OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0

BIGGERFIVE Vigor Plus review: 163 specs compared

Avg. price:~£35Battery life:?Screen size:1.47 inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:50 m

BIGGERFIVE Vigor Plus Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 1 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

BIGGERFIVE Vigor Plus
7.3/10

Overall score

Score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Score components

35%

7.6

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

6.9

Reviews score

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.1, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–²Better than 55% of fitness trackers
8.1

Value for money

Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Score components

70%

7.3

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 54%
7.6

Technical score

Technical score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 76% of models
Score components

20%

7.4

Sports

20%

7.9

Battery

18%

6.9

Health

18%

7.5

Display

8%

6.9

Smart functions

8%

8.5

Wellness

4%

7.7

Connectivity

4%

9.2

Design

â–²Better than 76%
6.9

Reviews score

Reviews score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models

80%

7.4

Average grade

20%

5.0

Popularity

Grades by review (1)
1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 67%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • biggerfive-vigor-plus
  • biggerfive-vigor-plus
  • biggerfive-vigor-plus
  • biggerfive-vigor-plus
  • biggerfive-vigor-plus
  • biggerfive-vigor-plus
  • biggerfive-vigor-plus
  • biggerfive-vigor-plus
biggerfive-vigor-plus
biggerfive-vigor-plus
biggerfive-vigor-plus
biggerfive-vigor-plus
biggerfive-vigor-plus
biggerfive-vigor-plus
biggerfive-vigor-plus
biggerfive-vigor-plus
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Fitness trackers model ranking

Ranked #86 of 238 models in Fitness trackers (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker BIGGERFIVE Vigor Plus

Technical score
Technical score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 76% of models
Score components:

20%

7.4

Sports

20%

7.9

Battery

18%

6.9

Health

18%

7.5

Display

8%

6.9

Smart functions

8%

8.5

Wellness

4%

7.7

Connectivity

4%

9.2

Design

7.6
Reviews score
6.9
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Score components:

70%

7.3

Overall score

30%

10

Price

8.1
Heart rate monitor
yes
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 36.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
?
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 36.5% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 13.7% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 32.2% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 12.7% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
N/A
GNSS bands supported
N/A
Galileo support
N/A
Acquires GPS faster
N/A
Show more
Notifications
?
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 14.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
no
This fitness tracker does not support call controls. 40.8% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 0.9% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.5% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.5% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
yes
This fitness tracker supports achievements. 23.8% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 21.4% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
no
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 36.4% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
?
Maximum Bluetooth range
?
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 11.8% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 2.5% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 0.9% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
Show more
Battery life
?
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Power-saving battery life
?
Battery capacity
?
Show more
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 26.3% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
1.47 inch
Market range: <0 inch – >1.6 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.47 inch which is larger than that of 72.8% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 10.1% of fitness trackers.
Display type
LCD
This fitness tracker uses LCD display technology which is less advanced than that of 64.1% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 6.4% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
?
Pixel density
?
Show more
Form factor
watch
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.1% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
yes
This fitness tracker is designed for kids. 97.1% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
?
Band width
?
Show more

