OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Casio EXILIM EX ZR1000 Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~ÂŁ230Sensor size:1/2.3"Weight:255 gBattery life (CIPA):470 shots

Casio EXILIM EX ZR1000 Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

5.5

Overall score

Score
5.5/ 10
âś•
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–˛ Better than 61% of models
Score components

90%

5.4

Technical score

10%

6.7

User score

â–˛Better than 61% of cameras
5.4

Technical score

Technical score
5.4/ 10
âś•
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–˛ Better than 61% of models
Score components

28%

5.1

Sensor & Image

25%

5.6

Photo Features

18%

4.9

Video & Audio

14%

5.9

Display & Design

8%

8.0

Battery & Power

7%

2.8

Connectivity & Storage

â–˛Better than 61% of cameras
6.7

User score

User score
6.7/ 10
âś•
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–Ľ Worse than 96% of models
Score components

70%

7.0

User ratings

30%

6.1

Number of reviews

Based on 44 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–ĽWorse than 96% of cameras
  • casio-exilim-ex-zr1000
casio-exilim-ex-zr1000

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Casio EXILIM EX ZR1000

Technical score
Technical score
5.4/ 10
âś•
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–˛ Better than 61% of models
Score components:

28%

5.1

Sensor & Image

25%

5.6

Photo Features

18%

4.9

Video & Audio

14%

5.9

Display & Design

8%

8.0

Battery & Power

7%

2.8

Connectivity & Storage

5.4
User score
User score
6.7/ 10
âś•
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–Ľ Worse than 96% of models
Score components

70%

7.0

User ratings

30%

6.1

Number of reviews

Based on 44 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
6.7
Popularity
Popularity
6.1/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–˛ Better than 63% of models
Popularity:
Casio EXILIM EX ZR1000 has a popularity score of 6.1, which is higher than 63.2% of cameras.
6.1
Value for money
Value for money
6.6/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–˛ Better than 71% of models
Score components:

60%

5.5

Overall score

40%

9.3

Price

6.6
Sensor size
1/2.3"
Sensor size
1/2.3"
â–Ľ Worse than 61% of models
This camera uses a sensor classified as 1/2.3"; it is smaller than the sensor in 60.5% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 38.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
16.1 MP
Main camera megapixels
16.1 MP
â–Ľ Worse than 53% of models
This camera has a sensor resolution of 16.1 MP, which is lower than that of 53.3% of cameras and equal to that of 7.9% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
1.34 µm
Main camera pixel size
1.34 µm
â–Ľ Worse than 74% of models
Market range: <1.33 µm – >5.94 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 1.34 µm, which are smaller than those in 74.1% of cameras and the same size as those in 14% of cameras.
Base ISO
80
Base ISO
80
â–Ľ Worse than 80% of models
Market range: <80 – >200
This camera has a base ISO of 80 which is lower than that of 80.3% of cameras and equal to that of 15.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 3200 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 3,200
â–Ľ Worse than 63% of models
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 3,200, which is lower than that of 62.9% of cameras and equal to that of 22.7% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
N/A
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
â–Ľ Worse than 11% of models
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
?
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
â–Ľ Worse than 37% of models
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
â–˛ Better than 12% of models
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1920 px
Max video resolution
1920 px
â–˛ Better than 29% of models
This camera supports 1920 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 28.7% of cameras and equal to that of 47.1% of cameras.
Video bitrate
40 Mbps
Video bitrate
40 Mbps
â–˛ Better than 64% of models
Market range: <12 Mbps – >237 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 40 Mbps which is higher than that of 63.5% of cameras and equal to that of 1.1% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
â–Ľ Worse than 12% of models
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
â–Ľ Worse than 22% of models
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264
Show more
Type
compact
Weight
255 g
Weight
255 g
â–˛ Better than 68% of models
Market range: <142 g – >812 g
This camera weighs 255 g which is lighter than 67.6% of cameras.
Width
107.5 mm
Width
107.5 mm
â–˛ Better than 71% of models
Market range: <96 mm – >142.6 mm
This camera has a width of 107.5 mm which is narrower than 71% of cameras.
Height
62 mm
Height
62 mm
â–˛ Better than 73% of models
Market range: <57.6 mm – >105.8 mm
This camera has a height of 62 mm which is shorter than 72.9% of cameras and equal to that of 1% of cameras.
Thickness
36.7 mm
Thickness
36.7 mm
â–˛ Better than 65% of models
Market range: <21.9 mm – >92 mm
This camera has a thickness of 36.7 mm which is thinner than 65.5% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
470 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
470 shots
â–˛ Better than 77% of models
Market range: <210 shots – >700 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 470 shots, which is longer than that of 77.2% of cameras and equal to that of 1.1% of cameras.
590 in Eco mode.
Battery capacity
1,800 mAh
Battery capacity
1,800 mAh
â–˛ Better than 79% of models
Market range: <700 mAh – >2.2k mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,800 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 78.6% of cameras and equal to those in 3.3% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
â–˛ Better than 1% of models
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
â–Ľ Worse than 10% of models
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
â–Ľ Worse than 48% of models
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
â–Ľ Worse than 23% of models
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
â–Ľ Worse than 15% of models
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Casio EXILIM EX ZR1000 vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    â–˛ Better than 71% of models
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    yes
    â–˛ Better than 65% of models
    This camera uses a BSI sensor, the average camera does not. 34.8% of cameras use a BSI sensor.
  • Supports slow-motion video
    Slow-motion video
    yes
    â–˛ Better than 61% of models
    This camera supports slow-motion video, the average camera does not.
    Supports up to 1,000 fps high-speed video.
  • 680 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,800 mAh
    â–˛ Better than 79% of models
    Market range: <700 mAh – >2.2k mAh
    This camera has a higher battery capacity than the average camera (1800 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    1,800 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • 140 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    470 shots
    â–˛ Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <210 shots – >700 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (470 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    590 in Eco mode.
    470 shots vs 330 shots
  • Built-in timelapse
    Timelapse function
    yes
    â–˛ Better than 56% of models
    This camera includes timelapse capture, the average camera does not.
  • 0.05 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    0.0522 GB
    â–˛ Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >0.07 GB
    This camera has a higher internal storage than the average camera (0.1 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera offers 0 GB of internal storage.
    0.0522 GB vs 0 GB
  • 140 g lighter
    Weight
    255 g
    â–˛ Better than 68% of models
    Market range: <142 g – >812 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (255 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    255 g vs 395 g
  • 140 g lighter
    Weight
    255 g
    â–˛ Better than 68% of models
    Market range: <142 g – >812 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (255 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    255 g vs 395 g
  • 11.9 mm shorter body
    Height
    62 mm
    â–˛ Better than 73% of models
    Market range: <57.6 mm – >105.8 mm
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (62 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    62 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 12.4 mm narrower
    Width
    107.5 mm
    â–˛ Better than 71% of models
    Market range: <96 mm – >142.6 mm
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (107.5 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    107.5 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    yes
    â–˛ Better than 65% of models
    This camera uses a BSI sensor, the average camera does not. 34.8% of cameras use a BSI sensor.
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    â–˛ Better than 71% of models
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
  • In-camera panorama mode
    In-camera panorama mode
    yes
    â–˛ Better than 56% of models
    This camera includes an in-camera panorama mode, the average camera does not.
  • Supports slow-motion video
    Slow-motion video
    yes
    â–˛ Better than 61% of models
    This camera supports slow-motion video, the average camera does not.
    Supports up to 1,000 fps high-speed video.
  • Built-in timelapse
    Timelapse function
    yes
    â–˛ Better than 56% of models
    This camera includes timelapse capture, the average camera does not.
  • 10 Mbps higher video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    40 Mbps
    â–˛ Better than 64% of models
    Market range: <12 Mbps – >237 Mbps
    This camera has a higher video bitrate than the average camera (40 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    40 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • 140 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    470 shots
    â–˛ Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <210 shots – >700 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (470 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    590 in Eco mode.
    470 shots vs 330 shots
  • 680 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,800 mAh
    â–˛ Better than 79% of models
    Market range: <700 mAh – >2.2k mAh
    This camera has a higher battery capacity than the average camera (1800 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    1,800 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • 0.05 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    0.0522 GB
    â–˛ Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >0.07 GB
    This camera has a higher internal storage than the average camera (0.1 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera offers 0 GB of internal storage.
    0.0522 GB vs 0 GB
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/2.3"
    â–Ľ Worse than 61% of models
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs APS-C).
    1/2.3" vs APS-C
  • 2 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.34 µm
    â–Ľ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <1.33 µm – >5.94 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.34 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 2.5 stops less CIPA-rated stabilization
    Image stabilization rating (CIPA)
    1.5 stops
    â–Ľ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <2.5 stops – >7.5 stops
    This camera offers less CIPA-rated stabilization than the average camera (1.5 stops vs 4 stops). The average camera reaches 4 stops.
    1.5 stops vs 4 stops
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    â–˛ Better than 36% of models
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    â–Ľ Worse than 54% of models
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • 3,200 ISO lower maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    3,200 ISO
    â–Ľ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <1.6k ISO – >40k ISO
    This camera has a lower maximum sensitivity than the average camera (3200 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 18.8% lower user score
    User score
    6.7/ 10
    âś•
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    â–Ľ
    â–Ľ
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Casio EXILIM EX ZR1000
    the average camera
    Casio EXILIM EX ZR1000 has a lower user score than the average camera (6.73 vs 8.000).
    6.73 vs 8
  • Older HDMI version
    HDMI version
    1.3
    â–Ľ Worse than 53% of models
    This camera uses HDMI 1.3, while the average camera uses HDMI 1.4.
    reported as 1.3a
    1.3 vs 1.4
  • 18.8% lower user score
    User score
    6.7/ 10
    âś•
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    â–Ľ
    â–Ľ
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Casio EXILIM EX ZR1000
    the average camera
    Casio EXILIM EX ZR1000 has a lower user score than the average camera (6.73 vs 8.000).
    6.73 vs 8
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    â–Ľ Worse than 54% of models
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/2.3"
    â–Ľ Worse than 61% of models
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs APS-C).
    1/2.3" vs APS-C
  • 2 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.34 µm
    â–Ľ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <1.33 µm – >5.94 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.34 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    â–˛ Better than 36% of models
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • 3,200 ISO lower maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    3,200 ISO
    â–Ľ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <1.6k ISO – >40k ISO
    This camera has a lower maximum sensitivity than the average camera (3200 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    16.1 MP
    â–Ľ Worse than 53% of models
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (16.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    16.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 1 older
    Release date
    2012
    â–Ľ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This camera is older than the average camera (2012 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    September 2012
    2,012 vs 2,013
  • 2.5 stops less CIPA-rated stabilization
    Image stabilization rating (CIPA)
    1.5 stops
    â–Ľ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <2.5 stops – >7.5 stops
    This camera offers less CIPA-rated stabilization than the average camera (1.5 stops vs 4 stops). The average camera reaches 4 stops.
    1.5 stops vs 4 stops
  • Older HDMI version
    HDMI version
    1.3
    â–Ľ Worse than 53% of models
    This camera uses HDMI 1.3, while the average camera uses HDMI 1.4.
    reported as 1.3a
    1.3 vs 1.4

