Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Xiaomi Mi Band 3i Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~ÂŁ20Battery life:20 daysScreen size:0.78 inchHeart rate monitor:noGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:50 m

Xiaomi Mi Band 3i Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

6.9

Overall score

Score
6.9/ 10
âś•
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

6.9

Technical score

20%

?

User score

â–ĽWorse than 56% of fitness-trackers
6.9

Technical score

Technical score
6.9/ 10
âś•
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

7.7

Sports & Navigation

20%

7.5

Battery

18%

5.6

Health

18%

5.1

Display

8%

7.9

Smart Features

8%

8.2

App & Wellness

4%

8.1

Connectivity

4%

8.5

Design & Durability

â–ĽWorse than 54% of fitness-trackers
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
âś•
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ ÂŁ20

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Xiaomi Mi Band 3i

Technical score
Technical score
6.9/ 10
âś•
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

7.7

Sports & Navigation

20%

7.5

Battery

18%

5.6

Health

18%

5.1

Display

8%

7.9

Smart Features

8%

8.2

App & Wellness

4%

8.1

Connectivity

4%

8.5

Design & Durability

6.9
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
âś•
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Xiaomi Mi Band 3i has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 58.7% of fitness trackers.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

6.9

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.9
Heart rate monitor
no
Heart rate monitor
no
This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring. 60.3% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
no
Resting heart rate
no
This fitness tracker does not support Resting heart rate. 47.9% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
?
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 25.4% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
no satellite positioning support.
GNSS bands supported
no
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.9% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.5% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 16.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
yes
Call control
yes
This fitness tracker supports call controls. 58.7% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Reject/mute only.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.3% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
via Mi Fit app
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
yes
Achievements
yes
This fitness tracker supports achievements. 24.3% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
yes
Inactivity alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 23.5% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
no
Coaching
no
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 34% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
4.2
Bluetooth version
4.2
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.2 which is newer than in 59.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 14.2% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
20 m
Maximum Bluetooth range
20 m
This fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 20 m which is higher than that of 80.6% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 6.7% of fitness trackers.
NFC
no
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 1.8% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi connectivity.
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
20 days
Battery life
20 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 20 days which is longer than that of 78.2% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 3.5% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life in power-saving mode
?
Battery capacity
110 mAh
Battery capacity
110 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 110 mAh which is higher than that of 48% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
yes
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
0.78 inch
Screen size
0.78 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 0.78 inch which is smaller than that of 83.2% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 0.7% of fitness trackers.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
This fitness tracker uses AMOLED display technology which is more advanced than that of 74.9% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 25.1% of fitness trackers.
Monochrome AMOLED display.
Screen resolution
128x 80
Screen resolution
128x 80
This fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 128x80 which is higher than that of 57.4% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 1.1% of fitness trackers.
Pixel density
194 ppi
Pixel density
194 ppi
This fitness tracker has a pixel density of 194 ppi which is lower than that of 61.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2.8% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
Replaceable watch band
yes
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 25.6% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
18 mm
Show more

