Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Leica M Typ 240 Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£2,200Sensor size:full frameWeight:680 gBattery life (CIPA):500 shots

Leica M Typ 240 Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

4.6

Overall score

Score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.6

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 74% of cameras
4.6

Technical score

Technical score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

6.7

Sensor & Image

25%

2.1

Photo Features

18%

3.4

Video & Audio

14%

5.5

Display & Design

8%

8.4

Battery & Power

7%

1.9

Connectivity & Storage

â–¼Worse than 66% of cameras
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £2,200

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Leica M Typ 240

Technical score
Technical score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

6.7

Sensor & Image

25%

2.1

Photo Features

18%

3.4

Video & Audio

14%

5.5

Display & Design

8%

8.4

Battery & Power

7%

1.9

Connectivity & Storage

4.6
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Leica M Typ 240 has a popularity score of 1, which is lower than 51.3% of cameras.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
3.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

4.6

Overall score

40%

1.0

Price

3.5
Sensor size
full frame
Sensor size
full frame
This camera uses a sensor classified as full frame; it is larger than the sensor in 83.7% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 14% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
24 MP
Main camera megapixels
24 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 24 MP, which is higher than that of 75.4% of cameras and equal to that of 1.2% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
6.01 µm
Main camera pixel size
6.01 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 6.01 µm, which are larger than those in 94.4% of cameras and the same size as those in 0.5% of cameras.
Base ISO
200
Base ISO
200
This camera has a base ISO of 200 which is higher than that of 84.7% of cameras and equal to that of 13.9% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 6400 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 6,400
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 6,400, which is higher than that of 37.3% of cameras and equal to that of 16.2% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Leica M
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
N/A
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
no
AF tracking
no
This camera does not support AF tracking. 88.1% of cameras support this feature.
Show more
Max video resolution
1920 px
Max video resolution
1920 px
This camera supports 1920 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 28.7% of cameras and equal to that of 47.1% of cameras.
Video bitrate
25 Mbps
Video bitrate
25 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 25 Mbps which is lower than that of 61% of cameras and equal to that of 1.4% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
Motion JPEG
Show more
Type
rangefinder
Weight
680 g
Weight
680 g
This camera weighs 680 g which is heavier than 81.7% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.6% of cameras.
Width
139 mm
Width
139 mm
This camera has a width of 139 mm which is wider than 85.9% of cameras and equal to that of 1.8% of cameras.
Height
80 mm
Height
80 mm
This camera has a height of 80 mm which is taller than 54.4% of cameras and equal to that of 2.4% of cameras.
Thickness
42 mm
Thickness
42 mm
This camera has a thickness of 42 mm which is thinner than 54.3% of cameras and equal to that of 1.4% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
500 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
500 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 500 shots, which is longer than that of 79.1% of cameras and equal to that of 3.6% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,800 mAh
Battery capacity
1,800 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,800 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 78.6% of cameras and equal to those in 3.3% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Accessory handgrip only.
Show more

Leica M Typ 240 vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • 2.67 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    6.01 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (6 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    6.01 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Larger sensor
    Sensor size
    full frame
    This camera has a larger sensor than the average camera (full frame vs APS-C).
    full frame vs APS-C
  • 170 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    500 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (500 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    500 shots vs 330 shots
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    24 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (24 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    24 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 680 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,800 mAh
    This camera has a higher battery capacity than the average camera (1800 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    1,800 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • 1,017 points higher DxOMark Sports score
    DxOMark sports score
    1,860 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark sports score than the average camera (1860 points vs 843 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sports score of 843 points.
    1,860 points vs 843 points
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    optical vs none
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    Lossless RAW capture is supported.
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    optical vs none
  • 2.67 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    6.01 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (6 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    6.01 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Larger sensor
    Sensor size
    full frame
    This camera has a larger sensor than the average camera (full frame vs APS-C).
    full frame vs APS-C
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    24 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (24 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    24 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 1,017 points higher DxOMark Sports score
    DxOMark sports score
    1,860 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark sports score than the average camera (1860 points vs 843 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sports score of 843 points.
    1,860 points vs 843 points
  • 11 points higher DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    84 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (84 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    84 points vs 73 points
  • 0.9 points higher DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    13.3 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (13.3 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    13.3 points vs 12.4 points
  • 1 points higher DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    24.0 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (24 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    24.0 points vs 23.0 points
  • 100 higher base ISO
    Base ISO
    200
    This camera has a higher base ISO than the average camera (200 vs 100). The average camera has a base ISO of 100.
    200 vs 100
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    Lossless RAW capture is supported.
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
  • 170 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    500 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (500 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    500 shots vs 330 shots
  • 680 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,800 mAh
    This camera has a higher battery capacity than the average camera (1800 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    1,800 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • No AF tracking
    AF tracking
    no
    This camera does not support AF tracking, the average camera does. 88% of cameras support it.
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    manual focus only
  • 285 g heavier
    Weight
    680 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (680 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    680 g vs 395 g
  • 2.7 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    3 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (3 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    3 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    This camera does not support HDMI output, the average camera does. 78.7% of cameras support HDMI output.
  • No flash
    Flash
    no
    This camera does not have a built-in flash, the average camera does. 73.4% of cameras have a flash.
  • 76.1% worse value for money
    Leica M Typ 240 has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (3.52 vs 6.2).
    3.52 vs 6.2
  • 7.59x more expensive
    Leica M Typ 240 is more expensive than the average camera (£2,200 vs £290).
    £2,200 vs £290
  • 93% less popular
    Leica M Typ 240 is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • 285 g heavier
    Weight
    680 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (680 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    680 g vs 395 g
  • No flash
    Flash
    no
    This camera does not have a built-in flash, the average camera does. 73.4% of cameras have a flash.
  • 0.1 x less viewfinder magnification
    Viewfinder magnification
    0.68 x
    This camera has a lower viewfinder magnification than the average camera (0.7 x vs 0.78 x). The average camera has a viewfinder magnification of 0.78 x.
    0.68 x vs 0.78 x
  • 19.1 mm wider
    Width
    139 mm
    This camera is wider than the average camera (139 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    139 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 1 older
    Release date
    2012
    This camera is older than the average camera (2012 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    September 2012
    2,012 vs 2,013
  • No AF tracking
    AF tracking
    no
    This camera does not support AF tracking, the average camera does. 88% of cameras support it.
  • 2.7 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    3 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (3 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    3 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    manual focus only
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 5 Mbps lower video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    25 Mbps
    This camera has a lower video bitrate than the average camera (25 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    25 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    This camera does not support HDMI output, the average camera does. 78.7% of cameras support HDMI output.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

