Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Olympus Tough TG-310 Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£110Sensor size:1/2.3"Weight:155 gBattery life (CIPA):150 shots

Olympus Tough TG-310 Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

4.1

Overall score

Score
4.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.1

Technical score

10%

?

User score

▼Worse than 91% of cameras
4.1

Technical score

Technical score
4.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

4.2

Sensor & Image

25%

5.3

Photo Features

18%

3.1

Video & Audio

14%

4.4

Display & Design

8%

2.6

Battery & Power

7%

2.7

Connectivity & Storage

▼Worse than 85% of cameras
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Olympus Tough TG-310

Technical score
Technical score
4.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

4.2

Sensor & Image

25%

5.3

Photo Features

18%

3.1

Video & Audio

14%

4.4

Display & Design

8%

2.6

Battery & Power

7%

2.7

Connectivity & Storage

4.1
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Olympus Tough TG-310 has a popularity score of 1, which is lower than 51.3% of cameras.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

4.1

Overall score

40%

9.9

Price

5.8
Sensor size
1/2.3"
Sensor size
1/2.3"
This camera uses a sensor classified as 1/2.3"; it is smaller than the sensor in 60.5% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 38.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
14 MP
Main camera megapixels
14 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 14 MP, which is lower than that of 78.6% of cameras and equal to that of 3.5% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
1.43 µm
Main camera pixel size
1.43 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 1.43 µm, which are smaller than those in 67.6% of cameras and the same size as those in 2.7% of cameras.
Base ISO
80
Base ISO
80
This camera has a base ISO of 80 which is lower than that of 80.3% of cameras and equal to that of 15.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 1600 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 1,600
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 1,600, which is lower than that of 85.9% of cameras and equal to that of 13.2% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
N/A
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
?
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1,280 px
Max video resolution
1,280 px
This camera supports 1,280 px video recording which is lower quality than that of 71.4% of cameras and equal to that of 18.5% of cameras.
Video bitrate
9 Mbps
Video bitrate
9 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 9 Mbps which is lower than that of 92.7% of cameras and equal to that of 4.9% of cameras.
approximate value
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264
Show more
Type
compact
Weight
155 g
Weight
155 g
This camera weighs 155 g which is lighter than 87.5% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.2% of cameras.
Width
96.3 mm
Width
96.3 mm
This camera has a width of 96.3 mm which is narrower than 89.5% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Height
63.4 mm
Height
63.4 mm
This camera has a height of 63.4 mm which is shorter than 70.8% of cameras and equal to that of 0.2% of cameras.
Thickness
22.7 mm
Thickness
22.7 mm
This camera has a thickness of 22.7 mm which is thinner than 88.1% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
150 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
150 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 150 shots, which is shorter than that of 98.4% of cameras and equal to that of 0.5% of cameras.
Battery capacity
740 mAh
Battery capacity
740 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 740 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 85.8% of cameras and equal to those in 2.2% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Olympus Tough TG-310 vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
  • 240 g lighter
    Weight
    155 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (155 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    155 g vs 395 g
  • 23.6 mm narrower
    Width
    96.3 mm
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (96.3 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    96.3 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 23.3 mm thinner
    Thickness
    22.7 mm
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (22.7 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    22.7 mm vs 46 mm
  • Has anti-flicker mode
    Anti-flicker mode
    yes
    This camera includes an anti-flicker mode, the average camera does not. 20% of cameras include it.
  • In-camera panorama mode
    In-camera panorama mode
    yes
    This camera includes an in-camera panorama mode, the average camera does not.
  • 2.64x cheaper
    Olympus Tough TG-310 is cheaper than the average camera (£110 vs £290).
    £110 vs £290
  • 0.02 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    0.0195 GB
    This camera has a higher internal storage than the average camera (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera offers 0 GB of internal storage.
    0.0195 GB vs 0 GB
  • 2.64x cheaper
    Olympus Tough TG-310 is cheaper than the average camera (£110 vs £290).
    £110 vs £290
  • 240 g lighter
    Weight
    155 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (155 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    155 g vs 395 g
  • 23.6 mm narrower
    Width
    96.3 mm
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (96.3 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    96.3 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 23.3 mm thinner
    Thickness
    22.7 mm
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (22.7 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    22.7 mm vs 46 mm
  • 10.5 mm shorter body
    Height
    63.4 mm
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (63.4 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    63.4 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
  • Has anti-flicker mode
    Anti-flicker mode
    yes
    This camera includes an anti-flicker mode, the average camera does not. 20% of cameras include it.
  • In-camera panorama mode
    In-camera panorama mode
    yes
    This camera includes an in-camera panorama mode, the average camera does not.
  • 0.02 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    0.0195 GB
    This camera has a higher internal storage than the average camera (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera offers 0 GB of internal storage.
    0.0195 GB vs 0 GB
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/2.3"
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs APS-C).
    1/2.3" vs APS-C
  • 5.1 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    0.6 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (0.6 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    0.6 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 0.3 in smaller screen diagonal
    Screen size
    2.7 in
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (2.7 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    2.7 in vs 3 in
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower video resolution
    Max video resolution
    1,280 px
    This camera records lower-resolution video than the average camera (1280 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    1280 px vs 1920 px
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
  • 1.91 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.43 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.4 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.43 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • 93% less popular
    Olympus Tough TG-310 is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • 6.4% worse value for money
    Olympus Tough TG-310 has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (5.82 vs 6.2).
    5.82 vs 6.2
  • 0.3 in smaller screen diagonal
    Screen size
    2.7 in
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (2.7 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    2.7 in vs 3 in
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • 3 m shallower water resistance
    Waterproof depth rating
    3 m
    This camera has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average camera (3 m vs 0 m). The average camera has a waterproof depth rating of 0 m.
    3 m vs 0 m
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/2.3"
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs APS-C).
    1/2.3" vs APS-C
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 1.91 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.43 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.4 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.43 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    14 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (14 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    14 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 4,800 ISO lower maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    1,600 ISO
    This camera has a lower maximum sensitivity than the average camera (1600 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    1,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 2 older
    Release date
    2011
    This camera is older than the average camera (2011 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    January 2011
    2,011 vs 2,013
  • 5.1 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    0.6 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (0.6 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    0.6 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • No RAW photo capture
    RAW photo capture
    no
    This camera does not support RAW photo capture, the average camera does. 62.8% of cameras support RAW formats.
  • No manual focus mode
    Manual focus
    no
    This camera does not support manual focus, the average camera does. 71.7% of cameras include a manual focus mode.
  • No manual exposure control
    Manual exposure
    no
    This camera does not support manual exposure, the average camera does. 72% of cameras support manual exposure controls.
  • 26 s shorter maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    4 s
    This camera supports a shorter maximum exposure than the average camera (4 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    4 s vs 30 s
  • Lower video resolution
    Max video resolution
    1,280 px
    This camera records lower-resolution video than the average camera (1280 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    1280 px vs 1920 px
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 21 Mbps lower video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    9 Mbps
    This camera has a lower video bitrate than the average camera (9 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    approximate value
    9 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • 180 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    150 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (150 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    150 shots vs 330 shots
  • 380 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    740 mAh
    This camera has a lower battery capacity than the average camera (740 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    740 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • Older HDMI version
    HDMI version
    1.3
    This camera uses HDMI 1.3, while the average camera uses HDMI 1.4.
    1.3 vs 1.4

