Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

OnePlus Band Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Battery life:14 daysScreen size:1.1 inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:50 m

OnePlus Band Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

8.1

Overall score

Score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

7.9

Technical score

20%

8.9

User score

â–²Better than 85% of fitness-trackers
7.9

Technical score

Technical score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

8.1

Sports & Navigation

20%

7.0

Battery

18%

8.2

Health

18%

7.8

Display

8%

8.8

Smart Features

8%

8.0

App & Wellness

4%

7.9

Connectivity

4%

8.6

Design & Durability

â–²Better than 84% of fitness-trackers
8.9

User score

User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 29,375 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–²Better than 88% of fitness-trackers
  • oneplus-band
  • oneplus-band
  • oneplus-band
  • oneplus-band
  • oneplus-band
  • oneplus-band
oneplus-band
oneplus-band
oneplus-band
oneplus-band
oneplus-band
oneplus-band

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker OnePlus Band

Technical score
Technical score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

8.1

Sports & Navigation

20%

7.0

Battery

18%

8.2

Health

18%

7.8

Display

8%

8.8

Smart Features

8%

8.0

App & Wellness

4%

7.9

Connectivity

4%

8.6

Design & Durability

7.9
User score
User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 29,375 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.9
Popularity
Popularity
10.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
OnePlus Band has a popularity score of 10 points, which is higher than 91.6% of fitness trackers.
10
Value for money
Value for money
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

8.1

Overall score

40%

10

Price

8.7
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 40.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
yes
Resting heart rate
yes
This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate. 52.6% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
yes
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts. 65.8% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
High heart rate alert only.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
yes
Blood oxygen sensor
yes
This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor. 75.1% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
GNSS bands supported
no
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.9% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.5% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 16.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
yes
Call control
yes
This fitness tracker supports call controls. 58.7% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Reject/mute only.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.3% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
yes
Achievements
yes
This fitness tracker supports achievements. 24.3% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
yes
Inactivity alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 23.5% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
no
Coaching
no
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 34% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
5
Bluetooth version
5
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 5 which is newer than in 74.6% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 16.8% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
This fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m which is higher than that of 14.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 63.4% of fitness trackers.
NFC
no
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 1.8% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
14 days
Battery life
14 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 14 days which is longer than that of 60.4% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 13.9% of fitness trackers.
Up to 30 days with charging case text belongs to neighboring product in source.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life in power-saving mode
?
Battery capacity
100 mAh
Battery capacity
100 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 100 mAh which is lower than that of 54% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 9.2% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
yes
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
1.1 inch
Screen size
1.1 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.1 inch which is larger than that of 55.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 4.2% of fitness trackers.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
This fitness tracker uses AMOLED display technology which is more advanced than that of 74.9% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 25.1% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
?
Pixel density
291 ppi
Pixel density
291 ppi
This fitness tracker has a pixel density of 291 ppi which is higher than that of 77.8% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2.8% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
Replaceable watch band
yes
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 25.6% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Quick-release band system.
Band width
21 mm
Show more

