OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0

Tikkers Series 1 review: 163 specs compared

Avg. price:~£20Battery life:7 daysScreen size:1.57 inchHeart rate monitor:noGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:1 m

Tikkers Series 1 Review: Compare 168 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

Tikkers Series 1
6.9/10

Overall score

Score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
Score components

35%

6.2

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

?

Reviews scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.2, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.1, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 77% of fitness trackers
7.9

Value for money

Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Score components

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 74%
6.2

Technical score

Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
Score components

20%

7.4

Sports

20%

4.0

Battery

18%

5.4

Health

18%

6.2

Display

8%

6.9

Smart functions

8%

8.6

Wellness

4%

7.7

Connectivity

4%

7.9

Design

â–¼Worse than 82%
?

Reviews score

Reviews score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet. Until we do, its review part counts as 7.2.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
No expert tests yet
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • tikkers-series-1
  • tikkers-series-1
  • tikkers-series-1
  • tikkers-series-1
  • tikkers-series-1
  • tikkers-series-1
tikkers-series-1
tikkers-series-1
tikkers-series-1
tikkers-series-1
tikkers-series-1
tikkers-series-1
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Fitness trackers model ranking

Ranked #117 of 238 models in Fitness trackers (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Tikkers Series 1

Technical score
Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
Score components:

20%

7.4

Sports

20%

4.0

Battery

18%

5.4

Health

18%

6.2

Display

8%

6.9

Smart functions

8%

8.6

Wellness

4%

7.7

Connectivity

4%

7.9

Design

6.2
Reviews score
7.2
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Score components:

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

10

Price

7.9
Heart rate monitor
no
This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring. 64.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
no
This fitness tracker does not support Resting heart rate. 53% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 36.5% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 13.7% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 32.2% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 12.7% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
N/A
GNSS bands supported
N/A
Galileo support
N/A
Acquires GPS faster
N/A
Show more
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.8% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 14.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
no
This fitness tracker does not support call controls. 40.8% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 0.9% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
yes
This fitness tracker supports calendar sync. 79.9% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.5% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
no
This fitness tracker does not support achievements. 76.7% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 21.4% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
no
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 36.4% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
5
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 5 which is newer than in 68% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 17.8% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
?
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 11.8% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 2.5% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 0.9% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
Show more
Battery life
7 days
Market range: <5 days – >180 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 7 days which is shorter than that of 56.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 21.9% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Power-saving battery life
?
Battery capacity
90 mAh
Market range: <30 mAh – >225 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 90 mAh which is lower than that of 68.2% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 4.7% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 26.3% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
1.57 inch
Market range: <0 inch – >1.6 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.57 inch which is larger than that of 86.7% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 0.6% of fitness trackers.
Display type
LCD
This fitness tracker uses LCD display technology which is less advanced than that of 64.1% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 6.4% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
240x 240
This fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 240x240 which is higher than that of 83.7% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2% of fitness trackers.
Pixel density
?
Show more
Form factor
watch
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.1% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
yes
This fitness tracker is designed for kids. 97.1% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 23.4% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
15 mm
Show more

