OVERALL

ALTERNATIVES

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

Samsung Galaxy FIT3 Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£35Battery life:13 daysScreen size:1.6 inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:50 m

Samsung Galaxy FIT3 Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

8.7

★Better than 96% of fitness-trackers

8.6

★Better than 94% of fitness-trackers

9.2

★Better than 97% of fitness-trackers

7.1
Swimming
Swimming
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for swimming performance.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this fitness-trackers meets your specific swimming needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
28.0%
10
ATM rating
24.0%
4.0
Open-water swim mode
18.0%
10
Waterproof depth rating
15.0%
4.0
GPS
15.0%
6.0
Battery life
7.4
Kids
Kids
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for kids performance.
When it matters
When selecting a durable, safe, and family-friendly fitness-trackers suitable for learning and young children.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
30.0%
6.0
Battery life
25.0%
4.4
Weight
20.0%
10
ATM rating
15.0%
10
Screen size
10.0%
10
Price

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Samsung Galaxy FIT3

8.7

Show more

Hide

Health

8.6

Show more

Hide

Heart rate monitor

Resting heart rate

Fast/slow heart rate alerts

Irregular heart rate alerts

?

Blood oxygen sensor

Show more

Sports & Navigation

9.1

Show more

Hide

GPS

Satellite systems supported

GNSS bands supported

Galileo support

Acquires GPS faster

Show more

Smart Features

9.0

Show more

Hide

Notifications

Vibrating alerts

Call control

Call answering

Calendar sync

Show more

App & Wellness

9.7

Show more

Hide

Activity reports

Goal setting

Achievements

Inactivity alerts

Coaching

Show more

Connectivity

5.9

Show more

Hide

Bluetooth version

Maximum Bluetooth range

?

NFC

Wi-Fi connectivity

?

Wi-Fi version

Show more

Battery

7.3

Show more

Hide

Battery life

Battery life with GPS on

N/A

Battery life in training mode

?

Battery life in power-saving mode

?

Battery capacity

Show more

Display

9.5

Show more

Hide

Display

Screen size

Display type

Screen resolution

?

Pixel density

Show more

Design & Durability

7.7

Show more

Hide

Form factor

wristband

Hybrid design

Designed for kids

Replaceable watch band

Band width

20 mm

Show more

Samsung Galaxy FIT3 vs the average fitness tracker

Why is Samsung Galaxy FIT3 better than the average fitness tracker?

Show more

Hide

33.3% higher screen brightness
Screen brightness
600 nits
▲ Better than 79% of models
Market range: <390 nits – >600 nits
This fitness tracker has a higher screen brightness than the average fitness tracker (600 nits vs 450 nits). The average fitness tracker has screen brightness of 450 nits.
600 nits vs 450 nits
Blood oxygen monitoring
Blood oxygen sensor
yes
▲ Better than 75% of models
This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.2% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Always-on display
Always-on display
yes
▲ Better than 75% of models
This fitness tracker has an always-on display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.6% of fitness trackers have an always-on display.
Optional always-on mode available.
Lower resting heart rate
Resting heart rate
yes
▲ Better than 53% of models
This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
89.1% larger battery capacity
Battery capacity
208 mAh
▲ Better than 82% of models
Market range: <30 mAh – >225 mAh
This fitness tracker has a higher battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (208 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
208 mAh vs 110 mAh
0.56 inch larger screen size
Screen size
1.6 inch
★ Better than 90% of models
Market range: <0 inch – >1.6 inch
This fitness tracker has a higher screen size than the average fitness tracker (1.6 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
1.6 inch vs 1.04 inch
Touchscreen
Touchscreen
yes
▲ Better than 56% of models
This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
Swim stroke counter
Swim stroke counter
yes
▲ Better than 78% of models
This fitness tracker supports swim stroke counting, while the average fitness tracker does not. 22% of fitness trackers support swim stroke counting.

15.4% higher user score
User score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Samsung Galaxy FIT3
the average fitness tracker
Samsung Galaxy FIT3 has a higher user score than the average fitness tracker (9.23 vs 8.000).
9.23 vs 8
14.9% better value for money
Samsung Galaxy FIT3 has a higher value-for-money score than the average fitness tracker (9.1 vs 7.9).
9.1 vs 7.92
93.8% more popular
Samsung Galaxy FIT3 has a higher popularity than the average fitness tracker (9.82 vs 5.1).
9.82 vs 5.07

