Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£130Sensor size:four thirdsWeight:396 gBattery life (CIPA):320 shots

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

5.9

Overall score

Score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.9

Technical score

10%

?

User score

▲Better than 70% of cameras
5.9

Technical score

Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

6.5

Sensor & Image

25%

6.3

Photo Features

18%

4.1

Video & Audio

14%

7.4

Display & Design

8%

4.9

Battery & Power

7%

4.9

Connectivity & Storage

▲Better than 72% of cameras
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Olympus OM-D E-M10

Technical score
Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

6.5

Sensor & Image

25%

6.3

Photo Features

18%

4.1

Video & Audio

14%

7.4

Display & Design

8%

4.9

Battery & Power

7%

4.9

Connectivity & Storage

5.9
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Olympus OM-D E-M10 has a popularity score of 1, which is lower than 51.3% of cameras.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

5.9

Overall score

40%

9.8

Price

7.1
Sensor size
four thirds
Sensor size
four thirds
This camera uses a sensor classified as four thirds; it is larger than the sensor in 49% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 8.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
16.1 MP
Main camera megapixels
16.1 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 16.1 MP, which is lower than that of 53.3% of cameras and equal to that of 7.9% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
3.76 µm
Main camera pixel size
3.76 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 3.76 µm, which are larger than those in 55.4% of cameras and the same size as those in 5.3% of cameras.
Base ISO
200
Base ISO
200
This camera has a base ISO of 200 which is higher than that of 84.7% of cameras and equal to that of 13.9% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 25600 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 25,600
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 25,600, which is higher than that of 75.6% of cameras and equal to that of 12.5% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Micro Four Thirds
Built-in focus motor
yes
Built-in focus motor
yes
This camera has a built-in focus motor. 10.9% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
81
N. of focus points
81
This camera has 81 focus points, more than the number offered by 72.9% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 1% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1920 px
Max video resolution
1920 px
This camera supports 1920 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 28.7% of cameras and equal to that of 47.1% of cameras.
Video bitrate
24 Mbps
Video bitrate
24 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 24 Mbps which is lower than that of 62.5% of cameras and equal to that of 7% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264, Motion JPEG
Show more
Type
mirrorless
Weight
396 g
Weight
396 g
This camera weighs 396 g which is heavier than 50.1% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.2% of cameras.
Width
119.1 mm
Width
119.1 mm
This camera has a width of 119.1 mm which is narrower than 50.5% of cameras.
Height
82.3 mm
Height
82.3 mm
This camera has a height of 82.3 mm which is taller than 59% of cameras.
Thickness
45.9 mm
Thickness
45.9 mm
This camera has a thickness of 45.9 mm which is thinner than 50.4% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
320 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
320 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 320 shots, which is shorter than that of 52.4% of cameras and equal to that of 2.3% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,150 mAh
Battery capacity
1,150 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,150 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 50.6% of cameras and equal to those in 1.2% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This camera supports Wi-Fi. This feature is available on 47.8% of cameras.
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
This camera uses Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) which is newer than that of 54.2% of cameras and equal to that of 35.6% of cameras.
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Olympus OM-D E-M10 vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
    3-axis in-body stabilization.
  • 19,200 ISO higher maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    25,600 ISO
    This camera has a higher maximum sensitivity than the average camera (25600 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    25,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Human eye AF
    Eye detection AF (human)
    yes
    This camera supports human eye-detection AF, the average camera does not.
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    electronic
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (electronic vs none).
    electronic vs none
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Supersonic Wave Filter.
  • Has a touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This camera has a touchscreen, the average camera does not. 36.6% of cameras support touchscreen input.
  • 60 Hz higher EVF refresh rate
    Max EVF refresh rate
    120 Hz
    This camera has a higher EVF refresh rate than the average camera (120 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average camera has an EVF refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    120 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • 1,770 s longer maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    1,800 s
    This camera supports a longer maximum exposure than the average camera (1800 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    1,800 s vs 30 s
  • 14.5% better value for money
    Olympus OM-D E-M10 has a better value-for-money score than the average camera (7.1 vs 6.2).
    7.1 vs 6.2
  • 2.23x cheaper
    Olympus OM-D E-M10 is cheaper than the average camera (£130 vs £290).
    £130 vs £290
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    electronic
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (electronic vs none).
    electronic vs none
  • Has a touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This camera has a touchscreen, the average camera does not. 36.6% of cameras support touchscreen input.
  • 60 Hz higher EVF refresh rate
    Max EVF refresh rate
    120 Hz
    This camera has a higher EVF refresh rate than the average camera (120 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average camera has an EVF refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    120 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • 0.37 x more viewfinder magnification
    Viewfinder magnification
    1.15 x
    This camera has a higher viewfinder magnification than the average camera (1.2 x vs 0.78 x). The average camera has a viewfinder magnification of 0.78 x.
    1.15 x vs 0.78 x
  • 3 more customizable buttons
    Customizable button count
    3
    This camera has more customizable buttons than the average camera (3 vs 0). The average camera offers 0 customizable buttons.
    3 vs 0
  • 19,200 ISO higher maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    25,600 ISO
    This camera has a higher maximum sensitivity than the average camera (25600 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    25,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Supersonic Wave Filter.
  • 100 higher base ISO
    Base ISO
    200
    This camera has a higher base ISO than the average camera (200 vs 100). The average camera has a base ISO of 100.
    200 vs 100
  • 0.42 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    3.76 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (3.8 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    3.76 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
    3-axis in-body stabilization.
  • Human eye AF
    Eye detection AF (human)
    yes
    This camera supports human eye-detection AF, the average camera does not.
  • 1,770 s longer maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    1,800 s
    This camera supports a longer maximum exposure than the average camera (1800 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    1,800 s vs 30 s
  • 58 more AF points
    N. of focus points
    81
    This camera has more focus points than the average camera (81 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    81 vs 23
  • Built-in AF motor
    Built-in focus motor
    yes
    This camera has a built-in focus motor, the average camera does not.
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
  • Supports touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    yes
    This camera supports touch autofocus, the average camera does not. 34.9% of cameras support touch autofocus.
  • 2.3 fps faster mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    8 fps
    This camera has a faster mechanical burst than the average camera (8 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    8 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • Built-in timelapse
    Timelapse function
    yes
    This camera includes timelapse capture, the average camera does not.
  • Supports Wi-Fi connectivity
    Wi-Fi connectivity
    yes
    This camera supports Wi-Fi, the average camera does not. 47.8% of cameras support Wi-Fi.
  • Smartphone remote control
    Smartphone remote control
    yes
    This camera supports smartphone remote control, the average camera does not. 46.2% of cameras support smartphone remote control.
    via OI.Share
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    four thirds
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (four thirds vs APS-C).
    four thirds vs APS-C
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -2
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-2 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -2 vs -4
  • 920000 dots lower EVF resolution
    EVF resolution
    1,440,000 dots
    This camera has a lower EVF resolution than the average camera (1440000 dots vs 2360000 dots). The average camera has an EVF resolution of 2360000 dots.
    1440000 dots vs 2360000 dots
  • 0.5 stops less CIPA-rated stabilization
    Image stabilization rating (CIPA)
    3.5 stops
    This camera offers less CIPA-rated stabilization than the average camera (3.5 stops vs 4 stops). The average camera reaches 4 stops.
    3.5 stops vs 4 stops
  • 6 Mbps lower video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    24 Mbps
    This camera has a lower video bitrate than the average camera (24 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    24 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • 93% less popular
    Olympus OM-D E-M10 is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    16.1 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (16.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    16.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 93% less popular
    Olympus OM-D E-M10 is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • 920000 dots lower EVF resolution
    EVF resolution
    1,440,000 dots
    This camera has a lower EVF resolution than the average camera (1440000 dots vs 2360000 dots). The average camera has an EVF resolution of 2360000 dots.
    1440000 dots vs 2360000 dots
  • 8.4 mm taller body
    Height
    82.3 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (82.3 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    82.3 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    four thirds
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (four thirds vs APS-C).
    four thirds vs APS-C
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    16.1 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (16.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    16.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 0.2 points lower DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    22.8 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (22.8 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    22.8 points vs 23.0 points
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -2
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-2 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -2 vs -4
  • 0.5 stops less CIPA-rated stabilization
    Image stabilization rating (CIPA)
    3.5 stops
    This camera offers less CIPA-rated stabilization than the average camera (3.5 stops vs 4 stops). The average camera reaches 4 stops.
    3.5 stops vs 4 stops
  • 6 Mbps lower video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    24 Mbps
    This camera has a lower video bitrate than the average camera (24 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    24 Mbps vs 30 Mbps