Xiaomi Mi Band 3i vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • 10 days longer battery life
    Battery life
    20 days
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (20 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    20 days vs 10 days
  • Touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • Tracks elevation
    Elevation tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports elevation tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 27.4% of fitness trackers support elevation tracking.
    Elevation estimate via connected phone GPS
  • Call control
    Call control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports call controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.5% of fitness trackers support call controls.
    Reject/mute only.
  • Modern Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.2
    This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (4.2 vs 4). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.0.
    4.2 vs 4.0
  • 10 m longer Bluetooth range
    Maximum Bluetooth range
    20 m
    This fitness tracker has a longer Bluetooth range than the average fitness tracker (20 m vs 10 m). The average fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m.
    20 m vs 10 m
  • Built-in route tracker
    Has a route tracker
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports route tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.8% of fitness trackers support route tracking.
    Built-in GPS route tracking.
  • 3.5x cheaper
    Xiaomi Mi Band 3i is cheaper than the average fitness tracker (ÂŁ20 vs ÂŁ70).
    ÂŁ20 vs ÂŁ70
  • 10 days longer battery life
    Battery life
    20 days
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (20 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    20 days vs 10 days
  • Touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Modern Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.2
    This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (4.2 vs 4). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.0.
    4.2 vs 4.0
  • 10 m longer Bluetooth range
    Maximum Bluetooth range
    20 m
    This fitness tracker has a longer Bluetooth range than the average fitness tracker (20 m vs 10 m). The average fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m.
    20 m vs 10 m
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • Call control
    Call control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports call controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.5% of fitness trackers support call controls.
    Reject/mute only.
  • Gesture control
    Gesture control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports gesture controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.8% of fitness trackers support gesture controls.
  • 20% lighter
    Thickness
    20 g mm
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (20 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    20 g vs 25 g
  • No heart rate monitoring
    Heart rate monitor
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 60% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
  • No automatic activity detection
    Automatic activity detection
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support automatic activity detection, while the average fitness tracker does. 52% of fitness trackers support automatic activity detection.
  • 1 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    2.5 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2.5 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    2.5 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    128 x 80
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (128x80 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    128x80 vs 194x368
  • 33.3% lower screen brightness
    Screen brightness
    300 nits
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen brightness than the average fitness tracker (300 nits vs 450 nits). The average fitness tracker has screen brightness of 450 nits.
    300 nits vs 450 nits
  • 0.26 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    0.78 inch
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen size than the average fitness tracker (0.8 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    0.78 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • No personalization options
    Can be personalised
    no
    This fitness tracker cannot be personalized, while the average fitness tracker can. 79.9% of fitness trackers can be personalized.
  • 20.8% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    194 ppi
    This fitness tracker has a lower pixel density than the average fitness tracker (194 ppi vs 245 ppi). The average fitness tracker has a pixel density of 245 ppi.
    194 ppi vs 245 ppi
  • 5.07x less popular
    Xiaomi Mi Band 3i has a lower popularity than the average fitness tracker (1 vs 5.1).
    1 vs 5.07
  • No heart rate monitoring
    Heart rate monitor
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 60% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
  • 1 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    2.5 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2.5 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    2.5 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    128 x 80
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (128x80 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    128x80 vs 194x368
  • 33.3% lower screen brightness
    Screen brightness
    300 nits
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen brightness than the average fitness tracker (300 nits vs 450 nits). The average fitness tracker has screen brightness of 450 nits.
    300 nits vs 450 nits
  • 0.26 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    0.78 inch
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen size than the average fitness tracker (0.8 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    0.78 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • 20.8% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    194 ppi
    This fitness tracker has a lower pixel density than the average fitness tracker (194 ppi vs 245 ppi). The average fitness tracker has a pixel density of 245 ppi.
    194 ppi vs 245 ppi
  • 74.4% lower RAM capacity
    RAM capacity
    0.000512 GB
    This fitness tracker has a lower RAM capacity than the average fitness tracker (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.002 GB of RAM capacity.
    Converted from 512 KB to GB.
    0.000512 GB vs 0.002 GB
  • 6 mm greater height
    Height
    46.8 mm
    This fitness tracker is taller than the average fitness tracker (46.8 mm vs 40.8 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 40.8 mm.
    46.8 mm vs 40.8 mm
  • No personalization options
    Can be personalised
    no
    This fitness tracker cannot be personalized, while the average fitness tracker can. 79.9% of fitness trackers can be personalized.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

G
gizchina.com
23/12/2019
Summary of the review
B
beetelbite.com
20/12/2019
Summary of the review
T
techreviewer.de
07/10/2024
Summary of the review
G
giga.de
19/08/2018
Summary of the review
F
futurezone.at
17/08/2018
Summary of the review
H
heise.de
19/07/2018
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
07/08/2018
Summary of the review
J
justegeek.fr
23/01/2019
Summary of the review
P
presse-citron.net
10/09/2018
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
30/11/2018
Summary of the review
F
frandroid.com
24/06/2018
Summary of the review
B
beetelbite.com
20/12/2019
Summary of the review
G
gizchina.com
23/12/2019
Summary of the review
T
techwiser.com
18/10/2021
Summary of the review
B
beetelbite.com
20/12/2019
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Xiaomi Mi Band 3i

  • Excellent value for money and extremely budget-friendly
  • Stellar battery life, easily lasting 14–20 days on a single charge
  • Lightweight and comfortable design for long-term wear
  • Waterproof up to 5 ATM, making it suitable for swimming and showering
  • Responsive 0.78-inch OLED touchscreen with intuitive swipe gestures
  • Useful smart features like weather forecasts, call rejection, and app notifications

What we don't like about Xiaomi Mi Band 3i

  • No built-in heart rate sensor, which is a major omission compared to the standard Mi Band 3
  • Poor screen visibility under direct sunlight due to limited brightness
  • Step tracking can be inaccurate, sometimes registering 'steps' while driving or sleeping
  • Does not track afternoon naps; sleep monitoring is generally limited to nighttime
  • Lacks an always-on display feature
  • Must be removed from the silicone strap every time it needs charging

Verdict

The Xiaomi Mi Band 3i is a budget-focused fitness tracker featuring a 0.78-inch monochrome AMOLED touchscreen with a 128 x 80 pixel resolution and a capacitive navigation button. Key characteristics include 5ATM water resistance (up to 50 meters), Bluetooth 4.2 connectivity, and a 110mAh battery providing up to 20 days of life. Its main pros are its extreme affordability, long-lasting battery, and lightweight, swim-proof design suitable for tracking steps, calories, and sleep. However, its primary cons are the complete lack of a heart rate sensor and poor screen visibility under direct sunlight.

Compare Xiaomi Mi Band 3i with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Xiaomi Mi Band 3i and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found