Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Leica M E Typ 220 Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£2,310Sensor size:full frameWeight:585 gBattery life (CIPA):?

Leica M E Typ 220 Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

3.9

Overall score

Score
3.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

3.9

Technical score

10%

?

User score

▼Worse than 96% of cameras
3.9

Technical score

Technical score
3.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

5.6

Sensor & Image

25%

1.9

Photo Features

18%

2.3

Video & Audio

14%

4.4

Display & Design

8%

8.1

Battery & Power

7%

1.9

Connectivity & Storage

▼Worse than 89% of cameras
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £2,310

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Leica M E Typ 220

Technical score
Technical score
3.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

5.6

Sensor & Image

25%

1.9

Photo Features

18%

2.3

Video & Audio

14%

4.4

Display & Design

8%

8.1

Battery & Power

7%

1.9

Connectivity & Storage

3.9
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Leica M E Typ 220 has a popularity score of 1, which is lower than 51.3% of cameras.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
3.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

3.9

Overall score

40%

1.0

Price

3.0
Sensor size
full frame
Sensor size
full frame
This camera uses a sensor classified as full frame; it is larger than the sensor in 83.7% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 14% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
18 MP
Main camera megapixels
18 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 18 MP, which is higher than that of 55.7% of cameras and equal to that of 1.8% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
6.91 µm
Main camera pixel size
6.91 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 6.91 µm, which are larger than those in 97.7% of cameras.
Base ISO
160
Base ISO
160
This camera has a base ISO of 160 which is higher than that of 80.6% of cameras and equal to that of 4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 2500 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 2,500
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 2,500, which is lower than that of 85.6% of cameras and equal to that of 0.2% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Leica M
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
N/A
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
no
AF tracking
no
This camera does not support AF tracking. 88.1% of cameras support this feature.
Show more
Max video resolution
N/A
Video bitrate
N/A
Video bit depth
N/A
Video chroma subsampling
N/A
Video codecs
N/A
Show more
Type
rangefinder
Weight
585 g
Weight
585 g
This camera weighs 585 g which is heavier than 72.4% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.1% of cameras.
Width
139 mm
Width
139 mm
This camera has a width of 139 mm which is wider than 85.9% of cameras and equal to that of 1.8% of cameras.
Height
80 mm
Height
80 mm
This camera has a height of 80 mm which is taller than 54.4% of cameras and equal to that of 2.4% of cameras.
Thickness
37 mm
Thickness
37 mm
This camera has a thickness of 37 mm which is thinner than 64.5% of cameras and equal to that of 0.6% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
?
Battery capacity
1,860 mAh
Battery capacity
1,860 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,860 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 82.6% of cameras and equal to those in 2.6% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Leica M E Typ 220 vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • 3.57 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    6.91 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (6.9 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    6.91 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Larger sensor
    Sensor size
    full frame
    This camera has a larger sensor than the average camera (full frame vs APS-C).
    full frame vs APS-C
  • 740 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,860 mAh
    This camera has a higher battery capacity than the average camera (1860 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    1,860 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    Optical rangefinder viewfinder.
    optical vs none
  • 210 s longer maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    240 s
    This camera supports a longer maximum exposure than the average camera (240 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    240 s vs 30 s
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    18 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (18 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    18 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 60 higher base ISO
    Base ISO
    160
    This camera has a higher base ISO than the average camera (160 vs 100). The average camera has a base ISO of 100.
    160 vs 100
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    Optical rangefinder viewfinder.
    optical vs none
  • 3.57 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    6.91 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (6.9 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    6.91 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Larger sensor
    Sensor size
    full frame
    This camera has a larger sensor than the average camera (full frame vs APS-C).
    full frame vs APS-C
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    18 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (18 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    18 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 60 higher base ISO
    Base ISO
    160
    This camera has a higher base ISO than the average camera (160 vs 100). The average camera has a base ISO of 100.
    160 vs 100
  • 210 s longer maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    240 s
    This camera supports a longer maximum exposure than the average camera (240 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    240 s vs 30 s
  • 740 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,860 mAh
    This camera has a higher battery capacity than the average camera (1860 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    1,860 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • No AF tracking
    AF tracking
    no
    This camera does not support AF tracking, the average camera does. 88% of cameras support it.
  • 0.5 in smaller screen diagonal
    Screen size
    2.5 in
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (2.5 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    2.5 in vs 3 in
  • 2 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    0
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (0 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    0 vs 2
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 3.7 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    2 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (2 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    2 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    no video recording
  • 22,800 ISO lower extended sensitivity limit
    Max expanded ISO
    2,500 ISO
    This camera has a lower expanded ISO than the average camera (2500 ISO vs 25300 ISO). The average camera reaches an expanded ISO of 25300 ISO.
    2,500 ISO vs 25,300 ISO
  • 190 g heavier
    Weight
    585 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (585 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    585 g vs 395 g
  • 2.07x worse value for money
    Leica M E Typ 220 has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (3 vs 6.2).
    3 vs 6.2
  • 7.97x more expensive
    Leica M E Typ 220 is more expensive than the average camera (£2,310 vs £290).
    £2,310 vs £290
  • 93% less popular
    Leica M E Typ 220 is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • 0.5 in smaller screen diagonal
    Screen size
    2.5 in
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (2.5 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    2.5 in vs 3 in
  • 190 g heavier
    Weight
    585 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (585 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    585 g vs 395 g
  • No flash
    Flash
    no
    This camera does not have a built-in flash, the average camera does. 73.4% of cameras have a flash.
  • 0.1 x less viewfinder magnification
    Viewfinder magnification
    0.68 x
    This camera has a lower viewfinder magnification than the average camera (0.7 x vs 0.78 x). The average camera has a viewfinder magnification of 0.78 x.
    0.68 x vs 0.78 x
  • 19.1 mm wider
    Width
    139 mm
    This camera is wider than the average camera (139 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    139 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 22,800 ISO lower extended sensitivity limit
    Max expanded ISO
    2,500 ISO
    This camera has a lower expanded ISO than the average camera (2500 ISO vs 25300 ISO). The average camera reaches an expanded ISO of 25300 ISO.
    2,500 ISO vs 25,300 ISO
  • 3,900 ISO lower maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    2,500 ISO
    This camera has a lower maximum sensitivity than the average camera (2500 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    2,500 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 0.7 points lower DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    11.7 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (11.7 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    11.7 points vs 12.4 points
  • 4 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    69 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (69 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    69 points vs 73 points
  • 1 older
    Release date
    2012
    This camera is older than the average camera (2012 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    September 2012
    2,012 vs 2,013
  • 0.3 points lower DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    22.7 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (22.7 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    22.7 points vs 23.0 points
  • 56 points lower DxOMark Sports score
    DxOMark sports score
    787 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sports score than the average camera (787 points vs 843 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sports score of 843 points.
    787 points vs 843 points
  • No AF tracking
    AF tracking
    no
    This camera does not support AF tracking, the average camera does. 88% of cameras support it.
  • 3.7 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    2 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (2 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    2 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 2 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    0
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (0 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    0 vs 2
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    no video recording
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    This camera does not support HDMI output, the average camera does. 78.7% of cameras support HDMI output.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
dxomark.com
06/03/2013
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
13/08/2013
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
15/08/2013
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
16/05/2014
Summary of the review
I
itsalwaysluck.wordpress.com
12/01/2017
Summary of the review
R
roter-punkt-kamera.de
14/09/2025
Summary of the review
F
fototouren-berlin.de
25/10/2014
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
D
dxomark.fr
17/09/2012
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
D
dxomark.fr
17/09/2012
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
21/10/2026
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Leica M E Typ 220