Blood oxygen monitoring
Blood oxygen sensor
yes
▲ Better than 75% of models
This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.2% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Lower resting heart rate
Resting heart rate
yes
▲ Better than 53% of models
This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Heart rate alerts
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
yes
▲ Better than 66% of models
This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts, while the average fitness tracker does not. 34.5% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
High and low resting heart rate alerts.
Tracks respiration rate
Respiration rate tracking
yes
▲ Better than 88% of models
This fitness tracker supports respiratory rate tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 12.9% of fitness trackers support respiratory rate tracking.
Sleep only; phone nearby required.
Tracks menstrual cycle
Menstrual cycle tracking
yes
▲ Better than 59% of models
This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.7% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
Period notifications
Has period notifications
yes
▲ Better than 69% of models
This fitness tracker has period notifications, while the average fitness tracker does not. 31% of fitness trackers have period notifications.
Fertile window notifications
Displays fertile window notifications
yes
▲ Better than 76% of models
This fitness tracker displays fertile window notifications, while the average fitness tracker does not. 24.1% of fitness trackers display fertile window notifications.
Ovulation prediction
Predicts ovulation
yes
▲ Better than 59% of models
This fitness tracker predicts ovulation, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.6% of fitness trackers predict ovulation.
Cycle start prediction
Predicts start date
yes
▲ Better than 58% of models
This fitness tracker predicts the start date, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42.5% of fitness trackers predict the start date.

Swim stroke counter
Swim stroke counter
yes
▲ Better than 78% of models
This fitness tracker supports swim stroke counting, while the average fitness tracker does not. 22% of fitness trackers support swim stroke counting.
Auto pause
Auto pause
yes
▲ Better than 77% of models
This fitness tracker supports auto pause, while the average fitness tracker does not. 23.2% of fitness trackers support auto pause.
Tracks elevation
Elevation tracking
yes
▲ Better than 73% of models
This fitness tracker supports elevation tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 27.4% of fitness trackers support elevation tracking.
Built-in gyroscope
Gyroscope
yes
▲ Better than 74% of models
This fitness tracker has a gyroscope, while the average fitness tracker does not. 26.5% of fitness trackers have a gyroscope.
Built-in barometer
Barometer
yes
▲ Better than 89% of models
This fitness tracker has a barometer, while the average fitness tracker does not. 11.3% of fitness trackers have a barometer.
Built-in route tracker
Has a route tracker
yes
▲ Better than 50% of models
This fitness tracker supports route tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.8% of fitness trackers support route tracking.
Built-in GPS route tracking.
94.5 more exercise modes
Exercise tagging
101
▲ Better than 42% of models
This fitness tracker has more exercise modes than the average fitness tracker (101 vs 6.5). The average fitness tracker offers 6.5 exercise modes.
101 vs 6.5

89.1% larger battery capacity
Battery capacity
208 mAh
▲ Better than 82% of models
Market range: <30 mAh – >225 mAh
This fitness tracker has a higher battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (208 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
208 mAh vs 110 mAh
3 days longer battery life
Battery life
13 days
▲ Better than 60% of models
Market range: <5 days – >180 days
This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (13 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
About 3.5 days with always-on display.
13 days vs 10 days

33.3% higher screen brightness
Screen brightness
600 nits
▲ Better than 79% of models
Market range: <390 nits – >600 nits
This fitness tracker has a higher screen brightness than the average fitness tracker (600 nits vs 450 nits). The average fitness tracker has screen brightness of 450 nits.
600 nits vs 450 nits
Always-on display
Always-on display
yes
▲ Better than 75% of models
This fitness tracker has an always-on display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.6% of fitness trackers have an always-on display.
Optional always-on mode available.
0.56 inch larger screen size
Screen size
1.6 inch
★ Better than 90% of models
Market range: <0 inch – >1.6 inch
This fitness tracker has a higher screen size than the average fitness tracker (1.6 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
1.6 inch vs 1.04 inch
Touchscreen
Touchscreen
yes
▲ Better than 56% of models
This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
Color display
Color display
yes
▲ Better than 63% of models
This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 37.7% of fitness trackers have a color display.
Branded damage-resistant glass
Has branded damage-resistant glass
yes
▲ Better than 78% of models
This fitness tracker uses branded damage-resistant glass, while the average fitness tracker does not. 22.2% of fitness trackers use branded damage-resistant glass.
Corning Gorilla Glass.
23.3% higher pixel density
Pixel density
302 ppi
▲ Better than 82% of models
Market range: <140 ppi – >330 ppi
This fitness tracker has a higher pixel density than the average fitness tracker (302 ppi vs 245 ppi). The average fitness tracker has a pixel density of 245 ppi.
302 ppi vs 245 ppi
Ambient light sensor
Ambient light sensor
yes
▲ Better than 84% of models
This fitness tracker has an ambient light sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 16.7% of fitness trackers have an ambient light sensor.
Durable display glass
Display glass type
panda glass
▲ Better than 80% of models
This fitness tracker uses more durable display glass than the average fitness tracker (panda glass vs glass). The average fitness tracker uses glass display glass.
panda glass vs glass

Modern Bluetooth version
Bluetooth version
5.3
★ Better than 96% of models
This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (5.3 vs 4). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.0.
5.3 vs 4.0

