OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Sony Cyber-shot H200 Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£180Sensor size:1/2.3"Weight:530 gBattery life (CIPA):350 shots

Sony Cyber-shot H200 Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

4.0

Overall score

Score
4.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Score components

90%

4.0

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 91% of cameras
4.0

Technical score

Technical score
4.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components

28%

4.4

Sensor & Image

25%

3.4

Photo Features

18%

3.9

Video & Audio

14%

4.7

Display & Design

8%

5.5

Battery & Power

7%

2.2

Connectivity & Storage

â–¼Worse than 86% of cameras
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £180

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Sony Cyber-shot H200

Technical score
Technical score
4.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components:

28%

4.4

Sensor & Image

25%

3.4

Photo Features

18%

3.9

Video & Audio

14%

4.7

Display & Design

8%

5.5

Battery & Power

7%

2.2

Connectivity & Storage

4.0
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Sony Cyber-shot H200 has a popularity score of 1, which is lower than 51.3% of cameras.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Score components:

60%

4.0

Overall score

40%

9.6

Price

5.7
Sensor size
1/2.3"
Sensor size
1/2.3"
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
This camera uses a sensor classified as 1/2.3"; it is smaller than the sensor in 60.5% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 38.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
20.1 MP
Main camera megapixels
20.1 MP
â–² Better than 62% of models
This camera has a sensor resolution of 20.1 MP, which is higher than that of 61.6% of cameras and equal to that of 4.3% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
1.19 µm
Main camera pixel size
1.19 µm
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Market range: <1.33 µm – >5.94 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 1.19 µm, which are smaller than those in 95.3% of cameras and the same size as those in 2.3% of cameras.
Base ISO
80
Base ISO
80
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Market range: <80 – >200
This camera has a base ISO of 80 which is lower than that of 80.3% of cameras and equal to that of 15.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 3200 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 3,200
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 3,200, which is lower than that of 62.9% of cameras and equal to that of 22.7% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
N/A
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
9
N. of focus points
9
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Market range: <9 – >399
This camera has 9 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 67.1% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 26% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
â–¼ Worse than 37% of models
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
â–² Better than 12% of models
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1,280 px
Max video resolution
1,280 px
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
This camera supports 1,280 px video recording which is lower quality than that of 71.4% of cameras and equal to that of 18.5% of cameras.
Video bitrate
9 Mbps
Video bitrate
9 Mbps
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Market range: <12 Mbps – >237 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 9 Mbps which is lower than that of 92.7% of cameras and equal to that of 4.9% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
â–¼ Worse than 12% of models
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
â–¼ Worse than 22% of models
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
Motion JPEG
Show more
Type
bridge
Weight
530 g
Weight
530 g
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
Market range: <142 g – >812 g
This camera weighs 530 g which is heavier than 66.4% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.6% of cameras.
Width
122.9 mm
Width
122.9 mm
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Market range: <96 mm – >142.6 mm
This camera has a width of 122.9 mm which is wider than 57.2% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Height
83.2 mm
Height
83.2 mm
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Market range: <57.6 mm – >105.8 mm
This camera has a height of 83.2 mm which is taller than 60.2% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Thickness
87.2 mm
Thickness
87.2 mm
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Market range: <21.9 mm – >92 mm
This camera has a thickness of 87.2 mm which is thicker than 85.5% of cameras and equal to that of 0.4% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
350 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
350 shots
â–² Better than 55% of models
Market range: <210 shots – >700 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 350 shots, which is longer than that of 54.5% of cameras and equal to that of 5% of cameras.
Battery capacity
N/A
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
Uses 4x AA batteries.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
â–¼ Worse than 10% of models
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 23% of models
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
â–¼ Worse than 15% of models
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Sony Cyber-shot H200 vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • Supports live streaming
    Live streaming (first-party)
    yes
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    This camera supports live streaming, the average camera does not.
    Imaging Edge Webcam.
  • 0.06 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    0.055 GB
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >0.07 GB
    This camera has a higher internal storage than the average camera (0.1 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera offers 0 GB of internal storage.
    0.055 GB vs 0 GB
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    20.1 MP
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (20.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    20.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • In-camera panorama mode
    In-camera panorama mode
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This camera includes an in-camera panorama mode, the average camera does not.
  • 3.66x more optical zoom
    Optical zoom
    26 x
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <1 x – >35 x
    40% more optical zoom: this camera offers 26 x, compared with 7.1 x on the average camera.
    The built-in lens provides 26x optical zoom.
    26 x vs 7.1 x
  • More versatile card slots
    Memory card slot types
    Memory Stick Duo + SD
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This camera uses more versatile card slots than the average camera (Memory Stick Duo + SD vs SD). The average camera supports SD memory card slot types.
    Hybrid shared slot.
    Memory Stick Duo + SD vs SD
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    20.1 MP
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (20.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    20.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • In-camera panorama mode
    In-camera panorama mode
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This camera includes an in-camera panorama mode, the average camera does not.
  • 3.66x more optical zoom
    Optical zoom
    26 x
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <1 x – >35 x
    40% more optical zoom: this camera offers 26 x, compared with 7.1 x on the average camera.
    The built-in lens provides 26x optical zoom.
    26 x vs 7.1 x
  • Supports live streaming
    Live streaming (first-party)
    yes
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    This camera supports live streaming, the average camera does not.
    Imaging Edge Webcam.
  • 0.06 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    0.055 GB
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >0.07 GB
    This camera has a higher internal storage than the average camera (0.1 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera offers 0 GB of internal storage.
    0.055 GB vs 0 GB
  • More versatile card slots
    Memory card slot types
    Memory Stick Duo + SD
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This camera uses more versatile card slots than the average camera (Memory Stick Duo + SD vs SD). The average camera supports SD memory card slot types.
    Hybrid shared slot.
    Memory Stick Duo + SD vs SD
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/2.3"
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs APS-C).
    1/2.3" vs APS-C
  • 2.15 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.19 µm
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <1.33 µm – >5.94 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.2 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.19 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 4.9 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    0.8 fps
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <1.08 fps – >10 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (0.8 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    0.8 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower video resolution
    Max video resolution
    1,280 px
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This camera records lower-resolution video than the average camera (1280 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    1280 px vs 1920 px
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <1 – >2
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • No RAW photo capture
    RAW photo capture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This camera does not support RAW photo capture, the average camera does. 62.8% of cameras support RAW formats.
  • 93% less popular
    Sony Cyber-shot H200 is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • 8.7% worse value for money
    Sony Cyber-shot H200 has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (5.7 vs 6.2).
    5.7 vs 6.2
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • 135 g heavier
    Weight
    530 g
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <142 g – >812 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (530 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    530 g vs 395 g
  • 41.2 mm thicker
    Thickness
    87.2 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <21.9 mm – >92 mm
    This camera is thicker than the average camera (87.2 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    87.2 mm vs 46 mm
  • 9.3 mm taller body
    Height
    83.2 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    Market range: <57.6 mm – >105.8 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (83.2 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    83.2 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/2.3"
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs APS-C).
    1/2.3" vs APS-C
  • 2.15 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.19 µm
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <1.33 µm – >5.94 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.2 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.19 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 3,200 ISO lower maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    3,200 ISO
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <1.6k ISO – >40k ISO
    This camera has a lower maximum sensitivity than the average camera (3200 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 4.9 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    0.8 fps
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <1.08 fps – >10 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (0.8 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    0.8 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • No RAW photo capture
    RAW photo capture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This camera does not support RAW photo capture, the average camera does. 62.8% of cameras support RAW formats.
  • 14 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    9
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <9 – >399
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (9 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    9 vs 23
  • No manual focus mode
    Manual focus
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This camera does not support manual focus, the average camera does. 71.7% of cameras include a manual focus mode.
  • Lower video resolution
    Max video resolution
    1,280 px
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This camera records lower-resolution video than the average camera (1280 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    1280 px vs 1920 px
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <1 – >2
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 21 Mbps lower video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    9 Mbps
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <12 Mbps – >237 Mbps
    This camera has a lower video bitrate than the average camera (9 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    9 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    This camera does not support HDMI output, the average camera does. 78.7% of cameras support HDMI output.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

