OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Philips FC6722/01 Review | 52 Data compared

Avg. price:~£220Suction power (AW):?Battery runtime:30 minutesCapacity:0.4 LWeight:2.43 kg

Philips FC6722/01 Review: Compare 52 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Vacuum Cleaners category and whether it is worth buying.

6.0

Overall score

Score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the vacuum cleaner's quality, based on technical analysis and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference for identifying the best vacuum cleaners on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components

80%

5.7

Technical Score

20%

7.0

User score

â–¼Worse than 96% of vacuum-cleaners
5.7

Technical Score

Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components

28%

5.9

Performance

22%

5.1

Battery

18%

6.1

Filtration

14%

5.1

Attachments

10%

7.5

Design

8%

4.0

Smart features

â–¼Worse than 96% of vacuum-cleaners
7.0

User score

User score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

4.3

Number of reviews

Based on 25 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 94% of vacuum-cleaners
  • philips-fc672201
  • philips-fc672201
  • philips-fc672201
  • philips-fc672201
  • philips-fc672201
  • philips-fc672201
philips-fc672201
philips-fc672201
philips-fc672201
philips-fc672201
philips-fc672201
philips-fc672201

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Philips SpeedPro FC6722/01 is an 18V bagless cordless 2-in-1 stick and handheld vacuum cleaner featuring a PowerBlade motor and PowerCyclone 7 technology that delivers an airflow of up to 800 L/min. Weighing 2.43 kg, it includes a 180-degree suction nozzle designed to capture up to 98% of dust per stroke, two speed settings, a washable motor filter, and an integrated crevice tool and brush. Key pros include its highly maneuverable design that goes fully flat to reach under low furniture, a hygienic 0.4-litre dust bucket, and a lithium-ion battery providing up to 30 minutes of runtime (15 minutes in turbo mode). However, notable cons include a relatively long 5-hour charging time, an 80 dB noise level, a small dust capacity that requires frequent emptying, and the lack of integrated LED headlights on the main nozzle.

Technical Specifications of vacuum cleaner Philips FC6722/01

Technical Score
Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components:

28%

5.9

Performance

22%

5.1

Battery

18%

6.1

Filtration

14%

5.1

Attachments

10%

7.5

Design

8%

4.0

Smart features

5.7
Philips FC6722/01 has a technical score of 5.7 points, which is lower than 96.5% of vacuum cleaners.
User score
User score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

4.3

Number of reviews

Based on 25 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.0
Philips FC6722/01 has a user score of 7.05 points, which is lower than 93.5% of vacuum cleaners.
Popularity
Popularity
4.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you prefer a vacuum cleaner that has been chosen and reviewed by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Popularity:
Philips FC6722/01 has a popularity score of 4.3 points, which is lower than 57% of vacuum cleaners.
4.3
Philips FC6722/01 has a popularity score of 4.3 points, which is lower than 57% of vacuum cleaners.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the vacuum cleaner's overall score with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a vacuum cleaner with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components:

60%

6.0

Overall score

40%

9.4

Price

7.0
Philips FC6722/01 has a value-for-money score of 7 points, which is lower than 96.5% of vacuum cleaners.
Suction power (AW)
?
Suction power (kPa)
?
Airflow
13.33 L/s
Airflow
13.33 L/s
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Market range: <16.5 L/s – >52 L/s
This vacuum cleaner delivers 13.33 L/s airflow, which is lower than that of 94.9% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 1.1% of vacuum cleaners.
Motor type
brushless
Power consumption
750 W
Power consumption
750 W
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Market range: <165 W – >899 W
This vacuum cleaner draws 750 W, which is higher than the power consumption of 69.3% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 6.6% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Cordless
yes
Cordless
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly. 49.5% of vacuum cleaners offer cordless operation.
Battery runtime
30 minutes
Battery runtime
30 minutes
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
This vacuum cleaner offers a battery runtime of 30 minutes, which is shorter than that of 89.1% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 6.4% of vacuum cleaners.
Charging time
5 hours
Charging time
5 hours
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
This vacuum cleaner charges in 5 hours, which is slower than 73.8% of vacuum cleaners and equal to 20.4% of vacuum cleaners.
Battery capacity
?
Battery voltage
18 V
Battery voltage
18 V
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Market range: <18 V – >28.8 V
This vacuum cleaner uses a battery voltage of 18 V, which is lower than that of 79.8% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 16% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Filter class
washable foam
Filter class
washable foam
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses filter class washable foam, which is less advanced than the class used by 90.8% of vacuum cleaners and the same as the class used by 0.7% of vacuum cleaners.
Minimum overall efficiency
99%
Minimum overall efficiency
99%
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
This vacuum cleaner reaches 99% minimum overall efficiency, which is lower than that of 87.6% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 1.6% of vacuum cleaners.
Suitable for allergy sufferers
no
Suitable for allergy sufferers
no
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for allergy sufferers. 82.4% of vacuum cleaners are allergy-friendly.
Capacity
0.4 L
Capacity
0.4 L
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
This vacuum cleaner has a dust capacity of 0.4 L, which is smaller than that of 90.7% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 4.5% of vacuum cleaners.
Bagless
yes
Bagless
yes
â–² Better than 21% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses a bagless design. 78.6% of vacuum cleaners use this setup.
Show more
Main brush type
roll brush
Roller type
bristled
Anti-tangle brush
no
Anti-tangle brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an anti-tangle brush. 25.7% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
Mini motorized brush
no
Mini motorized brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 27% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a mini motorized brush. 26.9% of vacuum cleaners include this attachment.
Suitable for pet owners
no
Suitable for pet owners
no
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for pet owners. 72% of vacuum cleaners handle pet hair well.
Show more
Vacuum type
stick
Weight
2.43 kg
Weight
2.43 kg
â–² Better than 82% of models
Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
This vacuum cleaner weighs 2.43 kg, which is lower than the weight of 81.6% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.2% of vacuum cleaners.
2-in-1 design
yes
2-in-1 design
yes
â–² Better than 47% of models
This vacuum cleaner offers a 2-in-1 design. 53% of vacuum cleaners offer this flexible format.
Self-standing
no
Self-standing
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not stand on its own. 18.9% of vacuum cleaners offer this convenience.
Adjustable tube height
no
Adjustable tube height
no
â–¼ Worse than 47% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include adjustable tube height. 47.4% of vacuum cleaners offer this ergonomic feature.
Show more
Auto suction adjustment
no
Auto suction adjustment
no
â–¼ Worse than 20% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support automatic suction adjustment. 19.9% of vacuum cleaners support this feature.
Dust particle sensor
no
Dust particle sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 8% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a dust particle sensor. 8% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
LED display
no
LED display
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an LED display. 25.9% of vacuum cleaners include this interface feature.
Nozzle light
no
Nozzle light
no
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a nozzle light. 43.4% of vacuum cleaners include this visibility feature.
Mopping support
no
Mopping support
no
â–¼ Worse than 4% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support mopping. 3.7% of vacuum cleaners support this multi-function feature.