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

H
hpility.sg
07/12/2012
Summary of the review
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 Camera Review - Hpility SG
S
shinilola.com
10/05/2013
Summary of the review
Casio Exilim ZR1000 Review | Video — SHINI LOLA
D
digitalkamera.de
26/11/2012
Summary of the review
Review: Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 - Digitalkamera.de
(Translated)Show original
C
chip.de
03/01/2013
Summary of the review
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 (Digital Camera) Review - CHIP
(Translated)Show original
D
dasfotoportal.de
24/01/2013
Summary of the review
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 Hands-on: Can your smartphone do that too?!
(Translated)Show original
C
computerwoche.de
13/08/2013
Summary of the review
Comparison Test: The Best Digital Camera - Computerwoche
(Translated)Show original
D
digicammuseum.de
Keine Datumsangabe
Summary of the review
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 - Digital Camera Museum
(Translated)Show original
F
faz.net
18/07/2013
Summary of the review
Casio Exilim EX-ZR 1000: Fast-shooting camera with a soft-focus touch
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
29/01/2013
Summary of the review
Casio Exilim ZR1000 Review: Casio's Compact Expert Camera
(Translated)Show original
0
01net.com
07/03/2013
Summary of the review
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 review: Potential ruined by image quality
(Translated)Show original
L
lifeandstyle.fr
28/08/2013
Summary of the review
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 Review - Lifestyle
(Translated)Show original
0
01net.com
08/03/2013
Summary of the review
Casio EX-ZR1000 Review: A High-Performing Compact with a Disappointing Sensor!
(Translated)Show original
S
stylecowboys.nl
06/03/2013
Summary of the review
Casio EX-ZR1000 Review - Stylecowboys
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 44 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Casio EXILIM EX ZR1000

  • High-speed performance with fast startup, autofocus, and short intervals between shots
  • Exceptional battery life, often exceeding the manufacturer's claim of 360-470 shots
  • Versatile 180-degree tiltable LCD screen, ideal for selfies and different shooting angles
  • Impressive high-speed video capabilities, including frame rates up to 1000fps
  • Good build quality and compact, pocketable design
  • Intuitive menu system and physical control ring for quick setting adjustments

What we don't like about Casio EXILIM EX ZR1000

  • Disappointing image quality in low-light conditions with noticeable noise at higher ISO settings
  • Issues with purple fringing and lateral chromatic aberration in high-contrast lighting
  • Lack of wireless connectivity (Wi-Fi) for easy photo sharing
  • Softness in images when using the extreme end of the digital zoom range
  • Panorama mode ('Sweep Panorama') is often cited as difficult to use or producing low-resolution results
  • No manual exposure control for high-speed video modes on this specific model

Verdict

The Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 is a high-speed compact camera featuring a 16.1-megapixel BSI-CMOS sensor and a 12.5x optical zoom lens (24-300mm equivalent) with sensor-shift image stabilisation. Powered by the EXILIM Engine HS 3, it offers exceptional performance metrics including a 0.99-second start-up time, 0.15-second autofocus, and rapid burst shooting up to 30 fps. Notable characteristics include a 3.0-inch 180-degree tilting LCD screen for selfies, a functional control ring around the lens, and support for RAW image capture. Main pros are its impressive 470-shot battery life, extensive high-speed video modes (up to 1000 fps at reduced resolution), and 'Triple Zero' technology that minimises lag and blur. However, cons include a small 1/2.3-inch sensor that struggles in low light, occasional autofocus inconsistencies, and a lack of built-in Wi-Fi.

Compare Casio EXILIM EX ZR1000 with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Casio EXILIM EX ZR1000 and other products in the Cameras category

No results found