OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Rowenta RO7C36EA Review | 52 Data compared

Avg. price:~£110Suction power (AW):?Battery runtime:N/A minutesCapacity:2.5 LWeight:6.93 kg

Rowenta RO7C36EA Review: Compare 52 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Vacuum Cleaners category and whether it is worth buying.

6.6

Overall score

Score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the vacuum cleaner's quality, based on technical analysis and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference for identifying the best vacuum cleaners on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

80%

6.4

Technical Score

20%

7.5

User score

â–¼Worse than 62% of vacuum-cleaners
6.4

Technical Score

Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Score components

28%

8.2

Performance

22%

4.0

Battery

18%

9.0

Filtration

14%

5.9

Attachments

10%

4.5

Design

8%

4.0

Smart features

â–¼Worse than 61% of vacuum-cleaners
7.5

User score

User score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components

70%

10

User ratings

30%

1.7

Number of reviews

Based on 1 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 87% of vacuum-cleaners
  • rowenta-ro7c36ea
  • rowenta-ro7c36ea
  • rowenta-ro7c36ea
  • rowenta-ro7c36ea
  • rowenta-ro7c36ea
  • rowenta-ro7c36ea
  • rowenta-ro7c36ea
  • rowenta-ro7c36ea
  • rowenta-ro7c36ea
rowenta-ro7c36ea
rowenta-ro7c36ea
rowenta-ro7c36ea
rowenta-ro7c36ea
rowenta-ro7c36ea
rowenta-ro7c36ea
rowenta-ro7c36ea
rowenta-ro7c36ea
rowenta-ro7c36ea

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Rowenta RO7C36EA Green Force Cyclonic Effitech is a corded, bagless cylinder vacuum cleaner powered by a 500-watt energy-saving motor that provides suction performance equivalent to a 900-watt model. Its eco-designed body is built from 67% recycled plastic and features an XXL 2.5-litre dust container, a 6.2-metre power cord giving a 9-metre operating radius, a parquet brush for fragile hard floors, and a HEPA filtration system that captures 99.98% of dust particles. Major advantages include its operating noise level of just 68 dBA, impressive eco-sustainability, and low power consumption. However, notable drawbacks include its relatively heavy weight of 6.9 kg, a power cord that some users find too short for larger spaces, and a basic suction head design that lacks an electronic handle-mounted remote control.

Technical Specifications of vacuum cleaner Rowenta RO7C36EA

Technical Score
Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Score components:

28%

8.2

Performance

22%

4.0

Battery

18%

9.0

Filtration

14%

5.9

Attachments

10%

4.5

Design

8%

4.0

Smart features

6.4
Rowenta RO7C36EA has a technical score of 6.4 points, which is lower than 61.3% of vacuum cleaners.
User score
User score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components

70%

10

User ratings

30%

1.7

Number of reviews

Based on 1 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.5
Rowenta RO7C36EA has a user score of 7.52 points, which is lower than 86.2% of vacuum cleaners.
Popularity
Popularity
1.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you prefer a vacuum cleaner that has been chosen and reviewed by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Popularity:
Rowenta RO7C36EA has a popularity score of 1.7 points, which is lower than 60.8% of vacuum cleaners.
1.7
Rowenta RO7C36EA has a popularity score of 1.7 points, which is lower than 60.8% of vacuum cleaners.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the vacuum cleaner's overall score with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a vacuum cleaner with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Score components:

