Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Leica M Typ 262 Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£2,110Sensor size:full frameWeight:600 gBattery life (CIPA):400 shots

Leica M Typ 262 Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

4.4

Overall score

Score
4.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.4

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 82% of cameras
4.4

Technical score

Technical score
4.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

6.8

Sensor & Image

25%

2.1

Photo Features

18%

2.3

Video & Audio

14%

5.7

Display & Design

8%

7.3

Battery & Power

7%

1.9

Connectivity & Storage

â–¼Worse than 75% of cameras
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £2,110

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Leica M Typ 262

Technical score
Technical score
4.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

6.8

Sensor & Image

25%

2.1

Photo Features

18%

2.3

Video & Audio

14%

5.7

Display & Design

8%

7.3

Battery & Power

7%

1.9

Connectivity & Storage

4.4
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Leica M Typ 262 has a popularity score of 1, which is lower than 51.3% of cameras.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
3.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

4.4

Overall score

40%

1.0

Price

3.4
Sensor size
full frame
Sensor size
full frame
This camera uses a sensor classified as full frame; it is larger than the sensor in 83.7% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 14% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
24 MP
Main camera megapixels
24 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 24 MP, which is higher than that of 75.4% of cameras and equal to that of 1.2% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
6.01 µm
Main camera pixel size
6.01 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 6.01 µm, which are larger than those in 94.4% of cameras and the same size as those in 0.5% of cameras.
Base ISO
200
Base ISO
200
This camera has a base ISO of 200 which is higher than that of 84.7% of cameras and equal to that of 13.9% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 6400 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 6,400
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 6,400, which is higher than that of 37.3% of cameras and equal to that of 16.2% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Leica M
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
N/A
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
no
AF tracking
no
This camera does not support AF tracking. 88.1% of cameras support this feature.
Show more
Max video resolution
N/A
Video bitrate
N/A
Video bit depth
N/A
Video chroma subsampling
N/A
Video codecs
N/A
Show more
Type
rangefinder
Weight
600 g
Weight
600 g
This camera weighs 600 g which is heavier than 73.9% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.3% of cameras.
Width
139 mm
Width
139 mm
This camera has a width of 139 mm which is wider than 85.9% of cameras and equal to that of 1.8% of cameras.
Height
80 mm
Height
80 mm
This camera has a height of 80 mm which is taller than 54.4% of cameras and equal to that of 2.4% of cameras.
Thickness
42 mm
Thickness
42 mm
This camera has a thickness of 42 mm which is thinner than 54.3% of cameras and equal to that of 1.4% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
400 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
400 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 400 shots, which is longer than that of 66.9% of cameras and equal to that of 3.5% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,800 mAh
Battery capacity
1,800 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,800 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 78.6% of cameras and equal to those in 3.3% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Leica M Typ 262 vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • 2.67 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    6.01 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (6 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    6.01 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Larger sensor
    Sensor size
    full frame
    This camera has a larger sensor than the average camera (full frame vs APS-C).
    full frame vs APS-C
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    24 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (24 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    24 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 680 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,800 mAh
    This camera has a higher battery capacity than the average camera (1800 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    1,800 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    optical vs none
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    Lossless RAW capture is supported.
  • 11 points higher DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    84 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (84 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    84 points vs 73 points
  • 70 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    400 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (400 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    400 shots vs 330 shots
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    optical vs none
  • 2.67 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    6.01 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (6 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    6.01 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Larger sensor
    Sensor size
    full frame
    This camera has a larger sensor than the average camera (full frame vs APS-C).
    full frame vs APS-C
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    24 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (24 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    24 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 11 points higher DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    84 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (84 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    84 points vs 73 points
  • 100 higher base ISO
    Base ISO
    200
    This camera has a higher base ISO than the average camera (200 vs 100). The average camera has a base ISO of 100.
    200 vs 100
  • 2 newer
    Release date
    2015
    This camera is newer than the average camera (2015 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    November 2015
    2,015 vs 2,013
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    Lossless RAW capture is supported.
  • 680 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,800 mAh
    This camera has a higher battery capacity than the average camera (1800 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    1,800 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • 70 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    400 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (400 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    400 shots vs 330 shots
  • No AF tracking
    AF tracking
    no
    This camera does not support AF tracking, the average camera does. 88% of cameras support it.
  • 2 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    0
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (0 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    0 vs 2
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    no video recording
  • 2.7 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    3 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (3 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    3 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 205 g heavier
    Weight
    600 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (600 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    600 g vs 395 g
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    This camera does not support HDMI output, the average camera does. 78.7% of cameras support HDMI output.
  • No flash
    Flash
    no
    This camera does not have a built-in flash, the average camera does. 73.4% of cameras have a flash.
  • 84.9% worse value for money
    Leica M Typ 262 has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (3.35 vs 6.2).
    3.35 vs 6.2
  • 7.28x more expensive
    Leica M Typ 262 is more expensive than the average camera (£2,110 vs £290).
    £2,110 vs £290
  • 93% less popular
    Leica M Typ 262 is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • 205 g heavier
    Weight
    600 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (600 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    600 g vs 395 g
  • No flash
    Flash
    no
    This camera does not have a built-in flash, the average camera does. 73.4% of cameras have a flash.
  • 0.1 x less viewfinder magnification
    Viewfinder magnification
    0.68 x
    This camera has a lower viewfinder magnification than the average camera (0.7 x vs 0.78 x). The average camera has a viewfinder magnification of 0.78 x.
    0.68 x vs 0.78 x
  • 19.1 mm wider
    Width
    139 mm
    This camera is wider than the average camera (139 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    139 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • No AF tracking
    AF tracking
    no
    This camera does not support AF tracking, the average camera does. 88% of cameras support it.
  • 2.7 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    3 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (3 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    3 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 2 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    0
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (0 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    0 vs 2
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    no video recording
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    This camera does not support HDMI output, the average camera does. 78.7% of cameras support HDMI output.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
t3.com
18/03/2016
Summary of the review
P
photolisticlife.com
05/05/2016
Summary of the review
S
stevehuffphoto.com
20/08/2016
Summary of the review
3
35mmc.com
11/03/2019
Summary of the review
G
gear.vogelius.se
11/03/2019
Summary of the review
M
mrleica.com
21/08/2024
Summary of the review
O
overgaard.dk
23/12/2015
Summary of the review
M
macfilos.com
26/02/2016
Summary of the review
L
l-camera-forum.com
04/09/2023
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
18/02/2016
Summary of the review
F
focus.de
14/03/2016
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
12/05/2016
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
22/02/2016
Summary of the review
D
digitalphoto.de
12/05/2016
Summary of the review
F
florian-renz.de
03/10/2022
Summary of the review
L
l-camera-forum.com
06/01/2016
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
19/11/2015
Summary of the review
F
fotografidigitali.it
30/03/2016
Summary of the review
F
fotografidigitali.it
30/03/2016
Summary of the review
M
mpb.com
N/A
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Leica M Typ 262