OnePlus Band vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • Blood oxygen monitoring
    Blood oxygen sensor
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.2% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • Touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports a smart alarm, while the average fitness tracker does not. 27.3% of fitness trackers support a smart alarm.
  • 0.5 hours shorter charging time
    Charging time
    1 hours
    This fitness tracker has a lower charging time than the average fitness tracker (1 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    1 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • Auto pause
    Auto pause
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports auto pause, while the average fitness tracker does not. 23.2% of fitness trackers support auto pause.
  • Heart rate alerts
    Fast/slow heart rate alerts
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts, while the average fitness tracker does not. 34.5% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
    High heart rate alert only.
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • 11% higher user score
    User score
    8.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    OnePlus Band
    the average fitness tracker
    OnePlus Band has a higher user score than the average fitness tracker (8.88 vs 8.000).
    8.88 vs 8
  • 97.4% more popular
    OnePlus Band has a higher popularity than the average fitness tracker (10 vs 5.1).
    10 vs 5.07
  • 2.8x cheaper
    OnePlus Band is cheaper than the average fitness tracker (£25 vs £70).
    £25 vs £70
  • 9.4% better value for money
    OnePlus Band has a higher value-for-money score than the average fitness tracker (8.66 vs 7.9).
    8.66 vs 7.92
  • Blood oxygen monitoring
    Blood oxygen sensor
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.2% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • Heart rate alerts
    Fast/slow heart rate alerts
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts, while the average fitness tracker does not. 34.5% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
    High heart rate alert only.
  • 0.5 hours shorter charging time
    Charging time
    1 hours
    This fitness tracker has a lower charging time than the average fitness tracker (1 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    1 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 4 days longer battery life
    Battery life
    14 days
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (14 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    Up to 30 days with charging case text belongs to neighboring product in source.
    14 days vs 10 days
  • Touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Color display
    Color display
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 37.7% of fitness trackers have a color display.
  • 18.8% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    291 ppi
    This fitness tracker has a higher pixel density than the average fitness tracker (291 ppi vs 245 ppi). The average fitness tracker has a pixel density of 245 ppi.
    291 ppi vs 245 ppi
  • Modern Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.0
    This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (5 vs 4). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.0.
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • Smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports a smart alarm, while the average fitness tracker does not. 27.3% of fitness trackers support a smart alarm.
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • Call control
    Call control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports call controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.5% of fitness trackers support call controls.
    Reject/mute only.
  • Camera remote control
    Camera remote control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports camera remote control, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.9% of fitness trackers support camera remote control.
  • No automatic activity detection
    Automatic activity detection
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support automatic activity detection, while the average fitness tracker does. 52% of fitness trackers support automatic activity detection.
  • No weight tracking
    Weight tracking
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support weight tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 81% of fitness trackers support weight tracking.
  • Not compatible with smart scales
    Compatible with smart scales
    no
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with smart scales, while the average fitness tracker is. 68.1% of fitness trackers are compatible with smart scales.
  • 9.1% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    100 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (100 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    100 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • 0.95 mm thicker design
    Thickness
    11.95 mm
    This fitness tracker is thicker than the average fitness tracker (12 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    11.95 mm vs 11 mm
  • 20 °C higher minimum operating temperature
    Min operating temperature
    -20 °C
    This fitness tracker has a higher minimum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (-20 °C vs 0 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a minimum operating temperature of 0 °C.
    -20 °C vs 0 °C
  • 9.1% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    100 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (100 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    100 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • 0.95 mm thicker design
    Thickness
    11.95 mm
    This fitness tracker is thicker than the average fitness tracker (12 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    11.95 mm vs 11 mm
  • 20 °C higher minimum operating temperature
    Min operating temperature
    -20 °C
    This fitness tracker has a higher minimum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (-20 °C vs 0 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a minimum operating temperature of 0 °C.
    -20 °C vs 0 °C
  • No weight tracking
    Weight tracking
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support weight tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 81% of fitness trackers support weight tracking.
  • Not compatible with smart scales
    Compatible with smart scales
    no
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with smart scales, while the average fitness tracker is. 68.1% of fitness trackers are compatible with smart scales.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

A
androidauthority.com
01/05/2021
Summary of the review
S
storeeva.com
05/04/2021
Summary of the review
T
thehindu.com
16/02/2021
Summary of the review
A
androidpolice.com
06/03/2021
Summary of the review
X
xda-developers.com
22/01/2021
Summary of the review
A
androidcentral.com
10/01/2021
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
11/01/2021
Summary of the review
S
smarthomeassistent.de
09/03/2021
Summary of the review
N
nextpit.de
06/02/2021
Summary of the review
G
global.techradar.com
27/01/2021
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 29,375 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about OnePlus Band

  • Bright and vivid 1.1-inch AMOLED display with good outdoor visibility
  • Includes SpO2 (blood oxygen) monitoring, which is rare for its budget price point
  • Lightweight and comfortable design suitable for 24/7 wear and sleep
  • Effective and prompt notification mirroring from smartphones
  • Responsive and lag-free touch interface with intuitive navigation
  • High durability ratings with IP68 and 5ATM water and dust resistance
  • Decent selection of 13 workout modes including niche options like cricket

What we don't like about OnePlus Band

  • Actual battery life (approx. 1 week) falls significantly short of the advertised 14 days
  • Finicky charging mechanism that often requires popping the tracker out of the strap
  • Lack of built-in GPS, requiring a connected phone for accurate outdoor tracking
  • OnePlus Health companion app is described as 'half-baked' and lacking refinement
  • Missing common features like stress tracking, menstrual cycle tracking, and REM sleep data
  • Strap clasp can be difficult to fasten securely, especially for slim wrists
  • Limited third-party app integrations and no support for actionable notifications or emojis

Verdict

The OnePlus Band is a budget-friendly fitness tracker featuring a vibrant 1.1-inch AMOLED touchscreen with a 126x294 resolution and a 100mAh battery offering up to 14 days of life. Key characteristics include 5ATM and IP68 water/dust resistance, 13 dedicated exercise modes, and comprehensive health monitoring via an optical heart rate sensor, 3-axis accelerometer, gyroscope, and a dedicated SpO2 sensor for blood oxygen tracking. Main pros are its lightweight, comfortable design, accurate sleep and SpO2 monitoring, and a highly responsive, bright display. However, notable cons include a proprietary charging cradle that requires removing the tracker from the strap, lack of auto-brightness, and real-world battery life often falling significantly short of the 14-day claim during intensive use.

Compare OnePlus Band with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of OnePlus Band and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found