OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Vacuum Cleaners Methodology v1.0
Vacuum Cleaners Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Vacuum Cleaners Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Vacuum Cleaners Methodology v1.0

Electrolux EB51C1OG Review | 52 Data compared

Avg. price:~£95Suction power (AW):209 AWBattery runtime:N/A minutesCapacity:3 LWeight:5.01 kg

Electrolux EB51C1OG Review: Compare 52 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Vacuum Cleaners category and whether it is worth buying.

6.5

Overall score

Score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the vacuum cleaner's quality, based on technical analysis and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference for identifying the best vacuum cleaners on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components

80%

6.1

Technical Score

20%

8.1

User score

▼Worse than 72% of vacuum-cleaners
6.1

Technical Score

Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 82% of models
Score components

28%

6.9

Performance

22%

3.9

Battery

18%

9.1

Filtration

14%

5.7

Attachments

10%

5.2

Design

8%

4.0

Smart features

▼Worse than 82% of vacuum-cleaners
8.1

User score

User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 70% of models
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

6.6

Number of reviews

Based on 182 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▲Better than 70% of vacuum-cleaners
  • electrolux-eb51c1og
  • electrolux-eb51c1og
  • electrolux-eb51c1og
  • electrolux-eb51c1og
  • electrolux-eb51c1og
  • electrolux-eb51c1og
electrolux-eb51c1og
electrolux-eb51c1og
electrolux-eb51c1og
electrolux-eb51c1og
electrolux-eb51c1og
electrolux-eb51c1og

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of vacuum cleaner Electrolux EB51C1OG

Technical Score
Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 82% of models
Score components:

28%

6.9

Performance

22%

3.9

Battery

18%

9.1

Filtration

14%

5.7

Attachments

10%

5.2

Design

8%

4.0

Smart features

6.1
User score
User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 70% of models
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

6.6

Number of reviews

Based on 182 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.1
Popularity
Popularity
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you prefer a vacuum cleaner that has been chosen and reviewed by many other buyers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 57% of models
Popularity:
Electrolux EB51C1OG has a popularity score of 6.6 points, which is higher than 56.6% of vacuum cleaners.
6.6
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the vacuum cleaner's overall score with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a vacuum cleaner with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components:

60%

6.5

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.5
Suction power (AW)
209 AW
Suction power (AW)
209 AW
▲ Better than 76% of models
Market range: <40 AW – >280 AW
This vacuum cleaner has a suction power of 209 AW, which is higher than that of 75.5% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.9% of vacuum cleaners.
Suction power (kPa)
19.2 kPa
Suction power (kPa)
19.2 kPa
▼ Worse than 53% of models
Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
This vacuum cleaner has a suction pressure of 19.2 kPa, which is lower than that of 53.2% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.9% of vacuum cleaners.
Airflow
31 L/s
Airflow
31 L/s
▲ Better than 63% of models
Market range: <16.5 L/s – >52 L/s
This vacuum cleaner delivers 31 L/s airflow, which is higher than that of 62.9% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 2.3% of vacuum cleaners.
Motor type
Universal motor
Power consumption
750 W
Power consumption
750 W
▼ Worse than 69% of models
Market range: <165 W – >899 W
This vacuum cleaner draws 750 W, which is higher than the power consumption of 69.3% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 6.6% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Cordless
no
Cordless
no
▼ Worse than 50% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not work cordlessly. 49.5% of vacuum cleaners offer cordless operation.
Battery runtime
N/A
Charging time
N/A
Battery capacity
N/A
Battery voltage
N/A
Show more
Filter class
hepa 12
Filter class
hepa 12
▲ Better than 74% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses filter class hepa 12, which is more advanced than the class used by 74.4% of vacuum cleaners and the same as the class used by 5% of vacuum cleaners.
Minimum overall efficiency
99.99%
Minimum overall efficiency
99.99%
▲ Better than 84% of models
Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
This vacuum cleaner reaches 99.99% minimum overall efficiency, which is higher than that of 84.3% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 9.6% of vacuum cleaners.
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
▲ Better than 18% of models
This vacuum cleaner is suitable for allergy sufferers. 82.4% of vacuum cleaners are allergy-friendly.
Capacity
3 L
Capacity
3 L
▲ Better than 81% of models
Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
This vacuum cleaner has a dust capacity of 3 L, which is larger than that of 80.6% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 4.1% of vacuum cleaners.
Bagless
no
Bagless
no
▼ Worse than 79% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not use a bagless design. 78.6% of vacuum cleaners use this setup.
Show more
Main brush type
classic
Roller type
none
Anti-tangle brush
no
Anti-tangle brush
no
▼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an anti-tangle brush. 25.7% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
Mini motorized brush
no
Mini motorized brush
no
▼ Worse than 27% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a mini motorized brush. 26.9% of vacuum cleaners include this attachment.
Suitable for pet owners
no
Suitable for pet owners
no
▼ Worse than 72% of models
This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for pet owners. 72% of vacuum cleaners handle pet hair well.
Show more
Vacuum type
canister
Weight
5.01 kg
Weight
5.01 kg
▼ Worse than 71% of models
Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
This vacuum cleaner weighs 5.01 kg, which is greater than the weight of 71.3% of vacuum cleaners.
2-in-1 design
no
2-in-1 design
no
▼ Worse than 53% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not offer a 2-in-1 design. 53% of vacuum cleaners offer this flexible format.
Self-standing
no
Self-standing
no
▼ Worse than 19% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not stand on its own. 18.9% of vacuum cleaners offer this convenience.
Adjustable tube height
yes
Adjustable tube height
yes
▲ Better than 53% of models
This vacuum cleaner includes adjustable tube height. 47.4% of vacuum cleaners offer this ergonomic feature.
Show more
Auto suction adjustment
no
Auto suction adjustment
no
▼ Worse than 20% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support automatic suction adjustment. 19.9% of vacuum cleaners support this feature.
Dust particle sensor
no
Dust particle sensor
no
▼ Worse than 8% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a dust particle sensor. 8% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
LED display
no
LED display
no
▼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an LED display. 25.9% of vacuum cleaners include this interface feature.
Nozzle light
no
Nozzle light
no
▼ Worse than 43% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a nozzle light. 43.4% of vacuum cleaners include this visibility feature.
Mopping support
no
Mopping support
no
▼ Worse than 4% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support mopping. 3.7% of vacuum cleaners support this multi-function feature.

