Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Casio EXILIM EX H10 Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£130Sensor size:1/2.3"Weight:194 gBattery life (CIPA):1000 shots

Casio EXILIM EX H10 Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

4.9

Overall score

Score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.6

Technical score

10%

8.0

User score

▼Worse than 60% of cameras
4.6

Technical score

Technical score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

4.2

Sensor & Image

25%

4.6

Photo Features

18%

3.3

Video & Audio

14%

5.8

Display & Design

8%

8.9

Battery & Power

7%

2.1

Connectivity & Storage

▼Worse than 66% of cameras
8.0

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.1

User ratings

30%

7.9

Number of reviews

Based on 239 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▲Better than 72% of cameras
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Casio EXILIM EX H10

Technical score
Technical score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

4.2

Sensor & Image

25%

4.6

Photo Features

18%

3.3

Video & Audio

14%

5.8

Display & Design

8%

8.9

Battery & Power

7%

2.1

Connectivity & Storage

4.6
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.1

User ratings

30%

7.9

Number of reviews

Based on 239 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.0
Popularity
Popularity
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Casio EXILIM EX H10 has a popularity score of 7.9, which is higher than 74.7% of cameras.
7.9
Value for money
Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

4.9

Overall score

40%

9.8

Price

6.4
Sensor size
1/2.3"
Sensor size
1/2.3"
This camera uses a sensor classified as 1/2.3"; it is smaller than the sensor in 60.5% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 38.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
12.1 MP
Main camera megapixels
12.1 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 12.1 MP, which is lower than that of 86.6% of cameras and equal to that of 6.9% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
1.54 µm
Main camera pixel size
1.54 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 1.54 µm, which are smaller than those in 62.2% of cameras and the same size as those in 2.2% of cameras.
Base ISO
64
Base ISO
64
This camera has a base ISO of 64 which is lower than that of 95.8% of cameras and equal to that of 3.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 3200 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 3,200
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 3,200, which is lower than that of 62.9% of cameras and equal to that of 22.7% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
N/A
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
9
N. of focus points
9
This camera has 9 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 67.1% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 26% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1,280 px
Max video resolution
1,280 px
This camera supports 1,280 px video recording which is lower quality than that of 71.4% of cameras and equal to that of 18.5% of cameras.
Video bitrate
24 Mbps
Video bitrate
24 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 24 Mbps which is lower than that of 62.5% of cameras and equal to that of 7% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:2
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:2
This camera supports 4:2:2 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 77.9% of cameras and equal to that of 22.1% of cameras.
Video codecs
Motion JPEG
Show more
Type
compact
Weight
194 g
Weight
194 g
This camera weighs 194 g which is lighter than 81.3% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.5% of cameras.
Width
102.5 mm
Width
102.5 mm
This camera has a width of 102.5 mm which is narrower than 79.3% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Height
62 mm
Height
62 mm
This camera has a height of 62 mm which is shorter than 72.9% of cameras and equal to that of 1% of cameras.
Thickness
24.3 mm
Thickness
24.3 mm
This camera has a thickness of 24.3 mm which is thinner than 86.3% of cameras and equal to that of 0.2% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
1,000 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
1,000 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 1,000 shots, which is longer than that of 95.6% of cameras and equal to that of 0.5% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1950 mAh
Battery capacity
1950 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1950 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 88.7% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Casio EXILIM EX H10 vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
  • 670 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    1,000 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (1000 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    1,000 shots vs 330 shots
  • 830 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1950 mAh
    This camera has a higher battery capacity than the average camera (1950 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    1,950 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • More complete chroma subsampling
    Video chroma subsampling
    4:2:2
    This camera supports better video chroma subsampling than the average camera (4:2:2 vs 4:2:0). The average camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling.
    4:2:2 vs 4:2:0
  • 201 g lighter
    Weight
    194 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (194 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    194 g vs 395 g
  • 21.7 mm thinner
    Thickness
    24.3 mm
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (24.3 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    24.3 mm vs 46 mm
  • 0.04 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    0.0357 GB
    This camera has a higher internal storage than the average camera (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera offers 0 GB of internal storage.
    0.0357 GB vs 0 GB
  • 17.4 mm narrower
    Width
    102.5 mm
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (102.5 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    102.5 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 0.5% higher user score
    User score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Casio EXILIM EX H10
    the average camera
    Casio EXILIM EX H10 has a higher user score than the average camera (8.04 vs 8.000).
    8.04 vs 8
  • 2.23x cheaper
    Casio EXILIM EX H10 is cheaper than the average camera (£130 vs £290).
    £130 vs £290
  • 201 g lighter
    Weight
    194 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (194 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    194 g vs 395 g
  • 21.7 mm thinner
    Thickness
    24.3 mm
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (24.3 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    24.3 mm vs 46 mm
  • 17.4 mm narrower
    Width
    102.5 mm
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (102.5 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    102.5 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 11.9 mm shorter body
    Height
    62 mm
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (62 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    62 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
  • More complete chroma subsampling
    Video chroma subsampling
    4:2:2
    This camera supports better video chroma subsampling than the average camera (4:2:2 vs 4:2:0). The average camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling.
    4:2:2 vs 4:2:0
  • 670 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    1,000 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (1000 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    1,000 shots vs 330 shots
  • 830 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1950 mAh
    This camera has a higher battery capacity than the average camera (1950 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    1,950 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • 0.04 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    0.0357 GB
    This camera has a higher internal storage than the average camera (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera offers 0 GB of internal storage.
    0.0357 GB vs 0 GB
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/2.3"
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs APS-C).
    1/2.3" vs APS-C
  • 5.3 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    0.4 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (0.4 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    0.4 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    12.1 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (12.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    12.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower video resolution
    Max video resolution
    1,280 px
    This camera records lower-resolution video than the average camera (1280 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    1280 px vs 1920 px
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • 1.8 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.54 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.5 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.54 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/2.3"
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs APS-C).
    1/2.3" vs APS-C
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    12.1 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (12.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    12.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 1.8 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.54 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.5 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.54 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 3,200 ISO lower maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    3,200 ISO
    This camera has a lower maximum sensitivity than the average camera (3200 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 4 older
    Release date
    2009
    This camera is older than the average camera (2009 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    June 2009
    2,009 vs 2,013
  • 5.3 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    0.4 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (0.4 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    0.4 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • No RAW photo capture
    RAW photo capture
    no
    This camera does not support RAW photo capture, the average camera does. 62.8% of cameras support RAW formats.
  • 14 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    9
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (9 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    9 vs 23
  • 26 s shorter maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    4 s
    This camera supports a shorter maximum exposure than the average camera (4 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    4 s vs 30 s
  • Lower video resolution
    Max video resolution
    1,280 px
    This camera records lower-resolution video than the average camera (1280 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    1280 px vs 1920 px
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 6 Mbps lower video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    24 Mbps
    This camera has a lower video bitrate than the average camera (24 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    24 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • 20 min shorter recording time
    Max video recording time
    10 min
    This camera records continuously for less time than the average camera (10 min vs 30 min). The average camera records for 30 min.
    10 min vs 30 min
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    This camera does not support HDMI output, the average camera does. 78.7% of cameras support HDMI output.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