8x larger internal storage
Internal storage
0.256 GB
▲ Better than 79% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >0.5 GB
This fitness tracker has a higher internal storage than the average fitness tracker (0.3 GB vs 0 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.032 GB of internal storage.
0.256 GB vs 0.032 GB
Phone finder support
Find my phone
yes
▲ Better than 51% of models
This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
Passcode protection
Passcode protection
yes
▲ Better than 83% of models
This fitness tracker supports passcode protection, while the average fitness tracker does not. 17.6% of fitness trackers support passcode protection.
Supports a PIN lock on the band.
Call control
Call control
yes
▲ Better than 59% of models
This fitness tracker supports call controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.5% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Reject/mute only.
8,000x higher RAM capacity
RAM capacity
16 GB
★ Better than 92% of models
Market range: <0.5 GB – >2 GB
This fitness tracker has a higher RAM capacity than the average fitness tracker (16 GB vs 0 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.002 GB of RAM capacity.
16 GB vs 0.002 GB
Fall detection
Fall detection
yes
★ Better than 100% of models
This fitness tracker supports fall detection, while the average fitness tracker does not. 1% of fitness trackers support fall detection.
Requires a paired smartphone for SOS/fall alerts.
Emergency SOS support
Emergency SOS
yes
★ Better than 99% of models
This fitness tracker has Emergency SOS, while the average fitness tracker does not. 2% of fitness trackers have Emergency SOS.
SOS is triggered by pressing the Home button 5 times.
Calendar sync
Calendar sync
yes
▲ Better than 80% of models
This fitness tracker supports calendar sync, while the average fitness tracker does not. 20.2% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Includes a calendar widget for synced phone events.
Camera remote control
Camera remote control
yes
▲ Better than 61% of models
This fitness tracker supports camera remote control, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.9% of fitness trackers support camera remote control.
Requires a Galaxy phone with One UI 6+.
1 more physical buttons
N. of physical buttons
1
▲ Better than 56% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This fitness tracker has a higher physical buttons than the average fitness tracker (1 vs 0). The average fitness tracker has 0 of physical buttons.
1 vs 0
Gesture control
Gesture control
yes
▲ Better than 60% of models
This fitness tracker supports gesture controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.8% of fitness trackers support gesture controls.

1.1 mm thinner design
Thickness
9.9 mm
▲ Better than 78% of models
Market range: <8 mm – >13 mm
This fitness tracker is thinner than the average fitness tracker (9.9 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
9.9 mm vs 11 mm
8 newer release date
Release date
2024
★ Better than 97% of models
Market range: <2k – >2k
This fitness tracker was released more recently than the average fitness tracker (2024 vs 2016). The average fitness tracker was released in 2016.
February 2024
2024 vs 2016

Coaching features
Coaching
yes
▲ Better than 67% of models
This fitness tracker supports coaching, while the average fitness tracker does not. 33.8% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Running Coach support.
Tracks calorie intake
Calorie intake tracking
yes
▲ Better than 61% of models
This fitness tracker supports calorie intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.3% of fitness trackers support calorie intake tracking.
Food intake can be logged in the official app, with a food tile/widget on supported models.
Water intake tracking
Water intake tracking
yes
▲ Better than 58% of models
This fitness tracker supports water intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42% of fitness trackers support water intake tracking.
Tracks temperature
Temperature tracking
yes
▲ Better than 88% of models
This fitness tracker supports temperature tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 12.9% of fitness trackers support temperature tracking.
Used for cycle-related temperature insights.
Ad-free
Free app
yes
▲ Better than 4% of models
This fitness tracker has an ad-free app, while the average fitness tracker does not. 48.1% of fitness trackers have an ad-free app.

Why is Samsung Galaxy FIT3 worse than the average fitness tracker?

Show more

Hide

47.2% heavier
Thickness
36.8 g mm
▲ Better than 78% of models
Market range: <8 mm – >13 mm
This fitness tracker is heavier than the average fitness tracker (36.8 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
36.8 g vs 25 g
Not compatible with iOS
Compatible with iOS
no
▼ Worse than 97% of models
This fitness tracker is not compatible with iOS, while the average fitness tracker is. 96.7% of fitness trackers are compatible with iOS.
No shock resistance standard
Shock resistance standard
none
▼ Worse than 56% of models
This fitness tracker meets a weaker shock resistance standard than the average fitness tracker (none vs MIL-STD-810G). The average fitness tracker meets the MIL-STD-810G shock resistance standard.
none vs MIL-STD-810G
10 °C lower maximum operating temperature
Max operating temperature
35 °C
▼ Worse than 90% of models
Market range: <35 °C – >60 °C
This fitness tracker has a lower maximum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (35 °C vs 45 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a maximum operating temperature of 45 °C.
Thermal alerts can begin above 35 C.
35 °C vs 45 °C

Not compatible with iOS
Compatible with iOS
no
▼ Worse than 97% of models
This fitness tracker is not compatible with iOS, while the average fitness tracker is. 96.7% of fitness trackers are compatible with iOS.

