OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Vacuum Cleaners Methodology v1.0
Vacuum Cleaners Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Vacuum Cleaners Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Vacuum Cleaners Methodology v1.0

Eureka WhirlWind NEN110A Review | 52 Data compared

Avg. price:~£60Suction power (AW):?Battery runtime:N/A minutesCapacity:2.5 LWeight:3.72 kg

Eureka WhirlWind NEN110A Review: Compare 52 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Vacuum Cleaners category and whether it is worth buying.

6.6

Overall score

Score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the vacuum cleaner's quality, based on technical analysis and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference for identifying the best vacuum cleaners on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 61% of models
Score components

80%

6.0

Technical Score

20%

9.0

User score

▼Worse than 61% of vacuum-cleaners
6.0

Technical Score

Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components

28%

7.2

Performance

22%

3.5

Battery

18%

7.8

Filtration

14%

6.5

Attachments

10%

6.2

Design

8%

4.0

Smart features

▼Worse than 83% of vacuum-cleaners
9.0

User score

User score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 93% of models
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 62,700 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
★Better than 93% of vacuum-cleaners
  • eureka-whirlwind-nen110a
  • eureka-whirlwind-nen110a
  • eureka-whirlwind-nen110a
  • eureka-whirlwind-nen110a
  • eureka-whirlwind-nen110a
  • eureka-whirlwind-nen110a
  • eureka-whirlwind-nen110a
  • eureka-whirlwind-nen110a
eureka-whirlwind-nen110a
eureka-whirlwind-nen110a
eureka-whirlwind-nen110a
eureka-whirlwind-nen110a
eureka-whirlwind-nen110a
eureka-whirlwind-nen110a
eureka-whirlwind-nen110a
eureka-whirlwind-nen110a

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of vacuum cleaner Eureka WhirlWind NEN110A

Technical Score
Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components:

28%

7.2

Performance

22%

3.5

Battery

18%

7.8

Filtration

14%

6.5

Attachments

10%

6.2

Design

8%

4.0

Smart features

6.0
User score
User score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 93% of models
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 62,700 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
9.0
Popularity
Popularity
10.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you prefer a vacuum cleaner that has been chosen and reviewed by many other buyers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Popularity:
Eureka WhirlWind NEN110A has a popularity score of 10 points, which is higher than 91.9% of vacuum cleaners.
10
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the vacuum cleaner's overall score with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a vacuum cleaner with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 61% of models
Score components:

60%

6.6

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.6
Suction power (AW)
?
Suction power (kPa)
?
Airflow
?
Motor type
Universal motor
Power consumption
960 W
Power consumption
960 W
▼ Worse than 95% of models
Market range: <165 W – >899 W
This vacuum cleaner draws 960 W, which is higher than the power consumption of 94.8% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 1.3% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Cordless
no
Cordless
no
▼ Worse than 50% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not work cordlessly. 49.5% of vacuum cleaners offer cordless operation.
Battery runtime
N/A
Charging time
N/A
Battery capacity
N/A
Battery voltage
N/A
Show more
Filter class
hepa
Filter class
hepa
▼ Worse than 38% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses filter class hepa, which is more advanced than the class used by 16% of vacuum cleaners and the same as the class used by 46% of vacuum cleaners.
Minimum overall efficiency
99.5%
Minimum overall efficiency
99.5%
▼ Worse than 80% of models
Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
This vacuum cleaner reaches 99.5% minimum overall efficiency, which is lower than that of 79.7% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 7.8% of vacuum cleaners.
Suitable for allergy sufferers
no
Suitable for allergy sufferers
no
▼ Worse than 83% of models
This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for allergy sufferers. 82.4% of vacuum cleaners are allergy-friendly.
Capacity
2.5 L
Capacity
2.5 L
▲ Better than 76% of models
Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
This vacuum cleaner has a dust capacity of 2.5 L, which is larger than that of 76% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 4.2% of vacuum cleaners.
Bagless
yes
Bagless
yes
▲ Better than 21% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses a bagless design. 78.6% of vacuum cleaners use this setup.
Show more
Main brush type
classic
Roller type
none
Anti-tangle brush
no
Anti-tangle brush
no
▼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an anti-tangle brush. 25.7% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
Mini motorized brush
no
Mini motorized brush
no
▼ Worse than 27% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a mini motorized brush. 26.9% of vacuum cleaners include this attachment.
Suitable for pet owners
yes
Suitable for pet owners
yes
▲ Better than 28% of models
This vacuum cleaner is suitable for pet owners. 72% of vacuum cleaners handle pet hair well.
Show more
Vacuum type
canister
Weight
3.72 kg
Weight
3.72 kg
▼ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
This vacuum cleaner weighs 3.72 kg, which is greater than the weight of 52.3% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.3% of vacuum cleaners.
2-in-1 design
no
2-in-1 design
no
▼ Worse than 53% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not offer a 2-in-1 design. 53% of vacuum cleaners offer this flexible format.
Self-standing
no
Self-standing
no
▼ Worse than 19% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not stand on its own. 18.9% of vacuum cleaners offer this convenience.
Adjustable tube height
yes
Adjustable tube height
yes
▲ Better than 53% of models
This vacuum cleaner includes adjustable tube height. 47.4% of vacuum cleaners offer this ergonomic feature.
Show more
Auto suction adjustment
no
Auto suction adjustment
no
▼ Worse than 20% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support automatic suction adjustment. 19.9% of vacuum cleaners support this feature.
Dust particle sensor
no
Dust particle sensor
no
▼ Worse than 8% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a dust particle sensor. 8% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
LED display
no
LED display
no
▼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an LED display. 25.9% of vacuum cleaners include this interface feature.
Nozzle light
no
Nozzle light
no
▼ Worse than 43% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a nozzle light. 43.4% of vacuum cleaners include this visibility feature.
Mopping support
no
Mopping support
no
▼ Worse than 4% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support mopping. 3.7% of vacuum cleaners support this multi-function feature.