60%

6.6

Overall score

40%

9.9

Price

7.6
Rowenta RO7C36EA has a value-for-money score of 7.6 points, which is higher than 39.2% of vacuum cleaners.
Suction power (AW)
?
Suction power (kPa)
?
Airflow
?
Motor type
effitech
Power consumption
500 W
Power consumption
500 W
â–² Better than 58% of models
Market range: <165 W – >899 W
This vacuum cleaner draws 500 W, which is lower than the power consumption of 57.7% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 2.3% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Cordless
no
Cordless
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not work cordlessly. 49.5% of vacuum cleaners offer cordless operation.
Battery runtime
N/A
Charging time
N/A
Battery capacity
N/A
Battery voltage
N/A
Show more
Filter class
epa 11
Filter class
epa 11
â–² Better than 67% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses filter class epa 11, which is more advanced than the class used by 66.6% of vacuum cleaners and the same as the class used by 1.5% of vacuum cleaners.
Minimum overall efficiency
99.98%
Minimum overall efficiency
99.98%
â–² Better than 79% of models
Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
This vacuum cleaner reaches 99.98% minimum overall efficiency, which is higher than that of 78.6% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 5.6% of vacuum cleaners.
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
â–² Better than 18% of models
This vacuum cleaner is suitable for allergy sufferers. 82.4% of vacuum cleaners are allergy-friendly.
Capacity
2.5 L
Capacity
2.5 L
â–² Better than 76% of models
Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
This vacuum cleaner has a dust capacity of 2.5 L, which is larger than that of 76% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 4.2% of vacuum cleaners.
Bagless
yes
Bagless
yes
â–² Better than 21% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses a bagless design. 78.6% of vacuum cleaners use this setup.
Show more
Main brush type
classic
Roller type
none
Anti-tangle brush
no
Anti-tangle brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an anti-tangle brush. 25.7% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
Mini motorized brush
no
Mini motorized brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 27% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a mini motorized brush. 26.9% of vacuum cleaners include this attachment.
Suitable for pet owners
no
Suitable for pet owners
no
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for pet owners. 72% of vacuum cleaners handle pet hair well.
Show more
Vacuum type
canister
Weight
6.93 kg
Weight
6.93 kg
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
This vacuum cleaner weighs 6.93 kg, which is greater than the weight of 88.2% of vacuum cleaners.
2-in-1 design
no
2-in-1 design
no
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not offer a 2-in-1 design. 53% of vacuum cleaners offer this flexible format.
Self-standing
no
Self-standing
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not stand on its own. 18.9% of vacuum cleaners offer this convenience.
Adjustable tube height
yes
Adjustable tube height
yes
â–² Better than 53% of models
This vacuum cleaner includes adjustable tube height. 47.4% of vacuum cleaners offer this ergonomic feature.
Show more
Auto suction adjustment
no
Auto suction adjustment
no
â–¼ Worse than 20% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support automatic suction adjustment. 19.9% of vacuum cleaners support this feature.
Dust particle sensor
no
Dust particle sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 8% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a dust particle sensor. 8% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
LED display
no
LED display
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an LED display. 25.9% of vacuum cleaners include this interface feature.
Nozzle light
no
Nozzle light
no
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a nozzle light. 43.4% of vacuum cleaners include this visibility feature.
Mopping support
no
Mopping support
no
â–¼ Worse than 4% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support mopping. 3.7% of vacuum cleaners support this multi-function feature.