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

W
whatdigitalcamera.com
15/03/2011
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
29/03/2011
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
07/06/2011
Summary of the review
E
ephotozine.com
03/10/2011
Summary of the review
A
au.pcmag.com
07/02/2012
Summary of the review
E
erikmoberg.net
28/11/2012
Summary of the review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
19/04/2011
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
14/09/2011
Summary of the review
B
backpacker.com
12/10/2011
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
06/02/2012
Summary of the review
F
focus.de
21/02/2011
Summary of the review
C
connect-living.de
26/05/2011
Summary of the review
G
gradias.de
22/10/2026
Summary of the review
U
unterwasserkamera-test.de
Unbekannt
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
22/03/2011
Summary of the review
J
juancmmartin.wordpress.com
05/03/2011
Summary of the review
P
portablegear.nl
22/10/2026
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Olympus Tough TG-310

  • Ultra-resistant design: Submersible up to 3 meters, shockproof (1.5m drops) and antifreeze (-10°C).
  • Excellent value for money for an action or underwater camera.
  • Compact size and light weight, easy to carry.
  • Excellent macro mode that allows you to focus on very close subjects (up to 2cm).
  • Compatible with Eye-Fi cards for wireless transfer.

What we don't like about Olympus Tough TG-310

  • Overall performance and image quality just average.
  • The LCD screen has a low resolution and may be difficult to view in certain conditions.
  • The camera does not float, which requires care if used in the sea or swimming pools.
  • The physical buttons can be a little awkward to press.

Verdict

The Olympus Tough TG-310 is a rugged 14-megapixel compact camera featuring a 3.6x wide-angle optical zoom lens (28-102mm equivalent) and a 2.7-inch LCD. Built for durability, it is waterproof to 3 metres, shockproof from 1.5 metres, and freezeproof to -10°C, offering dual image stabilisation and 720p HD video recording. Its main advantages include high-speed underwater shooting modes and a 3D photo mode, though it is limited by a small maximum aperture of f/3.5, a relatively low-resolution screen, and mediocre low-light performance.

Compare Olympus Tough TG-310 with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Olympus Tough TG-310 and other products in the Cameras category

No results found