OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 WiFi (3GB + 32GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£180RAM capacity:3 GBInternal storage:32 GBScreen size:8 inchesChipset:Qualcomm Snapdragon 660

Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 WiFi (3GB + 32GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 35 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

7.4/10

Overall score

Score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 69% of models
Score components

35%

6.2

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

8.4

Reviews score

10%

8.7

Sentiment score

â–²Better than 69% of tablets
8.1

Value for money

Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 86% of models
Score components

70%

7.4

Overall score

30%

9.6

Price

â–²Better than 86%
6.2

Technical score

Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 54% of models
Score components

22%

5.6

Performance

20%

5.0

Display

16%

8.5

Camera

14%

5.0

Battery

12%

6.7

Connectivity

8%

7.7

Software

5%

6.6

Design

3%

5.7

Audio

â–²Better than 54%
8.4

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 86% of models

80%

8.3

Average grade

20%

8.9

Popularity

Grades by review (35)
12 reviews: 9 with a printed score, 3 estimated from the review. 23 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 86%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £180
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Other versions:
3GB + 32GB4GB + 64GB

What reviewers say about the Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 WiFi (3GB + 32GB)

Based on 12 · 27

Reviewers love the long battery life and strong gaming performance, but frustrating software and a weak camera disappoint many.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 WiFi (3GB + 32GB)

Based on 139 owners sharing their experience in online comments

55%positive10%mixed35%negative

Owners praise its speed, battery life, and media experience, while software support and streaming limits frustrate many.

What owners dislike

  • Owners report freezing, touches ignored for 4 to 5 seconds after unlocking, and system errors; some get stuck on the Mi logo.15
  • Bootloader unlocking can force a 720-hour wait after one failed attempt, and Chinese-language setup and ROM flashing confuse many owners.8
  • Owners say updates are missing or late, with no OTA on China versions, no global ROM, and Android Pie or MIUI 11 never arriving.7
  • Some owners see yellowing along the screen edges, one after turning brightness near maximum, and say maximum brightness is too low.6
  • The tablet has Widevine L3 DRM rather than L1, so Netflix streams only at 480p, and owners hope a later update fixes it.5
  • Some games look pixelated or lose sound, NBA 2K19 crashes, and owners may need to grant Play Store extra permissions to install games.5
  • Phone calls are not possible through the built-in system, even on the LTE version; calls only work through third-party messaging apps.4
  • Some owners report losing about 1% every 5 minutes, even while watching videos at low brightness.4
  • Wi-Fi versions have no GPS, so the tablet cannot be used for navigation, and flashing a custom ROM did not add it.3
  • Both stereo speakers sit at the bottom, which feels odd in landscape, and one owner found one speaker barely audible.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 WiFi (3GB + 32GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 54% of models
Score components:

22%

5.6

Performance

20%

5.0

Display

16%

8.5

Camera

14%

5.0

Battery

12%

6.7

Connectivity

8%

7.7

Software

5%

6.6

Design

3%

5.7

Audio

6.2
Reviews score
8.4
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 86% of models
Score components:

70%

7.4

Overall score

30%

9.6

Price

8.1
RAM capacity
3 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 3 GB of RAM, which is less than 52.9% of tablets and equal to 8.4% of tablets.
Process node
14 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 14 nm process, which is smaller than 44.6% of tablets and equal to 8.5% of tablets.
Internal storage
32 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 32 GB of internal storage, which is less than 60.9% of tablets and equal to 17.9% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
353 points
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scores 353 points in single-core tests, which is lower than 76.8% of tablets and equal to 0.1% of tablets.
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
This tablet runs on Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, which is more advanced than 57.5% of tablets and equal to 0.3% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
1920×1200
This tablet has a 1920×1200 screen, which is sharper than 39.1% of tablets and equal to 18.8% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 60 Hz screen, which is smoother than 0.1% of tablets and equal to 73.4% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
283 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 283 ppi, which is higher than 84.4% of tablets and equal to 3% of tablets.
Display glass type
Chemically Strengthened Glass
This tablet protects its screen with Chemically Strengthened Glass, which is less durable than 65.1% of tablets and the same as 12.9% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
13 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a rear camera with 13 MP resolution, which is higher than 73.9% of tablets and equal to 21.7% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 5 MP resolution, which is higher than 48.6% of tablets and equal to 19.7% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.0, which is wider than 57.4% of tablets and equal to 24.7% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet has 1xx optical zoom, which is stronger than 18.2% of tablets and equal to 80.9% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
6,000 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 6,000 mAh battery capacity, which is smaller than 54.2% of tablets and equal to 4.2% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 10 W, which is slower than 60.9% of tablets and equal to 33.3% of tablets.
Battery life
12 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 12 hours, which is longer than that of 65.7% of tablets and equal to that of 9.3% of tablets.
video playback
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 56.9% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
no
This tablet does not have built-in LTE. 42.9% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.2%.
Update support duration
short
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.4% of tablets and equal to that of 47.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet supports direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
yes
This tablet supports on-device AI. 71.7% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not support app tracking protection. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
342.5 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 342.5 g, which is lighter than 83.3% of tablets and equal to 0.1% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
?
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
2
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 2, which is more than 55.1% of tablets and equal to 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.8% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say

Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 WiFi (3GB + 32GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • Better main-camera video
    This tablet supports better main-camera video recording than the average tablet (2160x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    2160x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • 5 MP higher rear resolution
    This tablet has a higher-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (13 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    13 MP vs 8 MP
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • More advanced graphics
    This tablet has more advanced graphics than the average tablet (Adreno 512 vs Mali-G51).
    Adreno 512 vs Mali-G51
  • 28.1% sharper screen detail
    This tablet has sharper screen detail than the average tablet (283 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    283 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Supports PDAF
    This tablet supports PDAF, the average tablet does not. 28% of tablets support PDAF.
  • 2 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (12 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    12 hours vs 10 hours
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This tablet has a wider front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's front camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • 20.0% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 86% of models

    80%

    8.3

    Average grade

    20%

    8.9

    Popularity

    Grades by review (35)
    12 reviews: 9 with a printed score, 3 estimated from the review. 23 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.4 vs 7.0
  • 16.0% higher sentiment score
    8.7 vs 7.5
  • 6.7% better value for money
    Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 WiFi (3GB + 32GB) has better value for money than the average tablet (8.06 vs 7.6).
    8.06 vs 7.55
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • More advanced graphics
    This tablet has more advanced graphics than the average tablet (Adreno 512 vs Mali-G51).
    Adreno 512 vs Mali-G51
  • More advanced memory type
    This tablet uses more advanced memory than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3).
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • 10% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 4 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (8 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    8 vs 4
  • 28.1% sharper screen detail
    This tablet has sharper screen detail than the average tablet (283 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    283 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 77 nits brighter screen
    This tablet is brighter than the average tablet (478 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    478 nits vs 401 nits
  • Better main-camera video
    This tablet supports better main-camera video recording than the average tablet (2160x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    2160x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • 5 MP higher rear resolution
    This tablet has a higher-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (13 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    13 MP vs 8 MP
  • Supports PDAF
    This tablet supports PDAF, the average tablet does not. 28% of tablets support PDAF.
  • Manual focus control
    This tablet supports manual focus, while the average tablet does not. 36.9% of tablets support manual focus.
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This tablet has a wider front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's front camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Supports manual ISO
    This tablet supports manual ISO, while the average tablet does not. 45.9% of tablets support manual ISO.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This tablet has a wider main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's main camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • 2 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (12 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    12 hours vs 10 hours
  • Supports HDMI output
    This tablet supports HDMI output, while the average tablet does not. 49.8% of tablets offer this.
    via USB-C DisplayPort Alt Mode adapter
  • Includes on-device AI
    This tablet includes on-device AI, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets include on-device AI.
  • 30.1% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (342.5 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    342.5 g vs 490 g
  • 55 mm narrower
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (120.3 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    120.3 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 1 more microphones
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet's microphone count is 1.
    2 vs 1
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • 2.1 inches smaller screen
    This tablet has a smaller screen than the average tablet (8 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    8 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 44.4% slower charging
    This tablet charges slower than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • 51 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (349 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    349 nits vs 400 nits
  • No camera and mic privacy
    This tablet does not support camera and mic privacy, while the average tablet does. 56.6% of tablets offer this.
  • 41.7% lower multi-core score
    This tablet has a lower multi-core score than the average tablet (1,102 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in multi-core tests.
    1,102 points vs 1,891 points
  • Less durable glass
    This tablet has less durable glass than the average tablet (Chemically Strengthened Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). The average tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass.
    Chemically Strengthened Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 41.7% lower multi-core score
    This tablet has a lower multi-core score than the average tablet (1,102 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in multi-core tests.
    1,102 points vs 1,891 points
  • 51.6% lower single-core score
    This tablet has a lower single-core score than the average tablet (353 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in single-core tests.
    353 points vs 729 points
  • 50% less internal storage
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (32 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    32 GB vs 64 GB
  • 1 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (3 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    3 GB vs 4 GB
  • 2.1 inches smaller screen
    This tablet has a smaller screen than the average tablet (8 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    8 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 51 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (349 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    349 nits vs 400 nits
  • Less durable glass
    This tablet has less durable glass than the average tablet (Chemically Strengthened Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). The average tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass.
    Chemically Strengthened Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • Narrower color gamut
    This tablet supports a narrower color gamut than the average tablet (NTSC vs sRGB). The average tablet covers sRGB color gamut.
    NTSC vs sRGB
  • 50% slower touch response
    This tablet samples touch more slowly than the average tablet (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet samples touch at 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • 44.4% slower charging
    This tablet charges slower than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • 9.1% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a smaller battery capacity than the average tablet (6,000 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    6,000 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No camera and mic privacy
    This tablet does not support camera and mic privacy, while the average tablet does. 56.6% of tablets offer this.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

