OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0

Oppo Band review: 163 specs compared

Avg. price:~£25Battery life:12 daysScreen size:1.1 inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:50 m

Oppo Band Review: Compare 163 technical specifications, 42 expert and video reviews and 1 best-of list to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

Oppo Band
7.4/10

Overall score

Score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 62% of models
Score components

35%

7.4

Technical score

30%

7.4

List score

25%

7.7

Reviews score

10%

7.0

Sentiment score

▲Better than 62% of fitness trackers
8.2

Value for money

Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 61% of models
Score components

70%

7.4

Overall score

30%

10

Price

▲Better than 61%
7.4

Technical score

Technical score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 67% of models
Score components

20%

7.3

Sports

20%

5.4

Battery

18%

8.1

Health

18%

8.3

Display

8%

7.0

Smart functions

8%

8.2

Wellness

4%

8.0

Connectivity

4%

8.9

Design

▲Better than 67%
7.7

Reviews score

Reviews score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 51% of models

80%

7.4

Average grade

20%

8.8

Popularity

Grades by review (42)
35 reviews: 12 with a printed score, 23 estimated from the review. 7 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▲Better than 51%
7.4

List score

List score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (1)
List score: in 1 of 85 lists (1%)
▲Better than 74%
  • oppo-band
  • oppo-band
  • oppo-band
  • oppo-band
  • oppo-band
oppo-band
oppo-band
oppo-band
oppo-band
oppo-band
Where to buy
    N/A~ £25
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Oppo Band

Based on 10 · 7

Reviewers find it comfortable with decent battery life and a good app, but charging, step counting and sport modes disappoint.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Oppo Band

Based on 148 owners sharing their experience in online comments

25%positive2%mixed73%negative

Owners value long battery life and simple everyday use, while frequent notification, connection, and reliability failures dominate.

What owners dislike

  • Owners say the band often disconnects from their phone and needs re-pairing, and some say it stopped appearing in Bluetooth search after an app update.15
  • Owners say incoming phone calls and WhatsApp call alerts do not show on the band, while message and SMS notifications still come through.13
  • Owners say the band suddenly shut down or stopped responding, often after a reset or during charging, and then would not turn back on.13
  • Owners report the battery draining far faster than advertised, sometimes lasting only one to four days instead of the claimed two weeks.10
  • Owners say the screen does not wake when they raise their wrist, so they must touch the band or press a button to see the display.9
  • Owners say some phone notifications, such as WhatsApp, messages and weather, do not appear on the band, even after resetting and reconfiguring.9
  • Owners say the companion app stopped working or disappeared after an update, which stopped syncing and left the band showing an outdated watch face.6
  • Owners say the touchscreen becomes slow, unresponsive or stops working entirely, sometimes within days of purchase or after about two years.5
  • Owners say the strap clasp breaks easily after normal use, and replacement straps are hard to find for this band.5
  • Owners say the screen or green sensor light turns on by itself, sometimes during arm swings or at night, even when they are not looking at the band.5

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Fitness trackers model ranking

Ranked #159 of 238 models in Fitness trackers (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Oppo Band

Technical score
Technical score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 67% of models
Score components:

20%

7.3

Sports

20%

5.4

Battery

18%

8.1

Health

18%

8.3

Display

8%

7.0

Smart functions

8%

8.2

Wellness

4%

8.0

Connectivity

4%

8.9

Design

7.4
Reviews score
7.7
List score
7.4
Value for money
Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 61% of models
Score components:

70%

7.4

Overall score

30%

10

Price

8.2
Heart rate monitor
yes
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 36.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
yes
This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate. 47.5% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts. 63.9% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 13.7% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
yes
This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor. 68.2% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
What reviewers say
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 12.7% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 14.4% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 85.6% of fitness trackers.
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.4% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 5.6% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
What reviewers say
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.8% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 14.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
no
This fitness tracker does not support call controls. 40.8% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 0.9% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.5% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
What reviewers say
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.5% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
yes
This fitness tracker supports achievements. 23.8% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 21.4% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
no
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 36.4% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
5
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 5 which is newer than in 68% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 17.8% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
?
NFC
?
Wi-Fi connectivity
?
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 0.9% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
12 days
Market range: <5 days – >180 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 12 days which is longer than that of 54.8% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 4% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Power-saving battery life
?
Battery capacity
100 mAh
Market range: <45 mAh – >225 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 100 mAh which is lower than that of 57.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 8.2% of fitness trackers.
Show more
What reviewers say
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 26.3% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
1.1 inch
Market range: <0.72 inch – >1.6 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.1 inch which is larger than that of 54.4% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 3.8% of fitness trackers.
Display type
AMOLED
This fitness tracker uses AMOLED display technology which is more advanced than that of 74.1% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 25.9% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
126x 294
This fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 126x294 which is higher than that of 77% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 1.5% of fitness trackers.
official OPPO Band spec lists 126 x 294 pixels.
Pixel density
291 ppi
Market range: <146 ppi – >326 ppi
This fitness tracker has a pixel density of 291 ppi which is higher than that of 74.4% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2.6% of fitness trackers.
Show more
What reviewers say
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.1% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 3.3% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 23.4% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
15 mm
Show more
What reviewers say

Oppo Band vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSportsBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart functionsDesignWellness
  • Blood oxygen monitoring
    This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 32.1% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
  • Always-on display
    This fitness tracker has an always-on display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.6% of fitness trackers have an always-on display.
  • Touchscreen
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 46.7% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Auto pause
    This fitness tracker supports auto pause, while the average fitness tracker does not. 22.4% of fitness trackers support auto pause.
    Walking and running only.
  • Heart rate alerts
    This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts, while the average fitness tracker does not. 36.4% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
  • Color display
    This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.1% of fitness trackers have a color display.
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 45.2% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • 17.8% higher pixel density
    This fitness tracker has a higher pixel density than the average fitness tracker (291 ppi vs 247 ppi). The average fitness tracker has a pixel density of 247 ppi.
    291 ppi vs 247 ppi
  • 2.8x cheaper
    Oppo Band is cheaper than the average fitness tracker (£25 vs £70).
    £25 vs £70
  • 5.5% higher review score
    Reviews score
    7.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 51% of models

    80%

    7.4

    Average grade

    20%

    8.8

    Popularity

    Grades by review (42)
    35 reviews: 12 with a printed score, 23 estimated from the review. 7 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    7.7 vs 7.3
  • Blood oxygen monitoring
    This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 32.1% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
  • Heart rate alerts
    This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts, while the average fitness tracker does not. 36.4% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 45.2% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Auto pause
    This fitness tracker supports auto pause, while the average fitness tracker does not. 22.4% of fitness trackers support auto pause.
    Walking and running only.
  • Auto lap
    This fitness tracker supports auto lap, while the average fitness tracker does not. 16.8% of fitness trackers support auto lap.
    Swimming only.
  • 2 days longer battery life
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (12 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    12 days vs 10 days
  • Always-on display
    This fitness tracker has an always-on display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.6% of fitness trackers have an always-on display.
  • Touchscreen
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 46.7% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Color display
    This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.1% of fitness trackers have a color display.
  • 17.8% higher pixel density
    This fitness tracker has a higher pixel density than the average fitness tracker (291 ppi vs 247 ppi). The average fitness tracker has a pixel density of 247 ppi.
    291 ppi vs 247 ppi
  • Durable display glass
    This fitness tracker uses more durable display glass than the average fitness tracker (reinforced glass vs glass). The average fitness tracker uses glass display glass.
    reinforced glass vs glass
  • Modern Bluetooth version
    This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (5 vs 4.1). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.1.
    5 vs 4.1
  • Camera remote control
    This fitness tracker supports camera remote control, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.6% of fitness trackers support camera remote control.
  • No automatic activity detection
    This fitness tracker does not support automatic activity detection, while the average fitness tracker does. 56.4% of fitness trackers support automatic activity detection.
  • No weight tracking
    This fitness tracker does not support weight tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 82.4% of fitness trackers support weight tracking.
  • 75% smaller internal storage
    This fitness tracker has a lower internal storage than the average fitness tracker (0 GB vs 0.1 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.064 GB of internal storage.
    0.016 GB vs 0.064 GB
  • 7.5% lower list score
    List score
    7.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (1)
    List score: in 1 of 85 lists (1%)
    7.4 vs 8.0
  • Lower screen resolution
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (126x294 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    official OPPO Band spec lists 126 x 294 pixels.
    126x294 vs 194x368
  • 20% smaller battery capacity
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (100 mAh vs 125 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 125 mAh of battery capacity.
    100 mAh vs 125 mAh
  • Not compatible with smart scales
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with smart scales, while the average fitness tracker is. 64.9% of fitness trackers are compatible with smart scales.
  • 11.4% lower sentiment score
    7.0 vs 7.9
  • 7.5% lower list score
    List score
    7.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (1)
    List score: in 1 of 85 lists (1%)
    7.4 vs 8.0
  • 11.4% lower sentiment score
    7.0 vs 7.9
  • No automatic activity detection
    This fitness tracker does not support automatic activity detection, while the average fitness tracker does. 56.4% of fitness trackers support automatic activity detection.
  • 20% smaller battery capacity
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (100 mAh vs 125 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 125 mAh of battery capacity.
    100 mAh vs 125 mAh
  • Lower screen resolution
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (126x294 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    official OPPO Band spec lists 126 x 294 pixels.
    126x294 vs 194x368
  • 75% smaller internal storage
    This fitness tracker has a lower internal storage than the average fitness tracker (0 GB vs 0.1 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.064 GB of internal storage.
    0.016 GB vs 0.064 GB
  • 0.95 mm thicker design
    This fitness tracker is thicker than the average fitness tracker (12 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    11.95 mm vs 11 mm
  • No weight tracking
    This fitness tracker does not support weight tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 82.4% of fitness trackers support weight tracking.
  • Not compatible with smart scales
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with smart scales, while the average fitness tracker is. 64.9% of fitness trackers are compatible with smart scales.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

