 days vs 10 days
  • 2.73x larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    300 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (300 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    300 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • Blood oxygen monitoring
    Blood oxygen sensor
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.2% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
  • Measures VO2 max
    VO2 max
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports VO2 max tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 21.8% of fitness trackers support VO2 max tracking.
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • Touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports a smart alarm, while the average fitness tracker does not. 27.3% of fitness trackers support a smart alarm.
    10-minute wake window.
  • Modern Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.3
    This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (5.3 vs 4). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.0.
    5.3 vs 4.0
  • 97.4% more popular
    Xiaomi Smart Band 9 Active has a higher popularity than the average fitness tracker (10 vs 5.1).
    10 vs 5.07
  • 2.8x cheaper
    Xiaomi Smart Band 9 Active is cheaper than the average fitness tracker (£25 vs £70).
    £25 vs £70
  • 11.4% better value for money
    Xiaomi Smart Band 9 Active has a higher value-for-money score than the average fitness tracker (8.82 vs 7.9).
    8.82 vs 7.92
  • 4.9% higher user score
    User score
    8.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Xiaomi Smart Band 9 Active
    the average fitness tracker
    Xiaomi Smart Band 9 Active has a higher user score than the average fitness tracker (8.39 vs 8.000).
    8.39 vs 8
  • Blood oxygen monitoring
    Blood oxygen sensor
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.2% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
  • Measures VO2 max
    VO2 max
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports VO2 max tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 21.8% of fitness trackers support VO2 max tracking.
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • Heart rate alerts
    Fast/slow heart rate alerts
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts, while the average fitness tracker does not. 34.5% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
    High and low resting heart rate alerts.
  • Continuous SpOâ‚‚ monitoring
    Continuous SpOâ‚‚ monitoring
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports continuous SpOâ‚‚ monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does not. 12.3% of fitness trackers support continuous SpOâ‚‚ monitoring.
    24/7 monitoring.
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.7% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Period notifications
    Has period notifications
    yes
    This fitness tracker has period notifications, while the average fitness tracker does not. 31% of fitness trackers have period notifications.
  • Fertile window notifications
    Displays fertile window notifications
    yes
    This fitness tracker displays fertile window notifications, while the average fitness tracker does not. 24.1% of fitness trackers display fertile window notifications.
  • Ovulation prediction
    Predicts ovulation
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts ovulation, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.6% of fitness trackers predict ovulation.
  • Cycle start prediction
    Predicts start date
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts the start date, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42.5% of fitness trackers predict the start date.
  • 8 days longer battery life
    Battery life
    18 days
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (18 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    18 days vs 10 days
  • 2.73x larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    300 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (300 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    300 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • Low power mode
    Low power mode
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports low power mode, while the average fitness tracker does not. 24.1% of fitness trackers support low power mode.
  • Touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • 0.43 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.47 inch
    This fitness tracker has a higher screen size than the average fitness tracker (1.5 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    1.47 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • Color display
    Color display
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 37.7% of fitness trackers have a color display.
  • Durable display glass
    Display glass type
    reinforced glass
    This fitness tracker uses more durable display glass than the average fitness tracker (reinforced glass vs glass). The average fitness tracker uses glass display glass.
    reinforced glass vs glass
  • Modern Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.3
    This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (5.3 vs 4). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.0.
    5.3 vs 4.0
  • Smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports a smart alarm, while the average fitness tracker does not. 27.3% of fitness trackers support a smart alarm.
    10-minute wake window.
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • Passcode protection
    Passcode protection
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports passcode protection, while the average fitness tracker does not. 17.6% of fitness trackers support passcode protection.
    Supports a 6-digit PIN lock.
  • Call control
    Call control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports call controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.5% of fitness trackers support call controls.
    Reject/mute only.
  • Calendar sync
    Calendar sync
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports calendar sync, while the average fitness tracker does not. 20.2% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
  • Camera remote control
    Camera remote control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports camera remote control, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.9% of fitness trackers support camera remote control.
  • Gesture control
    Gesture control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports gesture controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.8% of fitness trackers support gesture controls.
  • 1.01 mm thinner design
    Thickness
    9.99 mm
    This fitness tracker is thinner than the average fitness tracker (10 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    9.99 mm vs 11 mm
  • 8 newer release date
    Release date
    2024
    This fitness tracker was released more recently than the average fitness tracker (2024 vs 2016). The average fitness tracker was released in 2016.
    November 2024
    2024 vs 2016
  • 18% heavier
    Thickness
    29.5 g mm
    This fitness tracker is heavier than the average fitness tracker (29.5 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    29.5 g vs 25 g
  • 0.17 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    1.67 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (1.7 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    1.67 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 2 h shorter power-saving battery life
    Battery life in power-saving mode
    18 h
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life in power-saving mode than the average fitness tracker (18 h vs 20 h). The average fitness tracker has 20 h of battery life in power-saving mode.
    18 h vs 20 h
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    172 x 320
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (172x320 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    172x320 vs 194x368
  • 5.1 mm greater height
    Height
    45.9 mm
    This fitness tracker is taller than the average fitness tracker (45.9 mm vs 40.8 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 40.8 mm.
    45.9 mm vs 40.8 mm
  • 0.17 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    1.67 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (1.7 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    1.67 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 2 h shorter power-saving battery life
    Battery life in power-saving mode
    18 h
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life in power-saving mode than the average fitness tracker (18 h vs 20 h). The average fitness tracker has 20 h of battery life in power-saving mode.
    18 h vs 20 h
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    172 x 320
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (172x320 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    172x320 vs 194x368
  • 18% heavier
    Thickness
    29.5 g mm
    This fitness tracker is heavier than the average fitness tracker (29.5 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    29.5 g vs 25 g
  • 5.1 mm greater height
    Height
    45.9 mm
    This fitness tracker is taller than the average fitness tracker (45.9 mm vs 40.8 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 40.8 mm.
    45.9 mm vs 40.8 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

