OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 5G (6GB + 128GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£330RAM capacity:6 GBInternal storage:128 GBScreen size:12.1 inchesChipset:Qualcomm Snapdragon 7S Gen 2

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 5G (6GB + 128GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 5G (6GB + 128GB)
8.2/10

Overall score

Score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 86% of models
Score components

90%

8.2

Technical score

10%

8.6

User score

▲Better than 86% of tablets
8.4

Value for money

Value for money
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 93% of models
Score components

70%

8.2

Overall score

30%

8.8

Price

★Better than 93%
8.2

Technical score

Technical score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 86% of models
Score components

22%

7.8

Performance

20%

8.1

Display

16%

8.1

Camera

14%

8.6

Battery

12%

8.1

Connectivity

8%

9.2

Software & Features

5%

7.2

Design

3%

9.3

Audio & Multimedia

▲Better than 86%
8.6

User score

User score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 83% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

7.8

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▲Better than 83%
  • xiaomi-redmi-pad-pro-6gb-128gb-5g
  • xiaomi-redmi-pad-pro-6gb-128gb-5g
  • xiaomi-redmi-pad-pro-6gb-128gb-5g
xiaomi-redmi-pad-pro-6gb-128gb-5g
xiaomi-redmi-pad-pro-6gb-128gb-5g
xiaomi-redmi-pad-pro-6gb-128gb-5g
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
6GB + 128GB8GB + 128GBCheck price8GB + 256GBCheck price
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 5G (6GB + 128GB)

Technical score
Technical score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 86% of models
Score components:

22%

7.8

Performance

20%

8.1

Display

16%

8.1

Camera

14%

8.6

Battery

12%

8.1

Connectivity

8%

9.2

Software & Features

5%

7.2

Design

3%

9.3

Audio & Multimedia

8.2
User score
User score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 83% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

7.8

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.6
Popularity
Popularity
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 76% of models
Popularity:
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 5G (6GB + 128GB) has a user popularity of 7.8 points, which is lower than 76.2% of Tablets.
7.8
Value for money
Value for money
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 93% of models
Score components:

70%

8.2

Overall score

30%

8.8

Price

8.4
RAM capacity
6 GB
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 6 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 65.3% of tablets and equal to that of 7% of tablets.
Process node
4 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 4 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 88.2% of tablets and equal to the node used in 8.5% of tablets.
Internal storage
128 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 128 GB which is larger than the storage of 56.7% of tablets and equal to that of 19.6% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
1,022 points
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scored 1,022 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is higher than the score of 61.7% of tablets and equal to the score of 0.4% of tablets.
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7S Gen 2
This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7S Gen 2 chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 89.2% of tablets and equal to those in 0.4% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
2560×1600
This tablet has a screen resolution of 2560×1600 which is higher than that of 77.6% of tablets and equal to that of 10.1% of tablets.
Refresh rate
120 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 120 Hz which is higher than in 80.4% of tablets and equal to that in 10.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
249 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 249 ppi which is higher than that of 67.3% of tablets and equal to that of 1.9% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass 3
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3 display glass which is stronger than that on 80.1% of tablets and equal to that on 11.2% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than that of 36.5% of tablets and equal to that of 31.8% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than in 69.7% of tablets and equal to that in 19.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.0 which is wider than that of 57.5% of tablets and equal to that of 24.5% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
10,000 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 10,000 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 87.8% of tablets and equal to those in 2.1% of tablets.
Charging speed
33 W
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 33 W which is faster than in 74.8% of tablets and equal to speeds in 2.9% of tablets.
Battery life
14.49 hours
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 14.49 hours, which is longer than that of 85.2% of tablets and equal to that of 0.1% of tablets.
video playback
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 50.4% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
yes
This tablet supports 5G connectivity. 89% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.3% of tablets and equal to that of 32.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
yes
This tablet supports on-device AI. 71.8% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
yes
This tablet includes app tracking protection. 71.8% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
IP52
This tablet has an IP rating of IP52 which is higher than that of 85% of tablets and equal to that of 6.2% of tablets.
Weight
566 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 566 g which is heavier than 68.4% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.1% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
10 ms
Market range: <2 ms – >26 ms
This tablet has a pen latency of 10 ms, which is higher than that of 56.8% of tablets and equal to that of 7.8% of tablets.
Show more
Number of microphones
2
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 55.1% of tablets and equal to the number in 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
yes
This tablet supports aptX Adaptive. 93.1% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
yes
This tablet supports Dolby Atmos. 68.6% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
4
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 4 speakers, which is more than in 70.9% of tablets and equal to the number in 22.7% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 5G (6GB + 128GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7S Gen 2 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 7S Gen 2 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 2x higher refresh rate
    This tablet has a higher refresh rate than the average tablet (120 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    120 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • 4.49 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (14.5 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    14.49 hours vs 10 hours
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • Better GPU
    This tablet uses the Adreno 710 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 710 vs Mali-G51
  • 52% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (10,000 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    10,000 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • 199 nits higher peak brightness
    This tablet has a higher peak brightness than the average tablet (600 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    600 nits vs 401 nits
  • 2 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (12.1 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    12.1 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 18.1% better value for money
    Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 5G (6GB + 128GB) has better value for money than the average tablet (8.39 vs 7.1).
    8.39 vs 7.1
  • 8.1% higher user score
    User score
    8.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 5G
    the average tablet
    Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 5G (6GB + 128GB) has a higher user score than the average tablet (8.65 vs 8.000).
    8.65 vs 8
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7S Gen 2 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 7S Gen 2 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • Better GPU
    This tablet uses the Adreno 710 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 710 vs Mali-G51
  • 71.4% smaller process node
    This tablet uses a smaller process node than the average tablet (4 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    4 nm vs 14 nm
  • 20% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • 2x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 64 GB
  • 2 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (6 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    6 GB vs 4 GB
  • 2 more CPU threads
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • Includes neural engine
    This tablet includes a neural engine, the average tablet does not. 25.7% of tablets include a neural engine.
  • 71.8% higher memory bandwidth
    This tablet has a higher memory bandwidth than the average tablet (25.6 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    25.6 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 50.5% higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (2,846 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    2,846 points vs 1,891 points
  • 40.2% higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (1,022 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    1,022 points vs 729 points
  • 2x higher refresh rate