Philips FC6722/01 vs the average vacuum cleaner

246810TotalPerformanceBatteryFiltrationAttachmentsDesignSmart features
  • Cordless operation
    Cordless
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 32.9% lower weight
    Weight
    2.43 kg
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is lighter than the average vacuum cleaner (2.4 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    2.43 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • Includes battery indicator
    Battery level indicator
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a battery level indicator, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes wall bracket
    Wall-mounted bracket
    yes
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a wall-mounted bracket, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 3 minutes longer turbo runtime
    Turbo mode runtime
    15 minutes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    Market range: <6 minutes – >20 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers longer turbo runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (15 minutes vs 12 minutes).
    15 minutes vs 12 minutes
  • Cordless operation
    Cordless
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes battery indicator
    Battery level indicator
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a battery level indicator, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 3 minutes longer turbo runtime
    Turbo mode runtime
    15 minutes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    Market range: <6 minutes – >20 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers longer turbo runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (15 minutes vs 12 minutes).
    15 minutes vs 12 minutes
  • 32.9% lower weight
    Weight
    2.43 kg
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is lighter than the average vacuum cleaner (2.4 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    2.43 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • Includes wall bracket
    Wall-mounted bracket
    yes
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a wall-mounted bracket, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 20 minutes shorter runtime
    Battery runtime
    30 minutes
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers shorter battery runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (30 minutes vs 50 minutes).
    30 minutes vs 50 minutes
  • 14.47 L/s lower airflow
    Airflow
    13.33 L/s
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <16.5 L/s – >52 L/s
    This vacuum cleaner delivers lower airflow than the average vacuum cleaner (13.3 L/s vs 27.8 L/s).
    13.33 L/s vs 27.8 L/s
  • 0.6 L smaller dust container
    Capacity
    0.4 L
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (0.4 L vs 1 L).
    0.4 L vs 1 L
  • 1 hours slower charging
    Charging time
    5 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
    This vacuum cleaner charges slower than the average vacuum cleaner (5 hours vs 4 hours).
    5 hours vs 4 hours
  • Not pet-hair friendly
    Suitable for pet owners
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for pet owners, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    80-80 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (80-80 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    80-80 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • Not allergy-friendly
    Suitable for allergy sufferers
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for allergy sufferers, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • 0.95 % lower filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    99 %
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has lower filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (99 % vs 99.95 %).
    99 % vs 99.95 %
  • 9.7% worse value for money
    Philips FC6722/01 offers worse value for money than the average vacuum cleaner (6.97 vs 7.6).
    6.97 vs 7.65
  • 13.5% lower user score
    User score
    7.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Philips FC6722/01
    the average vacuum cleaner
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    Philips FC6722/01 has a lower user score than the average vacuum cleaner (7.05 vs 8.000).
    7.05 vs 8
  • 46.7% more expensive
    Philips FC6722/01 is more expensive than the average vacuum cleaner (£220 vs £150).
    £220 vs £150
  • 14.47 L/s lower airflow
    Airflow
    13.33 L/s
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <16.5 L/s – >52 L/s
    This vacuum cleaner delivers lower airflow than the average vacuum cleaner (13.3 L/s vs 27.8 L/s).
    13.33 L/s vs 27.8 L/s
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    80-80 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (80-80 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    80-80 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 150 W higher power consumption
    Power consumption
    750 W
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws more power than the average vacuum cleaner (750 W vs 600 W).
    750 W vs 600 W
  • 20 minutes shorter runtime
    Battery runtime
    30 minutes
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers shorter battery runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (30 minutes vs 50 minutes).
    30 minutes vs 50 minutes
  • 1 hours slower charging
    Charging time
    5 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
    This vacuum cleaner charges slower than the average vacuum cleaner (5 hours vs 4 hours).
    5 hours vs 4 hours
  • 4.2 V lower voltage
    Battery voltage
    18 V
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <18 V – >28.8 V
    This vacuum cleaner has a lower battery voltage than the average vacuum cleaner (18 V vs 22.2 V).
    18 V vs 22.2 V
  • 0.6 L smaller dust container
    Capacity
    0.4 L
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (0.4 L vs 1 L).
    0.4 L vs 1 L
  • Not allergy-friendly
    Suitable for allergy sufferers
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for allergy sufferers, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • 0.95 % lower filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    99 %
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has lower filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (99 % vs 99.95 %).
    99 % vs 99.95 %
  • Lower filter class
    Filter class
    washable foam
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    This vacuum cleaner uses a lower filter class than the average vacuum cleaner (washable foam vs hepa).
    washable foam vs hepa
  • Not pet-hair friendly
    Suitable for pet owners
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for pet owners, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • No upholstery nozzle
    Upholstery nozzle
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include an upholstery nozzle, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 70 mm taller body
    Height
    1,170 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <290 mm – >1.2k mm
    This vacuum cleaner is taller than the average vacuum cleaner (1170 mm vs 1100 mm).
    1,170 mm vs 1,100 mm

Graphic comparison of Philips FC6722/01 and other vacuum cleaners

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 25 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What customers like about Philips FC6722/01?

  • Highly agile and easy to manoeuvre around tight spaces
  • Effective 180-degree side suction that works well in corners
  • Operates quietly when running on the lower speed setting
  • Good overall build quality and durable plastic dust container
  • Convenient 2-in-1 integrated handheld unit and built-in brush attachment
  • Goes fully flat to easily clean under low furniture

What customers dislike about Philips FC6722/01?

  • Suction power can feel weak or insufficient on deeper carpets
  • Frequent hair tangles occur around the main nozzle roller
  • The 0.4-litre dust container is quite small and requires frequent emptying
  • Short battery runtime, lasting only 15 minutes on Turbo mode
  • The included charging cable is considered too short by some users
  • Requires regular, thorough disassembly and filter washing to maintain suction

Compare Philips FC6722/01 with other vacuum cleaners

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)