7.0
Nikolay Tanev
≈ estimated
28/06/2020
Hands-on review · setup, app and comparison with Mi Band 5
Verdict
Oppo Band is a good pick if blood oxygen tracking matters, but its charging and app features trail the Mi Band 5.
7.0
KLGadgetTV
≈ estimated
03/05/2021
Comparison · sleep tracking, app and battery against Mi Band 6
Verdict
Oppo Band is better for sleep tracking and has a cleaner interface, though it offers fewer workout modes than the rival.
Hands-on video, no verdict
Hands-on video, no verdict
Not graded
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

7.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
11/05/2021
Hands-on test · Simple fitness tracker
Verdict
The Oppo Band is a straightforward tracker for workouts and health data, lasting about ten days, though its small screen makes notifications hard to read.
8.0
techadvisor.com
✓ explicit
23/04/2021
Hands-on review · Basic fitness tracker
Verdict
The Oppo Band is a decent tracker with blood oxygen monitoring and a bright screen, but it doesn't beat rivals and only works with Android phones.
8.0
wareable.com
≈ estimated
30/04/2021
Hands-on review · Core tracking basics
Verdict
The Oppo Band suits basic tracking with a good screen and comfortable strap, but its heart rate readings run high and treadmill distances are off by about 1km.
5.0
digitaltrends.com
✓ explicit
23/03/2022
Hands-on review · Fitness wearable
Verdict
The Oppo Band is a basic tracker with reliable notifications and heart rate readings, but low step counts and erratic overnight oxygen readings mean you should skip it.
9.2
whatgadget.net
✓ explicit
09/09/2021
Hands-on review · Health tracker
Verdict
The Oppo Band is a solid pick for everyday workouts and health monitoring, but serious athletes should look at higher-end trackers.
6.0
coachweb.com
✓ explicit
07/06/2021
Long-term review · Everyday fitness tracker
Verdict
The Oppo Band is a likeable tracker with a sharp screen and sound basics, but it has no standout feature and a fiddly small touchscreen.
7.0
notebookcheck.net
≈ estimated
17/06/2021
Lab test · Fitness band
Verdict
The Oppo Band is a handy everyday band with a bright display, but inconsistent heart rate and step counts are a problem for serious training.
8.0
klgadgetguy.com
≈ estimated
26/04/2021
Hands-on review · Entry-level tracker
Verdict
The Oppo Band is a simple, lightweight starter tracker with detailed sleep data, but reaching its claimed battery life means switching off real-time heart rate tracking.
8.0
en.eloutput.com
≈ estimated
07/05/2021
Video review · Mi Band rival
Verdict
The Oppo Band is a close match for the Xiaomi Mi Band, with a bright screen and long battery life, though its bottom bezel is thick.
9.0
gadgetmtech.com
≈ estimated
31/05/2021
Product overview · Fitness band
Verdict
The Oppo Band is a bright, waterproof tracker that handles sleep, workouts and sitting reminders well, with battery life a little short of its claim.
5.0
nextpit.de
≈ estimated
10/08/2021
Hands-on test · Fitness tracker
Verdict
The Oppo Band lasts about nine days on a charge and has a readable display, but unreliable distance tracking makes it hard to recommend.
6.0
imtest.de
✓ explicit
09/06/2021
Lab test · Sport and sleep tracking
Verdict
The Oppo Band is comfortable, with a clear screen and reliable sport and sleep tracking, but without GPS it trails rivals like the Galaxy Fit 2.
8.0
ilfattoquotidiano.it
≈ estimated
30/04/2021
Hands-on review · Entry-level band
Verdict
The Oppo Band is a solid everyday tracker with a week-long battery and quick wrist wake, but its Android-only app and limited notifications hold it back.