Rowenta RO7C36EA vs the average vacuum cleaner

246810TotalPerformanceBatteryFiltrationAttachmentsDesignSmart features
  • Includes parquet brush
    Parquet brush
    yes
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a parquet brush, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Less operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    68-68 dB
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is quieter than the average vacuum cleaner (68-68 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    68-68 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 0.03 % higher filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    99.98 %
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has higher filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (100 % vs 99.95 %).
    99.98 % vs 99.95 %
  • Higher filter class
    Filter class
    epa 11
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    This vacuum cleaner uses a better filter class than the average vacuum cleaner (epa 11 vs hepa).
    epa 11 vs hepa
  • Adjustable tube height
    Adjustable tube height
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner has adjustable tube height, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 1.5 L larger dust container
    Capacity
    2.5 L
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a larger dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (2.5 L vs 1 L).
    2.5 L vs 1 L
  • 787 mm shorter body
    Height
    313 mm
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <290 mm – >1.2k mm
    This vacuum cleaner is shorter than the average vacuum cleaner (313 mm vs 1100 mm).
    313 mm vs 1,100 mm
  • 100 W lower power consumption
    Power consumption
    500 W
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws less power than the average vacuum cleaner (500 W vs 600 W).
    500 W vs 600 W
  • Less operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    68-68 dB
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is quieter than the average vacuum cleaner (68-68 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    68-68 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 100 W lower power consumption
    Power consumption
    500 W
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws less power than the average vacuum cleaner (500 W vs 600 W).
    500 W vs 600 W
  • 0.03 % higher filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    99.98 %
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has higher filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (100 % vs 99.95 %).
    99.98 % vs 99.95 %
  • Higher filter class
    Filter class
    epa 11
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    This vacuum cleaner uses a better filter class than the average vacuum cleaner (epa 11 vs hepa).
    epa 11 vs hepa
  • 1.5 L larger dust container
    Capacity
    2.5 L
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a larger dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (2.5 L vs 1 L).
    2.5 L vs 1 L
  • Includes parquet brush
    Parquet brush
    yes
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a parquet brush, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Adjustable tube height
    Adjustable tube height
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner has adjustable tube height, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 787 mm shorter body
    Height
    313 mm
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <290 mm – >1.2k mm
    This vacuum cleaner is shorter than the average vacuum cleaner (313 mm vs 1100 mm).
    313 mm vs 1,100 mm
  • Newer release date
    Release date
    2023
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This vacuum cleaner has a newer release date than the average vacuum cleaner (2023 vs 2021).
    Released in September 2023.
    2023 vs 2021
  • Not pet-hair friendly
    Suitable for pet owners
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for pet owners, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • No handheld conversion
    2-in-1 design
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not have a 2-in-1 design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 91.4% higher weight
    Weight
    6.93 kg
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is heavier than the average vacuum cleaner (6.9 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    6.93 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • No upholstery nozzle
    Upholstery nozzle
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include an upholstery nozzle, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 190 mm deeper body
    Depth
    455 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <170 mm – >440 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is deeper than the average vacuum cleaner (455 mm vs 265 mm).
    455 mm vs 265 mm
  • 20 mm wider body
    Width
    285 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <229 mm – >350 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is wider than the average vacuum cleaner (285 mm vs 265 mm).
    285 mm vs 265 mm
  • 6.3% lower user score
    User score
    7.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Rowenta RO7C36EA
    the average vacuum cleaner
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Rowenta RO7C36EA has a lower user score than the average vacuum cleaner (7.52 vs 8.000).
    7.52 vs 8
  • 6.3% lower user score
    User score
    7.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Rowenta RO7C36EA
    the average vacuum cleaner
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Rowenta RO7C36EA has a lower user score than the average vacuum cleaner (7.52 vs 8.000).
    7.52 vs 8
  • Not pet-hair friendly
    Suitable for pet owners
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for pet owners, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • No upholstery nozzle
    Upholstery nozzle
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include an upholstery nozzle, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • No handheld conversion
    2-in-1 design
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not have a 2-in-1 design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 91.4% higher weight
    Weight
    6.93 kg
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is heavier than the average vacuum cleaner (6.9 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    6.93 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • 190 mm deeper body
    Depth
    455 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <170 mm – >440 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is deeper than the average vacuum cleaner (455 mm vs 265 mm).
    455 mm vs 265 mm
  • 20 mm wider body
    Width
    285 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <229 mm – >350 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is wider than the average vacuum cleaner (285 mm vs 265 mm).
    285 mm vs 265 mm

Graphic comparison of Rowenta RO7C36EA and other vacuum cleaners

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 1 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What customers like about Rowenta RO7C36EA?

  • Energy efficient with low power consumption
  • Large 2.5-liter dust container capacity requires less frequent emptying
  • Operates relatively quietly compared to traditional models
  • Equipped with a highly efficient HEPA filtration system
  • Comes with a useful variety of accessories and nozzles
  • Eco-friendly design utilizing a high percentage of recycled plastics

What customers dislike about Rowenta RO7C36EA?

  • Power cable is notably short, limiting the cleaning radius
  • Vacuum can feel heavy, clumsy, and less maneuverable for some users
  • Filters clog relatively quickly, causing a rapid decrease in suction power
  • The body can tip over easily during use
  • Materials used for the extension pole and buttons can feel flimsy

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

Q
quechoisir.org
26/11/2025
Summary of the review
Review of the Rowenta RO7C36EA Green Force Cyclonic Effitech Vacuum Cleaner
(Translated)Show original
T
test-achats.be
N/A
Summary of the review
ROWENTA RO7C36EA: full review, price, specifications
(Translated)Show original
T
test-aankoop.be
01/06/2026
Summary of the review
ROWENTA RO7C36EA test and review - Testaankoop
(Translated)Show original
C
consumentenbond.nl
01/11/2025
Summary of the review
Rowenta RO7C36 Green Force Cyclonic Effitech Professional Review
(Translated)Show original

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Rowenta RO7C36EA with other vacuum cleaners

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)