OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0

LEBEXY S1 review: 163 specs compared

Avg. price:~£25Battery life:10 daysScreen size:0.87 inchHeart rate monitor:noGPS:yesWaterproof depth rating:1 m

LEBEXY S1 Review: Compare 168 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

LEBEXY S1
7.1/10

Overall score

Score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Score components

35%

6.7

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

?

Reviews scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.2, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.1, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 65% of fitness trackers
8.0

Value for money

Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
Score components

70%

7.1

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 64%
6.7

Technical score

Technical score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

20%

8.1

Sports

20%

5.9

Battery

18%

5.4

Health

18%

5.4

Display

8%

8.0

Smart functions

8%

8.5

Wellness

4%

7.7

Connectivity

4%

8.1

Design

â–¼Worse than 63%
?

Reviews score

Reviews score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet. Until we do, its review part counts as 7.2.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
No expert tests yet
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • lebexy-s1
  • lebexy-s1
  • lebexy-s1
  • lebexy-s1
  • lebexy-s1
  • lebexy-s1
lebexy-s1
lebexy-s1
lebexy-s1
lebexy-s1
lebexy-s1
lebexy-s1
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Fitness trackers model ranking

Ranked #108 of 238 models in Fitness trackers (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker LEBEXY S1

Technical score
Technical score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components:

20%

8.1

Sports

20%

5.9

Battery

18%

5.4

Health

18%

5.4

Display

8%

8.0

Smart functions

8%

8.5

Wellness

4%

7.7

Connectivity

4%

8.1

Design

6.7
Reviews score
7.2
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
Score components:

70%

7.1

Overall score

30%

10

Price

8.0
Heart rate monitor
no
This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring. 64.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
no
This fitness tracker does not support Resting heart rate. 53% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 36.5% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 13.7% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 32.2% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
yes
This fitness tracker has GPS. 87.8% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
GPS
This fitness tracker supports GPS satellite systems which is more versatile than that of 86.1% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 2.9% of fitness trackers.
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.4% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 5.6% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.8% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 14.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
?
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 0.9% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.5% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.5% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
yes
This fitness tracker supports achievements. 23.8% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 21.4% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
no
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 36.4% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
?
Maximum Bluetooth range
?
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 11.8% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 2.5% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 0.9% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
Show more
Battery life
10 days
Market range: <5 days – >180 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 10 days which is longer than that of 47.8% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 6.6% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Power-saving battery life
?
Battery capacity
?
Show more
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 26.3% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
0.87 inch
Market range: <0 inch – >1.6 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 0.87 inch which is smaller than that of 77.2% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2.5% of fitness trackers.
Display type
?
Screen resolution
240x 240
This fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 240x240 which is higher than that of 83.7% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2% of fitness trackers.
Pixel density
390 ppi
Market range: <140 ppi – >330 ppi
This fitness tracker has a pixel density of 390 ppi which is higher than that of 100% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Form factor
watch
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.1% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 3.3% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
?
Band width
?
Show more

LEBEXY S1 vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSportsBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart functionsDesignWellness
  • Built-in GPS
    This fitness tracker has GPS, while the average fitness tracker does not. 12.6% of fitness trackers have GPS.
  • 57.9% higher pixel density
    This fitness tracker has a higher pixel density than the average fitness tracker (390 ppi vs 247 ppi). The average fitness tracker has a pixel density of 247 ppi.
    390 ppi vs 247 ppi
  • 0.5 hours shorter charging time
    This fitness tracker has a lower charging time than the average fitness tracker (1 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    1 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • Multi-sport mode
    This fitness tracker supports multi-sport mode, while the average fitness tracker does not. 14.5% of fitness trackers support multi-sport mode.
  • Camera remote control
    This fitness tracker supports camera remote control, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.6% of fitness trackers support camera remote control.
  • 2.8x cheaper
    LEBEXY S1 is cheaper than the average fitness tracker (£25 vs £70).
    £25 vs £70
  • 2.8x cheaper
    LEBEXY S1 is cheaper than the average fitness tracker (£25 vs £70).
    £25 vs £70
  • Built-in GPS
    This fitness tracker has GPS, while the average fitness tracker does not. 12.6% of fitness trackers have GPS.
  • Multi-sport mode
    This fitness tracker supports multi-sport mode, while the average fitness tracker does not. 14.5% of fitness trackers support multi-sport mode.
  • 0.5 hours shorter charging time
    This fitness tracker has a lower charging time than the average fitness tracker (1 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    1 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 57.9% higher pixel density
    This fitness tracker has a higher pixel density than the average fitness tracker (390 ppi vs 247 ppi). The average fitness tracker has a pixel density of 247 ppi.
    390 ppi vs 247 ppi
  • Camera remote control
    This fitness tracker supports camera remote control, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.6% of fitness trackers support camera remote control.
  • No heart rate monitoring
    This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 63.9% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
  • Higher resting heart rate
    This fitness tracker does not support Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does. 52.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • 33.3% lower screen brightness
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen brightness than the average fitness tracker (300 nits vs 450 nits). The average fitness tracker has screen brightness of 450 nits.
    300 nits vs 450 nits
  • 49 m lower waterproof depth rating
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (1 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    1 m vs 50 m
  • 0.19 inch smaller screen size
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen size than the average fitness tracker (0.9 inch vs 1.06 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.06 inch.
    0.87 inch vs 1.06 inch
  • Not compatible with smart scales
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with smart scales, while the average fitness tracker is. 64.9% of fitness trackers are compatible with smart scales.
  • No heart rate monitoring
    This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 63.9% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
  • Higher resting heart rate
    This fitness tracker does not support Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does. 52.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • 33.3% lower screen brightness
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen brightness than the average fitness tracker (300 nits vs 450 nits). The average fitness tracker has screen brightness of 450 nits.
    300 nits vs 450 nits
  • 0.19 inch smaller screen size
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen size than the average fitness tracker (0.9 inch vs 1.06 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.06 inch.
    0.87 inch vs 1.06 inch
  • 49 m lower waterproof depth rating
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (1 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    1 m vs 50 m
  • Not compatible with smart scales
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with smart scales, while the average fitness tracker is. 64.9% of fitness trackers are compatible with smart scales.

Third-party reviews

What we like about LEBEXY S1

  • A battery life of 10 days lasts well over a week between charges.
  • A 1 hour charge is quick, so the band is off the wrist for little time.
  • GPS adds route tracking to steps, sleep and distance.
  • A silent alarm wakes you with a vibration rather than a sound.
  • The free app shows activity reports.
  • The IP68 rating keeps out dust and handles rain and splashes.

What we don't like about LEBEXY S1

  • The 0.87 inch screen is small for reading notifications.
  • The 1 m depth rating rules out swimming in deep water.
  • Heavy GPS use will shorten the 10 days of battery life.
  • The case is plastic, which scratches more easily than metal.
  • It is a band, not a full sports watch, so training detail is limited.

Verdict

Ten days between charges is the main reason to look at the LEBEXY S1, a plastic and silicone tracker for steps, sleep and distance. A full charge takes 1 hour, so topping up fits around a busy week. GPS is built in, and multi-sport mode covers several activities. Vibrating alerts and a silent alarm mean you get notified without a sound. The free app collects activity reports, and the band can be personalised. The trade-off is the screen: at 0.87 inch with 240 x 240 pixels, it is small, and tiny text is harder to read. The 1 m depth rating means it is built for splashes and short dips, not deep water. It suits someone who wants a long-lasting band with GPS and quiet alerts, and who does not mind a small screen.

Compare LEBEXY S1 with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of LEBEXY S1 and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found