OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Samsung WB800F Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£260Sensor size:1/2.3"Weight:218 gBattery life (CIPA):200 shots

Samsung WB800F Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

5.0

Overall score

Score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
Score components

90%

4.8

Technical score

10%

7.7

User score

â–¼Worse than 55% of cameras
4.8

Technical score

Technical score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Score components

28%

4.9

Sensor & Image

25%

4.6

Photo Features

18%

3.7

Video & Audio

14%

6.7

Display & Design

8%

3.4

Battery & Power

7%

4.9

Connectivity & Storage

â–¼Worse than 60% of cameras
7.7

User score

User score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

7.0

Number of reviews

Based on 86 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 85% of cameras
  • samsung-wb800f
samsung-wb800f

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Samsung WB800F

Technical score
Technical score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Score components:

28%

4.9

Sensor & Image

25%

4.6

Photo Features

18%

3.7

Video & Audio

14%

6.7

Display & Design

8%

3.4

Battery & Power

7%

4.9

Connectivity & Storage

4.8
User score
User score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

7.0

Number of reviews

Based on 86 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.7
Popularity
Popularity
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 68% of models
Popularity:
Samsung WB800F has a popularity score of 7, which is higher than 68.4% of cameras.
7.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 53% of models
Score components:

60%

5.0

Overall score

40%

9.2

Price

6.3
Sensor size
1/2.3"
Sensor size
1/2.3"
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
This camera uses a sensor classified as 1/2.3"; it is smaller than the sensor in 60.5% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 38.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
16.3 MP
Main camera megapixels
16.3 MP
â–² Better than 52% of models
This camera has a sensor resolution of 16.3 MP, which is higher than that of 51.6% of cameras and equal to that of 2.9% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
1.34 µm
Main camera pixel size
1.34 µm
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Market range: <1.33 µm – >5.94 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 1.34 µm, which are smaller than those in 74.1% of cameras and the same size as those in 14% of cameras.
Base ISO
100
Base ISO
100
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
Market range: <80 – >200
This camera has a base ISO of 100 which is higher than that of 19.9% of cameras and equal to that of 52.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 3200 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 3,200
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 3,200, which is lower than that of 62.9% of cameras and equal to that of 22.7% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
N/A
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
N/A
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
â–¼ Worse than 37% of models
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
â–² Better than 12% of models
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1920 px
Max video resolution
1920 px
â–² Better than 29% of models
This camera supports 1920 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 28.7% of cameras and equal to that of 47.1% of cameras.
Video bitrate
16 Mbps
Video bitrate
16 Mbps
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Market range: <12 Mbps – >237 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 16 Mbps which is lower than that of 80.8% of cameras and equal to that of 1.4% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
â–¼ Worse than 12% of models
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
â–¼ Worse than 22% of models
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264
Show more
Type
compact
Weight
218 g
Weight
218 g
â–² Better than 75% of models
Market range: <142 g – >812 g
This camera weighs 218 g which is lighter than 74.8% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.2% of cameras.
Width
110.6 mm
Width
110.6 mm
â–² Better than 65% of models
Market range: <96 mm – >142.6 mm
This camera has a width of 110.6 mm which is narrower than 65% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Height
65 mm
Height
65 mm
â–² Better than 67% of models
Market range: <57.6 mm – >105.8 mm
This camera has a height of 65 mm which is shorter than 66.9% of cameras and equal to that of 0.5% of cameras.
Thickness
22 mm
Thickness
22 mm
★ Better than 90% of models
Market range: <21.9 mm – >92 mm
This camera has a thickness of 22 mm which is thinner than 89.9% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
200 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
200 shots
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Market range: <210 shots – >700 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 200 shots, which is shorter than that of 90.5% of cameras and equal to that of 3.8% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,050 mAh
Battery capacity
1,050 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
Market range: <700 mAh – >2.2k mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,050 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 56.1% of cameras and equal to those in 3.6% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
â–¼ Worse than 10% of models
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This camera supports Wi-Fi. This feature is available on 47.8% of cameras.
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
â–² Better than 54% of models
This camera uses Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) which is newer than that of 54.2% of cameras and equal to that of 35.6% of cameras.
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 23% of models
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
â–¼ Worse than 15% of models
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Samsung WB800F vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This camera uses a BSI sensor, the average camera does not. 34.8% of cameras use a BSI sensor.
    Back-illuminated CMOS sensor.
  • Has a touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This camera has a touchscreen, the average camera does not. 36.6% of cameras support touchscreen input.
  • Supports Wi-Fi connectivity
    Wi-Fi connectivity
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This camera supports Wi-Fi, the average camera does not. 47.8% of cameras support Wi-Fi.
  • Smartphone remote control
    Smartphone remote control
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This camera supports smartphone remote control, the average camera does not. 46.2% of cameras support smartphone remote control.
  • 177 g lighter
    Weight
    218 g
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <142 g – >812 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (218 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    218 g vs 395 g
  • Supports touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    yes
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This camera supports touch autofocus, the average camera does not. 34.9% of cameras support touch autofocus.