    This tablet has a higher refresh rate than the average tablet (120 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    120 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • 199 nits higher peak brightness
    This tablet has a higher peak brightness than the average tablet (600 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    600 nits vs 401 nits
  • 2 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (12.1 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    12.1 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Supports adaptive refresh rate
    This tablet has adaptive refresh rate, the average tablet does not. 17.6% of tablets support adaptive refresh rate.
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2560×1600 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    2560×1600 vs 1920×1200
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1500:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,500:1 vs 1,015:1
  • More durable display glass
    This tablet uses better display glass than the average tablet (Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 11.2% higher pixel density
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (249 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    249 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 28 ppi higher screen sharpness
    This tablet has a higher screen sharpness than the average tablet (249 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    249 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 50% higher touch sampling rate
    This tablet has a higher touch sampling rate than the average tablet (180 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet has touch sampling rate of 120 Hz.
    180 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 3 MP higher front camera megapixels
    This tablet has more front camera megapixels than the average tablet (8 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    8 MP vs 5 MP
  • Supports PDAF
    This tablet supports PDAF, the average tablet does not. 28.1% of tablets support PDAF.
  • Allows manual focus
    This tablet allows manual focus control, the average tablet does not. 37.2% of tablets include manual focus.
  • Allows manual ISO
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This tablet has a better main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Includes flash
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • 4.49 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (14.5 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    14.49 hours vs 10 hours
  • 52% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (10,000 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    10,000 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Supports fast charging
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • 83.3% faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (33 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    33 W vs 18 W
  • Supports 5G connectivity
    This tablet supports 5G connectivity, the average tablet does not. 11.1% of tablets are 5G compatible.
  • More Wi-Fi bands
    This tablet supports more Wi-Fi bands than the average tablet (2.4GHz/5GHz/6GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz). The average tablet supports 2.4GHz/5GHz Wi-Fi bands.
    2.4GHz/5GHz/6GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This tablet supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This tablet supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average tablet (5.2 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    5.2 vs 5.0
  • Includes on-device AI
    This tablet includes on-device AI, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets include on-device AI.
  • Supports live text recognition
    This tablet supports live text recognition, the average tablet does not. 34.9% of tablets can recognize text from images.
  • Includes app tracking protection
    This tablet includes app tracking protection, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets offer app tracking protection.
  • Allows app offloading
    This tablet allows app offloading, the average tablet does not. 26.4% of tablets support app offloading.
  • Supports dynamic theme
    This tablet features dynamic themes, the average tablet does not. 29% of tablets offer dynamic theming.
  • Supports extra dim mode
    This tablet features extra dim mode, the average tablet does not. 35.4% of tablets support extra diming.
  • Includes clipboard warnings
    This tablet has clipboard warnings, the average tablet does not. 39.9% of tablets include clipboard warnings.
  • Higher IP rating
    This tablet has a better IP rating than the average tablet (IP52 vs not rated). Water and dust protection are still uncommon on tablets.
    IP52 vs not rated
  • Suitable for drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, the average tablet is not. 41% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • Supports stylus tilt
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.6% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • 5 newer release date
    This tablet has a newer release date than the average tablet (2024 vs 2019).
    2024 vs 2019
  • 2 more speakers
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (4 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    4 vs 2
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • 1 more microphone/s
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet has 1 microphones.
    2 vs 1
  • Supports LDAC
    This tablet supports LDAC, the average tablet does not. 25.2% of tablets support LDAC.
  • Supports aptX Adaptive
    This tablet supports aptX Adaptive, the average tablet does not. 6.9% of tablets include aptX Adaptive support.
  • Narrower color gamut
    This tablet supports a narrower color gamut than the average tablet (NTSC vs sRGB). The average tablet covers sRGB color gamut.
    72% NTSC coverage reported.
    NTSC vs sRGB
  • 15.5% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (566 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    566 g vs 490 g
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This tablet has a worse front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.28 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.28 vs f/2.2
  • No HDMI output
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • 80 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (280 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    280 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • 1 ms higher pen latency
    This tablet has higher pen latency than the average tablet (10 ms vs 9 ms). The average tablet has pen latency of 9 ms.
    10 ms vs 9 ms
  • Narrower color gamut
    This tablet supports a narrower color gamut than the average tablet (NTSC vs sRGB). The average tablet covers sRGB color gamut.
    72% NTSC coverage reported.
    NTSC vs sRGB
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This tablet has a worse front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.28 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.28 vs f/2.2
  • No HDMI output
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • 15.5% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (566 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    566 g vs 490 g
  • 80 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (280 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    280 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • 1 ms higher pen latency
    This tablet has higher pen latency than the average tablet (10 ms vs 9 ms). The average tablet has pen latency of 9 ms.
    10 ms vs 9 ms