Electrolux EB51C1OG vs the average vacuum cleaner

246810TotalPerformanceBatteryFiltrationAttachmentsDesignSmart features
  • 59 AW higher suction power
    Suction power (AW)
    209 AW
    ▲ Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <40 AW – >280 AW
    This vacuum cleaner has higher suction power than the average vacuum cleaner (209 AW vs 150 AW).
    209 AW vs 150 AW
  • Higher filter class
    Filter class
    hepa 12
    ▲ Better than 74% of models
    This vacuum cleaner uses a better filter class than the average vacuum cleaner (hepa 12 vs hepa).
    hepa 12 vs hepa
  • 0.04 % higher filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    99.99 %
    ▲ Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has higher filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (100 % vs 99.95 %).
    99.99 % vs 99.95 %
  • Includes full bin indicator
    Full bin indicator
    yes
    ▲ Better than 73% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a full bin indicator, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 872 mm shorter body
    Height
    228 mm
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Market range: <290 mm – >1.2k mm
    This vacuum cleaner is shorter than the average vacuum cleaner (228 mm vs 1100 mm).
    228 mm vs 1,100 mm
  • 2 L larger dust container
    Capacity
    3 L
    ▲ Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a larger dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (3 L vs 1 L).
    3 L vs 1 L
  • Adjustable tube height
    Adjustable tube height
    yes
    ▲ Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner has adjustable tube height, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 3.2 L/s higher airflow
    Airflow
    31 L/s
    ▲ Better than 63% of models
    Market range: <16.5 L/s – >52 L/s
    This vacuum cleaner delivers higher airflow than the average vacuum cleaner (31 L/s vs 27.8 L/s).
    31 L/s vs 27.8 L/s
  • 59 AW higher suction power
    Suction power (AW)
    209 AW
    ▲ Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <40 AW – >280 AW
    This vacuum cleaner has higher suction power than the average vacuum cleaner (209 AW vs 150 AW).
    209 AW vs 150 AW
  • 3.2 L/s higher airflow
    Airflow
    31 L/s
    ▲ Better than 63% of models
    Market range: <16.5 L/s – >52 L/s
    This vacuum cleaner delivers higher airflow than the average vacuum cleaner (31 L/s vs 27.8 L/s).
    31 L/s vs 27.8 L/s
  • Higher filter class
    Filter class
    hepa 12
    ▲ Better than 74% of models
    This vacuum cleaner uses a better filter class than the average vacuum cleaner (hepa 12 vs hepa).
    hepa 12 vs hepa
  • 0.04 % higher filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    99.99 %
    ▲ Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has higher filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (100 % vs 99.95 %).
    99.99 % vs 99.95 %
  • Includes full bin indicator
    Full bin indicator
    yes
    ▲ Better than 73% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a full bin indicator, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 2 L larger dust container
    Capacity
    3 L
    ▲ Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a larger dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (3 L vs 1 L).
    3 L vs 1 L
  • 872 mm shorter body
    Height
    228 mm
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Market range: <290 mm – >1.2k mm
    This vacuum cleaner is shorter than the average vacuum cleaner (228 mm vs 1100 mm).
    228 mm vs 1,100 mm
  • Adjustable tube height
    Adjustable tube height
    yes
    ▲ Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner has adjustable tube height, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Newer release date
    Release date
    2023
    ▲ Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This vacuum cleaner has a newer release date than the average vacuum cleaner (2023 vs 2021).
    2023 vs 2021
  • Not pet-hair friendly
    Suitable for pet owners
    no
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for pet owners, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • No handheld conversion
    2-in-1 design
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not have a 2-in-1 design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • No bagless design
    Bagless
    no
    ▼ Worse than 79% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not use a bagless design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • No cyclonic technology
    Cyclonic technology
    no
    ▼ Worse than 71% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not use cyclonic technology, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 38.4% higher weight
    Weight
    5.01 kg
    ▼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is heavier than the average vacuum cleaner (5 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    5.01 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • 151 mm wider body
    Width
    416 mm
    ▼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <229 mm – >350 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is wider than the average vacuum cleaner (416 mm vs 265 mm).
    416 mm vs 265 mm
  • 150 W higher power consumption
    Power consumption
    750 W
    ▼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws more power than the average vacuum cleaner (750 W vs 600 W).
    750 W vs 600 W
  • 0.5 m shorter power cord
    Power cord length
    6 m
    ▼ Worse than 57% of models
    Market range: <5 m – >9.3 m
    This vacuum cleaner has a shorter power cord than the average vacuum cleaner (6 m vs 6.5 m).
    6 m vs 6.5 m
  • 1.5% worse value for money
    Electrolux EB51C1OG offers worse value for money than the average vacuum cleaner (7.54 vs 7.6).
    7.54 vs 7.65
  • No cyclonic technology
    Cyclonic technology
    no
    ▼ Worse than 71% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not use cyclonic technology, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 150 W higher power consumption
    Power consumption
    750 W
    ▼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws more power than the average vacuum cleaner (750 W vs 600 W).
    750 W vs 600 W
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    78-78 dB
    ▲ Better than 52% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (78-78 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    78-78 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 0.8 kPa lower suction pressure
    Suction power (kPa)
    19.2 kPa
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
    This vacuum cleaner has lower suction pressure than the average vacuum cleaner (19.2 kPa vs 20 kPa).
    19.2 kPa vs 20 kPa
  • 0.5 m shorter power cord
    Power cord length
    6 m
    ▼ Worse than 57% of models
    Market range: <5 m – >9.3 m
    This vacuum cleaner has a shorter power cord than the average vacuum cleaner (6 m vs 6.5 m).
    6 m vs 6.5 m
  • No bagless design
    Bagless
    no
    ▼ Worse than 79% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not use a bagless design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • Not pet-hair friendly
    Suitable for pet owners
    no
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for pet owners, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • No handheld conversion
    2-in-1 design
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not have a 2-in-1 design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 38.4% higher weight
    Weight
    5.01 kg
    ▼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is heavier than the average vacuum cleaner (5 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    5.01 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • 151 mm wider body
    Width
    416 mm
    ▼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <229 mm – >350 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is wider than the average vacuum cleaner (416 mm vs 265 mm).
    416 mm vs 265 mm