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
dpreview.com
18/03/2014
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
25/04/2014
Summary of the review
G
gizmodo.com
13/02/2014
Summary of the review
W
whatdigitalcamera.com
12/03/2014
Summary of the review
C
cameralabs.com
29/01/2014
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
02/03/2014
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
04/03/2014
Summary of the review
N
neunzehn72.de
18/06/2014
Summary of the review
F
foto.nsonic.de
23/08/2014
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
01/06/2016
Summary of the review
M
madamebougeotte.com
06/06/2016
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
Date non spécifiée
Summary of the review
D
dxomark.fr
01/01/2014
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
11/07/2014
Summary of the review
D
darty.com
09/05/2014
Summary of the review
A
adopteunboitierphoto.fabien-nguyen.fr
N/A
Summary of the review
D
dday.it
09/10/2014
Summary of the review
M
macitynet.it
06/06/2014
Summary of the review
S
saggiamente.com
27/03/2015
Summary of the review
D
draadbreuk.nl
12/04/2015
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
15/10/2018
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Olympus OM-D E-M10

  • Extremely compact and lightweight design, ideal for travel
  • Excellent, durable all-metal body construction
  • Highly effective 5-axis in-body image stabilization
  • High-resolution OLED viewfinder and high-quality JPEG engine
  • Extensive customization options for buttons and dials
  • Great value for money (often considered a 'value king')
  • Good, responsive tilting touchscreen

What we don't like about Olympus OM-D E-M10

  • Small grip can be uncomfortable for some users
  • Autofocus speed drops significantly during continuous shooting (8fps -> 3fps)
  • Limited touch functionality (mostly for focusing, not menu navigation)
  • Smaller Micro Four Thirds sensor has inferior low-light performance compared to full-frame
  • Kit lens requires extension before shooting

Verdict

The Olympus OM-D E-M10 is a compact Micro Four Thirds mirrorless camera featuring a 16.1MP Live MOS sensor and a TruePic VII image processor. Key specifications include 3-axis in-body image stabilisation, an 81-point contrast-detection autofocus system, and a continuous shooting rate of 8 fps. It is equipped with a 1.44M-dot electronic viewfinder, a 3-inch tilting touchscreen LCD, built-in Wi-Fi, and a pop-up flash. Main pros include its highly portable metal body, excellent JPEG image quality, and extensive physical controls via twin command dials. However, it lacks weather-sealing, lacks a dedicated microphone input, and features a relatively short CIPA-rated battery life of approximately 320 shots.

Compare Olympus OM-D E-M10 with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Olympus OM-D E-M10 and other products in the Cameras category

No results found