E
ephotozine.com
05/10/2009
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
15/10/2009
Summary of the review
W
whatdigitalcamera.com
19/10/2009
Summary of the review
D
digitalreviews.net
18/11/2009
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
20/01/2010
Summary of the review
P
pocket-lint.com
24/09/2009
Summary of the review
B
businesstraveller.com
03/11/2009
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
11/06/2009
Summary of the review
W
welt.de
17/08/2009
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
11/09/2009
Summary of the review
W
welt.de
02/10/2009
Summary of the review
H
heise.de
17/12/2009
Summary of the review
D
dkamera.de
24/05/2010
Summary of the review
N
netzwelt.de
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
12/06/2009
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
Date non spécifiée
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
31/07/2009
Summary of the review
C
ciclismoafondo.es
18/12/2009
Summary of the review
C
ciclismoafondo.es
25/09/2009
Summary of the review
P
portablegear.nl
12/10/2009
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 239 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Casio EXILIM EX H10

  • Exceptional battery life (rated for approximately 1,000 shots per charge)
  • Compact and pocketable body despite the 10x optical zoom lens
  • Versatile 24mm ultra-wide angle lens suitable for landscapes
  • Effective mechanical anti-shake image stabilisation
  • Vivid colour reproduction in good lighting conditions
  • Dedicated buttons for 'Make-up' and 'Vivid Landscape' modes
  • Solid build quality with a premium feel

What we don't like about Casio EXILIM EX H10

  • Noticeable image noise and loss of detail at ISO 400 and above
  • Disappointing macro performance with a 15cm minimum focus distance
  • Slow shot-to-shot times and sluggish flash recycling
  • Cramped control panel with buttons that are easy to press accidentally
  • Lack of optical zoom during video recording
  • Softness in the corners of images and occasional chromatic aberration
  • Menu system can be confusing or overwhelming with too many 'Best Shot' modes

Verdict

The Casio Exilim EX-H10 is a compact travel superzoom camera featuring a 12.1-megapixel CCD sensor and a versatile 24-240mm (10x optical zoom) lens with mechanical image stabilisation. Key characteristics include its 720p HD video recording capability, a 3.0-inch LCD screen, and a thin, 24.3mm-thick body that ranks as one of the lightest in its class. Its primary pro is a class-leading battery life capable of approximately 1,000 shots per charge, making it ideal for extended trips without power access. Main cons include soft image quality in corners, high noise levels at ISO settings above 400, and relatively slow shot-to-shot cycle times of roughly 3.3 seconds.

Compare Casio EXILIM EX H10 with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Casio EXILIM EX H10 and other products in the Cameras category

No results found