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
TechHook
≈ estimated
13/08/2024
Hands-on review · performance, display, accessories and verdict
Verdict
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 5G is not flawless, but its strengths outweigh its weaknesses, and it is hard to beat in its segment.
9.0
Techniqued
≈ estimated
04/08/2024
Hands-on review · battery, camera, keyboard and stylus tests
Verdict
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 5G is a great budget tablet at a sensible price, with weaker cameras and slow charging as its downsides.
9.0
Tech Singh
≈ estimated
02/08/2024
Long-term review · performance, gaming and battery tests
Verdict
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 5G stays affordable and feels premium in use, with a few compromises.
9.0
Chandan24tech
≈ estimated
22/03/2025
Quick review · display and performance comparison
Verdict
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 5G is a very good tablet for the money, comfortable for media and multitasking.
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

A
ackodrive.com
03/10/2024
Summary of the review
Redmi Pad Pro Review: The Best Mainstream Android Tablet in 2024
M
mensxp.com
13/01/2026
Summary of the review
Redmi Pad 2 Pro 5G review: A No-Nonsense Budget Android Tablet
N
notebookcheck.net
27/09/2024
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 5G review – An attractive, affordable tablet with a large screen surface
N
notebookcheck.net
29/09/2024
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 5G: Tablet with large display, dual SIM and microSD impresses in review
W
which.co.uk
01/03/2026
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 5G review | 12.1-inches Android 1600
N
notebookcheck.com
24/09/2024
Summary of the review
Test Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 5G Tablet - Hübsches, günstiges Tablet mit viel Bildschirmfläche
(Translated)Show original
H
heise.de
11/10/2024
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro im Test: Sehr gutes & günstiges Tablet
(Translated)Show original
C
computerbild.de
05/07/2024
Summary of the review
Redmi Pad Pro im Test: Leuchtstarkes Tablet mit scharfem Bild
(Translated)Show original
C
computerbild.de
10/07/2024
Summary of the review
Redmi Pad Pro gegen Lenovo Tab Plus im Test
(Translated)Show original
L
langweiledich.net
15/08/2024
Summary of the review
Testbericht: Redmi Pad Pro 5G von Xiaomi
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
25/06/2024
Summary of the review
Test Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro: une tablette abordable aux atouts indéniables
(Translated)Show original
F
frandroid.com
07/04/2025
Summary of the review
Test de la Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro: un iPad Pro à 300 euros
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.biz
30/09/2024
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 5G: La tablette avec grand écran, double SIM et microSD impressionne dans notre test
(Translated)Show original
T
test-achats.be
03/03/2025
Summary of the review
Test XIAOMI REDMI PAD PRO 5G - Testachats
(Translated)Show original
Q
quechoisir.org
03/03/2025
Summary of the review
Test Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 5G - Tablette tactile
(Translated)Show original
I
idboox.com
27/06/2024
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Test – La tablette qui fait trembler l'iPad For detailed analysis, review the links provided above from French tech media.
(Translated)Show original
P
phonandroid.com
27/07/2024
Summary of the review
Test Redmi Pad Pro : voyez grand, payez petit
(Translated)Show original
J
journaldugeek.com
03/10/2024
Summary of the review
Test Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro : l'alternative à l'iPad sous les 300 euros
(Translated)Show original
I
id.nl
26/10/2024
Summary of the review
Review Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 5G – De aanbevolen budgettablet
(Translated)Show original
A
androidworld.nl
18/09/2024
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (5G) review: de nieuwe koning van het middensegment?
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 5G (6GB + 128GB)

  • High-quality 12.1-inch 120Hz display with 2.5K resolution that is clear and vibrant.
  • Excellent value for money, offering premium-feeling build and performance at a budget-friendly price.
  • Long battery life from the 10,000mAh battery, which many users find sufficient for several days of moderate use.
  • Immersive quad-speaker system with Dolby Atmos that provides loud and clear audio for movies.
  • Sleek and sturdy metal unibody design that feels premium.
  • Smooth multitasking and performance for everyday apps thanks to the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset.

What customers don't like about Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 5G (6GB + 128GB)

  • No fingerprint sensor, requiring users to rely on less secure or slower PIN and face unlock methods.
  • Average to poor camera quality, with users describing the 8MP sensors as barely sufficient for basic tasks like document scanning.
  • Heavier weight (approx. 571g) can make it uncomfortable to hold for extended periods without a stand.
  • Accessories like the smart pen and keyboard must be purchased separately and do not support magnetic charging on the tablet.
  • Mixed feedback on charging speed; while some find it adequate, others feel it is slow for such a large battery.
  • Presence of pre-installed bloatware and limited long-term software update guarantees compared to competitors.

Verdict

The Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 5G (6GB + 128GB) is a versatile mid-range tablet featuring a 12.1-inch 2.5K (2560 x 1600) LCD display with a smooth 120Hz AdaptiveSync refresh rate and 600 nits peak brightness. Powered by the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset and running Xiaomi HyperOS based on Android 14, it offers balanced performance for multitasking and entertainment, complemented by quad stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos and a large 10,000mAh battery supporting 33W fast charging. Key pros include its expansive, high-quality screen, robust battery life, 5G cellular connectivity, and the inclusion of a 3.5mm headphone jack and microSD expansion up to 1.5TB. However, notable cons include the lack of a fingerprint sensor, a build that can feel slightly flexible under pressure, and a shorter software update commitment compared to some competitors.

Compare Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 5G (6GB + 128GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 5G (6GB + 128GB) and other tablets

No results found