7.0
Mitchell Mobile
≈ estimated
24/08/2019
Long-term test · one year of daily use
Verdict
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 WiFi is still worth it for specific needs like backing up media, but not recommended for most people.
9.5
TechTablets
≈ estimated
07/05/2019
Long-term review · months of daily use
Verdict
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 WiFi is still a great little tablet and a favourite small Android device for long-term use.
9.0
Roberto Jorge Tech
≈ estimated
07/10/2018
Hands-on review · Wi-Fi, gaming, streaming and battery tests
Verdict
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 WiFi delivers impressive performance, Wi-Fi and battery life, with screen sharpness as its only minor drawback.
8.0
underKG
≈ estimated
21/08/2018
Hands-on review · screen, battery, charging and software tests
Verdict
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 WiFi is a good small Android tablet at this price, though not perfect.
9.0
Mitchell Mobile
≈ estimated
27/07/2018
Hands-on review · gaming performance and sound
Verdict
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 WiFi is strong for its class at this price, and most graphics-heavy games run smoothly.
6.0
Made by Bruce from Malaysia
≈ estimated
14/07/2018
Gaming test · battery drain over 10 minutes
Verdict
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 WiFi is playable at maximum graphics, but heavy gaming drains the battery quickly and is not advised.
9.0
Mitchell Mobile
≈ estimated
09/07/2018
First look · 24 hours of daily use
Verdict
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 WiFi is worth considering for its competitive price, long battery life and bright screen, despite lower resolution.
9.0
TechTablets
≈ estimated
06/07/2018
Hands-on review · gaming, battery, camera and build tests
Verdict
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 WiFi is a solid little tablet and the better pick over the previous model.
8.0
ITechNews
≈ estimated
25/03/2020
First look · unboxing, setup and camera test
Verdict
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 WiFi is a nice, fast small tablet, though it lacks GPS support.
9.0
Mitchell Mobile
≈ estimated
18/10/2018
Feature walkthrough · MIUI 10 update and performance
Verdict
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 WiFi gets a welcome MIUI 10 update, with faster performance and fluid gestures.
9.0
247Mi
≈ estimated
29/06/2018
Hands-on review · build, screen and multitasking tests
Verdict
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 WiFi makes a very good first impression, being fast and solid, with a minor split-screen glitch.
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
techadvisor.com
✓ explicit
05/10/2018
Lab test · Budget 8-inch tablet
Verdict
The Mi Pad 4 is a great budget tablet with a comfortable 8-inch body and strong hardware, though MIUI and missing Google Play may confuse buyers.
8.6
techtablets.com
✓ explicit
15/07/2018
Hands-on review · Gaming tablet
Verdict
The Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 is a fast gaming tablet with over 11 hours of video playback, but it lacks Widevine Level 1 support for HD streaming.
8.4
techrvw.com
✓ explicit
10/02/2020
Hands-on review · Budget tablet
Verdict
The Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 is a light 8-inch tablet for TV in bed and casual games, though MIUI will not suit everyone.
8.0
chekyang.com
≈ estimated
06/08/2019
First impressions · Daily use
Verdict
The Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 is a fun, low-priced tablet for reading and browsing that lasts a full day, though face unlock is hit or miss.
9.0
techexplorer.de
≈ estimated
20/08/2018
Long-term test · Work and games
Verdict
The Mi Pad 4 is a powerful, well-built tablet for work and games, though its home screen and preinstalled Chinese apps need tweaking.
8.5
smartzone.de
✓ explicit
25/07/2018
Hands-on test · Couch and gaming
Verdict
The Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 is a light, budget 8-inch tablet for films and games on the couch, though it lacks a fingerprint sensor.
8.2
notebookcheck.com
✓ explicit
13/09/2018
Lab test · Build and Wi-Fi
Verdict
The Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 is a well-built, fast-Wi-Fi tablet for its price class, but it has no NFC and no Google services out of the box.
9.0
phonandroid.com
≈ estimated
15/11/2018
Full review · 8-inch Android tablet
Verdict
The Mi Pad 4 is a compact tablet that plays games and video well, but its screen is hard to read in direct sunlight and its camera app is weak.
8.0
planetenumerique.com
✓ explicit
17/08/2018
Hands-on test · Android tablet
Verdict
The Mi Pad 4 is a sturdy tablet with long battery life and strong gaming performance, but Google Play must be installed separately.
8.0
planetenumerique.com
✓ explicit
17/08/2018
Hands-on test · Gaming and battery
Verdict
The Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 is a strong value for games, video and reading, with nearly 12 hours of battery, but it needs a separate download to add Google Play.
8.2
notebookcheck.org
✓ explicit
18/09/2018
Lab test · Wi-Fi and GPS
Verdict
The Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 is a fast Wi-Fi tablet with acceptable GPS, but this Chinese version ships without Google Play, which must be installed separately.
8.2
xiaomitoday.it
✓ explicit
30/07/2018
Hands-on review · Home tablet
Verdict
The Mi Pad 4 is a smooth, well-built home tablet for films and games, but its stripped-down MIUI software lacks several features.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 WiFi (3GB + 32GB)

