Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Oppo Band Style Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Battery life:12 daysScreen size:1.1 inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:50 m

Oppo Band Style Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

7.8

Overall score

Score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

7.6

Technical score

20%

8.5

User score

▲Better than 77% of fitness-trackers
7.6

Technical score

Technical score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

7.9

Sports & Navigation

20%

6.1

Battery

18%

8.1

Health

18%

8.4

Display

8%

7.0

Smart Features

8%

8.0

App & Wellness

4%

7.8

Connectivity

4%

8.5

Design & Durability

▲Better than 74% of fitness-trackers
8.5

User score

User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.1

User ratings

30%

9.4

Number of reviews

Based on 7,007 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▲Better than 80% of fitness-trackers
  • oppo-band-style
  • oppo-band-style
  • oppo-band-style
  • oppo-band-style
  • oppo-band-style
  • oppo-band-style
  • oppo-band-style
oppo-band-style
oppo-band-style
oppo-band-style
oppo-band-style
oppo-band-style
oppo-band-style
oppo-band-style

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Oppo Band Style

Technical score
Technical score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

7.9

Sports & Navigation

20%

6.1

Battery

18%

8.1

Health

18%

8.4

Display

8%

7.0

Smart Features

8%

8.0

App & Wellness

4%

7.8

Connectivity

4%

8.5

Design & Durability

7.6
User score
User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.1

User ratings

30%

9.4

Number of reviews

Based on 7,007 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.5
Popularity
Popularity
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Oppo Band Style has a popularity score of 9.4 points, which is higher than 83.1% of fitness trackers.
9.4
Value for money
Value for money
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

7.8

Overall score

40%

10

Price

8.5
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 40.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
yes
Resting heart rate
yes
This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate. 52.6% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
yes
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts. 65.8% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
High heart rate alert only.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
yes
Blood oxygen sensor
yes
This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor. 75.1% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
GNSS bands supported
no
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.9% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.5% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 16.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
no
Call control
no
This fitness tracker does not support call controls. 41.8% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.3% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
yes
Achievements
yes
This fitness tracker supports achievements. 24.3% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
yes
Inactivity alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 23.5% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
no
Coaching
no
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 34% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
5
Bluetooth version
5
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 5 which is newer than in 74.6% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 16.8% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
?
NFC
no
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
?
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
12 days
Battery life
12 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 12 days which is longer than that of 55% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 4.5% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life in power-saving mode
?
Battery capacity
100 mAh
Battery capacity
100 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 100 mAh which is lower than that of 54% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 9.2% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
yes
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
1.1 inch
Screen size
1.1 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.1 inch which is larger than that of 55.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 4.2% of fitness trackers.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
This fitness tracker uses AMOLED display technology which is more advanced than that of 74.9% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 25.1% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
?
Pixel density
291 ppi
Pixel density
291 ppi
This fitness tracker has a pixel density of 291 ppi which is higher than that of 77.8% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2.8% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
Replaceable watch band
yes
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 25.6% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
14 mm
Show more

