OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Philips 2000 Series PowerCyclone 4 Review | 52 Data compared

Avg. price:~£90Suction power (AW):?Battery runtime:N/A minutesCapacity:1.3 LWeight:4.4 kg

Philips 2000 Series PowerCyclone 4 Review: Compare 52 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Vacuum Cleaners category and whether it is worth buying.

6.0

Overall score

Score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the vacuum cleaner's quality, based on technical analysis and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference for identifying the best vacuum cleaners on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 94% of models
Score components

80%

5.7

Technical Score

20%

7.4

User score

▼Worse than 94% of vacuum-cleaners
5.7

Technical Score

Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components

28%

6.2

Performance

22%

3.9

Battery

18%

8.2

Filtration

14%

5.1

Attachments

10%

5.7

Design

8%

4.0

Smart features

▼Worse than 97% of vacuum-cleaners
7.4

User score

User score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 89% of models
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

4.8

Number of reviews

Based on 32 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▼Worse than 89% of vacuum-cleaners
  • philips-2000-series-powercyclone-4
  • philips-2000-series-powercyclone-4
  • philips-2000-series-powercyclone-4
  • philips-2000-series-powercyclone-4
  • philips-2000-series-powercyclone-4
  • philips-2000-series-powercyclone-4
  • philips-2000-series-powercyclone-4
  • philips-2000-series-powercyclone-4
philips-2000-series-powercyclone-4
philips-2000-series-powercyclone-4
philips-2000-series-powercyclone-4
philips-2000-series-powercyclone-4
philips-2000-series-powercyclone-4
philips-2000-series-powercyclone-4
philips-2000-series-powercyclone-4
philips-2000-series-powercyclone-4

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Philips 2000 Series PowerCyclone 4 is a corded bagless cylinder vacuum cleaner featuring an efficient 850W motor that provides high suction power alongside a 1.3-litre dust capacity and a 9-metre cleaning radius. Its primary characteristics include PowerCyclone 4 technology, which accelerates airflow to separate dust from the air, a Super Clean Air filter capturing over 99% of small particles, and an adjustable multi-purpose nozzle. Main pros include its compact 4.4 kg lightweight design, an integrated onboard crevice tool, and a hygienic one-handed emptying system. However, notable cons include its relatively high 82 dB noise level during operation, plastic wheels that lack premium rubber treading, and the absence of an electronic variable power control switch.

Technical Specifications of vacuum cleaner Philips 2000 Series PowerCyclone 4

Technical Score
Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components:

28%

6.2

Performance

22%

3.9

Battery

18%

8.2

Filtration

14%

5.1

Attachments

10%

5.7

Design

8%

4.0

Smart features

5.7
Philips 2000 Series PowerCyclone 4 has a technical score of 5.7 points, which is lower than 96.7% of vacuum cleaners.
User score
User score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 89% of models
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

4.8

Number of reviews

Based on 32 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.4
Philips 2000 Series PowerCyclone 4 has a user score of 7.45 points, which is lower than 88.6% of vacuum cleaners.
Popularity
Popularity
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you prefer a vacuum cleaner that has been chosen and reviewed by many other buyers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 55% of models
Popularity:
Philips 2000 Series PowerCyclone 4 has a popularity score of 4.8 points, which is lower than 54.7% of vacuum cleaners.
4.8
Philips 2000 Series PowerCyclone 4 has a popularity score of 4.8 points, which is lower than 54.7% of vacuum cleaners.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the vacuum cleaner's overall score with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a vacuum cleaner with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components:

60%

6.0

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.2
Philips 2000 Series PowerCyclone 4 has a value-for-money score of 7.2 points, which is lower than 86.6% of vacuum cleaners.
Suction power (AW)
?
Suction power (kPa)
16.8 kPa
Suction power (kPa)
16.8 kPa
▼ Worse than 70% of models
Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
This vacuum cleaner has a suction pressure of 16.8 kPa, which is lower than that of 70.1% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 1.6% of vacuum cleaners.
Airflow
?
Motor type
Universal motor
Power consumption
850 W
Power consumption
850 W
▼ Worse than 82% of models
Market range: <165 W – >899 W
This vacuum cleaner draws 850 W, which is higher than the power consumption of 82.3% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 2.9% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Cordless
no
Cordless
no
▼ Worse than 50% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not work cordlessly. 49.5% of vacuum cleaners offer cordless operation.
Battery runtime
N/A
Charging time
N/A
Battery capacity
N/A
Battery voltage
N/A
Show more
Filter class
epa 12
Filter class
epa 12
▲ Better than 71% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses filter class epa 12, which is more advanced than the class used by 70.6% of vacuum cleaners and the same as the class used by 3.7% of vacuum cleaners.
Minimum overall efficiency
99.9%
Minimum overall efficiency
99.9%
▼ Worse than 68% of models
Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
This vacuum cleaner reaches 99.9% minimum overall efficiency, which is lower than that of 68.1% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 10.6% of vacuum cleaners.
Suitable for allergy sufferers
no
Suitable for allergy sufferers
no
▼ Worse than 83% of models
This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for allergy sufferers. 82.4% of vacuum cleaners are allergy-friendly.
Capacity
1.3 L
Capacity
1.3 L
▲ Better than 59% of models
Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
This vacuum cleaner has a dust capacity of 1.3 L, which is larger than that of 58.5% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 1.1% of vacuum cleaners.
Bagless
yes
Bagless
yes
▲ Better than 21% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses a bagless design. 78.6% of vacuum cleaners use this setup.
Show more
Main brush type
classic
Roller type
bristled
Anti-tangle brush
no
Anti-tangle brush
no
▼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an anti-tangle brush. 25.7% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
Mini motorized brush
no
Mini motorized brush
no
▼ Worse than 27% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a mini motorized brush. 26.9% of vacuum cleaners include this attachment.
Suitable for pet owners
no
Suitable for pet owners
no
▼ Worse than 72% of models
This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for pet owners. 72% of vacuum cleaners handle pet hair well.
Show more
Vacuum type
canister
Weight
4.4 kg
Weight
4.4 kg
▼ Worse than 62% of models
Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
This vacuum cleaner weighs 4.4 kg, which is greater than the weight of 62.3% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.7% of vacuum cleaners.
2-in-1 design
no
2-in-1 design
no
▼ Worse than 53% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not offer a 2-in-1 design. 53% of vacuum cleaners offer this flexible format.
Self-standing
no
Self-standing
no
▼ Worse than 19% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not stand on its own. 18.9% of vacuum cleaners offer this convenience.
Adjustable tube height
yes
Adjustable tube height
yes
▲ Better than 53% of models
This vacuum cleaner includes adjustable tube height. 47.4% of vacuum cleaners offer this ergonomic feature.
Show more
Auto suction adjustment
no
Auto suction adjustment
no
▼ Worse than 20% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support automatic suction adjustment. 19.9% of vacuum cleaners support this feature.
Dust particle sensor
no
Dust particle sensor
no
▼ Worse than 8% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a dust particle sensor. 8% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
LED display
no
LED display
no
▼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an LED display. 25.9% of vacuum cleaners include this interface feature.
Nozzle light
no
Nozzle light
no
▼ Worse than 43% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a nozzle light. 43.4% of vacuum cleaners include this visibility feature.
Mopping support
no
Mopping support
no
▼ Worse than 4% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support mopping. 3.7% of vacuum cleaners support this multi-function feature.