47.2% heavier
Thickness
36.8 g mm
▲ Better than 78% of models
Market range: <8 mm – >13 mm
This fitness tracker is heavier than the average fitness tracker (36.8 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
36.8 g vs 25 g
No shock resistance standard
Shock resistance standard
none
▼ Worse than 56% of models
This fitness tracker meets a weaker shock resistance standard than the average fitness tracker (none vs MIL-STD-810G). The average fitness tracker meets the MIL-STD-810G shock resistance standard.
none vs MIL-STD-810G
10 °C lower maximum operating temperature
Max operating temperature
35 °C
▼ Worse than 90% of models
Market range: <35 °C – >60 °C
This fitness tracker has a lower maximum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (35 °C vs 45 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a maximum operating temperature of 45 °C.
Thermal alerts can begin above 35 C.
35 °C vs 45 °C

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

htxt.co.za

28/06/2024

Summary of the review

Samsung Galaxy Fit3 Review: Simple… most of the time

The Samsung Galaxy Fit3 offers a premium aluminum design, a responsive 1.6-inch AMOLED display, and reliable fitness/sleep tracking via Samsung Health. It stands out with safety features like Fall Detection and SOS, though initial setup can be tedious. YouTube · Limitations include the lack of built-in GPS and an altimeter, requiring a phone connection for outdoor mapping. While featuring a functional FreeRTOS interface with 4-7 day battery life, it lacks offline music, third-party apps, and iPhone compatibility.

thehelpfulhiker.com

12/08/2025

Summary of the review

Review: Samsung Galaxy Fit3 Smartwatch

The Samsung Galaxy Fit3 is a stylish, premium-feeling smartwatch that offers excellent value, especially for users already integrated into the Samsung ecosystem. The reviewer notes that it serves as a great upgrade from older budget trackers like the Amazfit GTS mini, providing reliable everyday health features including daily activity tracking, sleep monitoring, heart rate measurement, and exercise recording. A major highlight of the device is its affordability, costing the reviewer just £23 after combining an initial £49 sale price at John Lewis with additional Samsung and staff discounts. However, the smartwatch does come with notable connectivity and synchronization drawbacks. Setting up the connection between the Samsung Health App and Strava is described as a bit tricky. Furthermore, the watch fails to automatically upload all workout types to Strava; while common activities like walks and runs sync automatically, other exercises such as yoga or strength workouts require inconvenient manual uploads. Despite these synchronization quirks, the reviewer considers the device a worthwhile purchase for primary walking and running tracking.

eu.community.samsung.com

01/05/2024

Summary of the review

My one week, full review of the Galaxy Fit3 Would you like to see a comparison of how these different reviewers rated its battery life versus the offi...

The Samsung Galaxy Fit3 review praises the tracker for its small, lightweight, and comfortable design, ideal for sleep tracking, alongside a bright, responsive display that is easy to read in direct sunlight. Users benefit from a fast, lag-free interface and reliable "Lift to Wake" functionality, offering a premium, unobtrusive experience. Conversely, the review highlights software limitations, notably that users can only customize a single watch face at a time. Furthermore, a hardcoded restriction limits the "Lift to Wake" duration to just 4 seconds, disregarding longer user-defined screen timeout settings. samsung.com

lakadpilipinas.com

13/05/2024

Summary of the review

SAMSUNG GALAXY FIT3 ~ An In-Depth, Real World, Honest Review

The Samsung Galaxy Fit3 is a feature-packed, budget-friendly fitness tracker housed in a comfortable, lightweight aluminum body with a responsive 1.6-inch AMOLED screen. Priced affordably at ₱3,490.00, it stands out for its extensive tracking capabilities, including over 100 workout presets, automatic exercise detection, and comprehensive sleep monitoring that assigns playful "sleep animals" and coaching guidelines. It delivers great everyday utility with practical features like water and dust resistance, smartphone notifications, media playback control, and life-saving tools such as fall detection with emergency contact notification. Furthermore, its fast charging time allows the battery to reach full capacity in about an hour, providing a dependable 4-to-5-day lifespan under real-world usage. However, the device has notable drawbacks, most significantly a persistent syncing issue with the Galaxy Wearable app that affects both Samsung and non-Samsung Android devices, occasionally requiring resets that wipe out a day's worth of health data. The watch also lacks built-in GPS, meaning users must remain connected to a location-enabled smartphone to map out outdoor running or walking routes. Additionally, it lacks a microphone, preventing users from answering incoming phone calls...

digitalcitizen.life

31/07/2025

Summary of the review

Samsung Galaxy Fit3 review: Health and fitness tracking on a budget!