Oppo Band Style vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • Blood oxygen monitoring
    Blood oxygen sensor
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.2% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
  • Always-on display
    Always-on display
    yes
    This fitness tracker has an always-on display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.6% of fitness trackers have an always-on display.
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • Touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Auto pause
    Auto pause
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports auto pause, while the average fitness tracker does not. 23.2% of fitness trackers support auto pause.
    Walking and running only.
  • Heart rate alerts
    Fast/slow heart rate alerts
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts, while the average fitness tracker does not. 34.5% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
    High heart rate alert only.
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • Color display
    Color display
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 37.7% of fitness trackers have a color display.
  • 2.8x cheaper
    Oppo Band Style is cheaper than the average fitness tracker (£25 vs £70).
    £25 vs £70
  • 6.3% higher user score
    User score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Oppo Band Style
    the average fitness tracker
    Oppo Band Style has a higher user score than the average fitness tracker (8.50 vs 8.000).
    8.5 vs 8
  • 85.4% more popular
    Oppo Band Style has a higher popularity than the average fitness tracker (9.39 vs 5.1).
    9.39 vs 5.07
  • Blood oxygen monitoring
    Blood oxygen sensor
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.2% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • Heart rate alerts
    Fast/slow heart rate alerts
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts, while the average fitness tracker does not. 34.5% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
    High heart rate alert only.
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.7% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Cycle start prediction
    Predicts start date
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts the start date, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42.5% of fitness trackers predict the start date.
  • 2 days longer battery life
    Battery life
    12 days
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (12 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    12 days vs 10 days
  • Always-on display
    Always-on display
    yes
    This fitness tracker has an always-on display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.6% of fitness trackers have an always-on display.
  • Touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Color display
    Color display
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 37.7% of fitness trackers have a color display.
  • 18.8% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    291 ppi
    This fitness tracker has a higher pixel density than the average fitness tracker (291 ppi vs 245 ppi). The average fitness tracker has a pixel density of 245 ppi.
    291 ppi vs 245 ppi
  • Durable display glass
    Display glass type
    reinforced glass
    This fitness tracker uses more durable display glass than the average fitness tracker (reinforced glass vs glass). The average fitness tracker uses glass display glass.
    reinforced glass vs glass
  • Modern Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.0
    This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (5 vs 4). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.0.
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • Camera remote control
    Camera remote control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports camera remote control, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.9% of fitness trackers support camera remote control.
  • Ad-free
    Free app
    yes
    This fitness tracker has an ad-free app, while the average fitness tracker does not. 48.1% of fitness trackers have an ad-free app.
  • No automatic activity detection
    Automatic activity detection
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support automatic activity detection, while the average fitness tracker does. 52% of fitness trackers support automatic activity detection.
  • No weight tracking
    Weight tracking
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support weight tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 81% of fitness trackers support weight tracking.
  • 50% smaller internal storage
    Internal storage
    0.016 GB
    This fitness tracker has a lower internal storage than the average fitness tracker (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.032 GB of internal storage.
    0.016 GB vs 0.032 GB
  • Not compatible with smart scales
    Compatible with smart scales
    no
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with smart scales, while the average fitness tracker is. 68.1% of fitness trackers are compatible with smart scales.
  • 9.1% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    100 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (100 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    100 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • 0.95 mm thicker design
    Thickness
    11.95 mm
    This fitness tracker is thicker than the average fitness tracker (12 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    11.95 mm vs 11 mm
  • 10 °C higher minimum operating temperature
    Min operating temperature
    -10 °C
    This fitness tracker has a higher minimum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (-10 °C vs 0 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a minimum operating temperature of 0 °C.
    -10 °C vs 0 °C
  • 9.1% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    100 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (100 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    100 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • 50% smaller internal storage
    Internal storage
    0.016 GB
    This fitness tracker has a lower internal storage than the average fitness tracker (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.032 GB of internal storage.
    0.016 GB vs 0.032 GB
  • 0.95 mm thicker design
    Thickness
    11.95 mm
    This fitness tracker is thicker than the average fitness tracker (12 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    11.95 mm vs 11 mm
  • 10 °C higher minimum operating temperature
    Min operating temperature
    -10 °C
    This fitness tracker has a higher minimum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (-10 °C vs 0 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a minimum operating temperature of 0 °C.
    -10 °C vs 0 °C
  • No weight tracking
    Weight tracking
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support weight tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 81% of fitness trackers support weight tracking.
  • Not compatible with smart scales
    Compatible with smart scales
    no
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with smart scales, while the average fitness tracker is. 68.1% of fitness trackers are compatible with smart scales.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

F
financialexpress.com
01/04/2021
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
11/05/2021
Summary of the review
W
whatgadget.net
09/09/2021
Summary of the review
C
coachweb.com
07/06/2021
Summary of the review
T
techadvisor.com
23/04/2021
Summary of the review
W
wareable.com
30/04/2021
Summary of the review
T
tech.hindustantimes.com
16/06/2021
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.com
13/06/2021
Summary of the review
H
heise.de
28/07/2021
Summary of the review
N
nextpit.de
10/08/2021
Summary of the review
F
frandroid.com
24/06/2021
Summary of the review
P
phonandroid.com
19/04/2021
Summary of the review
B
batista70phone.com
04/05/2021
Summary of the review
I
ilfattoquotidiano.it
30/04/2026
Summary of the review
T
techzilla.it
20/04/2026
Summary of the review
C
coolesuggesties.nl
09/06/2021
Summary of the review
G
global.techradar.com
08/09/2021
Summary of the review
O
outdoordichtbij.nl
15/06/2021
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 7,007 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Oppo Band Style

  • Vibrant 1.1-inch AMOLED display with high responsiveness
  • Continuous SpO2 (blood oxygen) monitoring, even during sleep
  • Stylish and lightweight design with two different straps included in the box
  • Effective 5ATM water resistance suitable for swimming
  • Accurate heart rate monitoring and step tracking in most conditions
  • Fast charging capability (reaches 100% in about an hour)

What we don't like about Oppo Band Style

  • Inconsistent battery life, often falling short of the advertised 12 days when all health features are active
  • Notifications can be difficult to read due to the small screen size and narrow vertical layout
  • Lack of built-in GPS requires a connected smartphone for route tracking
  • Occasional software lag and lack of automatic workout detection
  • Charging requires removing the tracker module if using the standard 'Sport' strap
  • Sleep tracking accuracy reported as hit-or-miss by some users

Verdict

The Oppo Band Style is a lightweight fitness tracker featuring a 1.1-inch color AMOLED touchscreen with 126×294 resolution and 2.5D scratch-resistant glass. It is distinguished by its continuous SpO2 monitoring, which tracks blood oxygen levels 28,800 times during an eight-hour sleep cycle, alongside real-time heart rate monitoring and 12 dedicated workout modes. Key pros include its sleek design with a bundled metal-buckle 'Style Strap,' 5ATM water resistance suitable for swimming, and a 100mAh battery that provides up to 12 days of life. However, notable cons include the lack of built-in GPS (requiring a phone connection for distance tracking), the absence of stress or menstrual cycle tracking, and a small display that can make reading detailed notifications difficult.

Compare Oppo Band Style with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Oppo Band Style and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found