A
androidpolice.com
06/01/2025
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
06/01/2025
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
01/03/2026
Summary of the review
N
nextpit.de
14/12/2024
Summary of the review
H
heise.de
23/01/2026
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
09/03/2026
Summary of the review
A
altroconsumo.it
20/01/2026
Summary of the review
R
robadainformatici.it
28/10/2025
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 15,485 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Xiaomi Smart Band 9 Active

  • Extremely affordable entry-level price point
  • Lightweight and slim design (16.5g) making it comfortable for all-day wear and sleep
  • Reliable battery life that can last up to 18 days on a single charge
  • Fluid user interface with a 60Hz refresh rate on the 1.47-inch display
  • 5ATM water resistance suitable for swimming and showering
  • Simple and intuitive controls ideal for beginners or seniors
  • Support for 50+ basic sports modes and essential health tracking (heart rate, SpO2, sleep)

What we don't like about Xiaomi Smart Band 9 Active

  • Frequent reports of inaccurate heart rate and step count data
  • Lacks built-in GPS, requiring a constant phone connection for outdoor distance tracking
  • TFT LCD display is less vibrant than the AMOLED screens on standard models
  • No Always-On Display (AOD) or ambient light sensor for automatic brightness
  • Slow charging speeds, taking approximately 90 to 120 minutes for a full charge
  • Missing advanced smartwatch features like NFC for payments, speakers, or microphones
  • Limited customizability with only a few pre-installed watch faces

Verdict

The Xiaomi Smart Band 9 Active is an ultra-slim budget fitness tracker featuring a 1.47-inch TFT LCD display with a 60Hz refresh rate and 450 nits peak brightness, housed in a lightweight 16.5g body that is just 9.99mm thick. It offers comprehensive health monitoring including all-day heart rate, SpO2, sleep, and stress tracking, along with support for over 50 sports modes and 5ATM water resistance. Main pros include its highly affordable price point, impressive battery life of up to 18 days from a 300mAh cell, and a comfortable, nearly weightless design. However, notable cons include the lack of built-in GPS and NFC, the use of a lower-resolution TFT panel instead of AMOLED, and relatively thick display bezels.

Compare Xiaomi Smart Band 9 Active with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Xiaomi Smart Band 9 Active and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found