The Samsung Galaxy Fit3 is positioned as a top-tier budget fitness tracker, featuring a significantly improved, larger AMOLED display, a comfortable lightweight design, and seamless integration with the Samsung Health app. Commended for its 4/5 rating, the device offers excellent value for basic, day-to-day activity tracking and comprehensive workout data management. However, the review notes notable drawbacks, including a real-world battery life that falls short of the advertised 13 days and the absence of built-in GPS, which limits tracking accuracy to connected smartphone functionality. Additionally, the device lacks advanced sensors for features like ECG and faced initial firmware stability issues.

phonearena.com

10/01/2025

Summary of the review

Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 Review: Most smartwatch features at a fraction of the cost

The Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 is positioned as an affordable, stylish fitness tracker that bridges the gap between basic bands and full smartwatches for a retail price of $60. Its standout features include a vibrant 1.6-inch AMOLED display, a lightweight design that fits most wrist sizes comfortably, and a smooth, lag-free user interface powered by FreeRTOS. The device excels at basic health monitoring, offering tracking for over 100 exercise types and a unique "sleep animal" feature that categorizes sleep patterns in an engaging way. Battery life is another major strength, lasting up to 13 days on a single charge under light use, or around four days with the always-on display enabled. However, the Fit 3 has notable drawbacks that may deter more serious athletes or iPhone users. The most significant hardware omission is the lack of built-in GPS, meaning users must carry a paired phone to track run routes accurately. Additionally, despite Samsung's claims of official support, the reviewer found it impossible to pair with an iPhone, as the device was missing from the iOS Galaxy Fit app. While the...

techgearlab.com

13/08/2025

Summary of the review

Samsung Galaxy Fit3 Review | Tested & Rated - TechGearLab

The Samsung Galaxy Fit3 is a highly capable, budget-friendly fitness tracker priced at $60, designed exclusively for Android users. It excels in core tracking categories, delivering incredibly accurate step counts and heart rate readings that closely match premium chest strap monitors. Sleep tracking is equally reliable, offering deep insights into sleep stages, trends, and even snoring data. Despite its lack of built-in GPS, the device tracks basic cardio metrics surprisingly well, handles swimming metrics, and uses an integrated barometer to record elevation changes. It also boasts a slim, lightweight form factor with an easily readable AMOLED display. Users can expect a commendable battery life that lasts nearly the manufacturer's claimed 13 days, complete with convenient magnetic charging. However, the tracker comes with several notable drawbacks, the largest being its complete lack of iOS compatibility. The initial setup is remarkably tedious, requiring users to download three separate apps to fully pair the watch and view data. Software updates can also be finicky; testing revealed that a major app update forced a complete device reset, erasing all recorded data. On the hardware...

androidauthority.com

15/02/2025

Summary of the review

Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 review - Android Authority

The Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 marks a budget-friendly return to Samsung’s wearable lineup, priced at $59.99 to target users new to fitness tracking. Operating as a distinct, "diet" alternative to the more premium Galaxy Watch series, it features a classy, lightweight, and comfortable square design equipped with a bright 1.6-inch AMOLED display and 5ATM/IP68 durability. On the positive side, the tracker integrates seamlessly into the established Samsung ecosystem, automatically detects popular workouts, and includes practical everyday tools like a calculator, a flashlight, and media controls. Its standout feature is an impressive battery life that promises up to 13 days of use, though real-world testing with the always-on display active nets around four reliable days. However, the low price point results in notable compromises regarding health tracking accuracy and smart features. Reviewers found that the heart rate sensor struggles to match the pinpoint precision of chest straps during interval training, and the sleep tracking frequently overestimates total rest times by missing extended wake windows. Furthermore, the lack of built-in GPS forces outdoor runners to carry a paired phone to log their...

pcmag.com

11/02/2025

Summary of the review

Samsung Galaxy Fit3 Review - PCMag

The Samsung Galaxy Fit3 is a $69.99 budget fitness tracker featuring a vibrant AMOLED display, accurate heart rate monitoring, and long-lasting battery life. It offers essential health tracking capabilities like blood oxygen sensors and fall detection, delivering strong performance for its price point. However, the device lacks built-in GPS, speakers, and a microphone, restricting its functionality compared to full smartwatches. Additional limitations include limited compatibility with iOS, potential gaps in sleep data, and specific features that are exclusive to Samsung phones. YouTube ·

techradar.com

10/06/2025

Summary of the review

Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 review - TechRadar

The Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 is a highly affordable, budget-friendly fitness tracker tailored specifically for Android and Samsung Galaxy users. Priced around $59 / £49 / AU$139, it features a sleek, upgraded 1.6-inch AMOLED display that is significantly larger and sharper than its predecessor, mimicking the look of a smartwatch. It provides intuitive touch navigation, an impressive 8 to 10-day real-world battery life, and seamlessly integrates with the free Samsung Health app without requiring a paid subscription. On the positive side (pros), the device offers excellent value for the money, a highly bright and responsive touchscreen, and remarkably accurate heart rate tracking that remains consistent during typical gym workouts. However, the tracker has several notable limitations that casual or fitness-focused users should consider before purchasing. On the negative side (cons), the Galaxy Fit 3 completely excludes iOS compatibility, meaning it will not work with iPhones at all. It lacks built-in GPS, which results in inaccurate distance and pace tracking unless it is actively tethered to a smartphone during outdoor runs or bike rides. Additionally, the physical design can be uncomfortable...