  • Vibrant, film-like color rendering from the Kodak CCD sensor
  • Exceptional build quality with a solid brass and magnesium body
  • Bright and accurate optical rangefinder for manual focusing
  • Simplified, distraction-free interface focused on photography essentials
  • Compact and lightweight for a full-frame digital M camera
  • Cheapest entry point into the digital Leica M system (second-hand)

What we don't like about Leica M E Typ 220

  • High risk of CCD sensor corrosion (requires expensive replacement if not done)
  • Poor ISO performance above 800, leading to significant digital noise
  • Outdated, low-resolution 2.5-inch LCD screen makes checking focus difficult
  • Slow operation including long start-up times and sluggish image buffering
  • Lacks modern features like Live View, video recording, and Wi-Fi
  • Requires removing the bottom plate to access the battery or SD card

Verdict

The Leica M-E Typ 220 is a full-frame digital rangefinder featuring an 18-megapixel CCD sensor, renowned for producing vibrant, 'analog-like' colours that many CCD devotees prefer over modern CMOS alternatives. Released in 2012 as an entry-level model, it shares the core architecture of the M9 but strips away the USB port and frameline selector lever to offer a more streamlined, lightweight brass and magnesium body weighing 585g. Main characteristics include a minimalist manual-only focus system, an optical rangefinder viewfinder with 0.68x magnification, and a native ISO range of 80 to 2500. Its primary pros are its superior image quality at base ISOs, compact industrial design in anthracite grey, and compatibility with the extensive Leica M-mount lens library. However, it faces notable cons such as a slow 2.0 fps burst rate, the absence of live view or video recording, an outdated 2.5-inch 230k-dot rear LCD, and susceptibility to sensor corrosion in earlier batches.

Compare Leica M E Typ 220 with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Leica M E Typ 220 and other products in the Cameras category

No results found