BIGGERFIVE Vigor Plus vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSportsBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart functionsDesignWellness
  • Multi-sport mode
    This fitness tracker supports multi-sport mode, while the average fitness tracker does not. 14.5% of fitness trackers support multi-sport mode.
  • Touchscreen
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 46.7% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • 0.41 inch larger screen size
    This fitness tracker has a higher screen size than the average fitness tracker (1.5 inch vs 1.06 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.06 inch.
    1.47 inch vs 1.06 inch
  • Color display
    This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.1% of fitness trackers have a color display.
  • More child-focused design
    This fitness tracker is designed for kids, while the average fitness tracker is not. 3.3% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
  • No account required
    This fitness tracker works without an account, while the average fitness tracker does not. 9.8% of fitness trackers work without an account.
  • 2x larger internal storage
    This fitness tracker has a higher internal storage than the average fitness tracker (0.1 GB vs 0.1 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.064 GB of internal storage.
    0.128 GB vs 0.064 GB
  • 16.7% lighter
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (20 g vs 24 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 24 g.
    20 g vs 24 g
  • Multi-sport mode
    This fitness tracker supports multi-sport mode, while the average fitness tracker does not. 14.5% of fitness trackers support multi-sport mode.
  • Touchscreen
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 46.7% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • 0.41 inch larger screen size
    This fitness tracker has a higher screen size than the average fitness tracker (1.5 inch vs 1.06 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.06 inch.
    1.47 inch vs 1.06 inch
  • Color display
    This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.1% of fitness trackers have a color display.
  • 2x larger internal storage
    This fitness tracker has a higher internal storage than the average fitness tracker (0.1 GB vs 0.1 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.064 GB of internal storage.
    0.128 GB vs 0.064 GB
  • More child-focused design
    This fitness tracker is designed for kids, while the average fitness tracker is not. 3.3% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
  • 16.7% lighter
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (20 g vs 24 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 24 g.
    20 g vs 24 g
  • No account required
    This fitness tracker works without an account, while the average fitness tracker does not. 9.8% of fitness trackers work without an account.
  • No pace measurement
    This fitness tracker does not support pace measurement, while the average fitness tracker does. 62.9% of fitness trackers support pace measurement.
  • No route tracker
    This fitness tracker does not support route tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 52.3% of fitness trackers support route tracking.
  • Not compatible with smart scales
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with smart scales, while the average fitness tracker is. 64.9% of fitness trackers are compatible with smart scales.
  • 5.5% lower review score
    Reviews score
    6.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models

    80%

    7.4

    Average grade

    20%

    5.0

    Popularity

    Grades by review (1)
    1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    6.9 vs 7.3
  • 5.5% lower review score
    Reviews score
    6.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models

    80%

    7.4

    Average grade

    20%

    5.0

    Popularity

    Grades by review (1)
    1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    6.9 vs 7.3
  • No pace measurement
    This fitness tracker does not support pace measurement, while the average fitness tracker does. 62.9% of fitness trackers support pace measurement.
  • No route tracker
    This fitness tracker does not support route tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 52.3% of fitness trackers support route tracking.
  • Not compatible with smart scales
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with smart scales, while the average fitness tracker is. 64.9% of fitness trackers are compatible with smart scales.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

6.0
Unboxing with Eddie
≈ estimated
30/09/2026
Unboxing · setup and quick feature check
Verdict
BIGGERFIVE Vigor Plus has a clear screen and simple setup, but its features are very limited and the strap is rather large.
8.0
QuickTipsTo
≈ estimated
30/09/2026
Unboxing and feature tour · setup and app walkthrough
Verdict
BIGGERFIVE Vigor Plus is easy to set up and offers a good range of activities for children, so it's worth considering.

Third-party reviews

What we like about BIGGERFIVE Vigor Plus

  • The 1.47 inch LCD display is clear and crisp.
  • Setup of language and units is easy.
  • IP68 and 50 m rating cope with rain and pool splashes.
  • At 20 g it is light on the wrist.
  • The watch is designed for kids and has a silicone band.
  • A silent alarm wakes without sound.

What we don't like about BIGGERFIVE Vigor Plus

  • Features are very limited, with few apps.
  • There is no left or right swipe to move between screens.
  • The strap feels rather large.
  • It uses a proprietary charging connector rather than a standard cable.
  • There is no companion app to view data on a phone.

Verdict

The first thing you see on the BIGGERFIVE Vigor Plus is its clear 1.47 inch LCD screen, and setting up the language and units is easy. It is a budget watch for someone who wants the basics. It weighs 20 g and is rated IP68 and 50 m, so rain and a splash in the pool are no problem. Sleep, heart rate, step and calorie tracking are included, with distance tracking and goal setting on top. Sleep reports show how the night went, and the silent alarm wakes without sound. The trade-off is that there are very few apps, and there is no left or right swipe to move between screens. The strap also feels rather large. It suits a parent who wants a simple, waterproof watch for a child.

Compare BIGGERFIVE Vigor Plus with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of BIGGERFIVE Vigor Plus and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found