  • 2.3 fps faster mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    8 fps
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    Market range: <1.08 fps – >10 fps
    This camera has a faster mechanical burst than the average camera (8 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    8 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 24 mm thinner
    Thickness
    22 mm
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <21.9 mm – >92 mm
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (22 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    22 mm vs 46 mm
  • Has a touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This camera has a touchscreen, the average camera does not. 36.6% of cameras support touchscreen input.
  • 177 g lighter
    Weight
    218 g
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <142 g – >812 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (218 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    218 g vs 395 g
  • 24 mm thinner
    Thickness
    22 mm
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <21.9 mm – >92 mm
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (22 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    22 mm vs 46 mm
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This camera uses a BSI sensor, the average camera does not. 34.8% of cameras use a BSI sensor.
    Back-illuminated CMOS sensor.
  • Supports touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    yes
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This camera supports touch autofocus, the average camera does not. 34.9% of cameras support touch autofocus.
  • 2.3 fps faster mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    8 fps
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    Market range: <1.08 fps – >10 fps
    This camera has a faster mechanical burst than the average camera (8 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    8 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • In-camera panorama mode
    In-camera panorama mode
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This camera includes an in-camera panorama mode, the average camera does not.
  • Supports Wi-Fi connectivity
    Wi-Fi connectivity
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This camera supports Wi-Fi, the average camera does not. 47.8% of cameras support Wi-Fi.
  • Smartphone remote control
    Smartphone remote control
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This camera supports smartphone remote control, the average camera does not. 46.2% of cameras support smartphone remote control.
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/2.3"
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs APS-C).
    1/2.3" vs APS-C
  • 2 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.34 µm
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <1.33 µm – >5.94 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.34 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • 130 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    200 shots
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <210 shots – >700 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (200 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    200 shots vs 330 shots
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <1 – >2
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • No RAW photo capture
    RAW photo capture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This camera does not support RAW photo capture, the average camera does. 62.8% of cameras support RAW formats.
  • 22,100 ISO lower extended sensitivity limit
    Max expanded ISO
    3,200 ISO
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <3.2k ISO – >102.4k ISO
    This camera has a lower expanded ISO than the average camera (3200 ISO vs 25300 ISO). The average camera reaches an expanded ISO of 25300 ISO.
    3,200 ISO vs 25,300 ISO
  • 14 Mbps lower video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    16 Mbps
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <12 Mbps – >237 Mbps
    This camera has a lower video bitrate than the average camera (16 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    16 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • 3.9% lower user score
    User score
    7.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung WB800F
    the average camera
    Samsung WB800F has a lower user score than the average camera (7.70 vs 8.000).
    7.7 vs 8
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/2.3"
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs APS-C).
    1/2.3" vs APS-C
  • 2 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.34 µm
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <1.33 µm – >5.94 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.34 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 22,100 ISO lower extended sensitivity limit
    Max expanded ISO
    3,200 ISO
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <3.2k ISO – >102.4k ISO
    This camera has a lower expanded ISO than the average camera (3200 ISO vs 25300 ISO). The average camera reaches an expanded ISO of 25300 ISO.
    3,200 ISO vs 25,300 ISO
  • 3,200 ISO lower maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    3,200 ISO
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <1.6k ISO – >40k ISO
    This camera has a lower maximum sensitivity than the average camera (3200 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • No RAW photo capture
    RAW photo capture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This camera does not support RAW photo capture, the average camera does. 62.8% of cameras support RAW formats.
  • No manual focus mode
    Manual focus
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This camera does not support manual focus, the average camera does. 71.7% of cameras include a manual focus mode.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <1 – >2
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 14 Mbps lower video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    16 Mbps
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <12 Mbps – >237 Mbps
    This camera has a lower video bitrate than the average camera (16 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    16 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • 10 min shorter recording time
    Max video recording time
    20 min
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <25 min – >60 min
    This camera records continuously for less time than the average camera (20 min vs 30 min). The average camera records for 30 min.
    20 min vs 30 min
  • 130 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    200 shots
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <210 shots – >700 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (200 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    200 shots vs 330 shots
  • 70 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,050 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    Market range: <700 mAh – >2.2k mAh
    This camera has a lower battery capacity than the average camera (1050 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    1,050 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • Older HDMI version
    HDMI version
    1.3
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This camera uses HDMI 1.3, while the average camera uses HDMI 1.4.
    1.3 vs 1.4

