OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Tristar SZ-2000 Review | 52 Data compared

Avg. price:~£110Suction power (AW):?Battery runtime:45 minutesCapacity:0.9 LWeight:2.5 kg

Tristar SZ-2000 Review: Compare 52 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Vacuum Cleaners category and whether it is worth buying.

6.9

Overall score

Score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the vacuum cleaner's quality, based on technical analysis and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference for identifying the best vacuum cleaners on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 57% of models
Score components

80%

6.9

Technical Score

20%

7.0

User score

â–²Better than 57% of vacuum-cleaners
6.9

Technical Score

Technical score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 66% of models
Score components

28%

6.9

Performance

22%

7.2

Battery

18%

6.9

Filtration

14%

6.5

Attachments

10%

8.8

Design

8%

5.2

Smart features

â–²Better than 66% of vacuum-cleaners
7.0

User score

User score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Score components

70%

7.6

User ratings

30%

5.4

Number of reviews

Based on 62 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 95% of vacuum-cleaners
  • tristar-sz-2000
  • tristar-sz-2000
  • tristar-sz-2000
  • tristar-sz-2000
  • tristar-sz-2000
  • tristar-sz-2000
  • tristar-sz-2000
tristar-sz-2000
tristar-sz-2000
tristar-sz-2000
tristar-sz-2000
tristar-sz-2000
tristar-sz-2000
tristar-sz-2000

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Tristar SZ-2000 is a lightweight, 2.5 kg cordless bagless stick vacuum cleaner powered by a 150W brushless DC motor and a 29.6V Li-ion battery, producing a maximum noise level of 79 dB. Its main advantages include its dual functionality as a 2-in-1 removable handheld dustbuster, a built-in E10 HEPA filtration system, an integrated LED-lighted floor head for improved visibility, 15,000 Pa of suction power, and a decent runtime of up to 45 minutes on its lower speed setting. However, its primary drawbacks are a relatively small 0.9-liter dirt container capacity and a long battery recharging time of up to 5 hours.

Technical Specifications of vacuum cleaner Tristar SZ-2000

Technical Score
Technical score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 66% of models
Score components:

28%

6.9

Performance

22%

7.2

Battery

18%

6.9

Filtration

14%

6.5

Attachments

10%

8.8

Design

8%

5.2

Smart features

6.9
Tristar SZ-2000 has a technical score of 6.9 points, which is higher than 65.7% of vacuum cleaners.
User score
User score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Score components

70%

7.6

User ratings

30%

5.4

Number of reviews

Based on 62 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.0
Tristar SZ-2000 has a user score of 6.95 points, which is lower than 94.8% of vacuum cleaners.
Popularity
Popularity
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you prefer a vacuum cleaner that has been chosen and reviewed by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Popularity:
Tristar SZ-2000 has a popularity score of 5.4 points, which is lower than 51.7% of vacuum cleaners.
5.4
Tristar SZ-2000 has a popularity score of 5.4 points, which is lower than 51.7% of vacuum cleaners.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the vacuum cleaner's overall score with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a vacuum cleaner with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 60% of models
Score components:

60%

6.9

Overall score

40%

9.9

Price

7.8
Tristar SZ-2000 has a value-for-money score of 7.8 points, which is higher than 60% of vacuum cleaners.
Suction power (AW)
?
Suction power (kPa)
15 kPa
Suction power (kPa)
15 kPa
â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
This vacuum cleaner has a suction pressure of 15 kPa, which is lower than that of 76.9% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 3.7% of vacuum cleaners.
Airflow
?
Motor type
brushless
Power consumption
150 W
Power consumption
150 W
★ Better than 90% of models
Market range: <165 W – >899 W
This vacuum cleaner draws 150 W, which is lower than the power consumption of 89.7% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 1.7% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Cordless
yes
Cordless
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly. 49.5% of vacuum cleaners offer cordless operation.
Battery runtime
45 minutes
Battery runtime
45 minutes
â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
This vacuum cleaner offers a battery runtime of 45 minutes, which is shorter than that of 51.2% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 12.4% of vacuum cleaners.
Charging time
5 hours
Charging time
5 hours
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
This vacuum cleaner charges in 5 hours, which is slower than 73.8% of vacuum cleaners and equal to 20.4% of vacuum cleaners.
Battery capacity
2,500 mAh
Battery capacity
2,500 mAh
â–² Better than 48% of models
Market range: <2k mAh – >3.6k mAh
This vacuum cleaner has a battery capacity of 2,500 mAh, which is larger than that of 48.1% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 24.7% of vacuum cleaners.
Battery voltage
29.6 V
Battery voltage
29.6 V
★ Better than 91% of models
Market range: <18 V – >28.8 V
This vacuum cleaner uses a battery voltage of 29.6 V, which is higher than that of 91.2% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 5.9% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Filter class
epa 10
Filter class
epa 10
â–² Better than 62% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses filter class epa 10, which is more advanced than the class used by 62.2% of vacuum cleaners and the same as the class used by 2.8% of vacuum cleaners.
Minimum overall efficiency
85%
Minimum overall efficiency
85%
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
This vacuum cleaner reaches 85% minimum overall efficiency, which is lower than that of 94.6% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 5.4% of vacuum cleaners.
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
â–² Better than 18% of models
This vacuum cleaner is suitable for allergy sufferers. 82.4% of vacuum cleaners are allergy-friendly.
Capacity
0.9 L
Capacity
0.9 L
â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
This vacuum cleaner has a dust capacity of 0.9 L, which is smaller than that of 51.4% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 2.3% of vacuum cleaners.
Bagless
yes
Bagless
yes
â–² Better than 21% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses a bagless design. 78.6% of vacuum cleaners use this setup.
Show more
Main brush type
roll brush
Roller type
bristled
Anti-tangle brush
no
Anti-tangle brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an anti-tangle brush. 25.7% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
Mini motorized brush
no
Mini motorized brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 27% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a mini motorized brush. 26.9% of vacuum cleaners include this attachment.
Suitable for pet owners
yes
Suitable for pet owners
yes
â–² Better than 28% of models
This vacuum cleaner is suitable for pet owners. 72% of vacuum cleaners handle pet hair well.
Show more
Vacuum type
stick
Weight
2.5 kg
Weight
2.5 kg
â–² Better than 77% of models
Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
This vacuum cleaner weighs 2.5 kg, which is lower than the weight of 77.5% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 2.6% of vacuum cleaners.
2-in-1 design
yes
2-in-1 design
yes
â–² Better than 47% of models
This vacuum cleaner offers a 2-in-1 design. 53% of vacuum cleaners offer this flexible format.
Self-standing
yes
Self-standing
yes
â–² Better than 81% of models
This vacuum cleaner stands on its own. 18.9% of vacuum cleaners offer this convenience.
Adjustable tube height
yes
Adjustable tube height
yes
â–² Better than 53% of models
This vacuum cleaner includes adjustable tube height. 47.4% of vacuum cleaners offer this ergonomic feature.
Show more
Auto suction adjustment
no
Auto suction adjustment
no
â–¼ Worse than 20% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support automatic suction adjustment. 19.9% of vacuum cleaners support this feature.
Dust particle sensor
no
Dust particle sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 8% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a dust particle sensor. 8% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
LED display
no
LED display
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an LED display. 25.9% of vacuum cleaners include this interface feature.
Nozzle light
yes
Nozzle light
yes
â–² Better than 57% of models
This vacuum cleaner includes a nozzle light. 43.4% of vacuum cleaners include this visibility feature.
Mopping support
no
Mopping support
no
â–¼ Worse than 4% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support mopping. 3.7% of vacuum cleaners support this multi-function feature.