8.0
tech.everyeye.it
≈ estimated
07/05/2021
Hands-on review · Simple fitness band
Verdict
The Oppo Band is a simple first fitness band with the expected features, a bright screen and about a week of battery, held back by a clumsy charger.
8.0
tecnorecensioni.com
≈ estimated
18/08/2021
Hands-on review · Sport band
Verdict
The Oppo Band is a good smart band with precise heart rate and SpO2 tracking, but short battery life and charging by removing the strap let it down.
8.3
oppohub.it
✓ explicit
06/06/2021
Hands-on review · Sport band
Verdict
The Oppo Band is a reliable, easy-to-use tracker for everyday activity and sleep, but competitive athletes should look elsewhere.
8.0
smartworld.it
≈ estimated
14/04/2021
Full review · Sport smartband
Verdict
The Oppo Band is a light, waterproof tracker that does its job well, but its battery and fiddly charging hold it back.
6.0
tuttotech.net
≈ estimated
17/05/2021
Hands-on review · Xiaomi rival
Verdict
The Oppo Band is a good everyday tracker with long battery life and many watch faces, though workouts need starting by hand.
7.0
money.it
✓ explicit
21/04/2021
Hands-on review · Minimal tracker
Verdict
The Oppo Band is a light, water-resistant tracker for basic sport and daily monitoring, not for anyone wanting a full smartwatch with email.
8.0
focustech.it
≈ estimated
11/06/2021
Hands-on test · SpO2 band
Verdict
The Oppo Band is a light, accurate tracker whose heart rate and SpO2 readings suit everyday monitoring, though it charges awkwardly and needs its brightness set by hand.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Oppo Band

  • Bright and vibrant AMOLED display with good indoor visibility
  • Lightweight and comfortable design suitable for all-day wear
  • Continuous SpO2 (blood oxygen) monitoring, including during sleep
  • Reliable heart rate tracking and a solid variety of 12 workout modes
  • Responsive touchscreen interface without the need for physical buttons
  • Quick charging capability, reaching over two-thirds capacity in 30 minutes
  • Affordable and competitive pricing for an entry-level fitness tracker

What customers don't like about Oppo Band

  • Small screen size can make reading long notifications difficult
  • Battery life drops significantly (down to a few days) with advanced health features enabled
  • Lack of built-in GPS requires a paired smartphone for distance tracking
  • Measurement accuracy issues, specifically inconsistent step counting and SpO2 readings compared to competitors
  • Unintuitive software gestures, such as swiping to change watch faces instead of accessing menus
  • Proprietary charging cradle often requires removing the tracker from the strap
  • Limited smart features with no app store to expand basic functionality

Verdict

The OPPO Band is a compact fitness tracker featuring a 1.1-inch AMOLED color touchscreen with a 126x294 resolution and 2.5D curved glass. Key characteristics include continuous SpO2 monitoring, real-time heart rate tracking, and 5ATM water resistance suitable for swimming across 12 dedicated exercise modes. Its main pros are a lightweight design, a vibrant 100% DCI-P3 gamut display, and a 100mAh battery providing up to 12 days of life. However, notable cons include the lack of built-in GPS, a charging cradle that requires removing the strap, and limited screen visibility in direct sunlight due to the absence of auto-brightness.

Compare Oppo Band with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Oppo Band and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found