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
pcmag.com
10/05/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung WB800F Review - PCMag
C
cnet.com
26/06/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung WB800F Smart Camera review: A 21x zoom smartphone camera accessory - CNET
E
ephotozine.com
09/09/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung WB800F Review - ePHOTOzine
T
thedigitallifestyle.com
12/01/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung WB800F Smart Camera review - The Digital Lifestyle
U
uk.pcmag.com
16/05/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung WB800F - PCMag UK
C
chip.de
02/09/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung WB800F (Digital Camera) Review - CHIP
(Translated)Show original
C
clubic.com
28/06/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung WB800F: A step backward?
(Translated)Show original
P
priice.fr
12/05/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung WB800F review, specs, and discussion
(Translated)Show original
C
camerarace.com
07/01/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung WB800F - Review and Full Specifications
(Translated)Show original
M
m.alatest.fr
12/03/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung Smart Camera WB800F: Reviews, Tests and Price
(Translated)Show original
C
camerarace.com
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
Samsung WB800F - Review and specifications
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 86 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Samsung WB800F

  • Powerful 21x optical zoom lens for versatility
  • Wide-angle 23mm field of view
  • Strong wireless and Wi-Fi connectivity for easy sharing
  • Responsive 3-inch touchscreen and hybrid user interface
  • Good overall photo and video quality for its price range
  • Offers full manual shooting modes (Aperture, Shutter, Manual)
  • Compact and pocket-sized design with a functional handgrip

What we don't like about Samsung WB800F

  • Image quality significantly degrades at high ISO settings (above ISO 400-800)
  • Noticeable rolling shutter effect in video recordings
  • In-camera battery charging only (no dedicated external charger included)
  • Lack of RAW image support
  • LCD screen is prone to glare and not the sharpest in its class
  • Menu navigation and button placement can be non-intuitive
  • Image softness at full telephoto zoom and in corners

Verdict

The Samsung WB800F is a versatile travel-zoom compact camera featuring a 16.3-megapixel BSI CMOS sensor and a powerful 21x optical zoom lens with a 23–483mm equivalent focal range and a bright f/2.8 maximum aperture at the wide end. It is characterized by its 3.0-inch hybrid touch LCD, built-in Wi-Fi for instant sharing, and Full HD 1080p video recording at 30fps with optical image stabilization. Main pros include its impressive wide-angle lens, responsive touchscreen interface, and comprehensive manual control options. However, image quality tends to suffer from over-aggressive noise reduction at ISO settings above 400, and it lacks internal GPS and RAW file support.

Compare Samsung WB800F with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung WB800F and other products in the Cameras category

No results found