Philips 2000 Series PowerCyclone 4 vs the average vacuum cleaner

246810TotalPerformanceBatteryFiltrationAttachmentsDesignSmart features
  • Higher filter class
    Filter class
    epa 12
    ▲ Better than 71% of models
    This vacuum cleaner uses a better filter class than the average vacuum cleaner (epa 12 vs hepa).
    epa 12 vs hepa
  • Adjustable tube height
    Adjustable tube height
    yes
    ▲ Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner has adjustable tube height, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 66.7% cheaper
    Philips 2000 Series PowerCyclone 4 is cheaper than the average vacuum cleaner (£90 vs £150).
    £90 vs £150
  • 66.7% cheaper
    Philips 2000 Series PowerCyclone 4 is cheaper than the average vacuum cleaner (£90 vs £150).
    £90 vs £150
  • Higher filter class
    Filter class
    epa 12
    ▲ Better than 71% of models
    This vacuum cleaner uses a better filter class than the average vacuum cleaner (epa 12 vs hepa).
    epa 12 vs hepa
  • Adjustable tube height
    Adjustable tube height
    yes
    ▲ Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner has adjustable tube height, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    77-84 dB
    ▼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (77-84 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    77-84 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • Not pet-hair friendly
    Suitable for pet owners
    no
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for pet owners, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • No handheld conversion
    2-in-1 design
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not have a 2-in-1 design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • Not allergy-friendly
    Suitable for allergy sufferers
    no
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for allergy sufferers, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • 3.2 kPa lower suction pressure
    Suction power (kPa)
    16.8 kPa
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
    This vacuum cleaner has lower suction pressure than the average vacuum cleaner (16.8 kPa vs 20 kPa).
    16.8 kPa vs 20 kPa
  • No upholstery nozzle
    Upholstery nozzle
    no
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include an upholstery nozzle, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 250 W higher power consumption
    Power consumption
    850 W
    ▼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws more power than the average vacuum cleaner (850 W vs 600 W).
    850 W vs 600 W
  • 0.05 % lower filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    99.9 %
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has lower filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (99.9 % vs 99.95 %).
    99.9 % vs 99.95 %
  • 6% worse value for money
    Philips 2000 Series PowerCyclone 4 offers worse value for money than the average vacuum cleaner (7.22 vs 7.6).
    7.22 vs 7.65
  • 7.5% lower user score
    User score
    7.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Philips 2000 Series PowerCyclone 4
    the average vacuum cleaner
    ▲ Better than 72% of models
    Philips 2000 Series PowerCyclone 4 has a lower user score than the average vacuum cleaner (7.45 vs 8.000).
    7.45 vs 8
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    77-84 dB
    ▼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (77-84 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    77-84 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 3.2 kPa lower suction pressure
    Suction power (kPa)
    16.8 kPa
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
    This vacuum cleaner has lower suction pressure than the average vacuum cleaner (16.8 kPa vs 20 kPa).
    16.8 kPa vs 20 kPa
  • 250 W higher power consumption
    Power consumption
    850 W
    ▼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws more power than the average vacuum cleaner (850 W vs 600 W).
    850 W vs 600 W
  • 1 fewer power levels
    Number of speeds
    1
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <1 – >4
    This vacuum cleaner offers fewer speed levels than the average vacuum cleaner (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • 0.5 m shorter power cord
    Power cord length
    6 m
    ▼ Worse than 57% of models
    Market range: <5 m – >9.3 m
    This vacuum cleaner has a shorter power cord than the average vacuum cleaner (6 m vs 6.5 m).
    6 m vs 6.5 m
  • Not allergy-friendly
    Suitable for allergy sufferers
    no
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for allergy sufferers, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • 0.05 % lower filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    99.9 %
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has lower filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (99.9 % vs 99.95 %).
    99.9 % vs 99.95 %
  • Not pet-hair friendly
    Suitable for pet owners
    no
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for pet owners, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • No upholstery nozzle
    Upholstery nozzle
    no
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include an upholstery nozzle, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • No handheld conversion
    2-in-1 design
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not have a 2-in-1 design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 21.5% higher weight
    Weight
    4.4 kg
    ▼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is heavier than the average vacuum cleaner (4.4 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    4.4 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • 143 mm deeper body
    Depth
    408 mm
    ▼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <170 mm – >440 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is deeper than the average vacuum cleaner (408 mm vs 265 mm).
    408 mm vs 265 mm

Graphic comparison of Philips 2000 Series PowerCyclone 4 and other vacuum cleaners

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 32 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What customers like about Philips 2000 Series PowerCyclone 4?

  • Strong initial suction power for picking up dust, fine debris, and pet hair.
  • Compact and highly lightweight design making it easy to carry around the house.
  • Hygienic and simple pop-of-a-button bagless container emptying mechanism.
  • Equipped with an efficient filtration system that captures fine dust particles.
  • Adjustable floor multi-purpose nozzle easily transitions via a foot pedal between carpet and hard floors.
  • Affordable price point offering great value for money compared to expensive brands.

What customers dislike about Philips 2000 Series PowerCyclone 4?

  • Performance on thick or large debris can be poor, sometimes requiring lifting the cleaner head.
  • Filters get dirty very quickly and require frequent cleaning or maintenance to avoid loss of suction.
  • The corded versions can feel limiting due to a short power cable, requiring frequent outlet switching.
  • Replacement parts, especially matching filters, can be difficult to find in regular department stores.
  • The telescopic handle and attachments can feel slightly wobbly or cumbersome when fully extended.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

G
guide-aspirateur.net
01/04/2022
Summary of the review
Philips XB2125/09 review: one of the best bagless vacuum cleaners of 2022?
(Translated)Show original
C
consumentenbond.nl
01/08/2023
Summary of the review
Philips 2000 series XB2122/09 - Test, Reviews & Prices
(Translated)Show original
C
consumentenbond.nl
01/05/2022
Summary of the review
Philips 2000 series XB2142/09 - Test, Reviews & Prices
(Translated)Show original

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Philips 2000 Series PowerCyclone 4 with other vacuum cleaners

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)