OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

MyKronoz ZeTrack Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Battery life:5 daysScreen size:0.96 inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:1 m

MyKronoz ZeTrack Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

6.8

Overall score

Score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 59% of models
Score components

80%

7.0

Technical score

20%

6.0

User score

▼Worse than 59% of fitness-trackers
7.0

Technical score

Technical score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 51% of models
Score components

20%

8.5

Sports & Navigation

20%

4.4

Battery

18%

7.1

Health

18%

6.6

Display

8%

8.1

Smart Features

8%

8.8

App & Wellness

4%

7.4

Connectivity

4%

7.4

Design & Durability

▼Worse than 51% of fitness-trackers
6.0

User score

User score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components

70%

7.2

User ratings

30%

3.2

Number of reviews

Based on 9 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▼Worse than 92% of fitness-trackers
  • mykronoz-zetrack
  • mykronoz-zetrack
  • mykronoz-zetrack
  • mykronoz-zetrack
  • mykronoz-zetrack
mykronoz-zetrack
mykronoz-zetrack
mykronoz-zetrack
mykronoz-zetrack
mykronoz-zetrack

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker MyKronoz ZeTrack

Technical score
Technical score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 51% of models
Score components:

20%

8.5

Sports & Navigation

20%

4.4

Battery

18%

7.1

Health

18%

6.6

Display

8%

8.1

Smart Features

8%

8.8

App & Wellness

4%

7.4

Connectivity

4%

7.4

Design & Durability

7.0
User score
User score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components

70%

7.2

User ratings

30%

3.2

Number of reviews

Based on 9 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
6.0
Popularity
Popularity
3.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 55% of models
Popularity:
MyKronoz ZeTrack has a popularity score of 3.2 points, which is lower than 55.4% of fitness trackers.
3.2
Value for money
Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components:

60%

6.8

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.8
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
▲ Better than 40% of models
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 40.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
no
Resting heart rate
no
▼ Worse than 48% of models
This fitness tracker does not support Resting heart rate. 47.9% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
?
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
▼ Worse than 12% of models
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
Blood oxygen sensor
no
▼ Worse than 25% of models
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 25.4% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
▼ Worse than 11% of models
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
▼ Worse than 12% of models
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
no satellite positioning support.
GNSS bands supported
no
GNSS bands supported
no
▼ Worse than 9% of models
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.9% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
▼ Worse than 5% of models
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
▼ Worse than 8% of models
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
▲ Better than 28% of models
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.5% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
Vibrating alerts
yes
▲ Better than 16% of models
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 16.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
yes
Call control
yes
▲ Better than 59% of models
This fitness tracker supports call controls. 58.7% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Reject/mute only.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
▼ Worse than 1% of models
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
Calendar sync
no
▼ Worse than 20% of models
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.3% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
▲ Better than 6% of models
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
▲ Better than 2% of models
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
yes
Achievements
yes
▲ Better than 24% of models
This fitness tracker supports achievements. 24.3% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
yes
Inactivity alerts
yes
▲ Better than 24% of models
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 23.5% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
no
Coaching
no
▼ Worse than 34% of models
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 34% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
4
Bluetooth version
4
▼ Worse than 44% of models
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4 which is newer than in 5.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 51.3% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
?
NFC
no
NFC
no
▼ Worse than 13% of models
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
▼ Worse than 2% of models
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 1.8% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
▼ Worse than 1% of models
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
5 days
Battery life
5 days
▼ Worse than 79% of models
Market range: <5 days – >180 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 5 days which is shorter than that of 79.2% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 12.4% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life in power-saving mode
?
Battery capacity
90 mAh
Battery capacity
90 mAh
▼ Worse than 66% of models
Market range: <30 mAh – >225 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 90 mAh which is lower than that of 66.5% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 4.6% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
yes
Display
yes
▲ Better than 24% of models
This fitness tracker has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
0.96 inch
Screen size
0.96 inch
▼ Worse than 54% of models
Market range: <0 inch – >1.6 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 0.96 inch which is smaller than that of 53.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 9.1% of fitness trackers.
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
▼ Worse than 52% of models
This fitness tracker uses IPS LCD display technology which is less advanced than that of 51.8% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 1.5% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
128x 64
Screen resolution
128x 64
▲ Better than 53% of models
This fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 128x64 which is higher than that of 52.8% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2.3% of fitness trackers.
Pixel density
149 ppi
Pixel density
149 ppi
▼ Worse than 88% of models
Market range: <140 ppi – >330 ppi
This fitness tracker has a pixel density of 149 ppi which is lower than that of 88% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
▼ Worse than 2% of models
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
▼ Worse than 2% of models
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
Replaceable watch band
yes
▲ Better than 26% of models
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 25.6% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
16 mm
Show more