  • Excellent value for money and affordable pricing
  • Strong performance for gaming and multitasking via Snapdragon 660
  • Great battery life with up to 10+ hours of screen-on time
  • Portable and comfortable 8-inch form factor for one-handed use
  • Includes a 3.5mm headphone jack and expandable storage via microSD
  • Loud stereo speakers suitable for media consumption
  • Smooth gesture-based navigation within MIUI

What customers don't like about Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 WiFi (3GB + 32GB)

  • Lacks Widevine L1 support, limiting Netflix/Amazon Prime to SD (480p)
  • No built-in GPS on the WiFi-only model
  • Slow charging speeds (no official fast charge support)
  • Lack of integrated Google Play Services out of the box (requires side-loading)
  • Display quality is a step down from previous models in resolution and color
  • No fingerprint sensor (relies on face unlock which can be unreliable in low light)
  • Software updates are infrequent or nonexistent for global users

Verdict

The Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 WiFi (3GB + 32GB) is a compact 8-inch tablet featuring a 1920 x 1200 IPS display with a 16:10 aspect ratio and a solid unibody aluminum build. It is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 octa-core processor and includes a substantial 6,000 mAh battery, a 13MP rear camera, and a 5MP front-facing camera with AI face unlock. Key pros include its smooth performance for gaming and media consumption, impressive 8-to-10-hour battery life, and portable, premium-feeling design. However, it lacks a fingerprint scanner, does not support GPS on the WiFi-only model, and lacks Widevine L1 support, which limits streaming services like Netflix to 480p resolution.

Compare Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 WiFi (3GB + 32GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 WiFi (3GB + 32GB) and other tablets

No results found