konsument.at

22/05/2025

Summary of the review

Fit or Flop? Keeping Your Finger on the Pulse with Fitness Trackers - 2025 Review", "Fit or Flop? Moving with the Times with Fitness Trackers - 2025 T...

The Konsument 2025 review of budget-friendly fitness trackers highlights that affordable models from brands like Xiaomi, Huawei, and Honor are effective for tracking daily health data, with a Xiaomi model earning the highest rating. Evaluators tested seven devices, noting that while they offer strong battery life and durability, they often suffer from minor measurement inaccuracies. Key advantages include high cost-effectiveness and robust builds, whereas drawbacks involve limitations in versatility and precision compared to premium alternatives. The VKI recommends these devices for general use but warns that they may not suit users requiring high-precision data for specialized training.

computerbild.de

13/09/2024

Summary of the review

Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 Review: Not Fit Enough!", "Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 Test: Just Not Fit Enough!

The Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 features a highly responsive AMOLED display wrapped in an elegant, scratch-resistant housing. It offers significantly upgraded, highly accurate heart rate tracking compared to its predecessor, alongside precise sleep stage recording that successfully captures brief waking phases throughout the night. Users can utilize over 100 sports modes, complete with functional automatic workout recognition for activities like running and cycling. Additionally, Samsung updated the device's water-resistance functionality by replacing the previously cumbersome water-lock system with an easy-to-use, single side-button shortcut. Despite these structural upgrades, the tracker suffers from critical hardware and software limitations. The device lacks built-in GPS and a barometer, requiring you to carry a smartphone to track your workout routes. Furthermore, its swim-tracking mode is severely bugged, frequently registering zero meters after long sessions. There is no ECG sensor or NFC support for mobile payments. The software lacks third-party app availability, fails to calculate advanced health metrics like heart rate variability, cannot be paired with Apple iPhones, and contains poorly optimized menu typography that cuts off across the screen. Finally, while turning off the Always-On...

computerbild.de

08/08/2024

Summary of the review

Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 review: Competition for Fitbit?

The Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 is an affordable fitness tracker that delivers highly accurate continuous heart rate monitoring and an upgraded, vibrant AMOLED display with Always-on functionality. Encased in a durable aluminum housing, it tracks around 100 sports modes and provides comprehensive sleep analysis, including mental and physical recovery metrics. However, it completely lacks built-in GPS and a barometer, meaning outdoor route tracking is entirely dependent on a connected smartphone. Additionally, user privacy is a concern, as independent legal reviews highlighted opaque data protection conditions and the use of consumer data for advertising purposes. While it excels as a basic fitness logger, the device falls short in both smart capabilities and compatibility. It completely drops iOS support, requiring an Android 10 smartphone or newer paired with two separate apps (Galaxy Wearable and Samsung Health) for configuration and data viewing. On the smart front, it lacks NFC for contactless payments, has no Wi-Fi, cannot run third-party apps, and restricts communication to basic notifications with template replies. The physical design features a comfortable silicone strap that unfortunately lacks enough adjustment holes for...

test-achats.be

11/04/2026

Summary of the review

Samsung Galaxy Fit3 Review - Testachats (Lab Test)

The Samsung Galaxy Fit3 is a dedicated fitness tracker tailored for individuals seeking an intensive sport and workout companion to log metrics like daily goals, step counts, calories burned, distance, altitude, and elevation changes. Operating with a 256x402 resolution AMOLED touchscreen display and a weight of just 37 grams, the device features a detachable band, a built-in heart rate monitor, and a pulse oximeter for advanced health monitoring. It provides a suite of specific tracking modes, including running, hiking, and cycling, alongside automated activity detection and built-in sleep tracking. Pricing for the device fluctuates heavily across European online retailers, starting at a competitive €44.95 via Vanden Borre and peaking at €69.00 at Art & Craft. Several distinct pros and cons define the tracker’s capabilities. On the positive side, it delivers extensive physical notifications, allowing users to receive social media updates and read and directly reply to incoming SMS text messages. It also safely pair with a smartphone's GPS to precisely map outdoor exercises. However, a significant drawback is its ecosystem lock: the device is compatible only with Android smartphones and...