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
test-aankoop.be
13/09/2024
Summary of the review
Electrolux Canister Vacuum Cleaner EB51C2DB/EB51A4UG/EB51C2UG/EB51A4OG/EB51C1OG: Review, Prices, and Specifications
(Translated)Show original
T
test-aankoop.be
N/A
Summary of the review
Cylinder vacuum cleaner ELECTROLUX EB51C2DB/EB51A4UG/ EB51C2UG/ EB51A4OG/EB51C1OG
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 182 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Electrolux EB51C1OG

  • Powerful suction with an efficient 750 W motor
  • Three-litre dust bag and an 8.5-metre operating radius
  • Washable Hygiene filter captures up to 99.99% of microparticles
  • Lightweight body with large wheels and integrated accessory storage
  • Housing uses 37% recycled plastic

What we don't like about Electrolux EB51C1OG

  • Relatively loud 78 dB operating noise
  • No electronic filter-replacement indicator

Verdict

The Electrolux Clean 500 EB51C1OG is a bagged canister vacuum cleaner featuring a 750W max power motor, an 8.5-metre action radius with a 6-metre power cord, and a 3-litre capacity s-bag classic long performance dust bag. Finished in ocean green speckled and constructed from 37% recycled plastic, it incorporates an AllFloor multi-surface nozzle, large wheels, a telescopic tube, a washable Hygiene filter capturing up to 99.99% of microparticles, and a mechanical dustbag full indicator. Its main advantages include powerful suction, easy maneuverability over a 72 m² cleaning area without unplugging, integrated on-board accessory storage, and a lightweight body weighing just 3.64 kg without accessories; however, its potential drawbacks include a slightly higher operational noise level of 78 dB and the lack of an electronic filter replacement indicator.

Compare Electrolux EB51C1OG with other vacuum cleaners

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Electrolux EB51C1OG and other vacuum cleaners

No results found