Eureka WhirlWind NEN110A vs the average vacuum cleaner

246810TotalPerformanceBatteryFiltrationAttachmentsDesignSmart features
  • Adjustable tube height
    Adjustable tube height
    yes
    ▲ Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner has adjustable tube height, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 1.5 L larger dust container
    Capacity
    2.5 L
    ▲ Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a larger dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (2.5 L vs 1 L).
    2.5 L vs 1 L
  • 790 mm shorter body
    Height
    310 mm
    ▲ Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <290 mm – >1.2k mm
    This vacuum cleaner is shorter than the average vacuum cleaner (310 mm vs 1100 mm).
    310 mm vs 1,100 mm
  • 123.3 mm shallower body
    Depth
    141.7 mm
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <170 mm – >440 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is less deep than the average vacuum cleaner (141.7 mm vs 265 mm).
    141.7 mm vs 265 mm
  • 12.6% higher user score
    User score
    9.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Eureka WhirlWind NEN110A
    the average vacuum cleaner
    Eureka WhirlWind NEN110A has a higher user score than the average vacuum cleaner (9.01 vs 8.000).
    9.01 vs 8
  • 2.5x cheaper
    Eureka WhirlWind NEN110A is cheaper than the average vacuum cleaner (£60 vs £150).
    £60 vs £150
  • 12.6% higher user score
    User score
    9.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Eureka WhirlWind NEN110A
    the average vacuum cleaner
    Eureka WhirlWind NEN110A has a higher user score than the average vacuum cleaner (9.01 vs 8.000).
    9.01 vs 8
  • 2.5x cheaper
    Eureka WhirlWind NEN110A is cheaper than the average vacuum cleaner (£60 vs £150).
    £60 vs £150
  • 1.5 L larger dust container
    Capacity
    2.5 L
    ▲ Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a larger dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (2.5 L vs 1 L).
    2.5 L vs 1 L
  • Adjustable tube height
    Adjustable tube height
    yes
    ▲ Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner has adjustable tube height, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 790 mm shorter body
    Height
    310 mm
    ▲ Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <290 mm – >1.2k mm
    This vacuum cleaner is shorter than the average vacuum cleaner (310 mm vs 1100 mm).
    310 mm vs 1,100 mm
  • 123.3 mm shallower body
    Depth
    141.7 mm
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <170 mm – >440 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is less deep than the average vacuum cleaner (141.7 mm vs 265 mm).
    141.7 mm vs 265 mm
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    82-82 dB
    ▼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (82-82 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    82-82 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • No handheld conversion
    2-in-1 design
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not have a 2-in-1 design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • Not allergy-friendly
    Suitable for allergy sufferers
    no
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for allergy sufferers, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • No upholstery nozzle
    Upholstery nozzle
    no
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include an upholstery nozzle, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 0.45 % lower filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    99.5 %
    ▼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has lower filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (99.5 % vs 99.95 %).
    99.5 % vs 99.95 %
  • 360 W higher power consumption
    Power consumption
    960 W
    ▼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws more power than the average vacuum cleaner (960 W vs 600 W).
    960 W vs 600 W
  • 1.5 m shorter power cord
    Power cord length
    5 m
    ▼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <5 m – >9.3 m
    This vacuum cleaner has a shorter power cord than the average vacuum cleaner (5 m vs 6.5 m).
    5 m vs 6.5 m
  • 45 mm wider body
    Width
    310 mm
    ▼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <229 mm – >350 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is wider than the average vacuum cleaner (310 mm vs 265 mm).
    310 mm vs 265 mm
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    82-82 dB
    ▼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (82-82 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    82-82 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 360 W higher power consumption
    Power consumption
    960 W
    ▼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws more power than the average vacuum cleaner (960 W vs 600 W).
    960 W vs 600 W
  • 1.5 m shorter power cord
    Power cord length
    5 m
    ▼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <5 m – >9.3 m
    This vacuum cleaner has a shorter power cord than the average vacuum cleaner (5 m vs 6.5 m).
    5 m vs 6.5 m
  • Not allergy-friendly
    Suitable for allergy sufferers
    no
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for allergy sufferers, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • 0.45 % lower filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    99.5 %
    ▼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has lower filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (99.5 % vs 99.95 %).
    99.5 % vs 99.95 %
  • No upholstery nozzle
    Upholstery nozzle
    no
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include an upholstery nozzle, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • No handheld conversion
    2-in-1 design
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not have a 2-in-1 design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 45 mm wider body
    Width
    310 mm
    ▼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <229 mm – >350 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is wider than the average vacuum cleaner (310 mm vs 265 mm).
    310 mm vs 265 mm
  • Older release date
    Release date
    2018
    ▼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This vacuum cleaner has an older release date than the average vacuum cleaner (2018 vs 2021).
    Released in August 2018.
    2018 vs 2021