MyKronoz ZeTrack vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • Touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    ▲ Better than 56% of models
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    ▲ Better than 51% of models
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • Color display
    Color display
    yes
    ▲ Better than 63% of models
    This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 37.7% of fitness trackers have a color display.
  • Call control
    Call control
    yes
    ▲ Better than 59% of models
    This fitness tracker supports call controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.5% of fitness trackers support call controls.
    Reject/mute only.
  • 20% lighter
    Thickness
    20 g mm
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    Market range: <8 mm – >13 mm
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (20 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    20 g vs 25 g
  • Tracks temperature
    Temperature tracking
    yes
    ▲ Better than 88% of models
    This fitness tracker supports temperature tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 12.9% of fitness trackers support temperature tracking.
  • Camera remote control
    Camera remote control
    yes
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    This fitness tracker supports camera remote control, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.9% of fitness trackers support camera remote control.
  • Gesture control
    Gesture control
    yes
    ▲ Better than 60% of models
    This fitness tracker supports gesture controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.8% of fitness trackers support gesture controls.
  • 2.8x cheaper
    MyKronoz ZeTrack is cheaper than the average fitness tracker (£25 vs £70).
    £25 vs £70
  • Touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    ▲ Better than 56% of models
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Color display
    Color display
    yes
    ▲ Better than 63% of models
    This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 37.7% of fitness trackers have a color display.
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    ▲ Better than 51% of models
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • Call control
    Call control
    yes
    ▲ Better than 59% of models
    This fitness tracker supports call controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.5% of fitness trackers support call controls.
    Reject/mute only.
  • Camera remote control
    Camera remote control
    yes
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    This fitness tracker supports camera remote control, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.9% of fitness trackers support camera remote control.
  • Gesture control
    Gesture control
    yes
    ▲ Better than 60% of models
    This fitness tracker supports gesture controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.8% of fitness trackers support gesture controls.
  • 20% lighter
    Thickness
    20 g mm
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    Market range: <8 mm – >13 mm
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (20 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    20 g vs 25 g
  • Tracks temperature
    Temperature tracking
    yes
    ▲ Better than 88% of models
    This fitness tracker supports temperature tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 12.9% of fitness trackers support temperature tracking.
  • 5 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    5 days
    ▼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <5 days – >180 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (5 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    5 days vs 10 days
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    128 x 64
    ▲ Better than 53% of models
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (128x64 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    128x64 vs 194x368
  • 49 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    ▼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <0 m – >50 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (1 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    1 m vs 50 m
  • 39.2% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    149 ppi
    ▼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <140 ppi – >330 ppi
    This fitness tracker has a lower pixel density than the average fitness tracker (149 ppi vs 245 ppi). The average fitness tracker has a pixel density of 245 ppi.
    149 ppi vs 245 ppi
  • Limited ip rating
    IP rating
    IP67
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This fitness tracker has a lower IP rating than the average fitness tracker (IP67 vs IP68). The average fitness tracker has an IP rating of IP68.
    IP67 vs IP68
  • 18.2% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    90 mAh
    ▼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <30 mAh – >225 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (90 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    90 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • 0.08 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    0.96 inch
    ▼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <0 inch – >1.6 inch
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen size than the average fitness tracker (1 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    0.96 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • 33.8% lower user score
    User score
    6.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    MyKronoz ZeTrack
    the average fitness tracker
    MyKronoz ZeTrack has a lower user score than the average fitness tracker (5.98 vs 8.000).
    5.98 vs 8
  • 33.8% lower user score
    User score
    6.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    MyKronoz ZeTrack
    the average fitness tracker
    MyKronoz ZeTrack has a lower user score than the average fitness tracker (5.98 vs 8.000).
    5.98 vs 8
  • 5 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    5 days
    ▼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <5 days – >180 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (5 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    5 days vs 10 days
  • 18.2% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    90 mAh
    ▼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <30 mAh – >225 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (90 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    90 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    128 x 64
    ▲ Better than 53% of models
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (128x64 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    128x64 vs 194x368
  • 39.2% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    149 ppi
    ▼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <140 ppi – >330 ppi
    This fitness tracker has a lower pixel density than the average fitness tracker (149 ppi vs 245 ppi). The average fitness tracker has a pixel density of 245 ppi.
    149 ppi vs 245 ppi
  • 0.08 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    0.96 inch
    ▼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <0 inch – >1.6 inch
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen size than the average fitness tracker (1 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    0.96 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • 49 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    ▼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <0 m – >50 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (1 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    1 m vs 50 m
  • Limited ip rating
    IP rating
    IP67
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This fitness tracker has a lower IP rating than the average fitness tracker (IP67 vs IP68). The average fitness tracker has an IP rating of IP68.
    IP67 vs IP68
  • 20 °C higher minimum operating temperature
    Min operating temperature
    -20 °C
    ▲ Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <-20 °C – >5 °C
    This fitness tracker has a higher minimum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (-20 °C vs 0 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a minimum operating temperature of 0 °C.
    -20 °C vs 0 °C

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Third-party reviews

Based on 9 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about MyKronoz ZeTrack

  • Convenient built-in USB charger—no extra cables needed
  • Slim, lightweight, and comfortable design for daily wear
  • Competitive battery life lasting up to 5-7 days
  • Comprehensive basic tracking including heart rate, sleep, and body temperature
  • Affordable entry-level price point for a color touchscreen device
  • Intuitive one-touch navigation on a bright IPS-LCD display

What we don't like about MyKronoz ZeTrack

  • Inconsistent Bluetooth connectivity and syncing with the MyKronoz app
  • Limited smart features compared to more expensive rivals (no built-in GPS or NFC)
  • Software bugs, including reports of activity data failing to upload automatically
  • Low display resolution (128 x 64 px) can make some text difficult to read
  • Proprietary OS lacks the app support found on Wear OS or Fitbit platforms
  • Charging connector durability issues reported by some long-term users

Verdict

The MyKronoz ZeTrack is an ultra-slim activity tracker featuring a 0.96-inch IPS-LCD color touchscreen (128 x 64 px) and an IP67 water-resistant rating. It is equipped with a 3-axis accelerometer and an optical heart rate sensor to monitor steps, distance, calories, and sleep quality, while the 'ZeTrack+' variant adds a dedicated body temperature sensor. Key advantages include a built-in USB charger integrated directly into the strap for cable-free charging, up to 5 days of battery life from its 90 mAh cell, and real-time smartphone notifications for calls and SMS. However, it lacks built-in GPS for precise route tracking and does not support wireless charging or more advanced health metrics like ECG.

Compare MyKronoz ZeTrack with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of MyKronoz ZeTrack and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found