OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0

Beafon Fit20F review: 163 specs compared

Avg. price:~£35Battery life:25 daysScreen size:N/A inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:?

Beafon Fit20F Review: Compare 168 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

Beafon Fit20F
7.4/10

Overall score

Score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 56% of models
Score components

35%

7.4

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

?

Reviews scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.2, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.1, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–²Better than 56% of fitness trackers
8.1

Value for money

Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Score components

70%

7.4

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 54%
7.4

Technical score

Technical score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 71% of models
Score components

20%

8.0

Sports

20%

8.3

Battery

18%

8.2

Health

18%

4.0

Display

8%

7.5

Smart functions

8%

8.8

Wellness

4%

7.8

Connectivity

4%

9.1

Design

â–²Better than 71%
?

Reviews score

Reviews score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet. Until we do, its review part counts as 7.2.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
No expert tests yet
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • beafon-fit20f
  • beafon-fit20f
  • beafon-fit20f
  • beafon-fit20f
  • beafon-fit20f
beafon-fit20f
beafon-fit20f
beafon-fit20f
beafon-fit20f
beafon-fit20f
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Fitness trackers model ranking

Ranked #83 of 238 models in Fitness trackers (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Beafon Fit20F

Technical score
Technical score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 71% of models
Score components:

20%

8.0

Sports

20%

8.3

Battery

18%

8.2

Health

18%

4.0

Display

8%

7.5

Smart functions

8%

8.8

Wellness

4%

7.8

Connectivity

4%

9.1

Design

7.4
Reviews score
7.2
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Score components:

70%

7.4

Overall score

30%

10

Price

8.1
Heart rate monitor
yes
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 36.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
yes
This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate. 47.5% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts. 63.9% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 13.7% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
yes
This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor. 68.2% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 12.7% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 14.4% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 85.6% of fitness trackers.
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.4% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 5.6% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.8% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 14.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
no
This fitness tracker does not support call controls. 40.8% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 0.9% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.5% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.5% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
yes
This fitness tracker supports achievements. 23.8% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 21.4% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
no
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 36.4% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
5.1
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 5.1 which is newer than in 86.3% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 3.7% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
?
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 11.8% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 2.5% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 0.9% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
Show more
Battery life
25 days
Market range: <5 days – >180 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 25 days which is longer than that of 85.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 0.4% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Power-saving battery life
?
Battery capacity
180 mAh
Market range: <30 mAh – >225 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 180 mAh which is higher than that of 64.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 7.1% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
no
This fitness tracker does not have a display. 74.2% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
N/A
Display type
N/A
Screen resolution
N/A
Pixel density
N/A
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.1% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 3.3% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
?
Band width
?
Show more

Beafon Fit20F vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSportsBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart functionsDesignWellness
  • 15 days longer battery life
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (25 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    25 days vs 10 days
  • Blood oxygen monitoring
    This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 32.1% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
  • Multi-sport mode
    This fitness tracker supports multi-sport mode, while the average fitness tracker does not. 14.5% of fitness trackers support multi-sport mode.
  • Heart rate alerts
    This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts, while the average fitness tracker does not. 36.4% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
  • 59.6% lighter
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (9.7 g vs 24 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 24 g.
    9.7 g vs 24 g
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 45.2% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • 44% larger battery capacity
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (180 mAh vs 125 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 125 mAh of battery capacity.
    180 mAh vs 125 mAh
  • Modern Bluetooth version
    This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (5.1 vs 4.1). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.1.
    5.1 vs 4.1
  • Blood oxygen monitoring
    This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 32.1% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
  • Heart rate alerts
    This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts, while the average fitness tracker does not. 36.4% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 45.2% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    This fitness tracker supports blood pressure monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does not. 5% of fitness trackers support blood pressure monitoring.
  • Multi-sport mode
    This fitness tracker supports multi-sport mode, while the average fitness tracker does not. 14.5% of fitness trackers support multi-sport mode.
  • 91.5 more exercise modes
    This fitness tracker has more exercise modes than the average fitness tracker (100 vs 8.5). The average fitness tracker offers 8.5 exercise modes.
    100 vs 8.5
  • 15 days longer battery life
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (25 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    25 days vs 10 days
  • 44% larger battery capacity
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (180 mAh vs 125 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 125 mAh of battery capacity.
    180 mAh vs 125 mAh
  • Modern Bluetooth version
    This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (5.1 vs 4.1). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.1.
    5.1 vs 4.1
  • Camera remote control
    This fitness tracker supports camera remote control, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.6% of fitness trackers support camera remote control.
  • 59.6% lighter
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (9.7 g vs 24 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 24 g.
    9.7 g vs 24 g
  • Tracks calorie intake
    This fitness tracker supports calorie intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.4% of fitness trackers support calorie intake tracking.
  • No display
    This fitness tracker does not have a display, while the average fitness tracker does. 73.9% of fitness trackers have a display.
  • No display
    This fitness tracker does not have a display, while the average fitness tracker does. 73.9% of fitness trackers have a display.

Third-party reviews

What we like about Beafon Fit20F

  • 25 days of rated battery life means very few charges.
  • At 9.7 g it is barely noticeable on the wrist, even overnight.
  • IP68 rating protects it from rain and sweat.
  • A blood pressure monitor is an uncommon extra.
  • 100 exercises and multi-sport mode cover many activities.
  • Fast and slow heart rate alerts help you pace a session.

What we don't like about Beafon Fit20F

  • There is no display, so the band shows no numbers on the wrist.
  • There is no wireless charging, so it needs a cable.
  • The 180 mAh battery is small, so long life depends on light use.
  • The fabric band feels softer than rubber and suits casual wear.

Verdict

A 9.7 g fabric band with 25 days of battery life, the Beafon Fit20F is light enough to forget on the wrist. The battery is small at 180 mAh, yet it is rated for 25 days. Heart rate, blood oxygen and sleep tracking are all built in, and a blood pressure monitor is an uncommon extra. It also counts steps and calories, and it lists 100 exercises with multi-sport mode. It is rated IP68 for water, so rain and sweat do no harm. The trade-off is what it leaves out. There is no display, no color screen and no wireless charging. Vibrating alerts and a silent alarm work without a screen. It suits someone who wants simple tracking and long battery life, and does not need a screen.

Compare Beafon Fit20F with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Beafon Fit20F and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found