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

R
rtings.com
12/08/2020
Summary of the review
Eureka Whirlwind Bagless Canister Review - RTINGS.com
T
techgearlab.com
28/11/2024
Summary of the review
Eureka WhirlWind Review | Tested & Rated
M
medium.com
09/07/2024
Summary of the review
Eureka Vacuum Cleaner, An Honest Review | by Techbistro - Medium

Third-party reviews

Based on 62,700 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Eureka WhirlWind NEN110A

  • Strong suction power on hard floors and bare surfaces
  • Lightweight, compact, and easy to maneuver around furniture or stairs
  • Bagless design with washable filters eliminates recurring maintenance costs
  • Convenient automatic power cord rewind feature
  • Integrated 2-in-1 crevice tool and dusting brush built directly into the handle
  • Large, transparent, and easy-to-empty dust container
  • Affordable, budget-friendly price point

What we don't like about Eureka WhirlWind NEN110A

  • Poor performance on carpets due to a straight-suction head lacking a motorized brush roll
  • Struggles to pick up pet hair and embedded debris from deeper fabric fibers
  • Tends to push around larger debris like rice or cereal rather than passing over it
  • Limited set of accessories and attachments compared to other models
  • Basic filtration system lacks tight rubber seals, which can let fine dust escape back into the air
  • Plastic body construction can feel somewhat cheap to some users
  • Power cord is relatively short, requiring frequent outlet switching in larger spaces

Verdict

The Eureka WhirlWind NEN110A is a corded, bagless canister vacuum cleaner operating on a 120V, 8-amp motor with a 960 to 1800-watt maximum capacity and an 82 dB noise level. Weighing only 8.15 pounds, its main characteristics include a 2.5-liter dust container, a 16-foot automatic rewind power cord, a 9-foot extendable hose with a telescoping metal wand, and integrated fingertip airflow controls to switch between carpet, upholstery, and hard floor settings. Key pros include exceptional lightweight maneuverability, lack of recurring maintenance costs due to washable foam filters, and a highly convenient integrated 2-in-1 crevice tool and dusting brush. However, its notable cons include a short power cord that limits overall cleaning reach, the lack of a motorized brush roll for deep pet hair extraction, and a lack of official HEPA certification for advanced allergen filtration.

Compare Eureka WhirlWind NEN110A with other vacuum cleaners

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Eureka WhirlWind NEN110A and other vacuum cleaners

No results found