Tikkers Series 1 vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSportsBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart functionsDesignWellness
  • 0.51 inch larger screen size
    This fitness tracker has a higher screen size than the average fitness tracker (1.6 inch vs 1.06 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.06 inch.
    1.57 inch vs 1.06 inch
  • Multi-sport mode
    This fitness tracker supports multi-sport mode, while the average fitness tracker does not. 14.5% of fitness trackers support multi-sport mode.
  • Touchscreen
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 46.7% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Color display
    This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.1% of fitness trackers have a color display.
  • More child-focused design
    This fitness tracker is designed for kids, while the average fitness tracker is not. 3.3% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
  • No account required
    This fitness tracker works without an account, while the average fitness tracker does not. 9.8% of fitness trackers work without an account.
  • 3.5x cheaper
    Tikkers Series 1 is cheaper than the average fitness tracker (£20 vs £70).
    £20 vs £70
  • Calendar sync
    This fitness tracker supports calendar sync, while the average fitness tracker does not. 20.4% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
  • 3.5x cheaper
    Tikkers Series 1 is cheaper than the average fitness tracker (£20 vs £70).
    £20 vs £70
  • Multi-sport mode
    This fitness tracker supports multi-sport mode, while the average fitness tracker does not. 14.5% of fitness trackers support multi-sport mode.
  • 0.51 inch larger screen size
    This fitness tracker has a higher screen size than the average fitness tracker (1.6 inch vs 1.06 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.06 inch.
    1.57 inch vs 1.06 inch
  • Touchscreen
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 46.7% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Color display
    This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.1% of fitness trackers have a color display.
  • Modern Bluetooth version
    This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (5 vs 4.1). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.1.
    5.0 vs 4.1
  • Calendar sync
    This fitness tracker supports calendar sync, while the average fitness tracker does not. 20.4% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
  • 1 more physical buttons
    This fitness tracker has a higher physical buttons than the average fitness tracker (1 vs 0). The average fitness tracker has 0 of physical buttons.
    1 vs 0
  • Gesture control
    This fitness tracker supports gesture controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.6% of fitness trackers support gesture controls.
  • Camera remote control
    This fitness tracker supports camera remote control, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.6% of fitness trackers support camera remote control.
  • More child-focused design
    This fitness tracker is designed for kids, while the average fitness tracker is not. 3.3% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
  • 16.7% lighter
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (20 g vs 24 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 24 g.
    20 g vs 24 g
  • 1 mm thinner design
    This fitness tracker is thinner than the average fitness tracker (10 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    10 mm vs 11 mm
  • No account required
    This fitness tracker works without an account, while the average fitness tracker does not. 9.8% of fitness trackers work without an account.
  • No heart rate monitoring
    This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 63.9% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
  • Higher resting heart rate
    This fitness tracker does not support Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does. 52.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • No pace measurement
    This fitness tracker does not support pace measurement, while the average fitness tracker does. 62.9% of fitness trackers support pace measurement.
  • 0.5 hours longer charging time
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    2 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 33.3% lower screen brightness
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen brightness than the average fitness tracker (300 nits vs 450 nits). The average fitness tracker has screen brightness of 450 nits.
    300 nits vs 450 nits
  • 3 days shorter battery life
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (7 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    7 days vs 10 days
  • Limited ip rating
    This fitness tracker has a lower IP rating than the average fitness tracker (IPX7 vs IP68). The average fitness tracker has an IP rating of IP68.
    IPX7 vs IP68
  • 99.2% smaller internal storage
    This fitness tracker has a lower internal storage than the average fitness tracker (0 GB vs 0.1 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.064 GB of internal storage.
    0.0005 GB vs 0.064 GB
  • 2.8% worse value for money
    Tikkers Series 1 has a lower value-for-money score than the average fitness tracker (7.85 vs 8.1).
    7.85 vs 8.07
  • No heart rate monitoring
    This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 63.9% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
  • Higher resting heart rate
    This fitness tracker does not support Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does. 52.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • No pace measurement
    This fitness tracker does not support pace measurement, while the average fitness tracker does. 62.9% of fitness trackers support pace measurement.
  • No route tracker
    This fitness tracker does not support route tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 52.3% of fitness trackers support route tracking.
  • 0.5 hours longer charging time
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    2 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 3 days shorter battery life
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (7 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    7 days vs 10 days
  • 28% smaller battery capacity
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (90 mAh vs 125 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 125 mAh of battery capacity.
    90 mAh vs 125 mAh
  • 33.3% lower screen brightness
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen brightness than the average fitness tracker (300 nits vs 450 nits). The average fitness tracker has screen brightness of 450 nits.
    300 nits vs 450 nits
  • 99.2% smaller internal storage
    This fitness tracker has a lower internal storage than the average fitness tracker (0 GB vs 0.1 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.064 GB of internal storage.
    0.0005 GB vs 0.064 GB
  • Limited ip rating
    This fitness tracker has a lower IP rating than the average fitness tracker (IPX7 vs IP68). The average fitness tracker has an IP rating of IP68.
    IPX7 vs IP68
  • 49 m lower waterproof depth rating
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (1 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    1 m vs 50 m
  • Not compatible with smart scales
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with smart scales, while the average fitness tracker is. 64.9% of fitness trackers are compatible with smart scales.
  • No achievements
    This fitness tracker does not support achievements, while the average fitness tracker does. 76.4% of fitness trackers support achievements.

Third-party reviews

What we like about Tikkers Series 1

  • Battery life of 7 days means one charge lasts a week.
  • The 1.57 inch color screen is easy to read at a glance.
  • A full charge takes just 2 hours.
  • Find my phone helps when the tracker goes missing.
  • Sleep, step and calorie tracking covers the basics.
  • The IPX7 rating covers rain, splashes and short dips in water.

What we don't like about Tikkers Series 1

  • The 300 nits screen is hard to read in strong sunlight.
  • The 1 m depth rating rules out deeper water.
  • It has no GPS, so it cannot map a run or a bike ride.
  • Internal storage is only 0.0005 GB, so it cannot hold music.
  • Designed for kids, it may feel too basic for adult users.

Verdict

The Tikkers Series 1 is aimed at children, with a 1.57 inch color screen that is easy to read at a glance. A battery life of 7 days means a child can wear it for a week between charges, and a full charge takes 2 hours. It tracks steps, distance, sleep and calories, and it sets goals and syncs with the calendar. Find my phone and multi-sport mode are handy for games and days out. It is rated IPX7 for water and works with both Android and iOS, so setup is simple. The screen is only 300 nits, which makes it hard to read in strong sunlight, and it has no GPS. It suits a parent who wants a budget tracker for an active child who wears it all day.

Compare Tikkers Series 1 with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Tikkers Series 1 and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found