E
ephotozine.com
02/08/2013
Summary of the review
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 Review | ePHOTOzine
C
chip.de
24/05/2013
Summary of the review
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 (Digital Camera) Review - CHIP
(Translated)Show original
F
focus.de
04/07/2013
Summary of the review
Bridge cameras tested - 9th place: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200
(Translated)Show original
C
camerarace.com
N/A
Summary of the review
Is the Sony DSC H200 worth it?
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
26/02/2013
Summary of the review
Sony Cyber-shot H200 Test - The first 20 MP CCD bridge camera
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
26/02/2013
Summary of the review
Sony Cyber-shot H200: best price - Les Numériques
(Translated)Show original
M
maxvessi.net
17/10/2016
Summary of the review
Sony DSC-H200 Camera - Massimiliano Vessi Homepage
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about Sony Cyber-shot H200

  • Powerful 26x optical zoom lens offers great versatility for distant subjects
  • Comfortable, ergonomic DSLR-style grip makes it easy to hold
  • Affordable price point for an entry-level bridge camera
  • Uses widely available AA batteries, convenient for travel
  • 20.1 megapixel sensor produces good, vibrant color in daylight
  • Features Optical SteadyShot to reduce camera shake

What we don't like about Sony Cyber-shot H200

  • Poor low-light performance and high noise levels at higher ISO settings
  • Short battery life, especially when using standard alkaline batteries
  • Slow processing speed between shots, particularly when using flash
  • No Wi-Fi or wireless connectivity options
  • Video recording limited to 720p HD, not Full HD (1080p)

Verdict

The Sony Cyber-shot H200 is an entry-level bridge camera featuring a 20.1-megapixel Super HAD CCD sensor and a powerful 26x optical zoom lens (24-633mm equivalent). Key characteristics include a DSLR-style body with a comfortable grip, a 3-inch 460k-dot LCD screen, and Optical SteadyShot image stabilisation for reducing blur. Its main pros are the impressive focal range for wide-angle and telephoto shots, user-friendly Intelligent Auto modes, 360-degree Sweep Panorama, and the convenience of being powered by four standard AA batteries. However, notable cons include significant image noise even at low ISO settings, lack of an electronic viewfinder or RAW support, limited 720p HD video resolution, and relatively slow focus and shutter response times.

Compare Sony Cyber-shot H200 with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Sony Cyber-shot H200 and other products in the Cameras category

No results found