airmore.ai

07/07/2025

Summary of the review

Samsung Galaxy Fit3 (2025) Review: A Complete and Affordable Fitness Tracker

The Samsung Galaxy Fit3 is a lightweight (~18.5g) and affordable (~$60) fitness tracker featuring a premium aluminum casing and a bright 1.6-inch AMOLED display. It provides reliable daily health monitoring, including 24/7 heart rate tracking, blood oxygen levels (SpO₂), stress monitoring, and detailed sleep analysis powered by Samsung Health. The device includes over 100 workout modes with automatic activity detection, a 5ATM + IP68 water resistance rating suitable for swimming, and safety features like fall detection and emergency SOS. Battery life is another strong point, lasting between 10 to 13 days under basic usage, though intensive use with the Always-On Display (AOD) enabled drops it down to 4 to 6 days. However, the tracker has several notable limitations, most notably the total lack of built-in GPS, which forces users to carry a smartphone to map distances during outdoor workouts. It also lacks an integrated voice assistant, an app store, local music storage, and NFC capabilities for mobile payments. Furthermore, software performance can occasionally suffer from minor UI lag when the AOD is turned on. Finally, the tracker is completely incompatible...

protegez-vous.ca

11/04/2026

Summary of the review

SAMSUNG Galaxy Fit3 | Protégez-Vous.ca (Technical Review)

The Samsung Galaxy Fit3 is rated as a highly accurate, "Very Good" budget tracker for step counting, display clarity, and setup, offering "Good" performance for sleep, heart rate, and battery monitoring. It boasts excellent data security and a user-friendly Android app. Protégez-Vous Conversely, the device lacks built-in GPS, relying on a connected smartphone for tracking, and is incompatible with iOS devices. Key drawbacks include limited phone call integration, only moderate texting functionality, and an "Acceptable" rating for user data privacy.

elcomercio.pe

10/03/2024

Summary of the review

Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 Review | Is This Smartwatch Worth It?

The Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 is a renewed fitness tracker featuring an aluminum body, a larger 1.6-inch 3D AMOLED display with 450 nits of brightness, and a lightweight design of 36.8 grams. It integrates deeply into the Android ecosystem via the Galaxy Wearable app, providing users with rapid 3-minute syncing, Bluetooth 5.3 stability, 16 MB of RAM, and 256 MB of storage. Operating strictly as a sports-centric wearable, it accurately tracks daily activities, sports, and caloric loss while pushing these metrics directly to Samsung Health. Additionally, it includes handy day-to-day tools like customizable watch faces, stress monitoring, oxygen tracking, and the ability to view notifications or reject phone calls directly from the wrist. The primary advantages of this tracker include its auto-brightness capability, durable 2.5D glass display protection, IP68 water resistance rating, and an impressive battery life that yields up to 9 days of intense use with quick 1.5-hour charging. Furthermore, its budget-friendly price point of 249 Peruvian Soles offers accurate metric values relative to cost. On the downside, the device features a closed software ecosystem that is entirely incompatible...

altroconsumo.it

15/03/2024

Summary of the review

Samsung Galaxy Fit3 review and test - Altroconsumo

The Samsung Galaxy Fit3 is a highly rated, budget-friendly fitness tracker that balances smart functionalities with build quality. The wearable features a rectangular AMOLED touch screen with a 256 x 402 resolution and supports an always-on display mode. It is built with a replaceable strap, weighs 36.50 grams, and is water-resistant, making it suitable for shower use or swimming in pools. In terms of health tracking, the device includes an integrated heart rate monitor, a pulse oximeter for blood oxygen (SpO2) levels, a step counter, a sleep monitor, and automatic sport detection. It tracks multiple activities like walking, hiking, cycling, and indoor or outdoor running, though it is only compatible with Android smartphones and does not support iOS devices. Expert analysis highlights several distinct pros and cons for this wearable. The primary advantages include its excellent build quality, simple user interface, and solid smart features for a fitness band, such as the ability to read and reply to text messages, check calendar alerts, control the phone's camera, and manage music playback. However, the device has notable downsides, most significantly the...

hrdlpn.nl

11/03/2026

Summary of the review

Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 Activity Tracker Review

The Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 is a highly capable budget-friendly activity tracker that leans heavily into smartwatch territory for under €100. In terms of pros, it features a bright, large 1.6-inch AMOLED display that allows users to easily view stats like the pedometer, heart rate, and battery life at a glance. The tracker boasts robust health metrics, supporting 101 activity tracking modes, blood oxygen monitoring, fall detection, automatic workout detection, and comprehensive sleep tracking complete with snore detection. Additionally, it offers great convenience features like offline Spotify playback, remote smartphone camera control, over 100 customizable watch faces, and an impressive battery life that can last up to 13 days on a single charge. Despite these strong features, the reviewer highlights several notable cons. While the lightweight and thin rubber band makes it comfortable for sports, the tracker lacks the precision of Samsung's higher-end smartwatches. It is also limited by a lack of extensive third-party app integrations. Furthermore, customization is restricted because users must strictly buy Samsung's proprietary watch bands for replacements, as third-party alternatives will not fit. Lastly, while it...