S
slack.co.uk
Early 2013
Summary of the review
S
samhurdphotography.com
15/04/2013
Summary of the review
F
findingrange.com
28/04/2013
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
01/08/2013
Summary of the review
T
talktog.wordpress.com
11/07/2014
Summary of the review
I
indergaard.net
24/08/2015
Summary of the review
P
pebbleplace.com
28/05/2018
Summary of the review
K
keithwee.com
01/10/2018
Summary of the review
3
35mmc.com
11/02/2019
Summary of the review
O
overgaard.dk
Undated (Series)
Summary of the review
O
overgaard.dk
09/08/2015
Summary of the review
A
amateurphotographer.com
17/07/2013
Summary of the review
F
fotografr.de
07/03/2021
Summary of the review
A
armin-muratovic.at
10/02/2025
Summary of the review
Z
zielfoto.com
01/09/2020
Summary of the review
L
l-camera-forum.com
05/01/2022
Summary of the review
N
neunzehn72.de
06/03/2016
Summary of the review
M
messsucherwelt.com
14/10/2016
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
08/03/2013
Summary of the review
F
fae59.com
05/04/2013
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
05/02/2014
Summary of the review
J
jeanlucmichel.com
Date non spécifiée
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
17/09/2012
Summary of the review
R
rcefoto.com
No specific date
Summary of the review
D
dxomark.fr
No specific date
Summary of the review
M
macitynet.it
09/10/2013
Summary of the review
R
riflessifotografici.com
19/11/2016
Summary of the review
S
shoot.be
16/09/2013
Summary of the review
V
vintage-photo.nl
21/02/2022
Summary of the review
D
digitalefotografievakantie.nl
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
J
jipvankuijk.nl
10/06/2014
Summary of the review
J
jipvankuijk.nl
29/09/2014
Summary of the review
D
digifotopro.nl
15/03/2013
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Leica M Typ 240

  • Exceptional build quality with a solid-brass top plate
  • Vibrant, film-like color rendering and 'special' image quality
  • Excellent battery life, often lasting for days of shooting
  • First M-series to feature Live View with focus peaking for easier manual focus
  • Quiet and discreet shutter sound
  • Weather-sealed construction for added durability in the field

What we don't like about Leica M Typ 240

  • Increased weight and thickness compared to older M models
  • Poor auto-white balance performance, especially in mixed lighting
  • Noticeable banding and noise when shooting at high ISO settings above 3200
  • Slow boot-up and response times can lead to missed shots
  • Low-resolution and dated rear LCD and optional EVF
  • Subpar video quality that is generally considered unusable by modern standards

Verdict

The Leica M Typ 240 is a professional full-frame digital rangefinder featuring a 24-megapixel CMOS sensor and the Maestro image processor, marking a significant shift from previous CCD-based models. Key characteristics include its iconic magnesium alloy and brass construction with weather-sealing, a 3-inch 921k-dot LCD protected by Gorilla Glass, and the introduction of 1080p Full HD video and Live View with focus peaking. Main pros include its vastly improved battery life (1800mAh), compatibility with both M and R-mount lenses (via adapter), and superior high-ISO performance reaching up to 6400. However, notable cons include its increased body thickness and weight compared to film M cameras, a relatively slow startup time of about 2 seconds, and a limited 1GB buffer that can cause delays during continuous shooting.

Compare Leica M Typ 240 with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Leica M Typ 240 and other products in the Cameras category

No results found