  • Simplicity and focus on core photography by removing distractions like video and Live View
  • Significant weight reduction compared to the M 240 due to an aluminum top plate
  • Quieter, more discreet shutter cocking mechanism
  • Exceptional battery life that can last for days of active shooting
  • Minimalist menu system consisting of only two pages for rapid setting access
  • Excellent build quality and weather sealing due to fewer external ports

What we don't like about Leica M Typ 262

  • No Live View or video recording, which limits versatility for some users
  • Limited ISO range, with performance notably degrading above ISO 3200
  • Slow start-up time of approximately 2 to 2.5 seconds
  • Rangefinder limitations, such as difficulty focusing at distances closer than 70cm
  • Center-weighted average is the only metering mode, which can lead to exposure inconsistencies
  • Aluminum top plate may be seen as a downgrade from traditional Leica brass

Verdict

The Leica M (Typ 262) is a digital rangefinder designed for 'pure' still photography, featuring a 24-megapixel full-frame CMOS sensor and the Maestro image processor. It intentionally omits video recording and Live View, resulting in a streamlined two-page menu and a dedicated white balance button for more intuitive handling. Its main advantages include a lightweight 600g body—achieved via an aluminum top plate—and a significantly quieter shutter cocking mechanism for discreet shooting. However, its specialized design presents several cons: the lack of Live View makes it incompatible with electronic viewfinders and difficult to use with lenses wider than 28mm, while the omission of a sensor cleaning mechanism requires frequent manual maintenance to combat dust.

Compare Leica M Typ 262 with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Leica M Typ 262 and other products in the Cameras category

No results found