Tristar SZ-2000 vs the average vacuum cleaner

246810TotalPerformanceBatteryFiltrationAttachmentsDesignSmart features
  • Cordless operation
    Cordless
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes removable battery
    Removable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a removable battery, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Self-standing design
    Self-standing
    yes
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    This vacuum cleaner stands on its own, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 450 W lower power consumption
    Power consumption
    150 W
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws less power than the average vacuum cleaner (150 W vs 600 W).
    150 W vs 600 W
  • 7.4 V higher voltage
    Battery voltage
    29.6 V
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <18 V – >28.8 V
    This vacuum cleaner has a higher battery voltage than the average vacuum cleaner (29.6 V vs 22.2 V).
    29.6 V vs 22.2 V
  • 8 minutes longer turbo runtime
    Turbo mode runtime
    20 minutes
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <6 minutes – >20 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers longer turbo runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (20 minutes vs 12 minutes).
    20 minutes vs 12 minutes
  • 30.9% lower weight
    Weight
    2.5 kg
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is lighter than the average vacuum cleaner (2.5 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    2.5 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • Includes nozzle light
    Nozzle light
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a nozzle light, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 450 W lower power consumption
    Power consumption
    150 W
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws less power than the average vacuum cleaner (150 W vs 600 W).
    150 W vs 600 W
  • Cordless operation
    Cordless
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes removable battery
    Removable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a removable battery, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 7.4 V higher voltage
    Battery voltage
    29.6 V
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <18 V – >28.8 V
    This vacuum cleaner has a higher battery voltage than the average vacuum cleaner (29.6 V vs 22.2 V).
    29.6 V vs 22.2 V
  • 8 minutes longer turbo runtime
    Turbo mode runtime
    20 minutes
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <6 minutes – >20 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers longer turbo runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (20 minutes vs 12 minutes).
    20 minutes vs 12 minutes
  • Includes battery indicator
    Battery level indicator
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a battery level indicator, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Higher filter class
    Filter class
    epa 10
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This vacuum cleaner uses a better filter class than the average vacuum cleaner (epa 10 vs hepa).
    epa 10 vs hepa
  • Self-standing design
    Self-standing
    yes
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    This vacuum cleaner stands on its own, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 30.9% lower weight
    Weight
    2.5 kg
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is lighter than the average vacuum cleaner (2.5 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    2.5 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • Includes wall bracket
    Wall-mounted bracket
    yes
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a wall-mounted bracket, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Adjustable tube height
    Adjustable tube height
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner has adjustable tube height, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 15 mm narrower body
    Width
    250 mm
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <229 mm – >350 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is narrower than the average vacuum cleaner (250 mm vs 265 mm).
    250 mm vs 265 mm
  • Includes nozzle light
    Nozzle light
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a nozzle light, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 14.95 % lower filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    85 %
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has lower filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (85 % vs 99.95 %).
    85 % vs 99.95 %
  • 1 hours slower charging
    Charging time
    5 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
    This vacuum cleaner charges slower than the average vacuum cleaner (5 hours vs 4 hours).
    5 hours vs 4 hours
  • 5 kPa lower suction pressure
    Suction power (kPa)
    15 kPa
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
    This vacuum cleaner has lower suction pressure than the average vacuum cleaner (15 kPa vs 20 kPa).
    15 kPa vs 20 kPa
  • No upholstery nozzle
    Upholstery nozzle
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include an upholstery nozzle, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    79-79 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (79-79 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    79-79 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 5 minutes shorter runtime
    Battery runtime
    45 minutes
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers shorter battery runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (45 minutes vs 50 minutes).
    45 minutes vs 50 minutes
  • 150 mm taller body
    Height
    1,250 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <290 mm – >1.2k mm
    This vacuum cleaner is taller than the average vacuum cleaner (1250 mm vs 1100 mm).
    1,250 mm vs 1,100 mm
  • 15.1% lower user score
    User score
    7.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Tristar SZ-2000
    the average vacuum cleaner
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    Tristar SZ-2000 has a lower user score than the average vacuum cleaner (6.95 vs 8.000).
    6.95 vs 8
  • 15.1% lower user score
    User score
    7.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Tristar SZ-2000
    the average vacuum cleaner
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    Tristar SZ-2000 has a lower user score than the average vacuum cleaner (6.95 vs 8.000).
    6.95 vs 8
  • 5 kPa lower suction pressure
    Suction power (kPa)
    15 kPa
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
    This vacuum cleaner has lower suction pressure than the average vacuum cleaner (15 kPa vs 20 kPa).
    15 kPa vs 20 kPa
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    79-79 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (79-79 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    79-79 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 1 hours slower charging
    Charging time
    5 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
    This vacuum cleaner charges slower than the average vacuum cleaner (5 hours vs 4 hours).
    5 hours vs 4 hours
  • 5 minutes shorter runtime
    Battery runtime
    45 minutes
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers shorter battery runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (45 minutes vs 50 minutes).
    45 minutes vs 50 minutes
  • 14.95 % lower filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    85 %
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has lower filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (85 % vs 99.95 %).
    85 % vs 99.95 %
  • 0.1 L smaller dust container
    Capacity
    0.9 L
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (0.9 L vs 1 L).
    0.9 L vs 1 L
  • No upholstery nozzle
    Upholstery nozzle
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include an upholstery nozzle, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 150 mm taller body
    Height
    1,250 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <290 mm – >1.2k mm
    This vacuum cleaner is taller than the average vacuum cleaner (1250 mm vs 1100 mm).
    1,250 mm vs 1,100 mm

Graphic comparison of Tristar SZ-2000 and other vacuum cleaners

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 62 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What customers like about Tristar SZ-2000?

  • Good suction power on various floor types due to its brushless motor
  • Versatile 2-in-1 design that easily converts into a handheld unit
  • Generous 900ml dust tank capacity reduces the frequency of emptying
  • Lightweight and compact structure makes it easy to handle and store
  • Equipped with a long-lasting 29.6V battery providing up to 45 minutes of runtime
  • Integrated LED lights on the motorized floor nozzle reveal hidden dust and crumbs

What customers dislike about Tristar SZ-2000?

  • Performance is best suited for small to medium cleaning tasks rather than heavy-duty full-house cleaning
  • The motorized floor head is somewhat narrow, meaning it requires more passes to cover large areas
  • Suction power can occasionally feel weak when handling heavier or deeply embedded debris
  • Build quality feels less premium and uses a significant amount of plastic compared to high-end brands

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

B
biancoebruno.it
12/06/2020
Summary of the review
Electric brooms: goodbye germs and worries.
(Translated)Show original
C
consumentenbond.nl
No date available
Summary of the review
Tristar SZ-2000 - Test, Reviews & Prices - Consumentenbond
(Translated)Show original

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Tristar SZ-2000 with other vacuum cleaners

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)