technologyinsider.nl

10/02/2025

Summary of the review

Samsung Galaxy Fit3 Review: An affordable tracker with many advantages, but also downsides

The Samsung Galaxy Fit3 is characterized as an affordable, 18.5-gram tracker offering impressive battery life, with real-world testing indicating three to four days of usage and a rapid one-hour charging time. While designed for comfortable, long-term sleep and activity tracking, the device's budget positioning results in a simple plastic strap and fewer advanced features compared to premium smartwatches. Key compromises include its basic aesthetic and limited smart functionality, making it a functional choice for users prioritizing continuous, low-cost monitoring over high-end performance.

id.nl

03/01/2025

Summary of the review

Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 Review - Dirt Cheap Fitness Tracker

The ID.nl review highlights the Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 as an ultra-cheap, lightweight fitness tracker featuring a bright AMOLED screen, comprehensive health tracking, and an impressive battery life of up to 13 days with the Always-On Display (AOD) disabled. It is identified as a robust, budget-friendly entry-level option. However, the tracker suffers from a cumbersome setup requiring multiple apps, and enabling the AOD drastically reduces battery life to only three or four days. Additionally, users are limited by a restrictive interface featuring restricted watch faces and non-actionable tiles.

androidworld.nl

13/04/2025

Summary of the review

Samsung Galaxy Fit 3: Who is this wearable for?

The Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 is positioned as an affordable fitness tracker ideal for beginners or casual athletes who want basic health monitoring without the high price of a premium smartwatch. Key advantages include its long battery life, which can last up to 10 days with the screen off, and a comfortable, lightweight design that is fully waterproof (IP68). Users can also enjoy a vibrant 1.6-inch OLED display and extensive customization options with over 100 watch faces. However, the device has notable drawbacks, most significantly the lack of built-in GPS, requiring users to carry a phone to track outdoor routes. It also lacks a speaker for calls, does not support mobile payments, and cannot run third-party apps as it does not use Wear OS. Performance issues were also noted, such as inaccurate step counting—where cycling is often misidentified as walking—and inconsistent sleep tracking data. Are you looking for a device that focuses more on battery life or one that includes standalone GPS for running?

Third-party reviews

Based on 10,964 buyer reviews from online shops.

Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Samsung Galaxy FIT3

Bright and fluid 1.6-inch AMOLED display with a 60Hz refresh rate
Premium aluminum body that is lightweight and comfortable for 24/7 wear
Excellent value for money, offering robust health features at a budget-friendly price
Deep integration with the Samsung ecosystem, including sync for alarms and Do Not Disturb
Strong battery life compared to flagship smartwatches, typically lasting 7 to 10 days in real-world use
Intuitive and snappy user interface that is easy to navigate

What we don't like about Samsung Galaxy FIT3

Lack of built-in GPS, requiring a paired smartphone for route tracking
Exclusive compatibility with Samsung/Android phones; does not work with iOS
Inconsistent sleep and SPO2 tracking accuracy reported by some users
Real-world battery life often falls short of the advertised 13-day claim
No NFC support for contactless payments
Limited smart features, including no microphone, speaker, or third-party app store

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Fit3 is a budget-friendly fitness tracker featuring a 1.6-inch AMOLED display (256 x 402 resolution) housed in a slim 18.5g aluminum body with 5ATM and IP68 water and dust resistance. Key characteristics include tracking for over 100 sports modes, continuous heart rate monitoring, blood oxygen (SpO2) levels, and advanced sleep coaching, alongside modern safety features like fall detection and Emergency SOS. Its primary pros are a long-lasting battery that can reach up to 13 days on a single charge, a bright and responsive touchscreen, and seamless integration with the Samsung Health ecosystem. However, notable cons include the lack of built-in GPS (requiring a paired phone for location tracking), no microphone or speaker for calls, and complete incompatibility with iOS devices.

Best alternatives

Xiaomi Smart Band 9

Fitness trackers

Xiaomi Smart Band 8

Fitness trackers

Fitness trackers

Xiaomi Smart Band 7

Fitness trackers

Xiaomi Smart Band 7 Pro

Fitness trackers

Fitness trackers

Xiaomi Redmi Smart Band Pro

Fitness trackers

Xiaomi Mi Smart Band 6

Fitness trackers

Xiaomi Mi Band 5

Fitness trackers

Fitness trackers

Xiaomi Mi Band 4

Fitness trackers

Samsung Galaxy Fit

Fitness trackers

See best alternatives in Buying Guide

Compare Samsung Galaxy FIT3 with other products in the Fitness trackers category

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy FIT3 and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found